Search

Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients who relapse after autologous-stem-cell- transplantation (auto-SCT) have traditionally had a poor prognosis. We analyzed 1781 adult HL patients who relapsed between 2006 and 2017 after a first auto-SCT. The 4-year overall survival (OS) after relapse continuously increased from 32% for patients relapsing in 2006-2008, to 63% for patients relapsing in 2015-2017 (p = 0.001). The improvement over time was predominantly noted in patients who had an early relapse (within 12 months) after auto-SCT (p = 0.01). On multivariate analysis, patients who relapsed in more recent years and those with a longer interval from transplant to relapse had a better OS, whereas increasing age, poor performance status, bulky disease, extranodal disease and presence of B symptoms at relapse were associated with a worse OS. Brentuximab vedotin (BV), checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) and second transplant (SCT2; 86% allogeneic) were used in 233, 91 and 330 patients respectively. The 4-year OS from BV, CPI, and SCT2 use was 55%, 48% and 55% respectively. In conclusion, the outcome after post-transplant relapse has improved significantly in recent years, particularly in the case of early relapse. These large-scale real-world data can serve as benchmark for future studies in this setting.

We retrospectively compared outcomes of a large series of adult patients with APL in CR2 receiving alloHSCT (n = 228) or autoHSCT (n = 341) reported to the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation from January 2004 to December 2018. The 2-year cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality was significantly higher for alloHSCT 17.3% (95% CI 12.5–22.8) compared with autoHSCT 2.7% (95% CI 1.2–5) (p = 0.001), while differences in relapse rate were not significant (28% versus 22.9%; p = 0.28). Leukemia-free survival (LFS) and overall survival (OS) favored autoHSCT with 74.5% (95% CI 69–79.2) and 82.4% (95% CI 77.3–86.5) compared with alloHSCT with 54.7% (95% CI 47.5–61.3) (p = 0.001) and 64.3% (95% CI 57.2–70.6), respectively (p = 0.001 and p = 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed significantly worse LFS after alloHSCT (HR 0.49; 95% CI 0.37–0.67; p < 0.0001), older age (p = 0.001), and shorter time from diagnosis to transplant (p = 0.00015). Similar results were obtained for OS. The study shows that autoHSCT resulted in better survival outcomes (LFS and OS) for APL in CR2. These results were mainly due to reduced NRM in the autoHSCT as compared to alloHSCT.

We retrospectively compared outcomes of a large series of adult patients with APL in CR2 receiving alloHSCT (n = 228) or autoHSCT (n = 341) reported to the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation from January 2004 to December 2018. The 2-year cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality was significantly higher for alloHSCT 17.3% (95% CI 12.5-22.8) compared with autoHSCT 2.7% (95% CI 1.2-5) (p = 0.001), while differences in relapse rate were not significant (28% versus 22.9%; p = 0.28). Leukemia-free survival (LFS) and overall survival (OS) favored autoHSCT with 74.5% (95% CI 69-79.2) and 82.4% (95% CI 77.3-86.5) compared with alloHSCT with 54.7% (95% CI 47.5-61.3) (p = 0.001) and 64.3% (95% CI 57.2-70.6), respectively (p = 0.001 and p = 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed significantly worse LFS after alloHSCT (HR 0.49; 95% CI 0.37-0.67; p 0.0001), older age (p = 0.001), and shorter time from diagnosis to transplant (p = 0.00015). Similar results were obtained for OS. The study shows that autoHSCT resulted in better survival outcomes (LFS and OS) for APL in CR2. These results were mainly due to reduced NRM in the autoHSCT as compared to alloHSCT.

The present study aimed at describing the outcome of patients with HIV-associated lymphomas following autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (autoHCT) in the rituximab and combined antiretroviral therapy (cART) era. Eligible for this retrospective study were HIV-positive patients with lymphoma who received autoHCT between 2007 and 2013. A total of 118 patients were included with a median age of 45 years (range 24-66). Underlying diagnoses were diffuse large B cell lymphoma in 47%, Hodgkin lymphoma in 24%, Burkitt lymphoma in 18%, and plasmablastic lymphoma in 7% of patients. Disease status at autoHCT was complete remission in 44%, partial remission (PR) in 38%, and less than PR in 18% of the patients. With a median follow-up of 4 years, 3-year non-relapse mortality, incidence of relapse, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 10%, 27%, 63% and 66%, respectively. By multivariate analysis, disease status less than PR but not CD4+ cell count at the time of autoHCT was a significant predictor of unfavorable PFS and OS. In conclusion, in the era of cART and chemoimmunotherapy, the outcome of autoHCT for HIV-related lymphoma is driven by lymphoma-dependent risk factors rather than by characteristics of the HIV infection.

Oral busulfan is the historical backbone of the busulfan+cyclophosphamide regimen for autologous stem cell transplantation. However intravenous busulfan has more predictable pharmacokinetics and less toxicity than oral busulfan; we, therefore, retrospectively analyzed data from 952 patients with acute myeloid leukemia who received intravenous busulfan for autologous stem cell transplantation. Most patients were male (n=531, 56%), and the median age at transplantation was 50.5 years. Two-year overall survival, leukemia-free survival, and relapse incidence were 67 +/- 2%, 53 +/- 2%, and 40 +/- 2%, respectively. The non-relapse mortality rate at 2 years was 7 +/- 1%. Five patients died from veno-occlusive disease. Overall leukemia-free survival and relapse incidence at 2 years did not differ significantly between the 815 patients transplanted in first complete remission (52 +/- 2% and 40 +/- 2%, respectively) and the 137 patients transplanted in second complete remission (58 +/- 5% and 35 +/- 5%, respectively). Cytogenetic risk classification and age were significant prognostic factors: the 2-year leukemia-free survival was 63 +/- 4% in patients with good risk cytogenetics, 52 +/- 3% in those with intermediate risk cytogenetics, and 37 +/- 10% in those with poor risk cytogenetics (P=0.01); patients