Search

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of busulfan (BU) is currently performed by plasma sampling in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Saliva samples are considered a noninvasive TDM matrix. Currently, no salivary population pharmacokinetics (PopPKs) model for BU available. This study aimed to develop a PopPK model that can describe the relationship between plasma and saliva kinetics in patients receiving intravenous BU. The performance of the model in predicting the area under the concentration-time curve at steady state (AUC ss ) based on saliva samples is evaluated. Sixty-six patients with HSCT were recruited and administered 0.8 mg/kg BU intravenously. A PopPK model for saliva and plasma was developed using the nonlinear mixed effects model. Bayesian maximum a posteriori (MAP) optimization was used to estimate the model's predictive performance. Plasma and saliva PKs were adequately described with a one-compartment model and a scaled central compartment. Body surface area correlated positively with both clearance and apparent volume of distribution (Vd), whereas alkaline phosphatase correlated negatively with Vd. Simulations demonstrated that the percentage root mean squared prediction error and lower and upper limits of agreements reduced to 10.02% and -16.96% to 22.86% based on five saliva samples. Saliva can be used as an alternative matrix to plasma in TDM of BU. The AUC ss can be predicted from saliva concentration by Bayesian MAP optimization, which can be used to design personalized dosing for BU., (© 2023 The Authors. CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

Background: Personalizing busulfan doses to target a narrow plasma exposure has improved the efficacy and lowered the toxicity of busulfan-based conditioning regimens used in hematopoietic cell transplant. Regional regulations guide interlaboratory proficiency testing for busulfan concentration quantification and monitoring. To date, there have been no comparisons of the busulfan pharmacokinetic modeling and dose recommendation protocols used in these laboratories. Here, in collaboration with the Dutch Association for Quality Assessment in Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology, a novel interlaboratory proficiency program for the quantitation in plasma, pharmacokinetic modeling, and dosing of busulfan was designed. The methods and results of the first 2 rounds of this proficiency testing are described herein., Methods: A novel method was developed to stabilize busulfan in N,N-dimethylacetamide, which allowed shipping of the proficiency samples without dry ice. In each round, participating laboratories reported their results for 2 proficiency samples (one low and one high busulfan concentrations) and a theoretical case assessing their pharmacokinetic modeling and dose recommendations. All participants were blinded to the answers; descriptive statistics were used to evaluate their overall performance. The guidelines suggested that answers within ±15% for busulfan concentrations and ±10% for busulfan plasma exposure and dose recommendation were to be considered accurate., Results: Of the 4 proficiency samples evaluated, between 67% and 85% of the busulfan quantitation results were accurate (ie, within 85%-115% of the reference value). The majority (88% round #1; 71% round #2) of the dose recommendation answers were correct., Conclusions: A proficiency testing program by which laboratories are alerted to inaccuracies in their quantitation, pharmacokinetic modeling, and dose recommendations for busulfan in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients was developed. These rounds of proficiency testing suggests that additional educational efforts and proficiency rounds are needed to ensure appropriate busulfan dosing., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Busulfan (Bu) is commonly used in myeloablative conditioning regimens for children undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The standard target area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of Bu is approximately 900-1500 µM min. In previous studies using five fixed doses (0.8-1.2 mg/kg) for Bu without dose adjustment, 75% patients achieved the target AUC. The aim of this pilot study was to determine the percentage of target AUC for intravenous (IV) Bu in Thai children. IV Bu was administered every 6 h over 16 doses. Blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis after the first, ninth, and thirteenth doses of Bu. Seven patients (2-14 years; median 6 years) were diagnosed with thalassemia ( n  = 4), acute myeloid leukemia ( n  = 2), and pure red cell aplasia. Three, two, and two patients received Bu at 1.1, 1.2, and 0.8 mg/kg, respectively. The AUC of Bu varied from 292-1714 µM min (median = 804). Nine (42.86%), eleven (52.38%), and one (4.76%) AUC values were within, below, and above the target, respectively. The median (range) Bu clearance was 5.93 (1.91-14.65) mL/min/kg. In this study, 42.86% AUC value achieved the target, which was lower than that in previous studies. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of Bu should be considered in Thai children receiving five fixed doses of IV Bu, and dose adjustment should be performed as necessary. Further PK studies for Bu with a larger sample size are warranted for confirming the necessity of TDM in every step dose of Bu.(Trial registration numbers; TCTR20190528003).

A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitative detection of busulfan (BU) in children's hemolytic samples by HPLC-tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) was established. In this study, the sample preparation procedure involved a one-step protein precipitation with acetonitrile (ACN) solution, and the HPLC-MS/MS method used Hypersil GOLD C 18 . The mobile phase consisted of 10 mM ammonium acetate solution (containing 0.1% formic acid) and ACN with a flow rate of 0.4 mL/min. Multiple reaction monitoring modes were used for quantitative analysis and the ion pairs of BU and BU-d8 were m/z 263.9 → 150.9 and 272.0 → 159.0, respectively. BU had a good linearity in the range of 0.01-10 μg mL -1 . The intra- and inter-day relative error was between -7.21% and 8.26%, and the coefficient of variation was less than 12.64%. The average extraction recovery rate in plasma samples was 99.76% ± 6.53%, and the matrix in normal plasma and hemolyzed plasma had no significant effect on the detection results. Normal and hemolytic samples could maintain good stability at 4, 25 and -40°C. As a result, this method is particularly suitable for determining BU in hemolytic samples from children with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), and this study provides the methodological basis for further research on the pharmacokinetics of BU in children with HSCT., (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

