Search

This paper provides a practical clinical application of guideline recommendations relating to the inpatient monitoring of patients with acute heart failure, through the evaluation of various clinical, biomarker, imaging, invasive and non-invasive approaches. Comprehensive inpatient monitoring is crucial to the optimal management of acute heart failure patients. The European Society of Cardiology heart failure guidelines provide recommendations for the inpatient monitoring of acute heart failure, but the level of evidence underpinning most recommendations is limited. Many tools are available for the in-hospital monitoring of patients with acute heart failure, and each plays a role at various points throughout the patient's treatment course, including the emergency department, intensive care or coronary care unit, and the general ward. Clinical judgment is the preeminent factor guiding application of inpatient monitoring tools, as the various techniques have different patient population targets. When applied appropriately, these techniques enable decision making. However, there is limited evidence demonstrating that implementation of these tools improves patient outcome. Research priorities are identified to address these gaps in evidence. Future research initiatives should aim to identify the optimal in-hospital monitoring strategies that decrease morbidity and prolong survival in patients with acute heart failure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Unplanned readmissions early after a discharge from acute heart failure hospitalization are common and have become a reimbursement benchmark and marker of hospital quality. However, the competing risk of short-term post-discharge mortality is substantial.Methods and Results: Using data from the prospective, nationwide Registry IN-HF Outcome, we analysed the incidence and predictors of 30-day mortality or readmissions and associated days-alive-out-of-hospital (DAOH) in 1520 patients discharged alive after admission for acute heart failure. Within 30 days after discharge, 94 patients (6.2%) were readmitted (91% for cardiovascular causes; 60% recurrent heart failure) and 42 (2.8%) died, 10 of which occurred during readmission. Overall, 126 patients (8.3%) met the combined endpoint. By multivariable logistic regression, worsening chronic heart failure as clinical presentation [odds ratio (OR) 1.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.21-2.77, P = 0.005), inotropes during admission (OR 2.19, 95% CI 1.40-3.43, P = 0.0006), length of stay (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.04, P = 0.002) and renin-angiotensin system inhibitors at discharge (OR 0.52, 95%CI 0.35-0.77, P = 0.001) independently predicted 30-day all-cause mortality and/or readmission (c-statistic = 0.695). Per cent 30-day DAOH was lower in patients with in-hospital inotrope use, no renin-angiotensin system inhibitors prescription at discharge, New York Heart Association III-IV class at discharge, and correlated inversely with length of stay and age.Conclusion: A clinical and biohumoral profile consistent with chronic advanced heart failure and end-organ damage identifies acute heart failure patients discharged home from cardiology units, who are at highest risk of early death and/or readmission. These findings have practical implications for tailoring specific follow-up. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background In the recent Italian Network on Heart Failure (IN-HF) Outcome registry, including 1,855 patients with acute heart failure (AHF), we reviewed the use of inotropes and their prognostic implication on in-hospital and 12-month mortality. Methods IN-HF Outcome is a prospective, multicenter, observational, study involving 61 Italian cardiology centers. AHF patients have been enrolled over a 2-year period and followed-up for 1 year. Inotropes were used in 360 patients (19.4%). Results Patients who received inotropes had a more severe clinical and hemodynamic profile than those who did not and exhibited a significantly higher rate of in-hospital (21.4% vs 2.7%, p < 0.01) and 1-year (50.6% vs 17.7%, p < 0.01) mortality. At entry, systolic blood pressure (SBP) was ≤ 110 mm Hg in 58%, 111 to 130 mm Hg in 24.5%, and > 130 mm Hg in 17.5%. Multivariable analyses showed use of inotropes was the strongest predictor of all-cause death. These data were confirmed by propensity score analyses. According to SBP at entry, the 2 groups with SBP > 110 mm Hg who took inotropes, despite a more favorable clinical profile, exhibited a similar worse prognosis, particularly at 1 year: 56.3% (≤ 110 mm Hg), 43.7% (111–130 mm Hg), and 40.3% (>130 mm Hg) vs 17.7%. Conclusions Inotropes were used in nearly 20% of the patient admitted for AHF, and this treatment was associated with a short-term to medium-term poor prognosis. An inappropriate use of inotropes in patients with normal to high SBP, and presumably preserved cardiac output, may have significantly contributed to affect the all-group outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims Registries and surveys improve knowledge of the ‘real world’. This paper aims to describe baseline clinical profiles, management strategies, and the in-hospital outcome of patients admitted to hospital for an acute heart failure (AHF) episode. Methods and results IN-HF Outcome is a nationwide, prospective, multicentre, observational study conducted in 61 Cardiology Centres in Italy. Up to December 2009, 5610 patients had been enrolled, 1855 (33%) with AHF and 3755 (67%) with chronic heart failure (CHF). Baseline and in-hospital outcome data of AHF patients are presented. Mean age was 72 ± 12 years, and 39.8% were female. Hospital admission was due to new-onset heart failure (HF) in 43% of cases. Co-morbid conditions were observed more frequently in the worsening HF group, while those with de novo HF showed a higher heart rate, blood pressure, and more preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Electrical devices were previously implanted in 13.3% of the entire group. Inotropes were administered in 19.4% of the patients. The median duration of hospital stay was 10 days (interquartile range 7–15). All-cause in-hospital death was 6.4%, similar in worsening and de novo HF. Older age, hypotension, cardiogenic shock, pulmonary oedema, symptoms of hypoperfusion, hyponatraemia, and elevated creatinine were independent predictors of all-cause death. Conclusion Our registry confirms that in-hospital mortality in AHF is still high, with a long length of stay. Pharmacological treatment seems to be practically unchanged in the last decades, and the adherence to HF guidelines concerning implantable cardioverter defibrillators/cardiac resynchronization therapy is still very low. Some AHF phenotypes are characterized by worst prognosis and need specific research projects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]