Search

Aim: To assess the aetiological role of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection in adult patients with iron-refractory or iron-dependent anaemia of previously unknown origin., Methods: Consecutive patients with chronic iron-deficient anaemia (IDA) with H. pylori infection and a negative standard work-up were prospectively evaluated. All of them had either iron refractoriness or iron dependency. Response to H. pylori eradication was assessed at 6 and 12 mo from follow-up. H. pylori infection was considered to be the cause of the anaemia when a complete anaemia resolution without iron supplements was observed after eradication., Results: H. pylori was eradicated in 88 of the 89 patients. In the non-eradicated patient the four eradicating regimens failed. There were violations of protocol in 4 patients, for whom it was not possible to ascertain the cause of the anaemia. Thus, 84 H. pylori eradicated patients (10 men; 74 women) were available to assess the effect of eradication on IDA. H. pylori infection was considered to be the aetiology of IDA in 32 patients (38.1%; 95%CI: 28.4%-48.8%). This was more frequent in men/postmenopausal women than in premenopausal women (75% vs 23.3%; P < 0.0001) with an OR of 9.8 (95%CI: 3.3-29.6). In these patients, anaemia resolution occurred in the first follow-up visit at 6 mo, and no anaemia or iron deficiency relapse was observed after a mean follow-up of 21 ± 2 mo., Conclusion: Gastric H. pylori infection is a frequent cause of iron-refractory or iron-dependent anaemia of previously unknown origin in adult patients.

Background and Aims: We assessed whether mild enteropathy with negative coeliac serology may be gluten-dependent, and a cause of iron-deficiency anaemia. In cases not responding to gluten-free diet, the role of Helicobacter pylori infection was evaluated., Methods: 55 consecutive unexplained iron-deficiency anaemia patients were included. In all of them we performed: HLA-DQ2/DQ8 coeliac genetic study, distal duodenum biopsies, and tests to assess H. pylori infection. A gluten-free diet or H. pylori eradication was used as indicated. Final diagnosis was established based on response to specific therapy after a 12-month follow-up period., Results: Histological findings were: (1) group A (positive genetics): 21 Marsh I, 2 Marsh IIIA, 12 normal; (2) group B (negative genetics): 16 Marsh I, 4 normal. Final diagnosis of anaemia in patients with enteropathy were: group A, gluten-sensitive enteropathy, 45%; H. pylori infection, 20%; gluten-sensitive enteropathy plus H. pylori, 10%; other, 10%; unknown, 15%; group B, gluten-sensitive enteropathy, 10%; H. pylori infection, 0% (1 non-eradicated case, 10%); non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug intake, 20%; other, 20%; unknown, 40% (p=0.033)., Conclusions: Mild enteropathy is frequent in patients with unexplained iron-deficiency anaemia and negative coeliac serology. Most cases are secondary to either gluten-sensitive enteropathy or H. pylori infection, or both; however, there is also a substantial number of patients without a definitive diagnosis., (Copyright © 2010 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The aim of the study was to assess a new latex agglutination (LA) stool antigen assay (PYLOGEN; CerTest Biotec, Zaragoza, Spain) in the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection and to monitor its eradication after treatment. The LA test has been approved for sale in Europe, and its approval from the US Food and Drug Administration is still pending. The individuals enrolled were classified into 3 groups of patients: Group 1 consisted of 38 patients who are H. pylori positive. The diagnosis of H. pylori infection was established if there was concordance between 2 test results (urea breath test [UBT], rapid urease test, and histopathologic study) or if the culture alone was positive. Patients with only 1 positive test were considered indeterminate and were excluded from the study. Group 2 comprised 9 patients without positive tests and who were considered to be H. pylori negative. Group 3 consisted of 57 patients who received eradication treatment. The sensitivity and specificity of the test were 78.9% and 100%, respectively. The results of the UBT of the patients were studied 6 weeks after eradication therapy. The sensitivity and specificity of the LA test relative to UBT for patients after treatment were 75% and 93.3%, respectively.