This study aimed to predict the area under the curve (AUC) of the initial busulfan dose using a test dose with the sparse sampling scheme in adult patients who underwent hematopoietic cell transplant. A test dose of 0.8 mg/kg busulfan was used 2 days before twice-daily intravenous busulfan-based conditioning regimens were administered. The AUC and the clearance (CL) were calculated for both the test dose and the first dose (AUC T , CL T , AUC 1, and CL 1 ) by noncompartmental analysis. The sparse sampling schemes of the test dose were developed by Bayesian method based on the population pharmacokinetic model. The optimal sparse sampling schemes were determined by evaluating the mean prediction error, the root mean square error, the absolute mean prediction error, and Bland-Altman plot. The mean AUC 1 was 7.20 ± 1.48 mg • h/L, which ranged from 4.70 to 9.46 mg • h/L. The AUC 1 was below the therapeutic concentration of 7.38 mg • h/L in 45% (9 of 20) of the patients. The CL T of 3.05 ± 0.56 mL/min/kg was not significantly different with the CL 1 of 3.03 ± 0.69 mL/min/kg (P = .901). A sampling scheme at 2 and 6 hours after the test dose was developed to predict the AUC T (mean prediction error of 1.64%, root mean square error of 6.17%, and absolute mean prediction error of 4.94%). Additionally, the Bland-Altman plot showed that the 2-sampling scheme provided an acceptably accurate prediction of the AUC 1 . A test dose with a 2-sampling scheme was sufficient to personalize the initial busulfan dosing in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients., (© 2018, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

Background: Busulfan is commonly used as a conditioning regimen before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). There is a big inter-individual variability in busulfan exposure and the narrow therapeutic index, especially in pediatric population. Therefore, to achieve therapeutic efficacy and safety concurrently, personalized busulfan dosing, guided by pharmacokinetic study with serial plasma samples, is needed a few hours afterwards., Methods: A fast, sensitive, and accurate method for busulfan measurement was developed, validated, and implemented with liquid-chromatography-mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS). The sample preparation procedure involves only protein precipitation and dilution, and the HPLC-MS/MS method takes 3 min/sample. The assay was linear from 10 ng/ml to 7500 ng/ml (R 2  = 0.99). Recoveries were above 90%. The precision was determined at 3 levels (30, 300 and 4000 ng/ml): the intra-day variability (%CV) ranged from 1.4% to 2.5% (n = 20); the inter-day variability ranged from 2.2% to 5.5% (n = 20). The accuracy of the HPLC-MS/MS test was evaluated with an old HPLC-fluorescence method (n = 84), and a Correlation Coefficient (R) of 0.99 was observed., Conclusions: The analytical performance of the assay allows for timely dose adjustment and has been implemented in clinical service for better clinical outcome., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: There is an increasing interest in use of treosulfan (TREO), a structural analogue of busulfan, as an agent in conditioning regimens prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), both in pediatric and adult populations. The aim of this study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic model and to establish limited sampling strategies (LSSs) enabling accurate estimation of exposure to this drug., Methods: The study included 15 pediatric patients with malignant and non-malignant diseases, undergoing conditioning regimens prior to HSCT including TREO administered as a 1 h or 2 h infusion at daily doses of 10, 12, or 14 g/m 2 . A population pharmacokinetic model was developed by means of non-linear mixed-effect modeling approach in Monolix® software. Multivariate regression analysis and Bayesian method were used to develop 2- and 3-point strategies for estimation of exposure to TREO., Results: Pharmacokinetics of TREO was best described with a two-compartmental linear model with proportional residual error. Following sampling schedules allowed accurate estimation of exposure to TREO: 1 h and 6 h or 1 h, 2 h, and 6 h for a TREO dose 12 g/m 2 in a 1 h infusion, or at 2 h and 6 h or 2 h, 4 h, and 8 h for a TREO dose of 12 g/m 2 and 14 g/m 2 in a 2 h infusion., Conclusions: A two-compartmental population pharmacokinetic model of TREO was developed and successfully used to establish 2- and 3-point LSSs for accurate and precise estimation of TREO AUC 0→∞ .

Treosulfan-based conditioning is increasingly employed in paediatric haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Data on treosulfan pharmacokinetics in children are scarce, and the relationship between treosulfan exposure, toxicity and clinical outcome is unresolved. In this multicentre prospective observational study, we studied treosulfan pharmacokinetics and the drug's relationship with regimen-related toxicity and early clinical outcome in 77 paediatric patients. Treosulfan dose was 30 g/m 2 , administered over 3 consecutive days in infants <1 year old (n = 12) and 42 g/m 2 in children ≥1 year old (n = 65). Mean day 1 treosulfan exposure was 1744 ± 795 mg*h/l (10 g/m 2 ) and 1561 ± 511 mg*h/l (14 g/m 2 ), with an inter-individual variability of 56 and 33% in the respective groups. High treosulfan exposure (>1650 mg*h/l) was associated with an increased risk of mucosal [Odds ratio (OR) 4·40; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1·19-16·28, P = 0·026] and skin toxicity (OR 4·51; 95% CI 1·07-18·93, P = 0·040). No correlation was found between treosulfan exposure and the early clinical outcome parameters: engraftment, acute graft-versus-host disease and donor chimerism. Our study provides the first evidence in a large cohort of paediatric patients of high variability in treosulfan pharmacokinetics and an association between treosulfan exposure and early toxicity. Ongoing studies will reveal whether treosulfan exposure is related to long-term disease-specific outcome and late treatment-related toxicity., (© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background Optimization of the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of busulfan, an essential component of conditioning regimens, improves the outcomes in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Traditional sampling methods for calculating AUC require multiple sampling. Objective To establish a limited sampling strategy for predicting the AUC 0-12 of intravenous busulfan for Chinese adult patients prior to HSCT. Methods The pharmacokinetics of twice-daily intravenous busulfan was studied in forty-five Chinese adult patients. Limited sampling models were established by the multiple linear regression analysis. The prediction error (PE) and the absolute prediction error (APE) were calculated to evaluate predictive accuracy. The agreement between the predicted and actual AUC 0-12 was investigated by the Bland-Altman analysis. The accuracy and robustness of the models was validated by the bootstrap analysis. Results The AUC 0-12 values of the 1st and 7th doses of busulfan were 1491 ± 403.7 and 1908 ± 518.5 μmol L -1  min, respectively. The 2-sample model suggested that the predicted AUC 0-12 of twice-daily intravenous busulfan could be calculated using the following equation: AUC 0-12  = 40.017 + 0.955 × C 3  + 1.088 × C 6 with r 2  = 0.919. The mean PE and APE of the model were 0.52 ± 7.67 and 6.32 ± 4.27%, respectively. Conclusion The 2-sample model is an effective and reliable approach to predict the AUC 0-12 of twice-daily intravenous busulfan in Chinese adult patients.

