Search

Background: United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) allocation criteria changed in 2018 to accommodate the increased prevalence of patients on a ventricular assist device as a bridge to heart transplant and prioritize sicker people in anticipation of a heart graft. We aimed to assess the impact of patient age in the new allocation policy on mortality following heart transplantation. Secondary outcomes included the effect of age ≥70 on post-transplant events, including stroke, dialysis, pacemaker, and rejection requiring treatment., Methods: The UNOS Registry was queried to identify patients who underwent heart transplants alone in the US between 2000 and 2021. Patients were divided into groups according to their age (over 70 and under 70 years old)., Results: Patients aged over 70 were more likely to require dialysis during follow-up, but less likely to experience rejection requiring treatment, compared with patients aged <70. Age ≥70 in the new allocation system was a significant predictor of 1-year mortality (adjusted HR: 1.41; 95% CI: 1.05-1.91; p = .024), but its effect on 5-year mortality was not significant after adjusting for potential confounders (adjusted HR: 1.27; 95% CI:.97-1.66; p = .077). Undergoing transplantation under the new allocation policy vs the old allocation policy was not a significant predictor of mortality in patients over 70 years old., Conclusions: Age ≥70 is a significant predictor of 1-year mortality following heart transplantation, but not at 5 and 10 years; however, the new allocation does not seem to have changed the outcomes for this group of patients., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) allocation criteria changed in 2018 to accommodate the increased prevalence of ventricular assist device use as a bridge to heart transplant, which consequently prioritized sicker patients. We aimed to assess the impact of this new allocation policy on the length of stay following heart transplantation. Secondary outcomes include other risk factors for prolonged hospitalization and its effect on mortality and postoperative complications., Methods: The UNOS Registry was queried to identify patients who underwent isolated heart transplants in the United States between 2001 and 2023. Patients were divided into quartiles according to their respective length of stay., Results: A total of 57 020 patients were included, 15 357 of which were allocated with the new system. The median hospital length of stay was 15 days (mean 22.7 days). Length of stay was longer in the new allocation era (25 ± 30 vs. 22 ± 27 days, p < .001). The longer length of stay was associated with increased 5-year mortality in the new allocation system (aHR: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.15, 1.20; p-value: < .001)., Conclusion: Longer hospital stays and associated observed increased risk for mortality in the era after the allocation criteria change reflect the rationale of this shift which was to prioritize heart transplants for sicker patients. Further studies are needed to track the progress of surgical and perioperative management of these studies over time., (© 2023 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Cardiac graft failure may require repeat heart transplantation (HTx). Outcomes of patients that undergo repeat HTx have not been well described. We compared patients that received repeat HTx with patients that received initial HTx by inquiring the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database between 2015 and 2021. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality, while the role of baseline characteristics was also investigated. Patients were stratified according to whether they received initial HTx (n = 19,727, 97%) or repeat HTx (n = 578, 3%). Among the study population, 10,860 (53.5%) patients received a HTx using the old UNOS allocation system, whereas 9445 (46.5%) patients received a HTx after the implementation of the new UNOS donor allocation system in October 2018. In this sub-group of HTx recipients in the new allocation system era, the adjusted 1-year survival of repeat HTx patients remained lower than that of initial HTx patients (hazard ratio (HR): 1.19; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.15, 3.18; p = 0.013). When we compared the 1-year survival of repeat HTx patients before and after the implementation of the new allocation system, the adjusted 1-year survival was similar between groups (HR: 1.14; 95% CI: 0.71, 1.84; p = 0.591). The unadjusted risk of 30-day mortality was not significantly different in the new vs old allocation system. Mortality associated with repeat HTx remained higher than initial HTx but the new donor allocation system implementation did not affect outcomes.

(1) Background: Heart failure is an extremely impactful health issue from both a social and quality-of-life point of view and the rate of patients with this condition is destined to rise in the next few years. Transplantation remains the mainstay of treatment for end-stage heart failure, but a shortage of organs represents a significant problem that prolongs time spent on the waiting list. In view of this, the selection of donor and recipient must be extremely meticulous, considering all factors that could predispose to organ failure. One of the main considerations regarding heart transplants is the risk of graft rejection and the need for immunosuppression therapy to mitigate that risk. In this study, we aimed to assess the characteristics of patients who need immunosuppression treatment for rejection within one year of heart transplantation and its impact on mid-term and long-term mortality. (2) Methods: The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) Registry was queried to identify patients who solely underwent a heart transplant in the US between 2000 and 2021. Patients were divided into two groups according to the need for anti-rejection treatment within one year of heart transplantation. Patients' characteristics in the two groups were assessed, and 1 year and 10 year mortality rates were compared. (3) Results: A total of 43,763 patients underwent isolated heart transplantation in the study period, and 9946 (22.7%) needed anti-rejection treatment in the first year. Patients who required treatment for rejection within one year after transplant were more frequently younger (49 ± 14 vs. 52 ± 14 years, p < 0.001), women (31% vs. 23%, p < 0.001), and had a higher CPRA value (14 ± 26 vs. 11 ± 23, p < 0.001). Also, the rate of prior cardiac surgery was more than double in this group (27% vs. 12%, p < 0.001), while prior LVAD (12% vs. 11%, p < 0.001) and IABP (10% vs. 9%, p < 0.01) were more frequent in patients who did not receive anti-rejection treatment in the first year. Finally, pre-transplantation creatinine was significantly higher in patients who did not need treatment for rejection in the first year (1.4 vs. 1.3, p < 0.01). Most patients who did not require anti-rejection treatment underwent heart transplantation during the new allocation era, while less than half of the patients who required treatment underwent transplantation after the new allocation policy implementation (65% vs. 49%, p < 0.001). Patients who needed rejection treatment in the first year had a higher risk of unadjusted 1 year (HR: 2.25; 95% CI: 1.88–2.70; p < 0.001), 5 year (HR: 1.69; 95% CI: 1.60–1.79; p < 0.001), and 10 year (HR: 1.47; 95% CI: 1.41–1.54, p < 0.001) mortality, and this was confirmed at the adjusted analysis at all three time-points. (4) Conclusions: Medical treatment of acute rejection was associated with significantly increased 1 year mortality compared to patients who did not require anti-rejection therapy. The higher risk of mortality was confirmed at a 10 year follow-up. Further studies and newer follow-up data are required to investigate the role of anti-rejection therapy in the heart transplant population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]