Search

Introduction: The optimal left ventricular (LV) pacing site for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is unclear. The current study aims to explore the clinical significance of LV lead concordance to delayed contraction segment in CRT. Methods and Results: Concordant LV lead position was defined as the lead tip located by fluoroscopy at or immediately adjacent to the LV segment with latest contraction determined by tissue Doppler imaging. Echocardiographic and clinical outcomes among 101 consecutive patients with or without concordant LV lead positions were compared. There was no significant difference in changes in LV volumes and clinical parameters between patients with concordant (n = 46) or nonconcordant (n = 55) LV lead positions at 3 and 6 months. In multivariate analysis, the baseline asynchrony index (β= 1.092, 95% CI: 1.050–1.114; P < 0.001), but not LV lead concordance, was the only independent predictor of LV reverse remodeling. By Cox regression analysis, ischemic etiology, and LV reverse remodeling, but not LV lead concordance, were independent predictors of mortality (β= 2.475, 95% CI: 1.183–5.178; P = 0.016, and β= 0.272, 95% CI: 0.130–0.567; P < 0.001, respectively), cardiovascular hospitalization (β= 1.551, 95% CI: 1.032–2.333; P = 0.035, and β= 0.460, 95% CI: 0.298–0.708; P < 0.001, respectively), and heart failure hospitalization (β= 0.486, 95% CI: 0.320–0.738; P = 0.001 for LV reverse remodeling). Conclusion: LV lead concordance to the delayed contraction segment may not be a major determining factor for favorable echocardiographic and clinical outcomes after CRT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: We sought to investigate the effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on disease progression in patients with moderate left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction. Methods and Results: This is a prospective study to explore the effect of CRT in 15 optimally treated patients (age: 66.1 ± 12.8 years; male = 13) with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III, LV ejection fraction >35% and <45% and QRS duration >120 msec. Echocardiographic examination and standard heart failure assessment was performed before and 3 months after CRT implantation. The magnitude of echocardiographic remodeling measurements was compared with 30 age, sex, NYHA class, and heart failure etiology matched patients with conventional CRT indication. There were significant reductions in LV end-systolic (86.2 ± 24.1 to 69.7 ± 22.2 mL, P < 0.01)/end-diastolic (135.5 ± 36.8 to 120.5 ± 34.6 mL, P < 0.01) volumes, improvement in LV ejection fraction (39.1 ± 2.2 to 44.2 ± 5.5%, P = 0.01), and NYHA class (3.0 ± 0.0 to 2.07 ± 0.46, P < 0.001). There was no difference in changes in LV volumes, ejection fraction, NYHA class, and exercise capacity before and after CRT between the study and conventional groups except for greater improvement in the quality of life score in the conventional group. Conclusion: In this prospective study, significant LV reverse remodeling by CRT in those with a wide QRS complex and moderate LV systolic dysfunction was observed. Further studies to explore the benefit of CRT in patients with less severe heart failure are recommended. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Background: Carvedilol exerted a greater reduction in mortality than metoprolol tartrate in the Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial (COMET). However, it is unclear if the degree and time course of β1-blockade during a 24-h period was similar with each agent at the doses used. Therefore we analyzed 24-h ECG Holter recordings from a study which compared the long-term clinical efficacy of metoprolol tartrate to carvedilol in chronic heart failure patients using the same dosing regimen as in COMET. Methods and results: Fifty-one patients with chronic heart failure with a mean LVEF 26±1.8% were randomized in a double-blind fashion to receive metoprolol tartrate 50 mg bid or carvedilol 25 mg bid. 24-h ECG monitoring (Holter) was performed at baseline, 12 weeks and 1 year. Adequate quality recordings for analysis were obtained from 43 subjects at baseline, 42 at 12 weeks and 29 subjects at 1 year. Both drugs produced a fall in average 24-h heart rate from baseline at 12 weeks and at 1 year: metoprolol 88±3 to 71±2 and 69±3 bpm; carvedilol 83±3 to 70±2 and 70±3 bpm respectively (all p &#60;0.001). The pattern of suppression of heart rate during the 24-h period was similar for both drugs. Conclusion: Metoprolol tartrate 50 mg bid and carvedilol 25 mg bid had similar effects on 24-h heart rate. This result suggests that the degree of β1-blockade produced by these two drugs in these doses is comparable and the superior survival effect of carvedilol compared to metoprolol seen in COMET is likely to be due to actions of carvedilol other than β1-blockade. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Efficacy of CRT for Mildly Prolonged QRS.. Introduction:Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been shown to reverse left ventricular (LV) remodeling and improve symptoms in heart failure patients with wide QRS complexes; however, its role in patients with mildly prolonged QRS complexes is unclear. This study investigated if CRT benefited patients with mildly prolonged QRS complexes>120 to 150 ms and explored if the severity of systolic asynchrony determined such a response.Methods and Results:Fifty-eight patients (age 66± 11 years, 66% male) who had undergone CRT were studied prospectively. Of these patients, 27 had QRS duration between 120 and 150 ms (group A), and 31 had QRS duration>150 ms (group B). Tissue Doppler echocardiography and clinical assessment were performed at baseline and 3 months after CRT. Both groups had significant reduction of LV volume and increased ejection fraction,+dP/dt, and sphericity index (all P<0.05). These improvements were greater in group B and were explained by the higher prevalence of systolic intraventricular asynchrony. Significant reverse remodeling (reduction of LV end-systolic volume>15%) was evident in 46% of group A patients and 68% of group B patients. Improvement in clinical endpoints was observed in both groups (all P<0.01), although the changes in metabolic equivalent and New York Heart Association functional class were greater in group B. In both groups, systolic asynchrony index (TS-SD) was the most important predictor of reverse remodeling (r=−0.78, P<0.001) and was the only independent predictor in the multivariate model (β=−1.80, confidence interval=−2.18 to−1.42, P<0.001); QRS duration was not. A predefined TS-SD value>32.6 ms had a sensitivity of 94% and specificity of 83% to predict reverse remodeling. Improvement of intraventricular asynchrony after CRT was evident only in responders (P= 0.01).Conclusion:Improvement of LV remodeling and clinical status is evident after CRT in heart failure patients with QRS duration>120 to 150 ms. These responders are closely predicted by the severity of prepacing intraventricular asynchrony but not QRS duration.(J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 15, pp. 1-8, September 2004) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There is a wide variation (13% to 74%) in the reported prevalence of heart failure associated with normal left ventricular (LV) systolic function (diastolic heart failure). There is no published information on this condition in China. To ascertain the prevalence of diastolic heart failure in this community, 200 consecutive patients with the typical features of congestive heart failure were studied with standard 2-dimensional Doppler echocardiography. A LV ejection fraction (LVEF) >45% was considered normal. The results showed that 12.5% had significant valvular heart disease. Of the remaining 175 patients, 132 had a LVEF >45% (75%). Therefore, 66% of patients with a clinical diagnosis of heart failure had a normal LVEF. Heart failure with normal LV systolic function was more common than systolic heart failure in those >70 years old (65% vs 47%; p = 0.015). Most (57%) had an abnormal relaxation pattern in diastole and 14% had a restrictive filling pattern. In the systolic heart failure group, a restrictive filling pattern was more common (46%). There were no significant differences in the sex distribution, etiology, or prevalence of LV hypertrophy between these 2 heart failure groups. In conclusion, heart failure with a normal LVEF or diastolic heart failure is more common than systolic heart failure in Chinese patients with the symptoms of heart failure. This may be related to older age at presentation and the high prevalence of hypertension in this community. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The authors reflect on heart failure with a normal ejection fraction. They suggest that research has shown that heart failure with a normal ejection fraction is now a more common cause of hospital admission than systolic heart failure in many parts of the world. They argue that the condition is underdiagnosed, has a high mortality rate and lacks evidence based treatment.

