Search

Cure rates in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) improved using pediatric-based chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation (SCT). However, limited data on the health condition of cured adults are available whereas pediatric data cannot be transferred. The GMALL analyzed the health status in survivors of adult ALL retrospectively. Physicians answered a questionnaire on general condition (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] status) and comorbidity or syndrome occurrence observed after treatment. Five hundred and thirty-eight patients with a median age of 29 (range, 15-64) years at diagnosis were analyzed, median follow-up was 7 (range, 3-24) years. Thirty-one percent had received SCT. ECOG status was 0-1 in 94%, 34% had not developed significant comorbidities. Most frequent comorbidities involved the neurologic system (27%), endocrine system (20%), skin (18%), graft-versus-host-disease (15%), cardiac system (13%), fatigue (13%). SCT impacted ECOG status and comorbidity occurrence significantly. ECOG 0-1 was observed in 86% of SCT and 98% of non-SCT patients (P<0.0001); comorbidity was observed in 87% and 57% respectively (P<0.0001). Our analysis elucidates the spectrum of comorbidities in cured adult ALL patients, with higher risk for transplanted patients, providing stimulations for the design of adequate aftercare programs. Overall, a large proportion of non-SCT patients achieved unrestricted general condition. The data provide a reference for new patient-centered endpoints in future trials.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) is standard treatment for adult high-risk (HR) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and contributed to the overall improved outcome. We report a consecutive cohort of prospectively defined HR patients treated on German Multicenter Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia trials 06/99-07/03 with similar induction/consolidation therapy and HCT in first remission. A total of 542 patients (15-55 years) with BCR-ABL-negative ALL were analyzed. Sixty-seven percent received HCT from matched unrelated donors (MUD) and 32% from matched sibling donors (MSD). The incidence of non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 20% at 5 years. NRM occurred after median 6.6 months; the leading cause (46%) was infection. NRM after MUD decreased from 39% in trial 06/99 to 16% in trial 07/03 (P < .00001). Patient age was the strongest predictor of NRM. The 5-year relapse incidence was 23% using MSD and 25% using MUD. Minimal residual disease (MRD) was the strongest predictor of relapse (45% for molecular failure versus 6% for molecular CR; P < .0001). The median follow-up was 67 months, and the 5-year survival rate was 58%. Age, subtype/high risk feature, MRD status, trial and acute GvHD were significant prognostic factors. We provide a large reference analysis with long follow-up confirming a similar outcome of MSD and MUD HCT and improved NRM for MUD HCT over years. MRD has a strong impact on relapse risk, whereas age was the strongest predictor of NRM. New adapted conditioning strategies should be considered for older patients combined with the goal to reduce the MRD level before stem cell transplantation., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest M.B. received personal fees from Incyte (advisory board) and Roche Pharma AG, financial support for reference diagnostics from Affimed and Regeneron, grants and personal fees from Amgen (advisory board, speakers bureau, travel support), and personal fees from Janssen (speakers bureau). G.K. received research funding from Celgene and Amgen, Lecture fees, advisory board fees and travel support from Celgene, Amgen, Pfizer, Jazz, Neovii, Takeda, Medac, Biotest, Eurocept, MSD, Roche, Iqone, Novartis, Gilead and Abbvie N.A received honoraria for lectures from Amgen; honoraria for advisory board from Gilead, MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH, Pfizer, Amgen, Travel grant from Gilead, MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH, Pfizer and Amgen. N.G. received speaker honoraria, travel support or advisory board fees from Amgen, Celgene, Gilead, Novartis, Pfizer, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Incyte, Cellestia, Erytech and Morphosys and research support (institution) from Amgen, Pfizer, Novartis, Shire/Servier, Jazz Pharmaceuticals and Incyte., (Copyright © 2022 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Osteonecrosis occurs as an acute and long-term serious side effect in children, adolescents, and adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. It is associated with severe pain and reduced mobility, ultimately leading to joint destruction and significant long-term morbidity. The cumulative incidence ranges from 11 to 20% in adolescents and young adults. In symptomatic patients, multiple joints are frequently affected, which in turns poses a risk factor for the development of severe osteonecrosis. The genesis of leukemia-associated osteonecrosis is multifactorial. Risk factors include the use of corticosteroids and asparaginase. These exert their effects on the blood supply to the bone through hypercholesterolemia, hypertriglyceridemia, and hypertension. Bacteriemia, genetic susceptibility, and stem cell transplantation pose additional risk factors. The treatment of osteonecrosis is challenging and not evidence based. Preventive measurements have as yet mainly been tested in preclinical models., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Evaluation of minimal residual disease (MRD) during first-line treatment and after salvage therapy is part of the standard management of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Persistent or recurrent MRD is one of the most relevant prognostic factors and identifies a group of patients with resistance to standard chemotherapy. These patients have a high risk of relapse despite continued first-line therapy. Although stem cell transplantation (SCT) is an appropriate strategy, patients with high MRD show an increased relapse rate even after SCT. Approximately one-quarter of adult ALL patients develop an MRD failure, defined as MRD above 0.01% after standard induction and consolidation. The best time point and level of MRD for treatment modification are matters of debate. In order to eradicate MRD and thereby improve chances for a cure, new targeted compounds with different mechanisms of action compared to chemotherapy are being utilized. These compounds include monoclonal antibodies, chimeric antigen receptor T cells, and molecular targeted compounds. Essential factors for decision-making, available compounds, and follow-up therapies are discussed., (Copyright © 2021 by The American Society of Hematology.)