The aim of the study was to compare 6 stool antigen immunoassays for detecting Helicobacter pylori before and after eradication treatment. We compared 3 enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and 3 monoclonal immunochromatographic assays in diagnosing infection and in determining H. pylori status after eradication treatment. We evaluated stool samples from 80 patients diagnosed with H. pylori infection and from 18 patients without infection. To confirm H. pylori eradication, we evaluated 40 patients who received H. pylori treatment. The sensitivity and specificity were 87.3% and 83.3% for Immundiagnostik ELISA, 92.5% and 72.2% for HpSA EIA test, 95% and 66.6% for HpStAR EIA, 83.8% and 66.6% for H. pylori Letitest, 52.5% and 94.4% for ImmunoCard HpSA, and 78.8% and 55.5% for RAPID HpStAR, respectively. From the 40 patients evaluated 6 weeks after eradication therapy, the best agreement between the urea breath tests and immunoassay tests was with HpStAR EIA (90%) and H. pylori Letitest (85%). HpStAR EIA and H. pylori Letitest could be used as a routine diagnostic tool in the microbiology laboratory for assessing clinical significance and eradication control of H. pylori infection.

Background: Detection of Helicobacter pylori antigen in stool samples has been a subject of controversy. However, it has been included in several clinical guidelines as a recommended non-invasive testing procedure in dyspeptic patients., Aim: To compare a monoclonal enzyme immunoassay for detection of H. pylori stool antigen (Amplified IDEIA HpStAR, DakoCytomation) with a polyclonal enzyme immunoassay (HpSA test, Premier Platinum HpSA, Meridian Diagnostics) in diagnosing infection and in determining H. pylori status after eradication treatment., Methods: We evaluated stool samples of 198 patients diagnosed with H. pylori infection and of 41 patients without infection. The results of the monoclonal enzyme immunoassay HpStAR were compared with those of the polyclonal enzyme immunoassay HpSA., Results: The sensitivity and specificity of HpStAR were 91.9% and 70.7%, while those of HpSA were 89.4% and 80.5%, respectively. In the 126 patients evaluated 6 weeks after eradication therapy, the overall agreement between urea breath test and HpStAR was 90.5% (P = 0.710) and between urea breath test and HpSA was 76.9% (P = 0.410)., Conclusions: HpStAR is a rapid and easy-to-perform test with similar sensitivity to HpSA in the diagnosis of H. pylori infection, although it had lower specificity. In contrast, HpStAR is more accurate after eradication therapy than HpSA.

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the reliability of a newly developed enzyme immunoassay for Helicobacter pylori-specific antigen detection in stools (HpSA) compared to other standardized diagnostic techniques such as histology (H), rapid urease test (RUT) and 13C-urea breath test (UBT) to diagnose H. pylori infection and to evaluate its usefulness in determining H. pylori status after treatment., Methods: One hundred eighty-eight patients referred to our department for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy were included. H. pylori infection was confirmed in all patients by HpSA test in stools, RUT, UBT, and H. Patients were defined as positive for H. pylori if RUT and UBT or H were positive. A total of 142 symptomatic patients received eradication treatment and were reassessed 6 wk after therapy; for 70 of these patients, stool samples were also collected at 24 h and 6 months after finishing eradication treatment. In the posttreatment follow-up, UBT was used as gold standard., Results: The sensitivity of HpSA test for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection using a cut-off value of 0.130 was 89.5% and its specificity 77.8%. This specificity was lower than that obtained with UBT, H, and RUT. In the early follow-up the sensitivity of HpSA test was null. At 6 weeks and at 6 months post-treatment its sensitivity was 70.4% and 50% and its specificity was 81.6% and 79.3%, respectively., Conclusions: The HpSA stool test, using a cut-off value of 0.130, may be useful for the primary diagnosis of H. pylori infection, with sensitivity similar to that obtained with other standard tests, but with less specificity. HpSA test is not useful for early monitoring of treatment efficacy. At 6 wk and at 6 months posttreatment, HpSA test lacks accuracy as compared to UBT for evaluating the outcome of the eradication treatment.