There are several reports describing population pharmacokinetic (popPK) models of busulfan (BU). However, limited information is available in Chinese hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) patients. The present study aimed to establish a popPK model of intravenous BU in Chinese HSCT patients for individualized drug therapy. The popPK model of BU was developed from a total of 284 concentration-time points from 53 patients. The effects of demographic and biochemical covariates were investigated by nonlinear mixed effect model (NONMEM) software. Plots, visual predictive check (VPC), bootstrap and normalized prediction distribution error (NPDE) were performed to determine the stability and the reliability of the final model. A one-compartment model with first-order elimination process was confirmed as the final structural model for BU. For a typical patient whose body surface area (BSA) is 1.7 m 2 , the population typical values of CL and Vd were 11.86 L/h, and 48.2 L, respectively. The result suggested BSA showed significant influence on CL and Vd (P<.001). Plots revealed the final model was performing a goodness fit. The steady rate verified by bootstrap was 100%, relative deviation was less than 4.00%, estimated value of final model was in the 95% confidence interval (CI). The VPC results showed the observed values were almost all positioned within the 5th and 95th CIs. The mean and variance of the NPDE were 0.0363 (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, 0.298) and 0.877 (Fisher variance test, 0.134; SW test of normality, 0.108), respectively. The global adjusted P value was 0.305, which indicated that the prediction of the BU popPK model was adequate. A physician-friendly Microsoft Excel-base tool was implemented using the final popPK model for designing individualized dosing regimens., (© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

This study investigated the importance of an oral test dose for busulfan (BU) dose adjustment before a conditioning regimen for hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) and the effect of fludarabine (FLU) on the oral BU pharmacokinetics evaluated after the fifth treatment dose (first BU dose on day 2 of treatment). Twenty-eight patients treated with oral BU (1 mg/kg every 6 hours for 4 days) were divided into 2 groups according to the concomitant administration of FLU (n = 15; 30 mg/m 2 for 5 days) or subsequent administration of cyclophosphamide (CY) (n = 13; 60 mg/kg for 2 days). On the day prior to the beginning of the conditioning regimen, blood samples were collected (0-6 hours) after administration of an oral BU test dose of 0.25 mg/kg. Busulfan was quantified in plasma samples by LC-MS/MS, and the pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using WinNonlin software. Blood samples were collected between the fifth and sixth treatment dose to confirm the mean plasma steady-state concentration (C ss ) of BU. The AUC 0-6 and apparent clearance of BU did not differ (P < .05) between the groups receiving FLU and CY. In 81% of the patients who received BU doses adjusted based on the test dose (n = 21), the C ss was within the target range of 600-900 ng/mL. No association was observed between BU AUC 0-6 and clinical outcome in the study group (n = 28). The results suggest that in concomitant administration of FLU and BU during conditioning regimens for HSCT, changes in BU dose should be considered only after the administration of the fifth BU dose., (© 2016, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

Aim: The aim of this investigation was to develop a model-based dosing algorithm for busulfan and identify an optimal sampling scheme for use in routine clinical practice., Methods: Clinical data from an ongoing study (n = 29) in stem cell transplantation patients were used for the purposes our analysis. A one compartment model was selected as basis for sampling optimization and subsequent evaluation of a suitable dosing algorithm. Internal and external model validation procedures were performed prior to the optimization steps using ED-optimality criteria. Using systemic exposure as parameter of interest, dosing algorithms were considered for individual patients with the scope of minimizing the deviation from target range as determined by AUC(0,6 h)., Results: Busulfan exposure after oral administration was best predicted after the inclusion of adjusted ideal body weight and alanine transferase as covariates on clearance. Population parameter estimates were 3.98 h(-1), 48.8 l and 12.3 l h(-1) for the absorption rate constant, volume of distribution and oral clearance, respectively. Inter-occasion variability was used to describe the differences between test dose and treatment. Based on simulation scenarios, a dosing algorithm was identified, which ensures target exposure values are attained after a test dose. Moreover, our findings show that a sparse sampling scheme with five samples per patient is sufficient to characterize the pharmacokinetics of busulfan in individual patients., Conclusion: The use of the proposed dosing algorithm in conjunction with a sparse sampling scheme may contribute to considerable improvement in the safety and efficacy profile of patients undergoing treatment for stem cell transplantation., (© 2015 The British Pharmacological Society.)

