Search

We report a randomized prospective phase 3 study (CLL7), designed to evaluate the efficacy of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR) in patients with an early-stage high-risk chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Eight hundred patients with untreated-stage Binet A disease were enrolled as intent-to-treat population and assessed for four prognostic markers: lymphocyte doubling time 10 U/L, unmutated IGHV genes, and unfavorable cytogenetics (del(11q)/del(17p)/trisomy 12). Two hundred and one patients with ≥2 risk features were classified as high-risk CLL and 1:1 randomized to receive either immediate therapy with 6xFCR (Hi-FCR, 100 patients), or to be observed according to standard of care (Hi-W&W, 101 patients). The overall response rate after early FCR was 92.7%. Common adverse events were hematological toxicities and infections (61.0%/41.5% of patients, respectively). After median observation time of 55.6 (0–99.2) months, event-free survival was significantly prolonged in Hi-FCR compared with Hi-W&W patients (median not reached vs. 18.5 months, p p = 0.864). In conclusion, although FCR is efficient to induce remissions in the Binet A high-risk CLL, our data do not provide evidence that alters the current standard of care “watch and wait” for these patients.

Immunocompromised individuals such as patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) are at risk of impaired immune responses to vaccination. The objective of our study was to evaluate severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)–specific antibody responses in patients with CLL after the first, second, and third doses of the BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccines and after a single dose for patients with confirmed previous COVID-19. In all, 530 patients were included in the study. Patients received 2 doses at a 4-week interval and a third dose if they were seronegative after the second dose. Response rate was 27% after dose 1 and 52% after dose 2. Post-dose 2 treatment-naïve patients had the highest response rate (72%) followed by patients previously treated by chemoimmunotherapy (60%). Among patients receiving therapy, those receiving Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor alone (22%) or in combination with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies or venetoclax (0%) had the poorer response rate whereas patients who received venetoclax monotherapy achieved a significantly higher response rate (52%). A multivariable analysis identified age older than 65 years, ongoing CLL treatment, and gamma globulin ≤6 g/L as independent predictors of the absence of seroconversion. Post-dose 2 seronegative patients had a global response rate of 35% after dose 3. This study provides an argument for the use of a third dose and for prophylactic SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing monoclonal antibodies.

International audience; No abstract available

In total, 279 patients with hairy-cell leukemia (HCL) were analyzed, with a median follow-up of 10 years. Data were collected up to June 2018. We analyzed responses to treatment, relapses, survival, and the occurrence of second malignancies during follow-up. The median age was 59 years. In total, 208 patients (75%) were treated with purine analogs (PNAs), either cladribine (159) or pentosatin (49), as the first-line therapy. After a median follow-up of 127 months, the median overall survival was 27 years, and the median relapse-free survival (RFS) was 11 years. The cumulative 10-year relapse incidence was 39%. In patients receiving second-line therapy, the median RFS was 7 years. For the second-line therapy, using the same or another PNA was equivalent. We identified 68 second malignancies in 59 patients: 49 solid cancers and 19 hematological malignancies. The 10-year cumulative incidences of cancers, solid tumors, and hematological malignancies were 15%, 11%, and 5.0%, respectively, and the standardized incidence ratios were 2.22, 1.81, and 6.67, respectively. In multivariate analysis, PNA was not a risk factor for second malignancies. HCL patients have a good long-term prognosis. PNAs are the first-line treatment. HCL patients require long-term follow-up because of their relatively increased risk of second malignancies.

Objective To describe the characteristics of patients suffering from secondary immunodeficiencies (SID) associated with hematological malignancies (HM), who started immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IgRT), physicians' expectations regarding IgRT, and IgRT modalities. Methods Non-interventional, prospective French cross-sectional study. Results The analysis included 231 patients (66 ± 12 years old) suffering from multiple myeloma (MM) (N = 64), chronic lymphoid leukemia (CLL) (N = 84), aggressive non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphoma (aNHL) (N = 32), indolent NHL (N = 39), acute leukemia (N = 6), and Hodgkin disease (N = 6). Of the HM, 47% were currently treated, 42% were relapsing or refractory, 23% of patients had received an autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplant, and 1% had received an allograft. Serum immunoglobulin trough levels in 195 individuals were less than 5 g/L in 68.7% of cases. Most patients had a history of recurrent infections. Immunoglobulin dose was about 400 mg/kg/mo. Half of patients started with subcutaneous infusion. When starting IgRT, physicians mainly expected to prevent severe and moderate infections. They also anticipated improvement in quality of life and survival which is beyond evidence-based medicine. Conclusion NHL is a frequent condition motivating IgRT besides well-recognized indications. Physicians mainly based the decision of starting IgRT on hypogammaglobulinemia and recurrence of infections but, irrespective of current recommendations, were also prepared to start IgRT prophylactically even in the absence of a history of infections.

