Search

Key content: Adolescent heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) is commonly related to hypothalamic pituitary ovarian axis immaturity, which improves with age. This article outlines when and how to investigate for underlying pathological causes.Medical treatment for adolescent HMB consists predominantly of hormonal contraceptives. Preparation choice depends upon patient preference, comorbidities and co‐existing conditions.Acute adolescent HMB is rare; a suggested framework for assessing and managing such cases is provided within this article. Learning objectives: To understand how to clinically evaluate adolescent HMB.To understand when and how to investigate adolescent HMB.To understand the different medical treatment options for HMB, their efficacy, risks and alternatives.To understand the management of acute adolescent HMB. Ethical issues: Duties of confidentiality must be balanced against safeguarding concerns. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To evaluate of the indications requiring surgical intervention after Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System (LNG-IUS) (Mirena®) treatment due to heavy menstrual bleeding. Methods: This retrospectively designed study was created with 72 patients who applied to the university hospital gynecology outpatient clinics between January 2018 and April 2019 and were diagnosed with heavy menstrual bleeding and received LNG IUS (Mirena®) for treatment. Results: Surgery was not performed in 60 (83.33%) patients who had heavy menstrual bleeding and underlying organic pathology (FIGO-PALM group) These patients were treated with LNG-IUS. However, in 12 (16.67%) patients, LNG-IUS was removed and surgery was performed due to resistance to treatment within an average of 10.2 ± 8.0 months. There was no difference between the groups in terms of age, gravida, parity, body mass index and endometrial thickness (p > 0.05 for all parameters), but the mean hemoglobin value in the surgical group was found to be significantly lower than the group without it (8.9 ± 1.2 g/dL vs 11 ± 1.6 g/dL, p = 0.03) In the surgical group, the median diameters of leiomyoma and myoma compressing the endometrium were found to be significantly higher (44 mm vs 34 mm, p = 0.03 and 42 mm vs 33 mm, p = 0.04; respectively). Conclusions: LNG-IUS (Mirena®) is a popular and effective treatment option for heavy menstrual bleeding. The necessity of surgical intervention due to resistance to LNG-IUS revealed that the underlying organic pathologies in these patients should be determined precisely and effective treatment options should be carefully selected before LNG-IUS is inserted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence advises that considerations around quality of life should be made when assessing and treating heavy menstrual bleeding. A quick and reliable method for women to assess the impact of HMB on their quality of life might encourage help-seeking. This research aimed to develop a new 10-item measure of menstrual quality of life (the PERIOD-QOL). Methods: Three pilot studies describe PERIOD-QOL development and a cross-sectional survey (N = 376) assessed PERIOD-QOL scores in women who reported HMB and those who did not. A population sample of women (mean age 30.29, SD = 9.06) completed the PERIOD-QOL and rated their menstrual bleeding as heavy/very heavy/extremely heavy (HMB group) or very light/light/moderate bleeding (LMMB) group. Data were analysed using independent samples Analysis of Variance and independent samples t-tests. Results: Cronbach's Alpha for the PERIOD-QOL =.88. A significant reduction in PERIOD-QOL scores was found across the 6 levels of bleeding from very light to extremely heavy, and significantly lower PERIOD-QOL scores were reported in the HMB than the LMMB group. Conclusion: The results suggest that the PERIOD-QOL is a reliable measure and that women experiencing HMB reported significantly lower menstrual quality of life than those who did not. Further validation of the PERIOD-QOL is required to determine its relationships with existing measures of menstrual quality of life and to establish whether PERIOD-QOL scores are associated with decisions to seek help from health professionals and with verified diagnoses of conditions that cause HMB. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) is one of the most common distressing complications of uterine fibroids (UF); however, data on the health care costs for treatments in women experiencing HMB associated with UF are lacking. The objective of this study was to compare the direct costs and treatments patterns for women diagnosed with UF+HMB, UF only, and HMB only in the United States. Materials and Methods: The study design was retrospective matched cohort study using claims data. Women, aged 18–51 years, comprising four cohorts (HMB only, UF only, UF+HMB, and controls) were identified in the IBM MarketScan® Commercial Claims and Encounters Database (October 1, 2007‒September 30, 2018) and matched by demographics and Charlson Comorbidity Index score. Baseline characteristics and treatments during the 12 months post-diagnosis were summarized descriptively. Costs (2018 U.S. dollars) during the post-diagnosis year were compared using analysis of variance. Results: Before matching, women with UF+HMB represented 54% of UF cases. Following diagnosis, 32% in the matched UF+HMB cohort had no treatment, 49% underwent surgeries/procedures with (12%) or without (37%) medications, and 18% received medications only. The mean all-cause total costs for UF+HMB ($16,762) exceeded that for UF only by 24% ($13,506) and HMB only by 50% ($11,135), and almost tripled the mean cost for the control cohort ($6,691) (all, p < 0.001). The mean diagnosis-related costs were significantly higher for UF+HMB ($8,741) than for UF only ($4,550) and HMB only ($3,081) (all, p < 0.0001). Surgery/procedure costs comprised 80% of diagnosis-related medical costs for UF+HMB. Conclusions: UF with HMB were associated with significant economic burden, driven primarily by surgical/procedural costs and treatment patterns. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To describe practice patterns of an integrated complex family planning-pediatric hematology oncology clinic for patients with blood disorders STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively evaluated the outcomes of patients who had an initial consultation for blood disorders impacting menstrual bleeding in an integrated complex family planning-pediatric hematology oncology clinic from October 2015 to September 2020. We reviewed all charts to extract medical and gynecologic history, blood disorder diagnosis, hormonal treatment prior to and following initial consultation, subsequent visits to the integrated clinic, and hormonal treatment up to 24 months after initial consultation.Results: We saw 47 patients; their most common blood disorder diagnosis was protein defect (14 of 47, 30%). Most patients (30 of 47, 64%) were not using any hormonal treatment prior to their initial consultation. After the initial consultation, 26 (55%) elected to start, change, or discontinue hormonal treatment for abnormal menstrual bleeding, the most common treatment being combined hormonal contraception (CHC, 22 of 47, 47%), alone or as dual therapy. Over the study duration, 36 patients (77%) initiated, changed, or discontinued their hormone treatment, 22 (61%) of whom changed their treatment plan more than once. CHC usage decreased from 19 of 47 (40%) to 8 of 37 (22%) and hormonal device usage, particularly the implant, increased from 9 of 47 (19%) to 11 of 37 (30%) over the 24 months from initial consultation.Conclusion: Most patients in an integrated complex family planning-pediatric hematology oncology clinic will change their menstrual bleeding hormone treatment with initial consultation, although management may require multiple changes. The most common treatment 24 months following the initial consultation was hormonal devices.Implications: Patients with blood disorders affecting menstrual bleeding have complex needs that could be addressed by an integrated complex family planning-pediatric hematology oncology clinic. Most patients require multiple changes in treatment to achieve adequate control of their bleeding, and patients were more likely to choose hormonal devices for management over time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Women and girls with bleeding disorders experience abnormal and excessive bleeding that can negatively impact their overall health and quality of life. In this report, we provide an overview of the biology, types, clinical care, and state of the science related to bleeding disorders in girls and women and describe Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) activities related to (1) surveillance of bleeding disorders in women; (2) scientific review, research, and collaboration to inform health care gaps in identifying and caring for women with bleeding disorders; and (3) development of health promotion and education programs to bring awareness about bleeding disorders to both women and girls in the population at large and various health care providers who care for women. Findings generated from surveillance and research activities inform the development of new public health programs aimed at improving diagnostic and health care services and empowering women with bleeding disorders with the knowledge they need to navigate a complex health care system with the need for specialty care services. Additional work is needed to improve provider awareness and understanding of the unique needs of women and girls with bleeding disorders to achieve appropriate care and treatment and ensure optimal outcomes and quality of life. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: The aim of this evidence implementation project is to make a contribution to promoting evidence-based practice in the assessment and management of women with heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) attending the gynaecology outpatient clinic at Kenyatta National Hospital (KNH) and thereby improve patient outcomes and resource utilization. Methods: The evidence implementation project was carried out at the gynaecology outpatient clinic of the largest referral facility in Kenya. The Joanna Briggs Institute Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System and Getting Research into Practice audit and feedback tool were used. A baseline audit was conducted using a sample of 40 patient files; this was followed by interventions such as trainings, developing of visual tools and updating of protocols. A follow-up audit was then conducted 4 months post intervention. Results: Baseline audit results demonstrated varying results in each of the nine criteria selected. Four of the criteria recorded less than 51% compliance, with two of these recording 0% compliance. Postintervention results showed a remarkable increase in most of the audit criteria selected, with eight of these having compliance levels of 90% or more. Conclusion: The implementation project served the dual purpose of enlightening health care workers on best practices and educating patients on what they need to know about their condition. This led to an overall improvement in the management of HMB. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Heavy Menstrual Bleeding (HMB) is a common gynaecological presentation, which can affect girls and women throughout their reproductive years and cause significant health issues. This review discusses the most recent evidence-based management of HMB and strategies for providing safe and effective care during the Covid 19 pandemic. Thus protocols and recommendations for HMB, developed to tackle the Covid 19, could become the 'new normal' for both primary and secondary care. There is a need for administrative changes, improved technology and effective communication to adapt these new recommendations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB), previously known as menorrhagia, is in place with heavy flow and longer lasting days of bleeding during menstrual period, sequentially leading to anemia. We reported a rare case of HMB in a 33-year-old patient after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), who presented with acute coronary syndromes (ACS), uremia and systemic lupus erythematosus before PCI. This patient received three times of hemodialysis weekly (Monday, Wednesday, and Friday). On the next day after PCI, this patient began to have menstruation. On the fifth day of menstruation, the patient complained of HMB and physical discomfort, with an urgent need for consultation of gynecologist. After gynecologist consultation, this patient was under oxytocin treatment. However, 2 days of oxytocin treatment did not significantly improve HMB. Afterward, the menstrual volume of patients was significantly reduced on eighth day of menstruation after once therapy of testosterone propionate and norethindrone. Regarding the reasons of HMB, heparin in hemodialysis and antiplatelet drugs utilized (aspirin and clopidogrel) after PCI may be contributors to the HMB. In addition, uterine myoma, cervical canal cyst, renal insufficiency and CYP2C19∗2 heterozygous are also possible contributors to HMB. There is no such case of whom had HMB in reproductive age with ACS, uremia and systemic lupus erythematosus under hemodialysis and antiplatelet therapy. More clinical safety data on HMB of reproductive age women who are under antithrombotic therapy are required. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The study objective was to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of radiofrequency endometrial ablation in treating heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) in women with chronic renal failure (CRF). Method: Fifty-eight patients with CRF undergoing radiofrequency endometrial ablation in our hospital between January 2013 and July 2017 and for whom complete follow-up data were available were included. Outcome measures included amenorrhea, treatment failure and operative complications. Results: The mean patient age was 41.4 ± 7.7 years, the mean preoperative hemoglobin level was 69.6 ± 19.3 g/dL, the mean preoperative serum creatinine level was 879.1 ± 415.4 µmol/L, and the mean urea level was 18.2 ± 7.1 mmol/L. The mean treatment time for radiofrequency endometrial ablation was 61.7 ± 18.8 s. The median volume of estimated blood loss during the procedure was 10 mL (a range of 2-50 mL). On average, the study subjects were monitored for 24.4 months (a range of 6-60 months). The average amenorrhea rate was 89.7%. Only 2 (3.4%) patients required additional gynecologic surgery after endometrial ablation. Intra- and postoperative complications were not observed. Conclusion: Radiofrequency endometrial ablation was demonstrated to be safe and effective for the treatment of HMB in women with CRF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) in the long-term treatment of heavy menstrual blood loss in women unrelated to intrauterine pathology.Methods: One hundred and six parous women aged 33-48 years with recurrent heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) participated in this study. The women were followed up for 24 months and were assessed for intensity of bleeding both for pre- and post-insertion periods. An LNG-IUS was inserted in each patient within 7 days of the start of menstrual flow. The women were followed up at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months following the insertion of the intrauterine device.Results: One hundred and two women completed the follow-up period and had a significant reduction in the amount of menstrual blood loss. The LNG-IUS was well tolerated by all women. Pre-treatment of the use of the LNG-IUS, endometrial biopsy patterns for irregular proliferative endometrium and for atypical simple hyperplasia were 34/106 (32.08%) and 61/106 (57.55%) respectively and after treatment no abnormal pathologic findings were determined (p < 0.001).Conclusion: Our findings indicate that the LNG-IUS is effective for significantly reducing the amount of menstrual blood loss in women with HMB. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Objective On this study we sought to determine the relationship of bleeding disorders to iron deficiency anemia. Additionally, this study was undertaken to examine all current treatment modalities used in a menorrhagia clinic with respect to heavy menstrual bleeding management to identify the most effective options for menstrual management in the setting of an underlying bleeding disorder. Design, Setting, Participants, Interventions, and Main Outcome Measures We performed a retrospective chart review of adolescents younger than 21 years with heavy menstrual bleeding attending a multidisciplinary hematology-adolescent gynecology clinic. Information including demographic characteristics, bleeding diathesis, hematologic parameters, treatment, and the diagnosis was extracted from each chart. Subjects were grouped into 2 categories on the basis of the diagnosis of a bleeding disorder. Hemoglobin level, iron deficiency anemia, and need for transfusion were compared between a bleeding disorder and no bleeding disorder group. Subjects were grouped into categories depending on hormonal modality and treatment success of the groups were compared. Results Seventy-three subjects were tested for a bleeding disorder. Of the subjects who completed testing, 34 (46%) were diagnosed with a bleeding disorder. Thirty-nine subjects (54%) had heavy menstrual bleeding because of other causes. There was no significant difference in hemoglobin between those with and without a bleeding disorder. Iron deficiency anemia was significantly higher in subjects without a bleeding disorder. In a comparison of hormone therapy success, the levonorgestrel intrauterine device (89%, 8 out of 9 subjects) had the highest rate of menstrual suppression followed by norethindrone acetate 5-10 mg/d (83%, 5 out of 6 subjects), and the transdermal patch (80%, 4 out of 5 subjects). All subjects using tranexamic acid as well as hormonal therapy had 100% achievement of menstrual suppression. Conclusion A high frequency of bleeding disorders was found in those tested. Subjects with a bleeding disorder were less likely to present with severe anemia requiring blood transfusion and less likely to have iron deficiency anemia. Although combined oral contraceptives were commonly used clinically for menstrual suppression, they were not found to be the most effective option. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In a previous study it was shown that lower factor XI (FXI) levels in women with heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB). Our aim was to determine the single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) in the F11 gene in women with HMB. In addition, an extensive literature search was performed to determine the clinical significance of each SNV. Patients referred for HMB (PBAC-score >100) were included. With direct sequencing analysis of all 15 exons and flanking introns of the F11 gene, 29 different non-structural SNVs were detected in 49 patients with HMB. Interestingly, most of these SNVs have previously been associated with venous thrombosis instead of bleeding. These findings have not helped to elucidate the molecular basis of HMB. They also question the specificity of previously reported F11 variations in patients with thrombosis. More studies are needed to explain the lower FXI levels seen in patients with HMB. IMPACT STATEMENT Women with mild deficiencies of factor XI (FXI) (< 70%) are prone to excessive bleeding during menstruation. Bleeding manifestations are not well correlated with plasma FXI levels and bleeding episodes can vary widely among patients with similar low FXI levels. In a previous study we showed that women with heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) had normal, but on average, lower levels of FXI than controls. In light of these findings, we performed F11 gene analysis to determine the single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) in women with HMB and performed an extensive literature search to determine the clinical significance of each SNV. By direct sequencing analysis of the F11 gene we found 29 different non-structural SNVs in 49 women with heavy menstrual bleeding. Remarkably, a number of these SNVs have previously been implicated in thrombosis. These findings have not helped to elucidate the molecular basis of lower FXI levels in HMB. They also question the specificity of previously reported F11 variations in patients with thrombosis. More studies are needed to explain the lower FXI levels seen in patients with HMB. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This review studies women's preferences for shared decision-making about heavy menstrual bleeding treatment and evaluates interventions that support shared decision-making and their effectiveness. PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Medline and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched. Three research questions were predefined: 1) What is the range of perspectives gathered in studies that examine women facing a decision related to heavy menstrual bleeding management?; 2) What types of interventions have been developed to support shared decision-making for women experiencing heavy menstrual bleeding?; and 3) In what way might women benefit from interventions that support shared decision-making? All original studies were included if the study population consisted of women experiencing heavy menstrual bleeding. We used the TIDieR (Template