Objectives: The present study aimed to examine whether diastolic and systolic asynchrony exist in diastolic heart failure (DHF) and their prevalence and relationship to systolic heart failure (SHF) patients. Background: Few data exist on mechanical asynchrony in DHF. Methods: Tissue Doppler echocardiography was performed in 373 heart failure patients (281 with SHF and 92 with DHF) and 100 normal subjects. Diastolic and systolic asynchrony was determined by measuring the standard deviation of time to peak myocardial systolic (Ts-SD) and peak early diastolic (Te-SD) velocity using a 6-basal, 6-mid-segmental model, respectively. Results: Both heart failure groups had prolonged Te-SD (DHF vs. SHF vs. controls subjects: 32.2 ± 18.0 ms vs. 38.0 ± 25.2 ms vs. 19.5 ± 7.1 ms) and Ts-SD (31.8 ± 17.0 ms vs. 36.7 ± 15.2 ms vs. 17.6 ± 7.9 ms) compared with the control group (all p < 0.001 vs. control subjects). Based on normal values, the DHF group had comparable diastolic (35.9% vs. 43.1%; chi-square = 1.48, p = NS), but less systolic asynchrony than the SHF group (39.1% vs. 56.9%; chi-square = 8.82, p = 0.003). Normal synchrony, isolated systolic, isolated diastolic, and combined asynchrony were observed in 39.1%, 25.0%, 21.7%, and 14.1% of DHF patients, respectively, and these were 25.6%, 31.3%, 17.4%, and 25.6%, correspondingly, in SHF (chi-square = 10.01, p = 0.019). The correlation between systolic and diastolic asynchrony, and between the myocardial velocities and corresponding mechanical asynchrony appeared weak. A wide QRS duration (>120 ms) was rare in DHF (10.9% vs. 37.7% in SHF) (chi-square = 16.69, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Diastolic and/or systolic asynchrony was common in 61% of DHF patients despite narrow QRS complex. The presence of asynchrony was not related to myocardial systolic or diastolic function. Systolic and diastolic asynchrony were not tightly coupled, implying distinct mechanisms. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Right ventricular (RV) pacing related heart failure is reported in some patients after long term pacing. The exact mechanism is not yet clear but may be related to left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony induced by RV apical pacing. We report one case with baseline normal LV ejection fraction but complicated by heart failure and ventricular tachycardia after 4 months of pacing for complete heart block together with illustration of LV dyssynchrony demonstrated by tissue Doppler imaging. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objectives: We sought to examine whether cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves atrial function and induces atrial reverse remodeling. Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy is an established therapy for advanced heart failure with prolonged QRS duration, which improves left ventricle (LV) function and is associated with LV reverse remodeling. Methods: A total of 107 heart failure patients (66 ± 11 years) who received CRT and were followed up for 3 months were studied. Atrial function was assessed by M-mode, 2-dimensional echocardiography, transmitral Doppler, tissue Doppler velocity, and strain (ε) imaging. Left atrial (LA) emptying fraction based on the change in areas (LAA-EF) and volumes (LAV-EF) were calculated. The LV reverse remodeling was defined by a reduction of LV end-systolic volume >10%. Results: In the responders of LV reverse remodeling (n = 62), LAA-EF and LAV-EF were significantly increased (p < 0.001). Responders also had significant decrease in LA size area and volumetric measurements, both before (p < 0.05) and after atrial systole (p < 0.001). However, these parameters were unchanged in the nonresponders (n = 45, p = NS). In the responders, tissue Doppler velocity analysis showed improvement of contraction velocity in both left (p = 0.005) and right atria (p = 0.018), whereas ε in both atria were increased in all the phases of cardiac cycle, namely ventricular end-systole (p < 0.001), early diastole (p < 0.001), and late diastole (p = 0.007). Conclusions: Cardiac resynchronization therapy improves both left and right atrial pump function. The increase in atrial ε throughout the cardiac cycle is likely reflecting the improvement of atrial compliance. These changes lead to LA reverse remodeling with reduction of LA size before and after atrial systole. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Background: Proven medical therapy is under-prescribed in heart failure (HF) for various reasons. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is of proven value in selected patients with HF; however, the degree of benefit in those without the optimal therapy is not clear. Methods: This is a retrospective study comparing the effect of CRT in 30 patients without optimal combination therapy (group 1; 10 (33%) without ACEi or equivalent and 25 (83%) without beta-blockers) to an age, sex, ejection fraction (EF) and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class matched control but with the combination (group 2; n =30) at baseline. All patients were in NYHA class III or IV with EF ≤35% and QRS interval≥120 ms. Echocardiographic examination and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT pro-BNP) levels before and 3 months after CRT were compared between the two groups. The composite endpoints of HF hospitalization or death during follow-up were compared by Kaplan–Meier analysis. Results: There were significantly less improvement in EF (+4.0±2.5% vs +10.1±3.2%; p <0.05) and degree of reverse remodeling in group 1 after 3 months. Patients in group 1 had significantly higher level of NT pro-BNP levels at 3 months (2221±2001 pg/mL vs 1038±905 pg/mL; p <0.001) and higher rates of HF hospitalization or death (53.3% vs 23.3%; Log rank χ 2 5.52; p =0.019). Conclusion: Patients receiving CRT but without optimal medical therapy were associated with less echocardiographic and clinical improvement. Optimal medical therapy, if tolerated, before CRT is necessary. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]