Search

Aims: Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT), based on the combination of beta-blockers (BB), renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASI), and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA), is known to have a major impact on the outcome of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Although GDMT is recommended prior to mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER), not all patients tolerate it. We studied the association of GDMT prescription with survival in HFrEF patients undergoing M-TEER for secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR)., Methods and Results: EuroSMR, a European multicentre registry, included SMR patients with left ventricular ejection fraction <50%. The outcome was 2-year all-cause mortality. Of 1344 patients, BB, RASI, and MRA were prescribed in 1169 (87%), 1012 (75%), and 765 (57%) patients at the time of M-TEER, respectively. Triple GDMT prescription was associated with a lower 2-year all-cause mortality compared to non-triple GDMT (hazard ratio [HR] 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60-0.91). The association persisted in patients with glomerular filtration rate <30 ml/min, ischaemic aetiology, or right ventricular dysfunction. Further, a positive impact of triple GDMT prescription on survival was observed in patients with residual mitral regurgitation of ≥2+ (HR 0.62; 95% CI 0.44-0.86), but not in patients with residual mitral regurgitation of ≤1+ (HR 0.83; 95% CI 0.64-1.08)., Conclusion: Triple GDMT prescription is associated with higher 2-year survival after M-TEER in HFrEF patients with SMR. This association was consistent also in patients with major comorbidities or non-optimal results after M-TEER., (© 2022 The Authors. European Journal of Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of residual mitral regurgitation (resMR) on mortality with respect to left ventricular dilatation (LV-Dil) or right ventricular dysfunction (RV-Dys) in patients with secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) who underwent mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER)., Background: The presence of LV-Dil and RV-Dys correlates with advanced stages of heart failure in SMR patients, which may impact the outcome after TEER., Methods: SMR patients in a European multicenter registry were evaluated. Investigated outcomes were 2-year all-cause mortality and improvement in New York Heart Association functional class with respect to MR reduction, LV-Dil (defined as LV end-diastolic volume ≥159 ml), and RV-Dys (defined as tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion-to-systolic pulmonary artery pressure ratio of <0.274 mm/mm Hg)., Results: Among 809 included patients, resMR ≤1+ was achieved in 546 (67%) patients. Overall estimated 2-year mortality rate was 32%. Post-procedural resMR was significantly associated with mortality (p = 0.031). Although the improvement in New York Heart Association functional class persisted regardless of either LV-Dil or RV-Dys, the beneficial treatment effect of resMR ≤1+ on 2-year mortality was observed only in patients without LV-Dil and RV-Dys (hazard ratio: 1.75; 95% confidence interval: 1.03 to 3.00)., Conclusions: Achieving optimal MR reduction by TEER is associated with improved survival in SMR patients, especially if the progress in heart failure is not too advanced. In SMR patients with advanced stages of heart failure, as evidenced by LV-Dil or RV-Dys, the treatment effect of TEER on symptomatic improvement is maintained, but the survival benefit appears to be reduced., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This work was supported by Klinikum der Universität München. Dr. Higuchi has received lecture fees from Medtronic Japan, Daiichi-Sankyo, and Ono Pharmaceutical Company. Dr. Orban has received speaker fees from Abbott Vascular and Tomtec Imaging Systems. Dr. Karam has received consultant fees from Abbott Vascular. Dr. Kalbacher has received lecture fees and travel expenses from Abbott; and has received proctor fees and travel expenses from Edwards Lifesciences. Dr. Schofer has received personal fees from Boston Scientific; and has received travel compensation from Abbott Vascular and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr. Ludwig has received travel compensation from Abbott Vascular. Dr. Braun has received speaker honoraria from Abbott Vascular. Dr. Windecker has received research and educational grants from Abbott, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Bayer, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, CSL, Medtronic, Edwards, Sinomed, and Polares. Dr. Pfister has received financial support for attending symposia from Abbott Vascular. Dr. von Bardeleben has received speaker fees from Abbott Vascular and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr. Hausleiter has received research support and speaker honoraria from Abbott Vascular and Edwards Lifesciences. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Patients with advanced heart failure often have functional mitral regurgitation. Left ventricular assist device implantation improves functional mitral regurgitation through left ventricular unloading. However, residual mitral regurgitation after left ventricular assist device implantation leads to adverse outcomes, and whether patients need concomitant mitral valve surgery is not fully elucidated. Therefore, this study aimed to elucidate the predictors of residual mitral regurgitation and to describe the temporal changes in residual mitral regurgitation. We retrospectively enrolled 15 patients with implantable continuous-flow left ventricular assist device, who had significant mitral regurgitation on echocardiography before left ventricular assist device implantation. Three patients had residual mitral regurgitation (mitral regurgitation color jet area/left atrial area >0.2) 1 month after left ventricular assist device implantation. We investigated factors associated with residual mitral regurgitation and compared patients with or without residual mitral regurgitation. On univariate analysis, mitral valve tethering area and mitral regurgitation vena contracta before left ventricular assist device implantation were significantly associated with residual mitral regurgitation (odds ratio, 1.03; p  = 0.036 and odds ratio, 10.45; p  = 0.0087). One month after left ventricular assist device implantation, the mean pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and pulmonary artery pressure were higher in patients with residual mitral regurgitation (pulmonary capillary wedge pressure: 11.3 ± 3.5 vs 6.4 ± 3.4 mmHg, p  = 0.029 and pulmonary artery pressure: 21.3 ± 4.0 vs 15.9 ± 3.3 mmHg, p  = 0.023). However, the mitral regurgitation grading and hemodynamics were not significantly different 6 months after left ventricular assist device implantation. The hospitalization-free survival was not significantly different between the two groups. Mitral valve tethering area and mitral regurgitation vena contracta were predictors of residual mitral regurgitation. Residual mitral regurgitation improved until 6 months after left ventricular assist device implantation and might not affect the prognosis.