In Japan, intravenous busulfan (ivBu) is usually given four times per day as an infusion at 0.8 mg/kg over 2 h. However, as this requires a midnight administration, a once-daily infusion of ivBu at 3.2 mg/kg over 3 h has been investigated as a more convenient and safer method. In this study, 20 Japanese patients received once-daily ivBu in conditioning regimens before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), and blood samples were obtained just before, and 3, 3.5, 5, 7, 10, and 24 h after the initiation of ivBu infusion. The outcomes of HSCT were evaluated prospectively. The median area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) of Bu was 5272 μmol × min/L (range 3491-6284 μmol × min/L), and was similar to those in previous once-daily ivBu studies and to the estimated daily AUC in previous 4-times-daily ivBu studies. All of the patients but two, who died early due to infection, achieved neutrophil engraftment at a median of 25 days after transplantation. No patient was diagnosed with veno-occlusive disease according to the criteria established by Jones. No regimen-related toxicity was significantly associated with AUC. In conclusion, once-daily administration of ivBu has a stable pharmacokinetic profile, and was safely performed in Japanese patients.

Purpose: Older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome have often been excluded from myeloablative-conditioning regimens containing busulfan because of non-disease-related morbidity and mortality. We hypothesized that busulfan clearance (BuCL) in older patients (>60 years) would be reduced compared to that in younger patients, potentially explaining observed differences in busulfan tolerability., Methods: AML patients in three CALGB hematopoietic cell transplantation studies were treated with a conditioning regimen using IV busulfan, dosed at 0.8 mg/kg. Plasma busulfan concentrations were determined by LC-MS and analyzed by non-compartmental methods. BuCL was normalized to actual (ABW), ideal (IBW), or corrected (CBW) body weight (kg). Differences in BuCL between age groups were examined using the Wilcoxon rank sum test., Results: One hundred and eighty-five patients were accrued; 174 provided useable pharmacokinetic data. Twenty-nine patients ≥ 60 years old (median 66; range 60-74) had a significantly higher BuCL versus those <60 years old (median 50; range 18-60): BuCL 236 versus 168 mL/min, p = 0.0002; BuCL/ABW 3.0 versus 2.1 mL/min/kg, p = 0.0001; BuCL/IBW 3.8 versus 2.6 mL/min/kg, p = 0.0035; BuCL/CBW 3.4 versus 2.6 mL/min/kg, p = 0.0005. Inter-patient variability in clearance (CV %) was up to 48 % in both age groups. Phenytoin administration, a potential confounder, did not affect BuCL, regardless of weight normalization (p > 0.34)., Conclusions: Contrary to our hypothesis, BuCL was significantly higher in older patients compared to younger patients in these studies and does not explain the previously reported increase in busulfan toxicity observed in older patients.

This study evaluated the influence of fludarabine on the pharmacokinetics of busulfan administered orally to patients receiving a conditioning regimen for hematopoietic allogeneic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Twenty-six patients treated with oral busulfan (1 mg/kg/6 h for 4 days) were divided into two groups according to the concomitant administration of fludarabine (n = 11; 30 mg/m(2) for 5 days) or subsequent administration of cyclophosphamide (n = 15; 60 mg/kg for 2 days). Serial blood samples were collected on Day 4 of busulfan administration. Plasma busulfan concentrations were determined by HPLC-UV and the pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using the WinNonlin program. Patients concomitantly treated with fludarabine showed reduced apparent clearance of busulfan (110.5 mL/h/kg vs. 157.4 mL/h/kg) and higher AUC0-6 (area under the plasma concentrations vs. time curve) than patients subsequently treated with cyclophosphamide (7.9 µg h/mL vs. 5.7 µg h/mL). No association was observed between busulfan AUC0-6 and clinical evolution of the patients. Although plasma busulfan concentrations were higher in patients receiving concomitant fludarabine, myelosuppression-related toxicity was less frequent than in patients treated with busulfan and cyclophosphamide. The results suggest that patients treated with fludarabine should receive 30% lower busulfan doses during conditioning protocols for HSCT., (© 2013, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

Background & Objectives: Busulfan (Bu) in combination with cyclophosphamide is widely used in myeloablative conditioning regimen prior to haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Its narrow therapeutic range and toxic side effects at high systemic exposure and graft rejection at low exposure emphasize the need for busulfan dose optimization using targeted dose adjustment prior to HSCT. We report here a rapid and sensitive method to quantitate busulfan plasma levels in patients receiving busulfan as part of pre-transplant conditioning., Methods: The method involves simple protein precipitation of the plasma followed by analysis using a high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with tandem mass spectrometry - electrospray ionization technique (LC-ESI MS/MS) in positive ionization mode and quantified using multiple reaction monitoring (MRM). Deuterated busulfan (d₈-busulf`an) was used as the internal standard., Results: The method was linear for the concentration ranging from 0 to 4000 ng/ml of busulfan with a limit of detection of 2 ng/ml and limit of quantitation of 5 ng/ml. The assay was accurate for serial concentrations of Bu in plasma for five consecutive days and the CV was less than 10 per cent., Conclusion: Using this rapid and sensitive method, busulfan levels were targeted and subsequent doses adjusted at our center in 26 patients receiving high dose busulfan in combination with cyclophosphamide or fludarabine.