for Intervention: Description and Replication) checklist to assess the quality of description and the reproducibility of interventions. Interventions were categorized using Grande et al. guidelines and collated and summarized outcomes measures into three categories: 1) patient-reported outcomes; 2) observer-reported outcomes; and 3) doctor-reported outcomes. Fifteen studies were included. Overall, patients preferred to decide together with their doctor (74%). Women's previsit preference was the strongest predictor for treatment choice in two studies. Information packages did not have a statistically significant effect on treatment choice or satisfaction. However, adding a structured interview or decision aid to increase patient involvement did show a positive effect on treatment choice and results, patient satisfaction and shared decision-making related outcomes. In conclusion shared decision-making is becoming more important in the care of women with heavy menstrual bleeding. Structured interviews or well-designed (computerized) tools such as decision aids seem to facilitate this process, but there is room for improvement. A shared treatment choice is only possible after careful provision of information, elicitation of patients' preferences and integrating those preferences. Interventions should be designed accordingly. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To compare the efficacy, acceptability and compliance of combined hormonal vaginal ring (CVR), with combined hormonal pills (CHP) in patients with heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB).Study Design: This prospective study was conducted in 50 women with HMB in age group of 25-40 years. Patients were divided in two groups of 25 each and followed for six treatment cycles. In each group, cycle comprised of three weeks of CVR (releases 15μg of EE and 120μg of the etonogestrel per day) or CHP (containing 30μgm of EE and 150μgm of LNG) use, followed by one ring or pill free week. After each cycle, patients were evaluated about the amount of blood loss and duration of bleeding by the pictoral blood assessment chart (PBAC), early bleeding (EWB), continued bleeding (CWB), intermenstrual bleeding, intended bleeding, compliance, and user acceptability. The collected data were analyzed using the Chi square test, t-test and ANOVA test.Result: Reduction in PBAC score for CVR (70.73%) and CHP group (70.02%), duration of bleeding and incidence of EWB was comparable among the two groups. The incidence of intermenstrual bleeding was lower in CVR than in CHP group in cycle 3 and 4 with significant p value. The incidence of CWB was significantly lower and the incidence of intended bleeding pattern in CVR group was significantly higher in cycle 3, 4, 5 and 6, signifying better cycle control. Compliance was also higher in CVR (88%) than CHC (75.33% of all cycles).Conclusion: This trial suggests that both the CVR and CHP are very effective short-term treatments for HMB in reproductive age group. However, women had better cycle control and compliance with CVR. This may be an attractive option among the wide variety of medications used to treat HMB. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Heavy menstrual bleeding is defined as excessive menstrual blood loss which interferes with the woman's physical, emotional, social and material quality of life, and which can occur alone or in combination with other symptoms. In the majority of cases, an accurate history may indicate the cause of the bleeding. Common investigations include haematological blood tests, ultrasound scan and endometrial biopsy. Management may be medical or surgical, depending on the patient's age, pathology identified and fertility wishes. All interventions should aim to improve quality of life rather than focussing on menstrual blood loss alone. This review considers the intricacies involved when managing women with heavy menstrual bleeding. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This review provides an overview of therapeutic options, with a specific focus on the emerging role of medical options for UF management. Research design and methods: PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Systematic Reviews were searched for articles published between1980 and 2013. Relevant articles were identified using the following terms: ‘uterine fibroids’, ‘leiomyoma’, ‘heavy menstrual bleeding’, and ‘menorrhagia’. The reference lists of articles identified were also searched for other relevant publications. Results: Because of the largely benign nature of UFs, the most conservative options that minimize morbidity/risk and optimize outcomes should be considered. Watchful waiting, or no immediate intervention combined with regular follow-up, is an appropriate option for the majority of UF patients who experience no symptoms. For women with symptomatic UFs, the optimal treatment should restore quality of life through rapid relief of UF signs and symptoms, reduce tumor size for a sustained period, and maintain or improve fertility. Invasive surgical treatments, such as hysterectomy, have historically been the mainstay of UF treatment. Less invasive surgical and interventional techniques, such as myomectomy, uterine artery embolization, endometrial ablation, and myolysis provide alternatives to hysterectomy. Until recently, medical management of UFs was characterized by short-term treatments and therapies that