Search

Background: Data concerning the outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in type 0 bicuspid aortic stenosis (AS) are scarce. The study aims to compare the outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement for AS in patients with type 0 bicuspid, type 1 bicuspid, and tricuspid aortic valve anatomy., Methods: We enrolled consecutive patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement for severe AS between 2012 and 2022 in this single-center retrospective cohort study. The primary outcome was mortality, while secondary outcomes included in-hospital complications such as stroke and pacemaker implantation and transcatheter heart valve hemodynamic performance., Results: The number of patients with AS with type 0 bicuspid, type 1 bicuspid, and tricuspid aortic valve anatomy was 328, 302, and 642, respectively. Self-expanding transcatheter heart valves were used in the majority of patients (n=1160; 91.4%). In the matched population, differences in mortality (30 days: 4.2% versus 1.7% versus 1.7%, P overall =0.522; 1 year: 10% versus 2.3% versus 6.2%, P overall =0.099) and all stroke (30 days: 1.0% versus 0.9% versus 0.0%, P overall =0.765; 1 year: 1.4% versus 1.6% versus 1.3%, P overall =NS) were nonsignificant, and the incidence of overall in-hospital complications was comparable among groups. Ascending aortic diameter was the single predictor of 1-year mortality in type 0 bicuspid patients (hazard ratio, 1.59 [95% CI, 1.03-2.44]; P =0.035). The proportion of patients with a mean residual gradient ≥20 mm Hg was the highest in those with type 0 bicuspid anatomy, although the need for permanent pacemaker implantation was the lowest in this group., Conclusions: Major clinical outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement for AS in patients with type 0 bicuspid, type 1 bicuspid, and tricuspid aortic valve anatomy are equivalent at short- and mid-term follow-up. These observations merit further exploration in prospective international registries and randomized controlled trials., Competing Interests: Disclosures M. Chen and Dr Feng are proctors/consultants of Venus MedTech, MicroPort, and Peijia Medical. Dr Mylotte is a proctor and consultant for Medtronic and Microport and a consultant for Boston Scientific. Dr Piazza is a consultant and proctor for Medtronic and Peijia Medical. Dr Prendergast has received institutional educational and research grants from Edwards Lifesciences and speaker/consultancy fees from Abbott, Anteris, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, and Microport. The other authors report no conflicts.

Background: To explore why bicuspid aortic stenosis has certain clinical differences from the tricuspid morphology, we evaluated the metabolomics profile involved in bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) aortic stenosis prior to and after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in comparison with tricuspid aortic valve (TAV)., Methods: In this TAVR cohort with prospectively collected data, blood samples were obtained before TAVR valve deployment and at the 7th day after TAVR, which were then sent for liquid and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry detection. Besides comparisons between BAV and TAV, BAV patients were also divided in subgroups according to baseline hemodynamics (i.e. maximal transaortic velocity, V max ) and post-procedural reverse left ventricular (LV) remodeling (i.e. the change in LV mass index from baseline, ∆LVMI) for further analysis. Metabolic differences between groups were identified by integrating univariate test, multivariate analysis and weighted correlation network analysis algorithm., Results: A total of 57 patients were enrolled including 33 BAV patients. The BAV group showed lower arginine and proline metabolism both before and post TAVR than TAV represented by decreased expression of L-Glutamine. In BAV subgroup analysis, patients with baseline V max  > 5 m/s (n = 11) or the 4 th quartile of change in ∆LVMI at one-year follow-up (i.e. poorly-recovered LV, n = 8) showed elevated arachidonic acid metabolism compared with V max  < 4.5 m/s (n = 12) or the 1 st quartile of ∆LVMI (i.e. well-recovered LV, n = 8) respectively., Conclusions: Difference in arginine and proline metabolism was identified between BAV and TAV in TAVR recipients. Elevated arachidonic acid metabolism may reflect more severe baseline hemodynamics and worse LV reserve remodeling after TAVR in BAV.