Summary Background Most patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia relapse after initial therapy combining chemotherapy with rituximab. We assessed the efficacy and safety of rituximab maintenance treatment versus observation for elderly patients in remission after front-line abbreviated induction by fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR). Methods This randomised, open-label, multicentre phase 3 trial at 89 centres in France enrolled treatment-naive and fit patients aged 65 years or older with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia without del(17p). Eligible patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–1 and adequate renal and hepatic function. Patients in response to complete induction treatment with four monthly courses of full-dose FCR with two interim rituximab doses on day 14 of cycles 1 and 2 (oral fludarabine [40 mg/m 2 per day] and oral cyclophosphamide [250 mg/m 2 per day] for the first 3 days of each cycle, rituximab at 375 mg/m 2 intravenously on day 0 of cycle 1 and subsequently at 500 mg/m 2 on day 14 of cycle 1, days 1 and 14 of cycle 2, and day 1 of cycles 3 and 4) were eligible for randomisation. Recovery from FCR toxicity and patient willingness to continue the trial were mandatory. We randomly assigned (1:1) patients to either receive intravenous rituximab (500 mg/m 2 ) every 8 weeks for up to 2 years or undergo observation, with a central computer-generated randomisation list using randomly permuted blocks of variable sizes. Randomisation was stratified by IGHV mutational status, the presence or absence of del(11q), and response level to induction treatment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, with the objective to assess the superiority of rituximab maintenance relative to observation. The final analysis was done in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was analysed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug in the rituximab group and in all patients in the observation group. This trial is closed to accrual whilst continuing patient follow-up. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00645606. Findings Between Dec 14, 2007, and Feb 18, 2014, 542 patients were enrolled, of whom 525 started FCR induction. Between June 10, 2008, and Aug 14, 2014, 409 (78%) patients were randomly assigned to rituximab maintenance (n=202) or observation (n=207). Four (2%) patients in the rituximab group did not receive the allocated treatment (progressive disease [n=1], adverse events [n=3]). After a median follow-up of 47·7 months (IQR 30·4–65·8), median progression-free survival in the rituximab group (59·3 months, 95% CI 49·6–not estimable) was improved compared with the observation group (49·0 months, 39·9–60·5; hazard ratio 0·55, 95% CI 0·40–0·75; p=0·0002). Neutropenia and grade 3–4 infections were more common with rituximab maintenance (105 [53%] of 198 patients vs 74 [36%] of 207 patients and 38 [19%] vs 21 [10%], respectively) during the study. The most common grade 3–4 infection was lower respiratory tract infection (24 [12%] vs eight [4%]). The incidence of second cancers, except basal cell carcinoma, was similar in both groups (29 [15%] vs 23 [11%]). Deaths were related to adverse events for 23 (11%) patients in the rituximab group and 16 (8%) in the observation group. Interpretation 2-year maintenance rituximab in selected elderly patients improves progression-free survival and shows an acceptable safety profile. Immunotherapy maintenance strategy is a relevant option in front-line treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, even in the age of targeted therapy. Funding French National Cancer Institute (INCa), Roche, Chugai.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is responsible for an ongoing global pandemic. Phase III trials have demonstrated excellent efficacies of mRNA vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 in large population studies (Baden LR, NEJM, 2021; Polack FP, NEJM, 2020). Immunosuppressed individuals such as chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients are at risk for a suboptimal response to 2 vaccine doses (Herishanu Y, Blood, 2021). The French National Authority for Health recommends the use of a third dose in immunosuppressed patients. However, seroconversion rate after the triple-dose vaccine is not yet known. The objective of our study was to evaluate SARS-CoV-2 antibody responses after the first, second and third doses of the BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 vaccines. Data were collected from 17 French Innovative Leukemia Organization (FILO) investigating centers and the French CLL patients' association (SILLC). SARS-CoV-2 IgG anti-Spike levels were measured at 4-6 weeks after each vaccine dose. A total of 530 patients and 14 controls were included in the study. Vaccine response was evaluated post-dose 1 for 158 CLL patients, post-dose 2, for 506 patients and post-dose 3 for 66 patients. Peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets were studied post-dose 2 by flow cytometry in 80 CLL patients and 14 controls. The median age of the patients was 71 years (range 37-93), 218 (40%) were treatment-naïve (TN), 136 (26%) had a prior CLL treatment and 176 (34%) were on therapy. Post-dose 1, the global response rate was 27% (43/158). TN patients had a response rate of 34% (23/67), similar to those who had a prior CLL treatment (33%,12/36), and higher compared to on-therapy patients (15%, 8/55, P=0.02). Post-dose 2, the global response rate was 52% (265/506). TN patients had the highest response rate of 72% (151/210) compared to previously treated patients, mostly by immunochemotherapy (60%, 78/130, P=0.02) and on-therapy patients (22%, 36/166, P65 years (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.33-0.92, P=0.02), ongoing CLL treatment (OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.07-0.23, P Flow cytometry results suggest a differential balance of the T CD4+ cell subpopulations in Binet stage A and in patients on targeted therapy compared to healthy controls. Post-dose 2 seronegative patients were proposed a third dose and to date, 66 have been tested for the antibody response 4-6 weeks post-dose 3. The post-dose 3 response rate was 42% (28/66). TN patients and previously treated patients had a significantly higher response rate (57%, 16/28) compared to on-therapy patients (32%, 12/38, P=0.03). We further analyzed patients tested post-dose 2 with the Abbott Architect SARS-CoV-2 IgG anti-Spike assay (n=24). Those who achieved seroconversion after the third dose (n=10) had significantly higher titers post-dose 2 (median 12, IQR 3.0-40.8) compared to those who remained seronegative (n=14) (median 2.2, IQR 0.5-5.1, p An additional cohort of 40 CLL patients who presented a SARS-CoV-2 infection prior to vaccination participated to the study and was analyzed independently. All patients achieved seroconversion after infection and a single dose of vaccine, even though 30% (n=12) had an ongoing CLL treatment. In conclusion, double-dose mRNA vaccination generated a humoral response in 52% of our CLL cohort and a third dose induced seroconversion in 42% of the patients who remained seronegative after the second dose. The major independent predictor of negative antibody response was ongoing treatment with BTKi. The strongest boost to immune response against the virus seems to be SARS-CoV-2 infection, as a substantial increase in anti-Spike antibodies was observed in all CLL patients with prior infection, after a single dose vaccination. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Letestu: Janssen: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Dartigeas: Astra-Zeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel grants/Congress; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel grants/Congress; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel grants/Congress. Laribi: Astellas Phama, Inc.: Other: Personal Fees; BeiGene: Other: Personal Fees; AstraZeneca: Other: Personal Fees; IQONE: Other: Personal Fees; AbbVie: Other: Personal Fees, Research Funding; Takeda: Other: Personal Fees, Research Funding; Novartis: Other: Personal Fees, Research Funding; Le Mans Hospital: Research Funding; Jansen: Research Funding. Cymbalista: Lilly-LOXO: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ASTRA ZENECA: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

With the emergence of targeted therapies, defining the best strategy for the treatment of previously untreated CLL patients remains challenging. The aim of this phase 2 study was to compare the efficacy of an association with ibrutinib and venetoclax (IV) to the standard FCR regimen in fit patients with intermediate risk CLL defined by either unmutated IGHV status, 11q deletion or complex karyotype in the absence of TP53 abnormality. Patients were randomized 1:1 between two treatment arms, ie FCR 6 cycles or IV. After a lead-in phase of ibrutinib as a single agent from month (M)1 to M3, the total duration of treatment with IV was based on the response achieved at M9; if bone marrow (BM) MRD was < 0.01% using flow cytometry, the treatment was continued for 6 additional months until M15 and then stopped; if BM MRD at M9 was ≥ 0.01%, the treatment with IV was continued for 18 additional months until M27. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients with BM MRD < 0.01% at M27 in both arms. We present here the preliminary results on the first evaluation done at M9 including CT-scan, BM biopsy and MRD assessment in PB and BM after the inclusion of all the 120 patients as initially planned. One hundred and twenty patients were enrolled from September 2019 to February 2021. The median age was 59 [34-72] and 61 [34-74] years in the FCR and IV arms, respectively. The characteristics of the patients were well balanced between the 2 arms in terms of gender (male 72% FCR, 74% IV), PS ECOG 0-1 (59% FCR, 68% IV) and Binet stage (A, B and C 15%, 64%, 21% for FCR ; 8.5%, 59% and 32% for IV). No major difference in terms of cytogenetic features was noted, all patients but one had unmutated IGHV. At the time of data cut-off for this interim analysis, the median follow-up for the all cohort was 11 [2.9 - 19.8] months. The frequency of all grades adverse events (AE) observed so far was 53% (grade 3-4, 24%) in the FCR arm and 47% (grade 3-4, 17%) in the IV arm. The rate of infusion-related reactions (IRR) in the FCR arm was 35% on cycle 1-day 1 (14% grade 3-4) ; for the IV arm, 6% of patients experienced tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) (grade 4 for 4 patients). ibrutinib doses were reduced for 7 patients (4 permanently stopped and 3 resumed at a lower dose because of toxicities (digestive, hepatic or haematological)). Venetoclax was permanently discontinued before M9 in 4 patients (digestive toxicities and grade 4 neutropenia). Forty serious adverse events were reported of which 15 in the IV arm (1 sudden death, 1 ischemic stroke, 2 atrial fibrillations, 2 clinical TLS, 1 hepatitis, 1 neutropenia, 4 COVID pneumonitis and one osteoporotic fracture) and 25 in the FCR arm (2 neutropenias, 1 anemia, 1 thrombocytopenia, 1 autoimmune haemolytic anemia, 3 IRR, 4 TLS, 2 COVID pneumonitis, 4 fever episodes of undetermined origin, 1 community-acquired pneumonia, 1 gastrointestinal toxicity, 1 confusion, 2 chest pains, 1 acute myeloid leukemia, 1 myelodysplasic syndrome). The patients with COVID pneumonitis had a favorable evolution with the need for intensive care and convalescent plasma for 3 of them. The first 60 patients included in the study have reached M9 and among them, 6 prematurely discontinued the study, 3 in each arm (active hemolysis, ischemic stroke and sudden death in the IV arm; 2 grade 4 hematologic toxicities and 1 early progression in the FCR arm). In the evaluated patients (n=54), 71% of patients in the FCR arm and 48% of patients in the IV arm achieved bone BM MRD < 0.01%. The complete (CR, CRi) and partial response rates were 54% and 46% in the FCR arm and 76% and 24% in the IV arm respectively. In conclusion, the preliminary results show a lower BM MRD rate in the IV arm compared to the FCR arm at M9, with a toxicity that remains significant and relatively similar between the two arms. However, BM MRD rate should improve after longer exposure to the IV combination and the analysis of the primary endpoint at M27 will be decisive in determining the best therapeutic strategy. Disclosures Quinquenel: Abbvie: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria. Laribi: Le Mans Hospital: Research Funding; Novartis: Other: Personal Fees, Research Funding; Takeda: Other: Personal Fees, Research Funding; BeiGene: Other: Personal Fees; IQONE: Other: Personal Fees; AbbVie: Other: Personal Fees, Research Funding; Astellas Phama, Inc.: Other: Personal Fees; AstraZeneca: Other: Personal Fees; Jansen: Research Funding. Cymbalista: Lilly-LOXO: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ASTRA ZENECA: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Leblond: AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Lilly: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Support; Roche: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Beigene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Dartigeas: Astra-Zeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel grants/Congress; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel grants/Congress; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel grants/Congress. Ferrant: Janssen: Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses; AbbVie: Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses; AstraZeneca: Honoraria. de Guibert: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria. Feugier: Astrazeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Cartron: Roche, Celgene-BMS: Consultancy; Danofi, Gilead, Novartis, Jansen, Roche, Celgene-BMS, Abbvie, Takeda: Honoraria. Ysebaert: Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Roche: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding.