Minimal residual disease (MRD) is the strongest predictor of relapse in B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL). In BLAST study (NCT01207388), adults with BCP-ALL in remission with MRD after chemotherapy received blinatumomab, a CD19 BiTE ® immuno-oncotherapy, 15 µg/m 2 /day for up to four 6-week cycles (4 weeks continuous infusion, 2 weeks off). Survival was evaluated for 110 patients, including 74 who received HSCT in continuous complete remission. With a median follow-up of 59·8 months, median survival (months) was 36·5 (95% CI: 22.0-not reached [NR]). Median survival was NR (29.5-NR) for complete MRD responders ( n  = 84) and 14.4 (3.8-32.3) for MRD non-responders ( n  = 23; p  = 0.002); after blinatumomab and HSCT, median survival was NR (25.7-NR) ( n  = 61) and 16.5 (1.1-NR) ( n  = 10; p  = 0.065), respectively. This final analysis suggests complete MRD response during blinatumomab treatment is curative. Post-hoc analysis of study data suggests while post blinatumomab HSCT may be beneficial in appropriate patients, long-term survival without HSCT is also possible.

Background: Blinatumomab, a bispecific T-cell-engaging (BiTE®) immuno-oncology therapy, demonstrated superior overall survival versus standard-of-care chemotherapy (SOC) in adults with relapsed/refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R ALL) in the phase 3 TOWER study. Herein, the authors reported clinical features and outcomes for those patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) after treatment with blinatumomab., Methods: In the TOWER study, adults with R/R ALL were randomized 2:1 to receive blinatumomab or SOC. Study treatment consisted of 2 cycles of induction with blinatumomab or SOC followed by consolidation and maintenance therapy. At any time after the first cycle, patients who were eligible for HSCT could proceed to HSCT., Results: Of the 97 patients who underwent HSCT during the study, baseline characteristics generally were comparable and donor types were similar between the patients treated with blinatumomab (65 patients) and those receiving SOC (32 patients). There was no evidence to suggest that the survival benefit of HSCT differed between the patients treated with blinatumomab and those receiving SOC (P = .68). On the basis of descriptive statistics, a survival benefit of HSCT versus no HSCT was not observed in patients who achieved complete remission with full, partial, or incomplete hematologic recovery with blinatumomab (odds ratio, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.54-2.53). The best outcomes were achieved in patients with no prior salvage therapy and with minimal residual disease response to blinatumomab regardless of on-study HSCT status., Conclusions: Survival was found to be driven by response to study treatment and by salvage status regardless of on-study HSCT status. These data should be interpreted with caution because the current study was not designed to prospectively assess survival outcomes associated with HSCT after blinatumomab., Lay Summary: Evidence before this study: Blinatumomab is associated with superior morphologic and molecular response rates and superior overall outcome when compared with standard of care chemotherapy in adults with relapsed/refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Added value of this study: The best outcomes with blinatumomab were observed in patients who achieved minimal residual disease remission in first salvage treatment regardless of subsequent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Implications of all the available evidence: Patients achieving CR/CRh/CRi following blinatumomab can have a durable response with or without HSCT., (© 2019 American Cancer Society.)