Systemic exposure to high-dose busulfan has been correlated with efficacy and toxicity after hematopoietic cell transplantation for malignancy. We used the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) to prospectively determine the maximally tolerated systemic exposure to i.v. busulfan when given once daily after fludarabine administered at 40 mg/m(2) for 4 days. Three target AUC levels were planned: 6,000, 7,500, and 9,000 μM-min. Included were patients 16 to 65 years old, with a hematologic malignancy, an HLA A, B, or C, DRB1 8/8 or 7/8 matched donor, Karnofsky performance status ≥70%, and adequate organ function. For level 1 patients, i.v. busulfan doses 1 and 2 were 170 mg/m(2)/day, then doses 3 and 4 were adjusted based on first-dose pharmacokinetic modeling to achieve an average daily AUC of 6,000 μM-min. Doses 1 and 2 for the subsequent cohorts were based on the level 1 data: 180 mg/m(2)/day for AUC 7,500 μM-min (level 2) and 220 mg/m(2)/day for AUC 9,000 μM-min (level 3), with pharmacokinetic targeting for doses 3 and 4. Pharmacokinetic analysis after the last dose showed that 88% of the patients had been exposed to a mean AUC within 10% of the target. Forty patients were treated at level 1, 29 patients at level 2, and three patients at level 3. DLT was veno-occlusive disease of the liver, which occurred in none of 40 patients (0%) at level 1, two of 29 patients (7%) at level 2, and three of three patients (100%) at level 3. Dermatitis (P < .01) and pulmonary toxicity (P = .01) were also increased at higher AUC levels. Level 2 (7,500 μM-min × 4 days) was the maximally tolerated AUC. Within the confines of the trial's small sample size, there was no suggestion that escalating busulfan AUC from 6,000 to 7,500 μM-min × 4 days increased nonrelapse mortality. Assessment of the higher busulfan AUC on relapse prevention requires trials in patients with a homogeneous risk of relapse., (Copyright © 2012 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Does conditioning with fractionated total body irradiation (fTBI) or busulfan (Bu) causes less salivary dysfunction compared with single dose (sTBI) after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT)., Patients and Methods: A total of 74 adolescents below 13 years of age received allogeneic HSCT and conditioning with either: sTBI, fTBI or Bu. The unstimulated (USSR) and stimulated (SSSR) whole salivary secretion rates were measured at 15 years of age., Results:   Irrespective of conditioning type, there were no significant differences in USSR or SSSR between groups. Girls had a significantly lower SSSR, 0.7 ± 0.3 ml per min compared with 1.1 ± 0.4 ml per min in boys (P < 0.001). A significant correlation between age at HSCT and SSSR at 15 years of age (P = 0.02) in children conditioned with sTBI was found as well as an inverse correlation between the plasma area under curve (AUC) of Bu and SSSR. In the multivariate model, only female sex was significantly correlated with low SSSR at 15 years of age (OR 3.93, 95% CI 1.21-12.79; P = 0.021)., Conclusion: No differences in long-term whole salivary function after HSCT in adolescents receiving conditioning with sTBI, fTBI or Bu were found. Total systemic exposure to Bu was negatively correlated with stimulated salivary secretion., (© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.)

High-dose Busulfan in combination chemotherapy has been used commonly for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. It crosses the blood-brain barrier and could cause seizure. Benzodiazepines have been used as anticonvulsant prophylaxis. This is a prospective study using oral lorazepam together with busulfan-based conditioning regimen in 30 children undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The dose of lorazepam used ranged from 0.017 to 0.039 mg/kg (median = 0.026 mg/kg) per dose. None of the patients developed seizure while receiving oral lorazepam or within 72 hours of the last dose of Busulfan. Oral lorazepam was tolerated by the patients, but all patients needed dose reduction due to some adverse effects. In the authors' experience, oral lorazepam is a useful anticonvulsant prophylaxis for children receiving high-dose busulfan.

Purpose: The aim of this study is to determine the population pharmacokinetics of oral busulfan in Japanese adults., Methods: We previously underwent a clinical trial involving the dose adjustment of oral busulfan depending on the individual pharmacokinetics using a test dose in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients. Seventy-one Japanese patients aged from 16 to 67 years were enrolled. After taking oral busulfan 0.5 mg/kg as a test dose, blood samples were collected at five time points from each patient. Busulfan concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography, and the individual parameters were estimated by using the nonlinear mixed effects model computer program. A one-compartment model with first-order absorption was sufficient to describe the concentration-time profile., Results: The final pharmacokinetic parameter were the clearance (CL/F) = 0.153 L/h/kg, distribution volume (Vd/F) = 0.695 L/kg, and absorption rate constant (ka) = 2.39 h(-1). The inter-individual variabilities in CL/F, Vd/F and ka were 25.9, 26.2, and 111.8%, respectively, and the residual variability was 12.1% as the coefficient of variation., Conclusion: We developed a population pharmacokinetic model of oral busulfan in Japanese adults. The final population model was implemented into the program excel, leading to an easy and proper therapeutic monitoring of oral BU by using small number of samples.

The objectives of this study were to develop a population pharmacokinetic model and to determine the covariates affecting the pharmacokinetics of busulfan in Japanese pediatric patients who received high-dose oral busulfan as a conditioning regimen before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Population analysis was performed using retrospective therapeutic drug monitoring data (including test dose data) from 103 children. Their ages ranged from 2 months to 11 years old (mean age, 30 months; median age, 18 months). The plasma concentration of busulfan in all 1028 samples was measured with the same high-performance liquid chromatography method. Maximum likelihood estimates were sought for pharmacokinetic parameters with the NONMEM program. The best structural covariate-free model for busulfan was a one-compartment model with an exponential error model to account for intersubject variability and a proportional error model to account for intrasubject variability. The apparent oral clearance was found to be correlated with age, aspartate transaminase, and type of disease (malignant disease or other). The apparent volume of distribution was related to body weight. The busulfan formulation (1% powder form or crystal form) and dose (milligrams per kilogram) influenced the absorption rate constant. It was estimated that oral clearance expressed per kilogram of body weight is low at early infancy, then increases to a maximum at approximately 2 years of age and, thereafter, decreases. In conclusion, we have developed a population pharmacokinetic model of oral busulfan in children, particularly for those younger than 4 years old, that takes into consideration not only body size, but also several other covariates.