Fertility preservation embraces different techniques developed to improve young women chances of becoming mothers after healing. Among them, in vitro maturation (IVM) procedure is based on oocyte retrieval without any gonadotropin treatment, feasible under locoregional or local anesthesia, with very low operative complications. The present retrospective analysis of a preliminary case series of 25 women diagnosed with Hodgkin or non-Hodgkin lymphoma aims to evaluate the feasibility of IVM for urgent fertility preservation purposes in hematological context. A median of five mature oocytes was cryopreserved after one cycle of IVM, performed without delaying the start of the chemotherapy (median delay from histological diagnosis to start of the chemotherapy 17.5 days). No association was found between lymphomas' characteristics and the number of recovered or frozen oocytes. Although experimental, this technique could be relevant when fertility preservation has to be performed within a short time frame and without additional surgery nor any risk of malignant cells reintroduction.

As a result of significant recent developments, the management of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is changing, and new therapeutic options will continue to emerge in the near future. The recommendations of the French Innovative Leukemia Organization (FILO-CLL) group presented here are intended to provide practical recommendations for physicians taking care of CLL patients, taking into account the availability of both biological tests and therapies in daily practice in France at the time of publication. This text details the documented information and guidelines on diagnosis, indications for treatment, infectious complications and therapeutic strategies in frontline and relapsed CLL as well as in particular conditions such as autoimmune cytopenia or Richter syndrome.

Introduction In previously untreated, medically fit patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) and no 17p deletion, there is current research interest in improving survival outcomes and potentially sparing some patients from the standard 6 cycles of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and rituximab (FCR). The phase II ICLL-07 (NCT02666898) trial, conducted by the French Innovative Leukemia Organization (FILO), aimed to explore the efficacy of obinutuzumab and ibrutinib treatment induction for 9 months, followed by a minimal residual disease (MRD)-driven strategy. Methods Following assessment at Month 9, patients in complete response (CR) with bone marrow (BM) MRD ResultsBetween 10/2015 and 05/2017, 135 patients were enrolled. At Month 9, only 8% of patients reached CR with BM MRD Conclusion These findings from the ICLL-07 trial demonstrated that, in previously untreated, medically fit patients with CLL and no 17p deletion, treatment induction with obinutuzumab and ibrutinib followed by an MRD-driven strategy yielded a high rate of CR with BM and PB MRD Disclosures Salles: Roche, Janssen, Gilead, Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Educational events; Amgen: Honoraria, Other: Educational events. Leblond:Gilead: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Cartron:Roche, Celgene: Consultancy; Sanofi, Gilead, Janssen, Roche, Celgene: Honoraria. Cymbalista:Sunesis: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria. Le Garff-Tavernier:Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria. Letestu:Alexion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: speaker fee, expert contracts; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: speaker fee, expert contracts; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: speaker fee, expert contracts; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: speaker fee, expert contracts. Feugier:janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; roche: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Mutational analyses performed following acquired ibrutinib resistance have suggested that chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) progression on ibrutinib is linked to mutations in Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) and/or phospholipase Cγ2 (PLCG2) genes. Mutational information for patients still on ibrutinib is limited. We report a study aimed to provide a “snapshot” of the prevalence of mutations in a real-life CLL cohort still on ibrutinib after at least 3 years of treatment. Of 204 patients who initiated ibrutinib via an early-access program at 29 French Innovative Leukemia Organization (FILO) centers, 63 (31%) were still on ibrutinib after 3 years and 57 provided a fresh blood sample. Thirty patients had a CLL clone ≥0.5 × 109/L, enabling next-generation sequencing (NGS); BTK and PLCG2 mutations were detected in 57% and 13% of the NGS samples, respectively. After median follow-up of 8.5 months from sample collection, the presence of a BTK mutation was significantly associated with subsequent CLL progression (P = .0005 vs no BTK mutation). Our findings support that mutational analysis should be considered in patients receiving ibrutinib who have residual clonal lymphocytosis, and that clinical trials are needed to evaluate whether patients with a BTK mutation may benefit from an early switch to another treatment.

In patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, achievement of a complete response with minimal residual disease of less than 0·01% (ie,1 chronic lymphocytic leukaemia cell per 10 000 leukocytes) in bone marrow has been associated with improved progression-free survival. We aimed to explore the activity of induction therapy for 9 months with obinutuzumab and ibrutinib, followed up with a minimal residual disease-driven therapeutic strategy for 6 additional months, in previously untreated patients.We did a single-arm, phase 2 trial in 27 university hospitals, general hospitals, and specialist cancer centres in France. Eligible patients were at least 18 years old and previously untreated, and had immunophenotypically confirmed B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukaemia; an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score of less than 2; a Binet stage C according to IWCLL 2008 criteria or Binet stage A and B with active disease; no 17p deletion or absence of p53 mutation; and were considered medically fit. In the first part of the study (induction phase), all participants received eight intravenous infusions of obinutuzumab 1000 mg over six 4-weekly cycles and oral ibrutinib 420 mg once per day for 9 months. In part 2, after assessment on day 1 of month 9, patients with a complete response and bone marrow minimal residual disease of less than 0·01% received only oral ibrutinib 420 mg once per day for 6 additional months. Patients with a partial response, or with a complete response and bone marrow minimal residual disease of 0·01% or more, received 6 months of four 4-weekly cycles of intravenous fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and obinutuzumab 1000 mg, alongside continuing ibrutinib 420 mg once per day. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving a complete response with bone marrow minimal residual disease less than 0·01% on day 1 of month 16 assessed by intention to treat (ITT). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (number NCT02666898) and is still open for follow-up.Between Oct 27, 2015, and May 16, 2017, 135 patients were enrolled. After induction treatment (day 1 of month 9), 130 patients were evaluable, of which ten (8%) achieved a complete response with bone marrow minimal residual disease of less than 0·01% and were assigned to ibrutinib, and 120 (92%) were assigned to ibrutinib plus fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and obinutuzumab. After minimal residual disease-guided treatment (day 1 of month 16), 84 (62%, 90% CI 55-69) of 135 patients (ITT population) achieved a complete response with bone marrow minimal residual disease of less than 0·01%. The most common haematological adverse event was thrombocytopenia (in 45 [34%] of 133 patients at grade 1-2 in months 1-9 and in 43 [33%] of 130 patients at grade 1-2 in months 9-15). The most common non-haematological adverse events were infusion-related reactions (in 83 [62%] patients at grade 1-2 in months 1-9) and gastrointestinal disorders (in 62 [48%] patients at grades 1 and 2 in months 9-15). 49 serious adverse events occurred, most frequently infections (ten), cardiac events (eight), and haematological events (eight). No treatment-related deaths occurred.Obinutuzumab and ibrutinib induction therapy followed by a minimal residual disease driven strategy is safe and active in patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. With longer follow-up, including assessing the evolution of minimal residual disease, if response is maintained, this strategy could be an option in the first-line setting in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, although randomised evidence is needed.Roche, Janssen.

Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia is generally treated with alkylating agents, purine analogs and monoclonal antibodies, alone or in combination. We report the outcomes of 82 patients (median age 61 years) treated with the RFC combination. Twenty-five patients were treatment-naive. RFC was administered every 4 weeks, for a median of five cycles. At treatment discontinuation, the overall response rate was 85.4%. The responses improved after treatment discontinuation in 25 patients, with a median time to best response achievement of 10.8 months, raising the major response rate (PR, VGPR and CR) from 64.6% to 76.8%. With a median follow-up of 47 months, the median progression-free survival time had not been reached (67% PFS at 48 months) and was influenced by age and treatment status before RFC. Likewise, the median time to next therapy had not been reached. Two cases of myelodysplastic syndrome/AML and 3 cases of transformation to aggressive lymphoma occurred. Thirteen patients died. The 3-year overall survival rate was 90%. Long-lasting cytopenias occurred in 19 patients. The RFC combination thus gave a high response rate and durable responses, even in heavily treatment-experienced patients. The high incidence of long-lasting cytopenia might be reduced by giving fewer courses and thereby minimizing myelotoxicity. Am. J. Hematol. 91:782-786, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IgRT) is increasingly used in secondary immunodeficiency (SID) related to hematological malignancies (HM) to prevent infections. Study's objective was to document prospectively the efficacy and safety of IgRT in patients with HM-associated SID.Non-interventional, prospective French longitudinal study.One-hundred and sixty patients starting IgRT for HM-associated SID (myeloma: 54 cases, chronic lymphoid leukemia: 54, aggressive non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphoma: 19, indolent non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphoma: 29, and Hodgkin disease: 4. entered an observational, prospective, longitudinal study and were followed-up for 8.7 ± 4.0 months. Seventeen patients died (five within the context of sepsis). Compared to baseline, IgRT increased serum immunoglobulin levels by 3.4 ± 2.4 g/L and decreased frequency and severity of infections. Treatment was discontinued in 9% of patients, stopped for futility in 31%, temporally interrupted in 8%, suspended during summertime in 14% and pursued without interruption in 38% of patients.Our data confirm the efficacy of IgRT in reducing the risk of infections in HM-associated SID therefore fulfilling physicians' main expectations. They also illustrate the heterogeneity of management policies within the community setting.

International audience; Peripheral T-cell lymphoma carries a poor prognosis. To document a possible graft-versus-lymphoma effect in this setting, we evaluated the impact of immunomodulation in 63 patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma who relapsed after allogeneic transplant in 27 SFGM-TC centers. Relapse occurred after a median of 2.8 months. Patients were then treated with non-immunologic strategies (chemotherapy, radiotherapy) and/or immune modulation (donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) and/or discontinuation of immunosuppressive therapy). Median overall survival (OS) after relapse was 6.1 months (DLI group: 23.6 months, non-DLI group: 3.6 months). Among the 14 patients who received DLI, 9 responded and 2 had stable disease. Among the remaining 49 patients, a complete response accompanied by extensive chronic GvHD was achieved in two patients after tapering of immunosuppressive drugs. Thirty patients received radio-chemotherapy, with an overall response rate of 50%. In multivariate analysis, chronic GvHD (odds ratio: 11.25 (2.68–48.21), P=0.0009) and skin relapse (odds ratio: 4.15 (1.04–16.50), P=0.043) were associated with a better response to treatment at relapse. In a time-dependent analysis, the only factor predictive of OS was the time from transplantation to relapse (hazards ratio: 0.33 (0.17–0.640), P=0.0009). This large series provides encouraging evidence of a true GvL effect in this disease

We report our experience on bendamustine and rituximab (BR) combination in 26 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) complicated by autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA). At the time of BR initiation, 88% of the patients had already been treated for AIHA and CLL was progressive regardless of AIHA in all patients but one. Overall response rates were 81% for AIHA and 77% for CLL. Median time to next treatment was 28.3 months and 26.2 months for AIHA and CLL, respectively. BR therapy may represent a good and safe therapeutic option in this setting where adequate control of CLL seems important for long-term AIHA response.

Only a minority of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients harboring a positive direct antiglobulin test (DAT) will develop autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA). In a single institution cohort of 378 CLL patients, 56 patients (14.8%) had at least one positive DAT during the course of the disease, either at diagnosis or later. We found no relationship between the time of the first positive DAT and overall survival (OS). However, patients with a positive DAT who did not develop AIHA had the same adverse outcome as patients who developed AIHA. Of the patients who were in Binet stage A at diagnosis, those with a positive DAT had a significantly shorter OS, regardless of their IGHV mutational status, however, there was a strong association with VH1-69. By multivariate analysis, a positive DAT was found to be an independent adverse prognostic factor for OS. Thus, DAT represents a strong adverse prognostic factor and its determination should be repeated during follow-up.

Nous presentons les recommandations d’un groupe de onze experts appartenant a plusieurs centres hospitaliers francais. Ce groupe s’est reuni en novembre 2013 pour examiner les criteres de prise en charge des patients presentant une leucemie a tricholeucocytes (HCL). Les reflexions et propositions du groupe se sont basees sur une analyse critique des recommandations deja diffusees dans la litterature et sur un etat des pratiques de services d’hematologie clinique habitues a prendre en charge ces patients. La HCL est une hemopathie maligne rare, avec environ 195 nouveaux cas incidents en France. Le diagnostic repose sur l’examen attentif du frottis sanguin et l’immunophenotypage des cellules tumorales, avec un panel de quatre marqueurs dedies a la recherche de tricholeucocytes : CD11c, CD25, CD103 et CD123. En 2011, la mutation V600E du gene BRAF au niveau de l’exon 15 a ete identifiee dans la HCL : presente dans la maladie, elle est absente dans sa forme variante (HCL-v) et dans le lymphome splenique de la pulpe rouge de la rate (SRPL), deux entites proches de la HCL. La prise en charge des patients avec une HCL s’est modifiee ces dernieres annees. Une moins bonne reponse aux analogues des purines (PNA) est observee chez les patients avec une leucocytose elevee, une splenomegalie volumineuse, un profil non mute des genes IGVH, une utilisation de VH4-34 ou avec des mutations de TP53. Le traitement de premiere intention utilise les PNA : cladribine ou pentostatine. La place des inhibiteurs de BRAF, associes ou non aux inhibiteurs de MEK, est discutee.

Introduction: Hairy-cell leukemia (HCL) is a chronic B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder with a favorable outcome thanks to treatment with purine analogues (PNA) like cladribine and pentostatin. Here, we updated the French national retrospective cohort of HCL after 10 years of follow-up, in order to evaluate the risk of second cancers in these patients. Methods: Data were collected up to June 2018 through a questionnaire sent to the members of the Société Française d'Hématologie, and centralized in the cohort database. We described the second malignancies observed during the follow-up, distinguishing second 'solid' cancers from second hematological malignancies. Then, using a Fine and Gray model, we performed a multivariate analysis in order to identify second cancer risk factors. Finally, to evaluate the excess of cancers in our cohort in comparison with the French general population, we calculated the standardized incidence ratio (SIR). Results: 279 patients (pts) from 19 centers were included in our retrospective cohort. The median age was 59 years old (range 29-88). 21% had an infectious disease at diagnosis, 23% had a familial history of cancer and 11% a personal history of cancer before HCL diagnosis. The median number of lines of treatments was 1 (0-7). PNA (cladribine or pentostatin) were the first therapeutic choice in frontline (75% of pts) and at relapse (69%). With a median follow-up of 127 months (2-413), the median overall survival for the overall study population was 328 months (95% CI 299-357) and the median relapse-free survival (RFS) was 136 months (95% CI 109-163). Pts treated with cladribine or pentostatin in first line had a statistically significant better RFS than pts treated with 'other' treatments (log rank test, p < 0.001). The 10-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 39% (95% CI 33-46). Pts who received treatments other than PNA in first line had a higher risk of relapse (Gray's test, p < 0.001). For pts receiving PNA in first and second lines, there was no difference in outcomes between those who switched PNA and those who did not. In this cohort, we observed 68 second malignancies during the follow-up: 49 solid cancers (most prevalent: prostate and non-melanoma skin cancers) and 19 hematological malignancies (most prevalent: monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS)). The median onset of second cancer, second solid cancer and second hematological malignancy from HCL diagnosis was 81 months, 99 months and 78 months, respectively. The median age at diagnosis of cancer, solid cancer and hematological malignancy was 70, 69 and 77 years old, respectively. Considering death as a competing risk, the 10-year cumulative incidence of cancer, solid cancer and hematological malignancy was 15% (95% CI 11-19), 11% (95% CI 7.2-15), and 5.0% (95% CI 2.8-8.2), respectively. In multivariate analyses, IFN treatment was associated with a decreased risk for all cancers (Fine and Gray regression model, subdistribution Hazard Ratio (sdHR) 0.53 (95% CI 0.29-0.97); p = 0.038), a familial history of cancer was a risk factor for solid cancers (sdHR 2.12 (95% CI 1.15-3.91); p = 0.017), a personal history of cancer was a risk factor for hematological malignancies (sdHR 3.47 (95% CI 1.14-10.55); p = 0.028). Even after excluding non-melanoma skin cancers and MGUS, there was an excess of cancers (SIR = 2.22), solid cancers (SIR = 1.81) and hematological malignancies (SIR = 6.67). Conclusions: In this updated real-world retrospective cohort with a long follow-up and most pts treated with PNA, we highlighted the importance and the excess of second cancers in HCL patients, in particular hematological malignancies. Figure Disclosures Paillassa: Janssen: Other: Bibliography board with young hematologists. Thieblemont:Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Kyte: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Cellectis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hermine:AB Science: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Feugier:janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; roche: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Troussard:Innate Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Other: Research Support; Sysmex: Other: Research Support.