Objectives: Detectable minimal residual disease (MRD) after therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the strongest predictor of hematologic relapse. This study evaluated outcomes of patients with B-cell precursor ALL with MRD of ≥10 -4 Methods: Study population was from ALL study groups in Europe managed in national study protocols 2000-2014. MRD was measured by polymerase chain reaction or flow cytometry. Patients were age ≥15 years at initial ALL diagnosis. Patients were excluded if exposed to blinatumomab within 18 months of baseline or prior alloHSCT., Results: Of 272 patients in CR1, baseline MRD was ≥10 -1 , 10 -2 to <10 -1 , 10 -3 to <10 -2 , and 10 -4 to <10 -3 in 15 (6%), 71 (26%), 109 (40%), and 77 (28%) patients, respectively. Median duration of complete remission (DoR) was 18.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.9-27.2), median relapse-free survival (RFS) was 12.4 months (95% CI, 10.0-19.0) and median overall survival (OS) was 32.5 months (95% CI, 23.6-48.0). Lower baseline MRD level (P ≤ .0003) and white blood cell count <30,000/µL at diagnosis (P ≤ .0053) were strong predictors for better RFS and DoR. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) was associated with longer RFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.59; 95% CI, 0.41-0.84) and DoR (HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.29-0.64); the association with OS was not significant (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.50-1.05)., Discussion: In conclusion, RFS, DoR, and OS are relatively short in patients with MRD-positive ALL, particularly at higher MRD levels. AlloHSCT may improve survival but has limitations. Alternative approaches are needed to improve outcomes in MRD-positive ALL.

Attaining complete remission of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) correlates with better post-transplant outcomes. Inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO), an anti-CD22 antibody conjugated to calicheamicin, has shown significantly higher rates of remission, minimal residual disease negativity, and HSCT versus standard chemotherapy in treating relapsed/refractory (R/R) ALL. We investigated the role of previous transplant and proceeding directly to HSCT after remission as factors in determining post-transplant survival in the setting of InO treatment for R/R ALL. The analyzed population comprised InO-treated patients who proceeded to allogeneic HSCT in 2 clinical trials (phase 1/2: NCT01363297 and phase 3: NCT01564784). Overall survival (OS) was defined as time from HSCT to death (any cause). Of 236 InO-treated patients, 101 (43%) proceeded to allogeneic HSCT and were included in this analysis. Most received InO as first salvage (62%); 85% had no previous HSCT. Median (95% confidence interval [CI]) post-transplant OS was 9.2 months (5.1, not evaluable) with 2-year survival probability (95% CI) of 41% (32% to 51%). In first-HSCT patients (n = 86), median (95% CI) post-transplant OS was 11.8 months (5.9, not evaluable) with 2-year survival probability (95% CI) of 46% (35% to 56%); some patients relapsed and needed additional treatment before HSCT (n = 28). Those who went directly to first HSCT upon remission with no additional salvage/induction treatment (n = 73) fared best: median post-transplant OS was not reached with a 2-year survival probability (95% CI) of 51% (39% to 62%). In patients with R/R ALL, InO followed by allogeneic HSCT provided an optimal long-term survival benefit among those with no previous HSCT who went directly to transplant after remission., (Copyright © 2019 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) have a poor prognosis, and alternative therapies are needed for this patient population. Blinatumomab, a bispecific T cell engager immunotherapy, was evaluated in an open-label, single-arm, phase II study of adults with R/R Philadelphia chromosome-negative B cell precursor ALL and resulted in a rate of complete remission (CR) or CR with partial hematologic recovery of peripheral blood counts (CRh) of 43% within 2 treatment cycles. We conducted an exploratory analysis to determine the efficacy and safety of blinatumomab in 64 patients who had relapsed following alloHSCT before enrollment in the phase II study. Forty-five percent of the patients (29 of 64) achieved a CR/CRh within the first 2 cycles of treatment, 22 of whom had a minimal residual disease (MRD) response (including 19 with a complete MRD response). After 1 year and 3 years of follow-up, the median relapse-free survival was 7.4 months for patients who achieved CR/CRh in the first 2 cycles, and the median overall survival was 8.5 months; overall survival rate (Kaplan-Meier estimate) was 36% at 1 year and 18% at 3 years. Grade 3 and 4 adverse events were reported in 20 patients (31%) and 28 patients (44%), respectively, with grade 3 and 4 neurologic events in 8 and 2 patients, respectively, and grade 3 cytokine release syndrome in 2 patients. Eight patients had fatal adverse events, including 5 due to infections. Seven patients had grade ≤ 3 graft-versus-host disease during the study, none of which resulted in the discontinuation of blinatumomab or hospitalization. Our data suggest that blinatumomab is an effective salvage therapy in this patient population., (Copyright © 2019 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in first complete remission is a standard of care for adult patients with Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and high risk of relapse. However, the stratification systems vary among study groups. Inadequate response at the level of minimal residual disease is the most commonly accepted factor indicating the need for alloHSCT. In this consensus paper on behalf of the European Working Group for Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, we summarize available evidence and reflect current clinical practice in major European study groups regarding both indications for HSCT and particular aspects of the procedure including the choice of donor, source of stem cells and conditioning. Finally, we propose recommendations for daily clinical practice as well as for planning of prospective trials.