A direct and selective HPLC method with refractometric detection was worked out for determination of treosulfan in plasma and urine of children. Before injection onto reverse phase column plasma samples with treosulfan and barbital (I.S.) were clarified using filtration. The mobile phase was composed of phosphate buffer, pH 5 and acetonitrile. The linear range of the standard curve of treosulfan spanned concentrations of 10.0-2000.0 microg/ml and 50.0-10000.0 microg/ml in plasma and urine, respectively, and covered the levels found in biological fluids after infusion of the drug. The limit of detection amounted to 5 microg/ml for plasma and 25 microg/ml for urine. Intra- and inter-day precision and accuracy of the measurement fulfilled analytical criteria accepted in pharmacokinetic studies. Recovery of treosulfan as well as stability in biological fluids was also calculated. The validated method was successfully applied in pharmacokinetic studies of treosulfan administered to children prior to haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Differences between pharmacokinetics of treosulfan in children and adults were also studied.

We conducted a retrospective pharmacokinetic analysis of i.v. busulfan in children undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and describe its relation to transplantation outcomes. Forty-five children (median age, 3 yr) underwent HSCT at The Hospital for Sick Children from April 2003 through January 2006 and received i.v. busulfan every 6 h as part of their conditioning regimen. Initial busulfan doses were based on actual patient weight: <9 kg, 0.95 mg/kg per dose; 9-16 kg, 1.2 mg/kg per dose; 16-23 kg, 1.1 mg/kg per dose; 24-34 kg, 0.95 mg/kg per dose; >34 kg, 0.8 mg/kg per dose. Plasma busulfan concentrations were obtained after the first dose. The fourth and subsequent busulfan doses were adjusted to achieve an area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC) of 900-1500 microM.min. Development of hepatic venous occlusive disease (HVOD; modified Baltimore criteria) and engraftment (absolute neutrophil count >or=0.5 x 10(9)/L) were evaluated. Busulfan pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using 1-compartment methods. Mean busulfan pharmacokinetic parameters were maximum concentration (C(max); 4.7 +/- 0.75 microM), volume of distribution at steady state (0.68 +/- 0.17 L/kg), elimination rate constant (0.0051 +/- 0.0010 min(-1)), total body clearance (3.5 +/- 1.23 mL/[min.kg]), and AUC (1271 +/- 280 microM.min). Mean volume of distribution at steady state was larger in children <1 yr of age (0.77 +/- 0.24 vs 0.64 +/- 0.11 L/kg; P = .040) and children <4 yr of age (0.73 +/- 0.18 vs 0.60 +/- 0.11 L/kg; P = .001) than in older children. Compared with older children, mean weight-adjusted total body clearance was higher in children <4 yr of age (3.8 +/- 1.40 versus 3.0 +/- 0.76 mL/[min.kg]). HVOD was diagnosed in 8 children (18%), including 4 children <1 yr of age. Children who developed HVOD achieved a lower C(max) than did those without HVOD (4.2 +/- 0.68 versus 4.8 +/- 0.73 microM; P = .035). Other than C(max), no association was observed between busulfan disposition and development of HVOD in children for whom i.v. busulfan doses were adjusted to achieve a target AUC. The influence of factors other than busulfan disposition on transplantation outcomes, such as genetic polymorphisms, should be evaluated.

The objective of this study was to characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) of intravenous busulfan in pediatric patients and provide dosing recommendations. Twenty-four pediatric patients were treated with intravenous busulfan, 1.0 or 0.8 mg/kg for ages < or = 4 years or > 4 years, respectively, 4 times a day for 4 days. Dense PK sampling was performed. Body weight, age, gender, and body surface area were explored for effects on PK, and Monte Carlo simulations were performed to assess different dosing regimens. The PK of intravenous busulfan was described by a 1-compartment model with clearance of 4.04 L/h/20 kg and volume of distribution of 12.8 L/20 kg. Simulations indicated that the mg/kg and mg/m2 regimens were similar and achieved the desired target exposure in approximately 60% of patients. This model suggests that patients < or = 12 kg should be dosed at 1.1 mg/kg and those > 12 kg dosed at 0.8 mg/kg. Therapeutic drug monitoring and dose adjustment will further improve therapeutic targeting.

Purpose/objectives: To provide clinical insights into dosing and administration of IV busulfan, a conditioning agent for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT)., Data Sources: Review of published literature related to busulfan pretransplant conditioning using MEDLINE. Meeting abstracts, investigational protocols, and pharmaceutical manufacturers' package inserts also were reviewed., Data Synthesis: Busulfan is an effective myeloablative conditioning agent for HSCT. The IV formulation increases dose assurance and the ability to target a therapeutic window. Therapeutic drug monitoring ensures that targeted blood levels are achieved, especially in children, thereby preventing underdosing, which can lead to disease progression or rejection, as well as overdosing, which can cause an increased risk of toxic side effects., Conclusions: IV busulfan is a convenient, safe, and effective conditioning agent used in HSCT that has a predictable pharmacokinetic profile., Implications for Nursing: An understanding of the pharmacokinetic principles underlying the relationship between the therapeutic window for busulfan and optimal HSCT outcomes will facilitate proper dosing and administration of IV busulfan.