hma.2012.0744 Auteur(s) : Therese Aurrant, Evelyne Callet-Bauchu, Florence Cymbalista, Alain Delmer, Brigitte Dreyfus, Florence Nguyen Khac, Veronique Leblond, Stephane Lepretre, Vincent Levy, Sophie Raynaud, Xavier Troussard1 troussard-x@chu-caen.fr Pour l’intergroupe GCFLLC/MW/GOELAMS 1 Laboratoire d’hematologie, CHU de Caen, France Tires a part : X. Troussard Incidence La leucemie lymphoide chronique (LLC) est la plus frequente des leucemies de l’adulte. Avec 3 800 nouveaux [...]

hma.2012.0743 Auteur(s) : Bruno Cazin, Pascal Chaibi, Florence Cymbalista, Alain Delmer, Pierre Feugier, Luc Fornecker, Veronique Leblond, Vincent Levy, Anne-Sophie Michallet, Bruno Moulin, Brigitte Pegourie, Georges Sebbane, Pierre Soubeyran, Xavier Troussard1 troussard-x@chu-caen.fr, Jean-Marc Zini Pour l’intergroupe GCFLLC/MW/GOELAMS 1 Service d’hematologie, CHU Cote-de-Nacre, 14000 Caen, France Correspondance: X. Troussard La leucemie lymphoide chronique (LLC) represente en France 1 % [...]

Summary Atrial fibrillation (AF) occurs in 5–9% of patients treated with ibrutinib for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL); the clinical consequences and optimal management are unclear. We retrospectively studied 56 CLL patients who received ibrutinib and developed AF. Median time to onset was 3·8 months. AF was persistent in 35/56 (62%) cases despite treatment. Clinical consequences included: three episodes of severe cardiac failure (one fatal) and one stroke; eight non-thrombocytopenic patients (14%) experienced severe bleeding adverse events. Altogether, ibrutinib was permanently discontinued in 26/56 cases (46%). Data to guide optimal management are lacking and clinical practice guidelines are urgently needed.

International audience; Elderly patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) are underrepresented in trials evaluating fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR). We assessed four cycles of FCR with two additional rituximab doses on day 14 of cycles 1 and 2 in 194 untreated CLL patients \textgreater 65 years (median age 71.2) without del17p. Four FCR cycles were administered to 90.7% (176/194), with (n = 74) or without (n = 102) dose-delay and/or dose-reduction. A total of 50% grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred after each cycle. Only 6.2% cycles were associated with severe infection. Complete remission (CR) was achieved in 19.7%, and partial remission (PR) in 73.9% of patients. Minimal residual disease (MRD) was negative in 36.7%. Overall survival at 36 months was estimated at 87.4%. Oral FC and dose-dense rituximab is feasible and active in fit elderly CLL patients. However, myelosuppression is significant and frequent dose adaptations are required implying that these results cannot be generalized to unfit or frail elderly CLL

B-cell antigen receptor (BCR)–mediated signaling plays a critical role in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) pathogenesis and gives an in vitro survival advantage to B cells isolated from patients with unfavorable prognostic factors. In this study, we undertook to elucidate the signaling intermediates responsible for this biologic alteration. In responding cells only, in vitro BCR engagement triggers global phosphorylation of Syk, activation of phospholipase Cγ2, and intracellular calcium mobilization, reflecting competency of BCR signaling. The calcium–calcineurin-dependent transcription factor NFAT2 is up-regulated and to some extent constitutively activated in all CLL B cells. In contrast, its DNA-binding capacity is enhanced on IgM stimulation in responding cells only. NFAT inhibition using the VIVIT peptide prevents induction of CD23 target gene and IgM-induced survival, converting responding cells to unresponsive status. At the opposite, ionomycin-induced NFAT activity allows survival of nonresponding cells. These results demonstrate that the functional heterogeneity relies on variability of protein levels establishing BCR-dependent thresholds and NFAT-dependent activation. Finally, status of the BCR-NFAT pathway for each patient reveals its relevance for CLL clinical outcome and points out to BCR-NFAT intermediates as promising functional therapeutic targets.