Objectives: We aimed to assess the procedural and clinical results of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for nonraphe bicuspid aortic stenosis (AS) with coronary vs mixed cusp fusion., Background: It remains unclear whether cusp fusion morphology affects TAVR outcomes in patients with nonraphe bicuspid AS., Methods: This retrospective study enrolled consecutive patients with severe symptomatic AS and type-0 bicuspid aortic valve, who underwent TAVR at our institution between 2012 and 2017. TAVR outcomes were defined based on the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 recommendations., Results: Compared to patients with mixed cusp fusion (44/71), those with coronary cusp fusion (27/71) had a larger ellipticity index for the aortic annulus (21.9% ± 9.0% vs 15.6% ± 9.3%, p =0.007) and increased left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (31.1% ± 9.4% vs 26.9% ± 7.5%, p =0.04) but comparable rates of second valve implantation (15.9% vs 14.8%), mild paravalvular leakage (PVL, 38.5% vs 30.2%), permanent pacemaker implantation (PPM, 25.9% vs 15.9%), and 30-day mortality (7.4% vs 6.8%). Use of a first-generation transcatheter heart valve was associated with higher risk for mild PVL (odds ratio (OR) = 4.37; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 1.14-16.75; p =0.03) but not PPM (OR = 0.77; 95% CI = 0.22-2.62; p =0.67), whereas a larger oversizing ratio tended to be associated with a higher PPM rate (OR = 1.49; 95% CI = 0.46-4.86; p =0.51) but lower incidence of mild PVL (OR = 0.51; 95% CI = 0.19-1.35; p =0.17)., Conclusions: In AS patients with type-0 bicuspid valves, cusp fusion morphology does not affect the procedural or clinical results of TAVR. Use of second-generation transcatheter heart valves may provide more favorable results in such patients. This trial is registered with NCT01683474., Competing Interests: Yuan Feng and Mao Chen are consultants/proctors of Venus MedTech. Other authors declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2019 Wen-hua Lei et al.)

Background: Studies of permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) specifically for bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) patients are lacking. We aim to delineate possible aspects that might affect the incidence of PPI in a retrospective cohort of BAV patients treated with early-generation self-expanding devices., Methods: A total of 80 patients with bicuspid morphology who successfully underwent TAVR by self-expanding devices without prior PPI were included. Baseline clinical, echocardiographic, and angiographic characteristics, procedural and post-procedural details were collected., Results: The incidence of PPI after early-generation self-expanding valves in this BAV cohort was 26.3%. Baseline characteristics were comparable between patients requiring PPI post-TAVR or not. Perimeter oversizing greater than 20% significantly increased the risk of PPI compared with an oversizing of 10-20% (OR 5.08 [1.22, 21.07], P = 0.03). The proportion of patients with a depth of implantation greater than 6 mm was significantly higher in those who required PPI (82.4% vs 54.3%, P = 0.04). When testing the impact of depth of implantation >6 mm and oversizing in different morphologies, only in type 1 bicuspid patients and by oversizing>20% increased the risk of PPI (OR 12.00 [1.25, 115.36], P = 0.03) compared with an oversizing of 10-20%., Conclusions: Excessive perimeter oversizing in relation to aortic annulus and depth of implantation greater than 6 mm should be avoided to improve PPI post-TAVR for BAV patients receiving self-expanding devices, especially for type 1 BAV., (© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

To compare reverse left ventricular (LV) remodeling after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) between patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) and tricuspid aortic valve (TAV). We retrospectively reviewed data of patients with at least two serial echocardiographic follow-ups (1, 3, 6 months and 1 year) post-TAVR. A total of 116 patients were identified. BAV morphology was documented in 67 patients. LV mass index (LVMi) at baseline was not significantly different between the TAV and BAV group (178.0 ± 6.9 vs. 166.3 ± 6.4 g/m 2 , P = 0.14). Reverse LV remodeling was observed in both BAV and TAV patients, but the reduction of LVMi from baseline was significantly more pronounced in TAV patients compared with BAV patients from 6 months post-TAVR (- 56.3 ± 8.1 vs. - 30.0 ± 4.7 g/m 2 , P < 0.01 at 6-month follow-up; - 60.6 ± 7.6 vs. - 37.9 ± 6.2 g/m 2 , P = 0.02 at 1-year follow-up). EDV value changes during follow-up were similar between patient with TAV and BAV. There were no significant differences in the proportions of patients with more than mild PVL or new permanent pacemaker between TAV and BAV morphology throughout the follow-up. Patients with bicuspid morphology might experience less pronounced reverse LV remodeling post-TAVR than patients with tricuspid morphology.

Background: To investigate the individual sequential hemodynamic changes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), especially for patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV), in comparison with tricuspid aortic valve (TAV)., Methods: The study population comprised 85 patients with severe aortic stenosis who underwent TAVI for BAV (n = 49) or TAV (n = 36) with at least two serial echocardiographic follow-ups. Doppler echocardiography was scheduled to be performed at discharge and 1, 3, 6 months and 1 year after the procedure. D peak transvalvular velocities and D mean transvalvular gradients were calculated as the difference at follow-up time points and discharge. Paravalvular leak (PVL) was assessed as another indicator for prosthesis performance., Results: Comparisons between patients with BAV and TAV revealed similar gradient performances (1.00 [-2.00, 2.00] vs. 1.00 [-0.25, 5.00] mm Hg, p = 0.57 at 1 month; -0.71 ± 7.52 vs. 1.55 ± 3.97 mm Hg, p = 0.21 at 3 months; 0.96 ± 7.81 vs. 1.53 ± 5.85 mm Hg, p = 0.79 at 6 months; 1.00 [-0.50, 2.25] vs. 3.00 [-0.50, 7.50] mm Hg, p = 0.07 at 1 year). Moreover, the incidence of ≥ mild PVL was not significantly different in patients with BAV and TAV during follow-up (34.88% vs. 19.35%, p = 0.14 at 1 month; 45.83% vs. 27.27%, p = 0.19 at 3 months; 30.00% vs. 23.53%, p = 0.89 at 6 months; 30.00% vs. 17.65%, p = 0.56 at 1 year)., Conclusions: TAVI is effective and applicable in BAV anatomy with sustained and acceptable mid- -term prosthesis hemodynamic performance. (Cardiol J 2017; 24, 4: 350-357).