Aims: MitraClip therapy for the treatment of functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) is an increasingly used intervention for high-risk surgical patients. The aim of this observational study was to assess the impact of residual mitral regurgitation (rMR) at discharge on long-term outcome after MitraClip therapy in patients with FMR., Methods and Results: Overall, 458 patients (mean age 73.8 ± 8.9 years) underwent MitraClip implantation between September 2008 and December 2017. The impact of rMR ≤ 1+ at discharge (n = 251) was retrospectively compared to patients graded as rMR 2+ (n = 173) and rMR ≥3+ (n = 34) at discharge. Median follow-up time was 5.09 years (5.00-5.26) with maximum follow-up of 10.02 years. The primary outcome was survival, and Kaplan-Meier analyses revealed significant differences among all rMR subgroups with highest survival rates for rMR ≤ 1+ patients. This was further confirmed by composite outcome analyses (P < 0.02). The inferior outcomes of rMR 2+ and rMR ≥ 3+ at discharge were confirmed by increased adjusted hazard ratios when rMR 2+ (1.54, P = 0.0039) and rMR ≥ 3+ (2.16, P = 0.011) were compared to rMR ≤ 1+. Moreover, patients with stable rMR ≤ 1+ grades within 12 months showed significantly higher survival rates compared to patients with rMR ≤ 1+ at discharge and rMR ≥ 2+ at 12-month follow-up or rMR ≥ 2+ at discharge and 12-month follow-up (P = 0.029)., Conclusions: Patients with optimal and durable rMR ≤ 1+ at discharge and 12-month follow-up showed better outcome compared to patients with rMR 2+ and rMR ≥ 3+. Treatment success and durability characterized by rMR ≤ 1+ at discharge and 12 months seem to be important factors for long-term outcomes, which has to be further confirmed by prospective randomized trials., (© 2020 European Society of Cardiology.)

Background MitraClip (MC) is an alternative treatment for mitral regurgitation (MR). Although residual MR is common after MC, little was known about the impact of residual MR after MC. Methods We examined 255 consecutive patients who underwent MC. The primary endpoint was the composite endpoint including all-cause death, left ventricular (LV) assist device, and mitral valve surgery. Results Procedure failure defined as unsuccessful MC implantation (n = 6) and residual MR ≥ 3 + (n = 19) was associated with worse outcomes including the primary endpoint and all-cause death than those with acute procedure success (APS) defined as residual MR 2 + (n = 125) or 1 + (n = 105). Among patient with APS, background characteristics including age, MR etiology, heart failure severity, and LV function were not different. Although MR grade and NT-pro BNP level at 6 months after MC were higher in patients with residual MR 2 +, there was no significant difference in the incidence of the primary endpoint and all-cause death. Subanalysis showed that the primary endpoint occurred more frequently in patients with MR 2 + in patients with LV ejection fraction ≤ 40%, chronic kidney disease, and baseline NYHA-class IV. Conclusion Procedure failure was associated with adverse outcomes after MC. Among patients with APS, residual MR 2 + was not significantly associated with overall worse outcomes than residual MR 1 +. However, residual MR 2 + was associated with poorer prognosis in patients with impaired LV function, renal dysfunction, and severe heart failure, suggesting that the optimal endpoint of MC procedure should be individualized according to each patient's baseline characteristic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The correlation between residual mitral regurgitation (rMR) grade or mitral valve pressure gradient (MVPG), at transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (TEEMr) completion and at discharge, is unknown. Furthermore, there is disagreement regarding rMR grade or MVPG from which prognosis diverts. We retrospectively studied 82 patients that underwent TEEMr. We tested the correlation between rMR or MVPG and evaluated their association, with outcomes. Moderate or less rMR (rMR ≤ 2) at TEEMr completion was associated with improved survival, whereas mild or less rMR (rMR ≤ 1) was not. Patients with rMR ≤ 1 at discharge demonstrated a longer time of survival, of first heart failure hospitalization and of both. The correlation for both rMR grade (r = 0.5, p < 0.001) and MVPG (r = 0.51, p < 0.001), between TEEMr completion and discharge, was moderate. MR ≤ 2 at TMEER completion was the strongest predictor for survival (HR 0.08, p < 0.001) whereas rMR ≤ 1 at discharge was independently associated with a lower risk of the combined endpoint (HR 4.17, p = 0.012). MVPG was not associated with adverse events. We conclude that the assessments for rMR grade and MVPG, at the completion of TEEMr and at discharge, should be distinctly reported. Improved outcome is expected with rMR ≤ 2 at TEEMr completion and rMR ≤ 1 at discharge. Higher MVPG is not associated with unfavorable outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]