Background: Detection of bacterial antigen in stool specimens (HpSAT) is a new promising tool for diagnosing Helicobacter pylori infection., Objective: To evaluate diagnostic accuracy of HpSAT in the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection., Patients and Methods: We evaluate the presence of Helicobacter pylori infection by the rapid urease test and the 13C-urea breath test in endoscopic biopsies. Patients who were positive for both tests were considered to have Helicobacter pylori infection. Patients negative for both tests were considered free of infection. The presence of Helicobacter pylori infection was also determined in stool specimens by means of HpSAT., Results: The sensitivity of HpSAT was 92.8%, the specificity 92.3%, the positive predictive value 98.1% and the negative predictive value 75%., Conclusions: HpSAT is a reliable tool for diagnosing Helicobacter pylori infection.

Objective: One-week triple therapy has been shown to be effective in Helicobacter pylori eradication and duodenal ulcer healing. However, the optimal therapeutic combination has not yet been identified. Bismuth-containing regimens have the advantage of requiring only one antibiotic. It has been suggested that high doses of omeprazole improve the bactericidal efficacy of antimicrobial regimens against H. pylori. We evaluated the efficacy of two 1-wk triple-therapy regimens for H. pylori eradication and duodenal ulcer healing., Methods: On an intention-to-treat basis, 182 patients with H. pylori-associated duodenal ulcer were randomized. Group OCB patients (n = 91) were given omeprazole 40 mg b.i.d., clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d., and colloidal bismuth subcitrate 120 mg q.i.d. for 7 days. Group OCA patients (n = 91) were treated with omeprazole and clarithromycin at the same doses plus amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d., also for 7 days. Endoscopies were performed at entry and at 4 wk after the end of treatment. The presence of H. pylori was assessed by urease test, histology, Gram stain, and culture. No patient received follow-up treatment., Results: H. pylori eradication rates achieved in the OCB and OCA groups were similar whether by intention-to-treat (82.4% vs 88.9% ;p = 0.21) or per protocol analysis (83.3% vs 89.9%; p = 0.19). Duodenal ulcer healing rates also were the same for OCB and OCA in intention-to treat (91.2% vs 91.1%) and per protocol analysis (92.2% vs 92.1%), respectively (p = 0.98)., Conclusions: High rates of H. pylori eradication and duodenal ulcer healing were obtained with both short-treatment regimens, which were safe and well-tolerated. Colloidal bismuth subcitrate seems to be a good alternative to amoxicillin in the triple-therapy combination with omeprazole and clarithromycin. The omeprazole dose does not seem to play a major role in H. pylori eradication in these therapeutic combinations.

Unlabelled: Recent trials have shown that duodenal ulcers treated by H2-blockers heal faster if Helicobacter pylori is eradicated concurrently., Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of a short treatment regimen in H. pylori eradication and ulcer healing and to assess the impact of colloidal bismuth subnitrate (CBS) in H. pylori eradication rate., Methods: Sixty-one patients with H. pylori-associated duodenal ulcer were randomized in two short treatment groups. Group A patients (31) were given omeprazole 20 mg b.i.d. x 8 days. Clarithromycin (500 mg, b.i.d.) and CBS (120 mg, q.i.d.) were added 24 h after starting omeprazole and were given for 7 days. Group B patients (30) were treated as group A patients but without CBS. Endoscopies were performed at entry and 4 wk after the end of treatment. Presence of H. pylori was assessed at each endoscopy by urease test, and biopsy specimens were examined for histological evidence of gastritis and by Gram stain and culture for H. pylori infection. No patient received follow-up treatment., Results: H. pylori eradication rates were achieved in 25/31 (80.6%) group A patients and in 15/30 (50%) in group B patients (p = 0.012). Duodenal ulcer healing was documented in 30/31 (96.8%) patients in group A and in 25/30 (83%) patients in group B., Conclusions: The addition of CBS to the double therapy with omeprazole and clarithromycin substantially improves the eradication rate of H. pylori. Short therapy with omeprazole 20 mg/b.i.d., clarithromycin 500 mg/b.i.d., and CBS 120 mg/q.i.d. is a safe, well tolerated combination that achieves a 80.6% eradication rate of H. pylori and duodenal ulcer healing rates as good as those achieved by omeprazole 20 mg/d when given for 4 wk.