provided symptomatic control. In addition to controlling abnormal uterine bleeding, newer medical therapies, including the recently Health-Canada-approved ulipristal acetate, act directly to shrink the tumor. Although no agent is currently approved for such use, emerging evidence suggests the potential for long-term medical management of UFs. Conclusions: The advent of novel medical therapies may diminish the long-held reliance on more invasive surgical UF treatment options [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A systematic review to compare the effectiveness of contraceptives to treat heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB). PubMed was searched for studies using hormonal contraceptive methods to treat HMB. Two reviewers screened 734 citations and extracted eligible trials based on rigid inclusion and exclusion criteria. Fourteen articles met inclusion criteria. The evidence was good to poor quality and suggested that all contraceptives tested were effective in the treatment of HMB, but the levonorgestrel intrauterine system was the most effective method. Hormonal contraceptives effectively treat HMB. The levonorgestel intrauterine system is the superior method. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Heavy menstrual bleeding is an important health problem. Two frequently used therapies are the levonorgestrel intra-uterine system (LNG-IUS) and endometrial ablation. The LNG-IUS can be applied easily by the general practitioner, which saves costs, but has considerable failure rates. As an alternative, endometrial ablation is also very effective, but this treatment has to be performed by a gynaecologist. Due to lack of direct comparison of LNG-IUS with endometrial ablation, there is no evidence based preferred advice for the use of one of these treatment possibilities. Method/design: A multicenter randomised controlled trial, organised in a network infrastructure in the Netherlands in which general practitioners and gynaecologists collaborate. Women ⩾34 years with heavy menstrual bleeding, a Pictorial Blood Assessment Chart (PBAC) score exceeding 150 points and no future child wish can participate in the trial. After informed consent, women will be randomised to a strategy starting with a levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system or a strategy starting with endometrial ablation. The primary outcome is the PBAC score at 24 months of follow-up. Secondary outcomes are patient satisfaction, complications, number of re-interventions, menstrual bleeding pattern, quality of life, sexual function, sick leave and costs. As predictors of effect of intervention we also meaure level of coagulation factors. Discusson: This study, considering both effectiveness and cost effectiveness of LNG-IUS versus endometrial ablation may well improve care for women with heavy menstrual bleeding. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) is an important health problem affecting up to 30 % of reproductive age women, interfering with their quality of life. Medical therapy, with the avoidance of unnecessary surgery, is an attractive option. Purpose: To provide a comprehensive review of the current medical treatments available for idiopathic HMB and to focus on the newly introduced modalities. Furthermore, to provide a practical algorithm based on the best available evidence. Methods: A PubMed search was conducted looking for the different trials, reviews and various guidelines relating to medical treatment of idiopathic HMB. Results: The most effective medical treatment for idiopathic HMB is the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system. It provides a reliable long-term effect. Importantly, there is a growing scientific evidence for new modalities entailing; modified-release formulation of tranexamic acid, the new four-phasic estradiol valerate/dienogest contraceptive pills and combined contraceptive vaginal ring. Also, vaginal danazol has been tried. Conclusion: Maintenance of status quo, i.e., keeping first-line treatment of idiopathic HMB as medical treatment is an essential issue. Modified-release formulation of tranexamic acid, the new four-phasic contraceptive pills and contraceptive vaginal ring are recently added to the medical armamentarium for treatment of idiopathic HMB increasing its efficacy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Background: This study compared the efficacy of the contraceptive vaginal ring (CVR; NuvaRing; N.V. Organon, Oss, the Netherlands) and norethisterone for treatment of idiopathic heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) during the fertile age. Study Design: Ninety-five women with idiopathic HMB were selected in this randomized controlled trial. They were treated with either the CVR (n=48) or norethisterone (n=47) for three cycles. Each cycle consisted of 3 weeks of CVR use and then a 1-week ring-free period or norethisterone tablets, 5 mg three times daily from Cycle Days 5 to 26. Outcome measures were as follows: menstrual blood loss assessed by pictorial blood loss assessment chart (PBAC), duration of menses, hemoglobin, serum ferritin, quality of life (QoL) questionnaire, side effects and overall satisfaction with treatment. Result: Significant improvements in PBAC score, the duration of menses, hemoglobin, serum ferritin and QoL were observed at the end of the study in each group. No statistically significant differences were found regarding the mean PBAC score (90.2±24.4 vs. 92.3±26.7) and its percent reduction (68.6% vs. 69.5%), duration of menses (5.3±1.2 vs. 5.5±1.1 days), hemoglobin and serum ferritin at the end of the study between the CVR and the norethisterone groups, respectively. Significantly more ring users were satisfied and elected to continue with treatment. Conclusion: Both the CVR and oral norethisterone are effective treatments for idiopathic HMB. The CVR may be an attractive option especially for those requesting contraception as well. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: One in 20 women of reproductive age consults their general practitioner each year in the UK because of heavy menstrual bleeding. The impact on their social, professional and sexual life can be significant and, more than half will be referred to secondary care without any investigation or treatment being instituted. There are many causes for menorrhagia but, of those who undergo hysterectomy, more than half will be found to have a completely normal uterus. Hysterectomy has been a popular treatment for heavy periods, with one in five women in the UK having their uterus removed before the age of 60 years. New effective treatments – such as the Mirena intrauterine system and second generation endometrial ablation – should see rates of hysterectomy for the treatment of dysfunctional uterine bleeding fall. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: Heavy menstrual bleeding affects up to one third of women in the United States, resulting in a reduced quality of life and significant cost to the health care system. Multiple treatment options exist, offering different potential for symptom control at highly variable initial costs, but the relative value of these treatment options is unknown.Objective: The objective of the study was to evaluate the relative cost-effectiveness of 4 treatment options for heavy menstrual bleeding: hysterectomy, resectoscopic endometrial ablation, nonresectoscopic endometrial ablation, and the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system.Study Design: We formulated a decision tree evaluating private payer costs and quality-adjusted life years over a 5 year time horizon for premenopausal women with heavy menstrual bleeding and no suspected malignancy. For each treatment option, we used probabilities derived from literature review to estimate frequencies of minor complications, major complications, and treatment failure resulting in the need for additional treatments. Treatments were compared in terms of total average costs, quality-adjusted life years, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was conducted to understand the range of possible outcomes if model inputs were varied.Results: The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system had superior quality-of-life outcomes to hysterectomy with lower costs. In a probabilistic sensitivity analysis, levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system was cost-effective compared with hysterectomy in the majority of scenarios (90%). Both resectoscopic and nonresectoscopic endometrial ablation were associated with reduced costs compared with hysterectomy but resulted in a lower average quality of life. According to standard willingness-to-pay thresholds, resectoscopic endometrial ablation was considered cost effective compared with hysterectomy in 44% of scenarios, and nonresectoscopic endometrial ablation was considered cost effective compared with hysterectomy in 53% of scenarios.Conclusion: Comparing all trade-offs associated with 4 possible treatments of heavy menstrual bleeding, the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system was superior to both hysterectomy and endometrial ablation in terms of cost and quality of life. Hysterectomy is associated with a superior quality of life and fewer complications than either type of ablation but at a higher cost. For women who are unwilling or unable to choose the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system as a first-course treatment for heavy menstrual bleeding, consideration of cost, procedure-specific complications, and patient preferences can guide the decision between hysterectomy and ablation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: We sought to assess the efficacy and safety of 2 dosing regimens of a novel, oral tranexamic acid formulation (Lysteda; Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc, Parsippany, NJ) in women with cyclic heavy menstrual bleeding. Study Design: This was a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel-group trial for 3 menstrual cycles (n = 304). Women with mean menstrual blood loss (MBL) of ≥80 mL/cycle were randomized to receive either 1.95 g/d or 3.9 g/d of tranexamic acid or placebo for up to 5 days of menstrual bleeding. Primary efficacy endpoints were mean MBL reduction from baseline, mean MBL reductions that were considered “meaningful” by subjects, and mean MBL reductions from baseline >50 mL/cycle. Adverse events (AEs) were also assessed. Results: Only the 3.9 g/d group met all 3 primary efficacy endpoints. AEs did not significantly differ among the 3 groups. There were no serious study-related AEs. Conclusion: The 3.9-g/d dose met all 3 primary efficacy endpoints, whereas the 1.95 g/d dose met 2 primary efficacy endpoints. Both doses were well tolerated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]