Achievement of CR with undetectable minimal residual disease (uMRD) may be associated with a longer survival in CLL, but BCR signaling inhibitors alone seldom allow reaching uMRD. We conducted a multicenter phase II trial aiming at exploring the efficacy of an induction treatment associating obinutuzumab and ibrutinib, followed by immunochemotherapy for patients who do not reach CR with uMRD. Previously untreated fit patients with active Binet stage A and B or stage C CLL, no TP53 mutation/deletion, CIRS score < 7 and ECOG 0 or 1 were eligible. Induction treatment consisted of 6 courses of obinutuzumab (1000 mg D1, D8, D15 for cycle 1 and D1 for cycles 2 to 6) along with ibrutinib 420 mg/d for 9 months. Assessment of response to induction was performed at month 9, including CT-scan, bone marrow (BM) biopsy, peripheral blood (PB) and BM MRD testing. Patients in CR with BM MRD < 0.01% (by 8-color flow cytometry) received ibrutinib alone for 6 additional months whereas all the other patients received 4 courses of fludarabine (F) + cyclophosphamide (C) and obinutuzumab along with continuous ibrutinib until month 16. Patients with stable or progressive disease were taken off study. Final evaluation of response was performed at D1 Month 16. The primary endpoint of this study was the rate of CR (according to IWCLL 2008 guidelines) with uMRD in BM at month 16 and the assumption that at least 30% of patients would achieve this goal at the end of the overall strategy. Between November 2015 and May 2017, 135 patients (89 males/46 females) were enrolled; 7% were Binet stage A, 67% stage B and 26% stage C. Median age was 62 years (range, 35-80). Genetic alterations included 26% del(11q), 19% trisomy 12 and 56% del(13q); 15% had a complex karyotype and 56% patients had unmutated IGHV status. Median Beta 2 microglobulin was 3.6 mg/L (1.5-7.5) and median GFR (Cockroft) was 81 mL/min (42-173). At Month 9, 92% patients had received the 8 planned infusions of obinutuzumab. Ibrutinib dosage was reduced in 4 patients and definitively discontinued in 3 of them (3.9%) due to AE (atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter and neutropenia). Fifty seven percent of the patients presented at least a grade (G) 3 toxicity during the first 9 months of treatment (neutropenia 24%, anemia 6% and thrombocytopenia 31%). One hundred and thirty patients were evaluable for response at M9 and 5 not evaluable (2 deaths: one sudden at M7 and one accidental at M8; one acute coronary syndrome; one listeria meningitidis and one acute pulmonary edema at day 1 cycle 1). In intention to treat (ITT), ORR was 100% with 41% of patients reaching CR (42% for evaluable patients) but only 12% had BM MRD < 0.01%. Therefore 88% of the patients were planned to receive FC and obinutuzumab treatment while continuing ibrutinib. At month 16, 115 patients were evaluable for response. In ITT, the CR rate was 69% (78% for evaluable patients) and 79% of patients had BM MRD < 0.01% (90% of evaluable patients). Overall, 62% patients achieved CR with BM MRD < 0.01% (ITT) and 70% evaluable patients did so. The IGHV mutational status did not impact the quality of response. During the trial second period (M9 to M16), 38% patients presented at least a G3 toxicity: neutropenia 24%, thrombocytopenia 15%, anemia 1.5%, febrile neutropenia 3%, gastrointestinal disorders 9.5% and cardiac events 2.4%. A total of 41 serious AEs were observed throughout the entire treatment duration: 9 cardiac events including 1 atrial flutter and 3 atrial fibrillations, 4 hemorrhagic events, 7 infections, 3 second cancers (2 basocellular carcinoma, 1 renal adenocarcinoma) and 2 deaths. In conclusion, this MRD-driven strategy given for a definite period of time leads to a very high rate of uMRD CR in previously untreated CLL fit patients without TP53 aberration and displays an acceptable security profile. To our knowledge, these results are superior to standard FC + rituximab (FCR) or any chemo-free regimen. We hypothesize that this very high rate of bone marrow undetectable MRD will translate in a prolonged PFS while discontinuing treatment. Disclosures Laribi: Novartis: Other: Grant and personal fees; Takeda: Other: Grant and personal fees; Teva: Other: Grant; Gilead: Other: Personal fees; Sandoz: Other: Grant; Roche: Other: Grant; Amgen: Other: Personal fees; Hospira: Other: Grant. Salles:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria; Acerta: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Epizyme: Honoraria; Gilead Sciences: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria; Morphosys: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Servier: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Leblond:Gilead: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Sandoz: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. Cartron:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Gilead Sciences: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Ysebaert:Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Cymbalista:Gilead: Honoraria; AbbVie, Inc: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Sunesis: Research Funding. Feugier:Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Background Autoimmune cytopenia (AIC) are well-known complications of chronic lymphocytic leukemia, occurring in approximately 4 to 10% of patients. The management of CLL-associated AIC is not consensual and patient with uncontrolled AIC are systematically excluded from clinical trials. Few data evaluating the efficacy of BCR inhibitors on CLL-related AIC are available. If some preliminary data focusing on patients included in clinical trials with controlled AIC suggested that ibrutinib was able to control AIC, the duration of responses were unknown. Moreover, no data regarding the ability of idelalisib to control AIC have been currently reported. The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze the outcome of CLL patients suffering from autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA), immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), Evans syndrome or pure red cell anemia (PRCA) and treated with ibrutinib or idelalisib. Results Forty-four patients from 15 FILO centers were included in this study. First kinase inhibitor (KI) was ibrutinib for 25 patients and idelalisib for 19 patients. Among the ibrutinib treated patients, diagnosis of AIC was AIHA for 16 patients (64%), ITP for 5 patients (20%), Evans syndrome for 3 patients (12%) and PRCA for one patient (4%). In the idelalisib group, 12 patients were treated for AIHA (63%), 6 patients for ITP (32%) and one patient for an Evans syndrome (5%). Most patients presented with adverse prognostic factors such as 11q or 17p deletion by FISH and unmutated IgHV. Most patients had previously been treated either for CLL progression, autoimmune cytopenia or both and median number of prior therapies was 1 (0 to 6). Before starting ibrutinib or idelalisib, 34 patients (77%) had a history of AIC and had previously received corticosteroid monotherapy (N=15), rituximab monotherapy (N=15), a combination of rituximab, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (N=23) or rituximab and bendamustine (N=15). At the time of KI initiation, 66% of patients were receiving concomitant AIC therapy, consisting in corticosteroids in 26 patients (59%) or TPO (thrombopoietin) receptor agonists in 3 patients (7%). Overall response rates (ORRs) to ibrutinib and idelalisib on AIC were 92% and 95% respectively, and were not correlated to the AIC type. On ibrutinib therapy, 87.5% of patients with AIHA and 100% of patients with ITP or Evans syndrome achieved at least partial response (PR). In the idelalisib group, the ORR was 92% for AIHA patients and 100% for patients with ITP or PRCA. Considering CLL, Ibrutinib ORR and bone marrow unconfirmed complete response (CR) were 100% and 24% respectively. ORR and BM unconfirmed CR on CLL were 95% and 37% respectively the idelalisib group. KI therapy allowed discontinuing corticosteroids in 86% of ibrutinib patients and in 67% of idelalisib patients. Fifteen patients (34%) of the whole cohort experienced progression of CLL, CAI or both during the follow-up. Among them, nine (20%) experienced relapses of the CAI, and all of them were AIHA. In the ibrutinib arm, 1 patient withdrew ibrutinib shortly after initiation because of uncontrolled AIHA and 2 patients experienced relapse of AIHA while on therapy. In the idelalisib group, treatment failed to control AIHA in one case, but for responding patients, no AIHA relapse was described during idelalisib treatment. Five patients experienced relapse of AIHA after idelalisib discontinuation. With a median follow-up of the entire cohort of 26.8 months, the estimated two years overall survival (2y-OS) of the whole cohort was 88%, while the estimated two years progression free survival (2y-PFS) were 75.3% for CLL and 65.1% for AIC. In the ibrutinib cohort, 2y-OS was 95% and 2y-PFS were 81% for AIC and 94.4% for CLL. In the idelalisib arm, 2y-OS was 80%. Median PFS was 19 months for AIC and 25.7 months for CLL. Conclusion Our results demonstrate that kinase inhibitors are able to induce long-term control of both AIC and CLL and represent new therapeutics options for patients with AIC associated with CLL. Disclosures Quinquenel: Jansen Cilag: Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria. Ysebaert:Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Diagnosis of leukemic B-cell chronic lymphoproliferative disorders (B-CLPD) is a frequent challenge in hematology. In this multicentric study, we prospectively studied 165 new consecutive leukemic patients with B-CLPD selected on the basis of Royal Marsden Hospital scoring system < or =3. The primary aim of the study was to try to decipher the atypical cases and identify homogenous subgroups. Overall, morphological examination contributed to diagnosis in only 20% cases, all of them CD5 negative. Thirty additional cases were CD5 negative suggestive of leukemic marginal zone lymphoma in most cases. The significantly poorer survival of the 26 cyclin D1 positive cases justifies recommending its systematic determination among atypical B-CLPD. CD20 expression segregated clearly two subgroups among CD5 positive cyclin D1 negative B-CLPD. The 17 patients with the CD20 dim profile represent a homogeneous subgroup very close to typical B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL) on morphological, phenotypical and cytogenetical criteria. In contrast, the subgroup of 51 patients with a CD20 bright profile is heterogeneous. Their significantly lower p27 expression level suggest the presence of a proliferative component, underlying a more aggressive disease. Further genomic studies are warranted to establish their precise nature. These cases should not be included in the same therapeutic trials as B-CLL.

Fludarabine (FDR) therapy gives a response rate of about 30% in previously treated patients with Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM). The combination of FDR and cyclophosphamide (Cy) has been shown to be effective in chronic lymphoproliferative disorders. We administered the combination of FDR (30 mg/m2 i.v. D1-D3) and Cy (300 mg/m2 i.v. D1-D3) to 49 patients. Median age was 64 years. The median hemoglobin, albumin, beta 2 microglobulin and immunoglobulin M (IgM) levels were 9.9 g/100 ml, 39.6 g/l, 3 mg/l and 24.7 g/l, respectively. In all, 14 patients (29%) had not previously been treated. FDR/Cy was administered every 4 weeks for a median of four cycles. In all, 38 patients (77.6%) had partial responses, nine had stable disease and two had progressive disease. After a median of follow-up of 25 months, six patients relapsed and two patients developed large-cell lymphoma. The median time to treatment failure was 27 months. The main toxicity was hematological. In all, 12 patients died, four from progression, one from large-cell lymphoma, three from infection and four from a second malignancy. Two factors negatively influenced overall and event-free survival, age65 years and IgM40 g/l. The FDR/Cy combination, therefore, gives a high response rate in WM, even in previously treated patients with factors of poor prognosis.