Objectives: This study sought to evaluate transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) aortic stenosis (AS), with a particular emphasis on TAVR-directed bicuspid aortic valve imaging (BAVi) of morphological classification., Background: TAVR has been used to treat BAV-AS but with heterogeneous outcomes and uncertainty regarding the relevance of morphology., Methods: In 14 centers in the United States, Canada, Europe, and Asia, 130 BAV-AS patients underwent TAVR. Baseline cardiac computed tomography (CT) was analyzed by a dedicated Corelab. Outcomes were assessed in line with Valve Academic Research Consortium criteria., Results: Bicommissural BAV (vs. tricommissural) accounted for 68.9% of those treated in North America, 88.9% in Europe, and 95.5% in Asia (p = 0.003). For bicommissural bicuspids, non-raphe type (vs. raphe type) BAV accounted for 11.9% of those treated in North America, 9.4% in Europe, and 61.9% in Asia (p < 0.001). Overall rates of 30-day mortality (3.8%) and cerebrovascular events (3.2%) were favorable and similar among anatomical subsets. The rate of new permanent pacemaker insertion was high (26.2%) and similar between balloon-expandable (BE) and self-expanding (SE) designs (BE: 25.5% vs. SE: 26.9%; p = 0.83); there was a trend to greater permanent pacemaker insertion in BE TAVR in the presence of coronary cusp fusion BAV morphology. Paravalvular aortic regurgitation (PAR) ≥ moderate was 18.1% overall but lower at 11.5% in those with pre-procedural CT. In the absence of pre-procedural CT, there was an excess of PAR in BE TAVR that was not the case in those with a pre-procedural CT; SE TAVR required more post-dilation. Predictors of PAR included intercommissural distance for bicommissural bicuspids (odd ratio [OR]: 1.37; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02 to 1.84; p = 0.036) and lack of a baseline CT for annular measurement (OR: 3.03; 95% CI: 1.20 to 7.69; p = 0.018)., Conclusions: In this multicenter study, TAVR achieved favorable outcomes in patients with pre-procedural CT, with the exception of high permanent pacemaker rates for all devices and shapes., (Copyright © 2016 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an established therapeutic option for high-risk patients with tricuspid aortic valve stenosis. Historically, the presence of a bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) has been regarded as a contraindication to TAVI, on the basis of putative concerns about the associated risks of elliptical deployment, accelerated leaflet degeneration, periprosthetic leaks, and aortic complications. Fortunately, with technological refinements and mounting experience, reasonable success has been achieved with TAVI in selected patients with a BAV. The rate of procedural success is high, and survival is similar to that in patients with a tricuspid aortic valve who undergo TAVI. Nevertheless, moderate or severe aortic regurgitation and aortic dissection seem to occur more frequently in patients with a BAV rather than a tricuspid aortic valve. Specifically-designed prospective studies should address these concerns and help to define anatomical selection criteria before TAVI can be recommended for patients with a BAV.

Introduction: Little has been reported on dietary choices and obesity in patients with valvular heart disease. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that obesity is prevalent in patients with aortic stenosis and that significant differences in heart-healthy dietary choices may be observed between obese and non-obese patients. Methods: Consecutive patients with severe or critical aortic stenosis (AS) were evaluated in a busy Heart Valve Clinic for consideration of surgical or transcatheter valve replacement. All patients underwent a detailed dietary evaluation with a rate your plate (RYP) questionnaire. Obesity was defined as body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2. Dietary data was stratified according to presence of obesity. Data was analyzed by student's t-test for continuous data and chi-squared analysis for categorical data. Results: A total of 138 patients were evaluated; of these, 41 (29.7%) were obese. Overall there was no difference in the RYP score for obese and non-obese patients. However, obese patients scored significantly worse on RYP heart-healthy (HH) choices for fried foods and grains (table) with no significant differences in other categories. Conclusions: Obesity is common in patients with severe aortic stenosis. Self-reported heart-healthy choices differ only in categories of fried foods and grains (figure) which may be a good initial focus for nutritional intervention in this population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]