Search

The right ventricle plays a pivotal role in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH). Its adaptation to pressure overload determines a patient's functional status as well as survival. In a healthy situation, the right ventricle is part of a low pressure, high compliance system. It is built to accommodate changes in preload, but not very well suited for dealing with pressure overload. In PH, right ventricular (RV) contractility must increase to maintain cardiac output. In other words, the balance between the degree of RV contractility and afterload determines stroke volume. Hypertrophy is one of the major hallmarks of RV adaptation, but it may cause stiffening of the ventricle in addition to intrinsic changes to the RV myocardium. Ventricular filling becomes more difficult for which the right atrium tries to compensate through increased stroke work. Interaction of RV diastolic stiffness and right atrial (RA) function determines RV filling, but also causes vena cava backflow. Assessment of RV and RA function is critical in the evaluation of patient status. In recent guidelines, this is acknowledged by incorporating additional RV parameters in the risk stratification in PH. Several conventional parameters of RV and RA function have been part of risk stratification for many years. Understanding the pathophysiology of RV failure and the interactions with the pulmonary circulation and right atrium requires consideration of the unique RV anatomy. This review will therefore describe normal RV structure and function and changes that occur during adaptation to increased afterload. Consequences of a failing right ventricle and its implications for RA function will be discussed. Subsequently, we will describe RV and RA assessment in clinical practice., Competing Interests: None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Background: Surgical removal of thromboembolic material by pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) leads within months to the improvement of right ventricular (RV) function in the majority of patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. However, RV mass does not always normalize. It is unknown whether incomplete reversal of RV remodeling results from extracellular matrix expansion (diffuse interstitial fibrosis) or cellular hypertrophy, and whether residual RV remodeling relates to altered diastolic function., Methods: We prospectively included 25 patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension treated with PEA. Structured follow-up measurements were performed before, and 6 and 18 months after PEA. With single beat pressure-volume loop analyses, we determined RV end-systolic elastance (Ees), arterial elastance (Ea), RV-arterial coupling (Ees/Ea), and RV end-diastolic elastance (stiffness, Eed). The extracellular volume fraction of the RV free wall was measured by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and used to separate the myocardium into cellular and matrix volume. Circulating collagen biomarkers were analyzed to determine the contribution of collagen metabolism., Results: RV mass significantly decreased from 43±15 to 27±11g/m 2 (-15.9 g/m 2 [95% CI, -21.4 to -10.5]; P <0.0001) 6 months after PEA but did not normalize (28±9 versus 22±6 g/m 2 in healthy controls [95% CI, 2.1 to 9.8]; P <0.01). On the contrary, Eed normalized after PEA. Extracellular volume fraction in the right ventricular free wall increased after PEA from 31.0±3.8 to 33.6±3.5% (3.6% [95% CI, 1.2-6.1]; P =0.013) as a result of a larger reduction in cellular volume than in matrix volume ( P interaction =0.0013). Levels of MMP-1 (matrix metalloproteinase-1), TIMP-1 (tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1), and TGF-β (transforming growth factor-β) were elevated at baseline and remained elevated post-PEA., Conclusions: Although cellular hypertrophy regresses and diastolic stiffness normalizes after PEA, a relative increase in extracellular volume remains. Incomplete regression of diffuse RV interstitial fibrosis after PEA is accompanied by elevated levels of circulating collagen biomarkers, suggestive of active collagen turnover., Competing Interests: Disclosures All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements) or nonfinancial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge, or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this article.