Background: Plasma concentrations of oral busulfan (BU) were measured in multiple myeloma (MM) patients undergoing autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (ASCT) with a double alkylating conditioning protocol in order to individualise doses of BU based on individual pharmacokinetic parameters and to reduce toxicities related to BU exposure., Patients and Methods: Forty-four consecutive patients with MM participating in the co-operative Spanish protocol were prospectively evaluated. Conditioning regimen prior to autologous infusion consisted of BU followed by melphalan. BU pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated for each patient after the first dose based on measured concentrations and subsequent doses were modified as necessary to achieve target exposure., Results: Mean BU exposure (AUCss) (+/-DS) before dosage modification range from 3192 to 12 180 ng h/mL. Twenty-six out of 44 (59%) patients required dose adjustment. None of the patients developed hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD). Grade > or = II oropharyngeal mucositis was observed in the majority of patients (95%) and the severity of mucositis increased with increasing average steady-state BU plasma concentration. There were four treatment-related deaths: two patients died from multiorgan failure and two of respiratory infections. Of the remaining 40 patients, 15 were in complete remission with negative immunofixation, 21 in partial remission and four in stable disease 3 months after ASCT., Conclusions: The results of the present study show the variability in BU pharmacokinetic parameters and suggest the possible relationship between toxicities and BU exposure. Individualising BU dosage in MM patients undergoing ASCT we observed the absence of VOD.

Background and Objective: Busulfan pharmacokinetic studies suggest that an individual dosing strategy may be necessary to optimise systemic exposure in order to decrease toxicity and improve outcome in haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Therapeutic and toxic effects of the busulfan/cyclophosphamide regimen have been related to the area under the busulfan plasma concentration-time curve. Because of practical limitations in obtaining blood from children, saliva was evaluated as an alternative matrix for therapeutic drug monitoring, offering the advantages of a non-invasive, rapid and easy sampling procedure. Another objective was to evaluate an easy and robust liquid chromatography- tandem mass spectrometry method for plasma and saliva busulfan determination., Methods: An online extraction cartridge with column-switching technique, analytical liquid chromatography over a Chromolith RP 18 e column, and tandem mass spectrometry were used to quantify busulfan concentrations in matched plasma and saliva samples. The study population consisted of ten patients, aged 1.3-19 years (median age 11.8 years, seven females, three males), undergoing haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. All patients received busulfan 0.8-1.3 mg/kg orally every 6 hours for a total of 16 doses, followed by two doses of cyclophosphamide (60 mg/kg/day)., Results: The lowest limit of detection was 2 microg/L and the lower limit of quantification was 10 microg/L. Only 100 microL of plasma/saliva was needed. The mean recoveries (SD) of busulfan were 97.2% (2.7) in plasma and 100.4% (1.3) in saliva. Intra- and inter-assay imprecision was 2-3% and 2-4% for plasma, and 1-2% and 2-4% for saliva (concentration range 30-1,500 microg/L). The bias was <4% for both plasma and saliva. The correlation between the busulfan concentration in plasma and saliva was highly significant (r=0.958; p<0.0001; saliva/plasma ratio=1.09+/-0.04; n=69 sample pairs). The apparent plasma clearance was slightly higher than the apparent saliva clearance (202+/-31 mL/h/kg vs 189+/-28 mL/h/kg; p=0.001). The mean elimination half-life was found to be 2.31+/-0.46 hours for plasma and 2.30+/-0.36 hours for saliva; these were not significantly different (p=0.83)., Conclusion: The present study demonstrated that busulfan analysis in saliva could be a valuable and reliable alternative to plasma analysis.

Summary: High-dose busulfan is an important component of myeloablative regimens. Variable drug exposure may occur following oral administration. Therefore, the use of intravenous busulfan has been advocated. Previous work has suggested a cumulative dosage of 16 mg/kg for haematopoietic transplantation in children less than 3 years of age, but only limited data are available in infants. Pharmacokinetics of intravenous busulfan administered at the suggested dosage were studied in 14 infants (median age 4.7 months). Busulfan plasma concentrations were measured by either GC-MS or HPLC-UV. In seven patients, the dose was decreased to target an area- under- the- curve of 600-1300 micromol min. The median total dose given was 13.8 mg/kg. All patients engrafted. Severe veno-occlusive disease occurred in one patient. Our study demonstrates that a cumulative dosage of 16 mg/kg is associated with higher exposure than expected in infants. We suggest an initial dose of 0.8 mg/kg followed by pharmacokinetically guided dose adjustment.

A total of 109 patients (aged 6-66 years; median, 46 years) with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) were treated with busulfan (BU) targeted to plasma concentrations of 800 to 900 ng/mL plus cyclophosphamide (CY), 2 x 60 mg/kg, and hemopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation from related (n = 45) or unrelated donors (n = 64). At the time of transplantation, 69 patients had less than 5% myeloblasts in the marrow, and 40 patients had more advanced disease. All but 2 evaluable patients had engraftment. The Kaplan-Meier estimates of 3-year relapse-free survival (RFS) were 56% for related and 59% for unrelated recipients. The cumulative incidences of relapse were 16% for related and 11% for unrelated recipients. Nonrelapse mortality (NRM) at 100 days (3 years) was 12% (28%) for related and 13% (30%) for unrelated recipients. The only factor significant for RFS was the etiology of MDS (de novo better than treatment related; P =.03). Factors significantly correlated with relapse were advanced French-American-British classification (P =.002) and International Prognostic Scoring System score (P =.009), poor-risk cytogenetics (P =.03), and treatment-related etiology (P =.03). None of the factors examined was statistically significant for NRM. Patient age and donor type had no significant impact on outcome. RFS tended to be superior in patients receiving transplants with peripheral blood rather than marrow stem cells. Thus, a targeted BUCY regimen provided effective transplant conditioning for patients with MDS receiving transplants from HLA-identical siblings or alternative donors. Although there was still considerable nonrelapse morbidity and mortality, the present regimen was used successfully even in patients older than 60 years of age.