Purpose To evaluate the outcome of cancer patients considered for admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). Patients and Methods Prospective, one-year hospital-wide study of all cancer and hematology patients, including bone marrow transplantation patients, for whom admission to the ICU was requested. Results Of the 206 patients considered for ICU admission, 105 patients (51%) were admitted. Of the 101 patients who were not admitted, 54 patients (26.2%) were considered too sick to benefit, and 47 patients (22.8%) were considered to be too well to benefit from the ICU. Of these 47 patients, 13 patients were admitted later. Survival rates after 30 and 180 days were significantly associated with admission status (P < .0001). Remission of the malignancy (odds ratio [OR], 3.37; 95% CI, 1.25 to 9.07) was independently associated with ICU admission, whereas poor chronic health status (OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.16 to 0.74) and solid tumor (OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.78) were associated with ICU refusal. In admitted patients, 30-day and 6-month survival rates were 54.3% and 32.4%, respectively. Of the patients considered too sick to benefit from ICU admission, 26% were alive on day 30 and 16.7% on day 180. Among patients considered too well to benefit, the 30-day survival rate was a worrisome 78.7%. Calibration of the Mortality Probability Model (the only score available at triage) was of limited value for predicting 30-day survival (area under the curve, 0.62). Conclusion Both the excess mortality in too-well patients later admitted to the ICU and the relatively good survival in too-sick patients suggest the need for a broader admission policy.

To decrease red blood cell (RBC) transfusion requirements during high-dose therapy (HDT) for hematological malignancies, we conducted a pilot study to assess the effect of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEpo) given during chemotherapy before HDT and autologous peripheral stem-cell transplantation (APSCT). The transfusion histories of 15 HDT and APSCT for hematological disease performed in 11 consecutive patients who received rHuEpo (10 000 U subcutaneously three times/week) were compared to those of 22 HDT and ASCT performed in 17 consecutive historical controls matched for hematological parameters. rHuEpo increased the hemoglobin (Hb) level from 10.3+/-2.3 g/dl at diagnosis to 12.9+/-2.2 g/dl at the time of HDT in 11 patients; no major adverse effects occurred. Compared to historical controls (95%, 21/22), RBC transfusion requirements were significantly lower for rHuEpo recipients (26%, 4/15) (P=0.00001) and rHuEpo responders (15%, 2/13) (P=0.000002). After HDT and APSCT, fewer RBC transfusions were needed: 3.3, 1.2 and 0.3 RBC units for controls, rHuEpo recipients and rHuEpo responders, respectively (P=0.006 and 0.00002). Therefore, rHuEpo should be administered before, and not after HDT and APSCT, to lower RBC transfusion requirements after HDT and APSCT.

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a distinct clinico-pathological entity with a poor prognosis. We have conducted a prospective study in patients with MCL to evaluate a therapeutic strategy in which CHOP polychemotherapy was followed by DHAP if CHOP failed to induce complete remission. Responding patients then proceeded to an intensification therapy with autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (APBSCT). Twenty-eight consecutive patients with newly diagnosed aggressive MCL were included. After four cycles of CHOP regimen, two complete responses (CR) were obtained (7%) and 14 (50%), five (18%) and seven (25%) patients achieved partial (PR), minor (MR) and no response, respectively (one patient died from septic complications during CHOP induction). The two patients in CR after CHOP underwent intensification with TBI, high-dose cyclophosphamide-etoposide and APBSCT. The other twenty-five patients received DHAP and in this group a response rate of 92% (21 CR (84%), two PR (8%)) was observed. Two patients had progressive disease. The twenty-three responding patients received high-dose therapy (TAM8 regimen: TBI-cytarabine-melphalan) followed by APBSCT. One of the two partial responding patients achieved CR after TAM8. After a median follow-up of 47.6 months (range, 14-70), seven patients have relapsed. Our data confirm that: (1) CHOP regimen induces a low CR rate in MCL; (2) CHOP plus DHAP appears to be much more efficient and allows a large proportion of patients to proceed to high-dose therapy in CR; (3) consolidation therapy including TBI and high-dose Arac-C followed by APBSCT may improve event-free survival.

BACKGROUND: No agreement exists about the number of autologous peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) to transfuse for optimal hematologic recovery after high-dose chemotherapy. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: To determine CD34+ cell dosage following high-dose chemotherapy (in terms of hematologic recovery and blood component consumption), the effects of two schedules of CD34+ cell transfusions in a cohort of patients with myeloma or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma were examined. Forty patients (Group 1) received between 2.5 and 5 × 106 CD34+ cells per kg, with a median of 3.4 × 106 per kg following high-dose chemotherapy, and 40 patients (Group 2), selected to match Group 1 for age, diagnosis, prior therapies, and procedure for PBPC mobilization, received a dose of CD34+ cells >5 × 106 per kg, with a median of 8.4 × 106 per kg (5-33). RESULTS: The median number of days to achieve a neutrophil count of >0.5 × 109 per L and unsupported platelets of >20 × 109 per L was identical for the two groups, but the time required to reach 1.5 × 109 neutrophils per L and 50 × 109 platelets per L was greatly delayed in Group 1. No significant difference was observed for the median number of RBC and platelet transfusions, or for the proportion of patients in each group that did not require either platelet or RBC transfusions. CONCLUSION: Our data confirm a dose–response relationship between CD34+ cell dose transfused and time to hematologic recovery after high-dose chemotherapy. However, the minimal Hb and platelet counts for transfusion independence in the two groups are similar when the CD34+ cell dose is greater than 5 × 106 CD34+ cells per kg. Therefore, our data suggest that it is not necessary to go on with apheresis procedures after 5 × 106 CD34+ cells per kg are harvested to sustain one high-dose chemotherapy.

Recent developments in the management of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients have made necessary the availability of dependable prognostic factors. We have developed a prognostic index derived from the multivariate analysis of 339 stage A patients at diagnosis, exhaustively studied for classical and recent predictive markers. Only 4 biologic parameters were found to be independent predictors of progression-free survival (PFS): serum thymidine kinase (sTK), lymphocytosis, β2-microglobulin, and CD38 expression. Two groups were distinguishable: cases with no or 1 risk factor (among whom 85% did not progress after 7 years), and cases with 2 or more factors showing a median PFS of 20 months. Finally, we propose an easy, fast, cost-effective strategy for a trustworthy prognostication in stage A patients, who currently represent more than 80% of the CLL population, allowing physicians to adapt follow-up individually.

Ochrobactrum anthropi is an oxidase-producing gram-negative bacillus preferring aqueous environments. It is an opportunist of low pathogenicity with a wide and unpredictable antibiotic resistance. We observed bacteraemia caused by this organism in two immunocompromized patients hospitalized in the same haematology unit and catheter-associated sepsis was recognized within two days. Another isolate was obtained from the stools of a third patient of the same unit. Environmental investigations recovered an isolate from a tap-water sample of the unit. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis of these four isolates and two others isolates previously found in the same ward, showed identical restriction patterns for the two blood isolates and confirmed that the two bacteraemia were epidemiologically related.

