Search

The role of Helicobacter pylori and the accompanying mucosal inflammatory response in functional dyspepsia is still undefined. Human and animal studies have clearly demonstrated a link between intestinal mucosal inflammation and changes in sensory-motor function. Growing clinical and basic evidence supports the concept that a similar paradigm may occur in H. pylori-related dyspepsia. The infection may both induce gastric dysmotility and trigger neuroplastic changes in the afferent neural pathways leading to visceral hyperalgesia. A reduction of central antinociceptive control systems may also play a pathophysiological role. H. pylori eradication has provided disappointing results in terms of improvement of symptoms. This may reflect the long-term recovery of neuroplastic changes occurring in the afferent nervous system or, alternatively, the incomplete resolution of gastritis and the persistent production of inflammatory mediators by resident cells in the muscularis externa. The identification of these mechanisms may provide a better understanding of the pathophysiology of H. pylori-related dyspepsia and prompt innovative therapeutic approaches.

Background: Helicobacter pylori eradication is recommended currently only in peptic ulcer patients. The accumulating evidence of a possible pathogenetic role of the germ in other pathological conditions, such as mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphomas and (possibly) also functional dyspepsia and gastric cancer, creates increasing pressure in favor of an expansion of such indication. However, at present, cultural and practical considerations should discourage widespread screening and eradication programs., Methods: The basis for our study is a critical review of the literature., Results: The lack of a sound pathophysiological basis linking H. pylori infection to both dyspeptic symptom perception and gastric cancer risk sharply contrasts with the numerical and clinical relevance of these pathological conditions. Screening tests are not sufficiently cheap, easy, and reliable to be applicable on a large scale. Also, eradication therapies may provide suboptimal therapeutic effects and excessive side effects if applied by physicians who are not prepared culturally., Conclusions: Improvement of pathophysiological, diagnostic, and therapeutic knowledge must be achieved before eradication programs can be proposed on a large scale.