We retrospectively analyzed the relationship between busulfan average steady-state plasma concentration (C(SS)) and graft rejection in 53 children receiving busulfan/cyclophosphamide (BU/CY) preparative regimens prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Patients received a total oral busulfan dose of 11 to 28 mg/kg followed by a total cyclophosphamide dose of 120 to 335 mg/kg in preparation for allogeneic grafts (HLA-matched or HLA partially matched sibling, parent or unrelated donor). Graft rejection occurred in eight (15%) patients. Busulfan C(SS) (P = 0.0024) was the only statistically significant predictor of rejection on univariate logistic regression analysis, with the risk of rejection decreasing with an increase in busulfan C(SS). Severe (grade 3 or 4) regimen-related toxicity (RRT) occurred in four patients. Ten patients (19%) had a busulfan C(SS) higher than 900 ng/ml, one of whom had severe RRT. Higher and variable doses of cyclophosphamide may explain the lack of a relationship between busulfan C(SS) and RRT in children. It may be possible to improve the outcome of HSCT in pediatric patients receiving the BU/CY regimen through optimization of busulfan C(SS) and better definition of the contribution of activated cyclophosphamide metabolites to toxicity.

Aims: Intravenous formulations of busulfan have recently become available. Although busulfan is used frequently in children as part of a myeloablative regimen prior to bone marrow transplantation, pharmacokinetic data on intravenous busulfan in children are scarce. The aim was to investigate intravenous busulfan pharmacokinetics in children and to suggest a limited sampling strategy in order to determine busulfan systemic exposure with the minimum of inconvenience and risk for the patient., Methods: Plasma pharmacokinetics after the first administration was investigated in six children using nonlinear mixed effect modelling., Results: Pharmacokinetics showed little variability and were described adequately with a one-compartment model (population estimates CL,av=0.29 l h(-1) kg(-1); V,av=0.84 l kg(-1); t(1/2)=1.7-2.8 h). Combined with limited sampling and a Bayesian fitting procedure, the model can adequately estimate the systemic exposure to intravenous busulfan, which in children appears to be at the lower end of the adult range., Conclusions: Busulfan systemic exposure in children during intravenous administration can be estimated adequately with limited sampling and a Bayesian fitting procedure from a one-compartment model. Intravenous busulfan pharmacokinetics in children should be the subject of more research.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is the only treatment for selected inherited metabolic storage diseases (IMSD); a significant shortcoming is failure to achieve donor-derived engraftment. This study was undertaken to determine whether busulfan pharmacokinetics (BU PK) are altered in children with IMSD and whether BU concentrations are important in achieving engraftment. BU samples were obtained from 39 IMSD children, including 20 children with Hurler syndrome, undergoing HCT. Patients received oral BU (40 mg/m(2)/dose x 8 doses), cyclophosphamide (60 mg/kg/day x 2 doses) and TBI (750 cGy in one fraction) as a preparative regimen. Median (range) oral clearance corrected for bioavailability (Cl/F in ml/min/kg), area under the curve (AUC in ng min/ml) and BU plasma concentration (Cp in ng/ml) with the fourth dose were 5.2 (2.1-11.4), 318 294 (112 893-640 995) and 950 (314-1780), respectively. Children < 3 years of age had lower AUC and Cp but higher Cl/F (P < or = 0.03). BU Cp (P = 0.06) or marrow cell dose (P = 0.32) was not different in Hurler syndrome compared to other IMSD. A median BU Cp of 959 and 831 ng/ml was achieved in children with full and failed early engraftment, respectively. There was no difference in early and late engraftment between children with Hurler and other IMSD. In conclusion, we found no significant association between engraftment, marrow cell dose and BU exposure when combined with CY and TBI in children with IMSD.

The aim of the study was to correlate busulphan (BU) levels of thalassaemia patients with outcome of allogeneic transplant. BU levels were measured by gas chromatography mass fragmentography. All patients received a standardised dose of BU 16 mg/kg, and cyclophosphamide 150 or 200 mg/kg. For area-under-the-curve analysis (AUC), blood samples were obtained at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 h after the first and fifth dose for all patients, and additional levels were measured after ninth and/or 13th dose in most patients. Outcome parameters examined included veno-occlusive disease of liver (VOD), idiopathic interstitial pneumonitis, chimerism, and day 90 survival. Twenty consecutive thalassaemia patients who underwent haematopoietic stem cell transplantation were studied. The median age at transplant was 11.2 years (range 3-21 years). Mean BU AUC levels were correlated with age at transplant (r = 0.58, P = 0.007). Nine patients developed VOD and six had mixed chimerism, but these did not correlate with mean BU AUC level. Four patients died before day 50 from VOD and interstitial pneumonitis. Patients with BU AUC levels greater than the median (908 micromol x min/l) had significantly lower probability of survival at day 90 (60%), whereas patients with BU AUC level less than the median all survived beyond day 90. No patient had graft rejection. In conclusion, a high BU AUC level was associated with a higher treatment-related mortality in thalassaemia patients after transplant.

Busulfan is an alkylating agent commonly used to ablate marrow before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. High levels have been shown to increase the chance for severe hepatic veno-occlusive disease, for which there is no treatment and which can be fatal. Low levels are associated with recurrence of chronic myeloid leukemia, whereas even lower levels are associated with graft rejection. The therapeutic window for busulfan is narrow and disease and graft-source dependent. Busulfan concentration in plasma is readily assayed by gas chromatography. In the authors' center, busulfan levels determined from the first dose of the drug are used to adjust the dose to that selected to achieve the desired therapeutic outcome by the third dose of the 16-dose regimen. Thus, turnaround time is less than 6 hours. Analytical and pharmacokinetic aspects of busulfan therapeutic monitoring are described. The cost of pharmacokinetically targeting busulfan concentration is < or = 1% of the cost of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.