Introduction Atrial fibrillation (AF) occurs in 5-9% of patients treated with ibrutinib for CLL. We previously reported on the clinical characteristics and management outcomes of 56 patients with ibrutinib-associated AF (n=52) or atrial flutter (n=4) retrospectively identified from centers of the FILO group (French Innovative Leukemia Organization, France/Belgium, n=29), MD Anderson Cancer Center (USA, n=21), and Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre (Australia, n=6) (Thompson et al BJH 2016). We found that (1) the median time from the initiation of ibrutinib to AF was 3.8 months (range: 6 - 1410 days); (2) AF recurred or became persistent in 63% despite medical management; (3) AF and its management was associated with serious sequelae including severe cardiac failure (n=3, 1 fatal), ischemic stroke (n=3) and severe bleeding events (n=8); (4) immediate cessation of ibrutinib therapy was required in 22/56 (39%). Given the reported poor outcomes for patients who discontinue ibrutinib for toxicity, we update the results of this cohort with respect to CLL outcomes and survival. Aim To describe long term overall and disease-specific outcomes in patients who develop ibrutinib-associated AF. Methods This is an update of an international, retrospective cohort of patients who developed ibrutinib-associated AF. Patients are managed according to local best standard practice. The median follow-up from onset of AF is 21 months. Results The median overall survival after development of AF is 43 months. Twenty-two (39%) patients stopped ibrutinib at the time of AF. Among these patients, 7 (32%) eventually died from CLL progression (n=3), infection (1), cardiac failure (1), pulmonary hemorrhage (1) and colon cancer (1). Of the 34 patients who initially continued ibrutinib, 5 (15%) died; causes of death were: Richter transformation (RT) (n=2), septic shock (1), CLL progression (1), and stroke in the context of AF (1). In order to gain insight into disease control in relationship to AF and its management, we examined PFS from the time of AF onset. The following features had no impact on PFS: single AF episode vs paroxysmal/permanent AF or time from ibrutinib initiation to onset of AF. However, patients who had ibrutinib interrupted at the time of AF onset (n=22) had a significantly inferior PFS (median 19 months) compared with those who had dose reduction without interruption (n=13) or those who continued full dose ibrutinib (n=21, median 27 months, p=0.023, Figure 1). There was a trend toward inferior overall survival in those who interrupted ibrutinib (62% at 3 years) compared with those who continued without interruption (74% at 3 years, p=0.10), but this did not reach statistical significance at the time of analysis. Only 3 of 22 (14%) patients who had initial interruption of ibrutinib successfully restarted ibrutinib following control of AF; all 3 remain in continuous partial remission. Four other patients restarted ibrutinib, but subsequently discontinued due to pulmonary hemorrhage (n=1), stroke (1), CLL progression (1) and RT (1). Among patients who discontinued Ibrutinib permanently, only 9 did so solely because of uncomplicated AF. The others discontinued because of: (a) complications of AF or its management such as cardiac failure (n=1), recurrent AF (n=5) and bleeding events (n=4; one each of hemopericardium, pulmonary hemorrhage, subdural hematoma and gastrointestinal hemorrhage); (b) complications related to CLL such as CLL progression (n=1) and RT (n=2); or (c) other causes such as lung cancer (n=1) or unknown reasons (n=2). Altogether, 21 patients were still on Ibrutinib among 44 patients alive at last follow-up. Conclusion Occurrence of AF at any time during ibrutinib treatment was associated with an initial discontinuation rate of 39%, and only 37.5% of patients remain alive and on drug after a median of 21 months follow-up. Patients who interrupted ibrutinib at the time of AF onset have an inferior PFS compared to those who continued ibrutinib or were managed with dose reductions. This inferior outcome in CLL control is likely related to the low rate of patients (14%) who subsequently successfully restarted ibrutinib. Development of AF was associated with serious complications, including hemorrhage, ischemic stroke and cardiac failure. Management of ibrutinib-associated AF is complex and requires international consensus guidelines and a multidisciplinary approach. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Thompson: Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria. Levy:Abbive: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria. Tam:janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Quinquenel:janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Dupuis:ABBVIE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; janssen: Honoraria. Cymbalista:Roche: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Introduction Patients with residual disease following initial treatment of chronic lymphocyticleukemia(CLL) withfludarabine, cyclophosphamide and rituximab (FCR) chemotherapy have reduced progression free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The CLL6 RESIDUUM trial is a joint trial of the Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group (ALLG) and the French CLL branch of the French InnovativeLeukemiaOrganization (FILO) thatanalyzesthe role oflenalidomide(LEN) as consolidation therapy in patients following front-line treatment for CLL who do not enter minimal residual disease (MRD) negative complete remission. Methods CLL patients with CIRS score Results As of end of July 2016, data from 79 patients randomized on the study were analyzedfor the effects of consolidation treatment on blood and marrow MRD. Median duration from randomization was 488 days. There were 63 males and 16 females. Median age was 62 years (range 29 to 81). 37 patients were randomized to receive LEN, 42 to OBS .On the LEN arm 13, 3 and 21 patientsvs 12, 9 and 21 on the OBS arm were in CR, nodular PR and PR respectively at the time of randomization. There were 26 serious adverse events (SAEs) reported in 22 patients. 12 SAEs in 11 patients were attributed to LEN including pneumonia/chest infection (n=4), pulmonary infiltrate (1), prostatitis (1) second primary malignancy (SPM) (1), vomiting (1), neutropenia (1), tumorflare (1), acute kidney injury (1) and anal warts (1). There were 5 SAEs in the OBS arm comprising SPM (2), neutropenia (1), gout (1) and GuillainBarre syndrome(1). Peripheral blood samples were analyzedprior to consolidation and at 3, 6 and 12 months and every 6 months thereafter. MRD levels during consolidation were compared with pre-consolidation levels and categorized as increasing, decreasing, stable detectable or stable undetectable (Fig 1). MRD increased over the period of observation in 38% of patient on the LEN arm and in 62% of patients on the OBS arm (p = 0.032, Χ2). 10 patients (27%) in the LEN arm and 2 patients (5%) in the control arm had decreasing levels of MRD in the blood (p = 0.006, Χ2). There was no difference between consolidation treatments in the percentage of patients with stable blood MRD measurements, whether in the detectable or the undetectable range. The effect of LEN was most apparent in patients in PR at randomization where 5 patients (24%) taking LEN had increasing MRD in the blood compared to 15 patients (71%) on the OBS arm (p = 0.002, Χ2). Bone marrow MRD levels were assessed prior to consolidation and after 12 months in 9 patients in each arm of the study (LEN arm 2 CR, 1 nPR, 6 PR; OBS arm 4 CR, 1 nPR, 4 PR at randomization). Eight patients in the LEN arm and 2 patients in the OBS arm were observed to have a reduction in marrow MRD. There was a significant reduction between the 2 time points in the LEN arm (p=0.022 paired Wilcoxon test) but not in the OBS arm. Four of 9 patients in the LEN arm and 1 patient in the OBS arm achieved marrow MRD values below 10-4 after 1 year on trial. Conclusion LEN consolidation therapy for residual disease after FCR front-line therapy for CLL is associated with improved control of MRD in both blood and bone marrow. A large group of recently randomized patients will provide more data to determine whether these encouraging results will translate into improved progression free and overall survival. Figure 1 Percentage of patients on LEN and OBS arms with increasing, decreasing, stable detectable or stable undetectable MRD. Figure 1. Percentage of patients on LEN and OBS arms with increasing, decreasing, stable detectable or stable undetectable MRD. Disclosures Gottlieb: Indee: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Aurran:Janssen: Honoraria. Tam:Gilead: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Letestu:Roche: Honoraria; Alexion: Honoraria. Levy:Roche: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Abbive: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Leblond:Roche: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria. Mulligan:GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Cymbalista:Abbvie: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Background: To estimate the prevalence of adults and children with acute leukemia (AL) included in clinical trials and to determine factors associated with noninclusion. Patients and methods: All patients with AL admitted to the 17 departments managing AL in Paris area from 2005 to 2007 were prospectively included. Clinical data, therapeutic decisions, and enrollment in trials were recorded. Reasons that prevented accrual were identified. Results: A total of 1066 admissions with AL (85% of adults) were recorded, and 34 trials were open. In adults, the rate of inclusion in a trial was 25% [95% confidence interval (CI) 21% to 28%] for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and 23% (95% CI 17% to 29%) for acute lymphoid leukemia (ALL). In children, the rate of inclusion was 58% (95% CI 41% to 73%) for AML and 64% (95% CI 55% to 72%) for ALL. The rate of inclusion varied across centers, with a significant increase when they were involved in clinical research. Patients included in trials differed significantly from those not included according to age, primary/secondary AL, leukemia type, results of cytogenetic analyses, and stage of disease. Conclusions: The rate of inclusion is higher than in oncology. This difference may be explained by management in specialized centers often involved in clinical research.

Rationale Case vignettes have been validated as an efficient tool for assessing the quality of clinical practices, and have been used in a variety of medical settings. However, their use in the field of hematology has not been tested. Objectives We undertook a study to pre-test seven case vignettes, and thereby to assess practice patterns and, when possible, guideline adherence in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) by French hematologists. Findings Of the 64 hematologists who agreed to participate, 26 (41%) completed the vignettes. We found significant differences in the physicians’ patterns of ordering further investigations among young and old patients in the same clinical context. This is not consistent with published guidelines. Moreover, the most striking differences concerned the physicians’ interpretations of prognostic factors and the use of radiological testing before treatment. Modalities of treatment were variable across clinical situations, especially with regard to second-line treatments. Clinicians understood the vignettes well, except for those that dealt with stem cell transplantation. Conclusions This pilot study showed the feasibility of the use of case vignettes to assess the quality of clinical practice in CLL. The initial results identified deviations from the published guidelines. A large-scale European survey will commence in a few months.