Little data are available on the relative merits of chimerism and minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring for relapse prediction after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT). We performed a retrospective analysis of serial chimerism assessments in 101 adult HCT recipients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and of serial MRD assessments in a subgroup of 22 patients. All patients had received myeloablative conditioning. The cumulative incidence of relapse was significantly higher in the patients with increasing mixed chimerism (in-MC) compared with those with complete chimerism, low-level MC, and decreasing MC, but the sensitivity of in-MC detection with regard to relapse prediction was only modest. In contrast, MRD assessment was highly sensitive and specific. Patients with MRD positivity after HCT had the highest incidence of relapse among all prognostic groups analyzed. The median time from MRD positivity to relapse was longer than the median time from detection of in-MC, but in some cases in-MC preceded MRD positivity. We conclude that MRD assessment is a powerful prognostic tool that should be included in the routine post-transplantation monitoring of patients with ALL, but chimerism analysis may provide additional information in some cases. Integration of these tools and clinical judgment should allow optimal decision making with regard to post-transplantation therapeutic interventions., (Copyright © 2014 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Quantification of minimal residual disease (MRD) by real-time PCR directed to TCR and Ig gene rearrangements allows a refined evaluation of response in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The German Multicenter Study Group for Adult ALL prospectively evaluated molecular response after induction/consolidation chemotherapy according to standardized methods and terminology in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-negative ALL. The cytologic complete response (CR) rate was 89% after induction phases 1 and 2. At this time point the molecular CR rate was 70% in 580 patients with cytologic CR and evaluable MRD. Patients with molecular CR after consolidation had a significantly higher probability of continuous complete remission (CCR; 74% vs 35%; P < .0001) and of overall survival (80% vs 42%; P = .0001) compared with patients with molecular failure. Patients with molecular failure without stem cell transplantation (SCT) in first CR relapsed after a median time of 7.6 months; CCR and survival at 5 years only reached 12% and 33%, respectively. Quantitative MRD assessment identified patients with molecular failure as a new high-risk group. These patients display resistance to conventional drugs and are candidates for treatment with targeted, experimental drugs and allogeneic SCT. Molecular response was shown to be highly predictive for outcome and therefore constitutes a relevant study end point. The studies are registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00199056 and NCT00198991.

This is a comprehensive overview on the most recent developments in diagnosis and treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Dr. Dieter Hoelzer and colleagues give an overview of current chemotherapy approaches, prognostic factors, risk stratification, and new treatment options such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies. Furthermore the role of minimal residual disease (MRD) for individual treatment decisions in prospective clinical studies in adult ALL is reviewed. Drs. Ching-Hon Pui and Mary Relling discuss late treatment sequelae in childhood ALL. The relation between the risk of second cancer and treatment schedule, pharmacogenetics, and gene expression profile studies is described. Also pathogenesis, risk factors, and management of other complications such as endocrinopathy, bone demineralization, obesity, and avascular necrosis of bone is reviewed. Dr. Fred Appelbaum addresses long-term results, late sequelae and quality of life in ALL patients after stem cell transplantation. New options for reduction of relapse risk, e.g., by intensified conditioning regimens or donor lymphocyte infusions, for reduction of mortality and new approaches such as nonmyeloablative transplantation in ALL are discussed. Drs. Jacques van Dongen and Tomasz Szczepanski demonstrate the prognostic value of MRD detection via flow cytometry or PCR analysis in childhood ALL. They discuss the relation between MRD results and type of treatment protocol, timing of the follow-up samples, and the applied technique and underline the importance of standardization and quality control. They also review MRD-based risk group definition and clinical consequences.

BackgroundPatients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have a poor prognosis and limited treatment options.MethodsThe efficacy of inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO), a humanized anti-CD22 monoclonal antibody conjugated to the cytotoxic antibiotic calicheamicin, was evaluated in R/R ALL patients in the phase 1/2 study 1010 (NCT01363297) and open-label, randomized, phase 3 study 1022 (INO-VATE; NCT01564784). This analysis focused specifically on Ph+ R/R ALL patients. In study 1022, Ph+ patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to InO (n = 22) or standard intensive chemotherapy (SC) (n = 27) and 16 Ph+ patients in study 1010 received InO.ResultsIn study 1022, rates of complete remission/complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CR/CRi) and minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity (patients achieving CR/CRi) were higher with InO (CR/CRi = 73%; MRD = 81%) versus SC (CR/CRi = 56%; MRD = 33%). The corresponding rates in study 1010 were 56% (CR/CRi) and 100% (MRD). The hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) rate in study 1022 was 41% versus 19% for InO versus SC; however, there was no benefit in overall survival (median OS: 8.7 vs 8.4 months; hazard ratio, 1.17 [95% CI, 0.64-2.14]). The probability of being event-free (progression-free survival) at 12 months was greater with InO versus SC (20.1% vs 4.8%).ConclusionGiven the substantial improvement in responses and rates of HSCT, InO is an important treatment option for patients with R/R Ph+ ALL. Future studies need to consider better characterization of disease characteristics, more sensitive MRD measurements, MRD-directed therapy before HSCT, and potentially combination therapies, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Minimal residual disease (MRD), where leukemic cell levels are lower than the morphologic detection threshold, is the most important prognostic factor for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) relapse during first-line chemotherapy treatment and is standard of care in treatment monitoring and decision making. Limited data are available on the prognostic value of MRD response after relapse. We evaluated the relationship between MRD response and outcomes in blinatumomab-treated adults with relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell precursor ALL. Of 90 patients with complete remission (CR) or CR with partial hematologic recovery (CRh), 64 (71.1%) achieved a complete MRD response (no detectable individual rearrangements of immunoglobulin/T-cell receptor genes by polymerase chain reaction [PCR] at a minimum sensitivity level of 10-4). Eleven patients had MRD

BACKGROUND: Inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) is an antibody-drug conjugate used for adults with relapsed/refractory B-cell precursor (BCP) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The INotuzumab Ozogamicin trial to inVestigAte Tolerability and Efficacy (INO-VATE) previously reported improved outcomes with InO versus standard-of-care (SoC) chemotherapy. This article reports the final INO-VATE results (≥2 years of follow-up) and additional analyses of patient characteristics associated with improved outcomes. METHODS: Between August 27, 2012, and January 4, 2015, this multicenter, parallel, open-label, phase 3 trial randomized 326 adults with relapsed/refractory ALL to InO (n = 164) or SoC (n = 162); 307 received 1 or more doses of the study drug (164 in the InO arm and 143 in the SoC arm). RESULTS: The complete remission (CR)/complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) rate was higher with InO versus SoC (73.8% vs 30.9%; 1-sided P

Background: Blinatumomab is a CD19 BiTE (bispecific T‐cell engager) immuno‐oncology therapy that mediates the lysis of cells expressing CD19. Methods: A pooled analysis of long‐term follow‐up data from 2 phase 2 studies that evaluated blinatumomab in heavily pretreated adults with Philadelphia chromosome–negative, relapsed/refractory B‐cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia was conducted. Results: A total of 259 patients were included in the analysis. The median overall survival (OS) among all patients, regardless of response, was 7.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.5‐8.5 months); the median follow‐up time for OS was 36.0 months (range, 0.3‐60.8 months). The median relapse‐free survival (RFS) among patients who achieved a complete remission (CR) or complete remission with partial hematologic recovery (CRh) in the first 2 cycles (n = 123) was 7.7 months (95% CI, 6.2‐10.0 months); the median follow‐up time for RFS was 35.0 months (range, 9.5‐59.5 months). OS and RFS plateaued with 3‐year rates of 17.7% and 23.4%, respectively. The cumulative incidence function of the time to relapse, with death not due to relapse considered a competing risk, for patients who achieved a CR/CRh within 2 cycles of treatment also plateaued with a 3‐year relapse rate of 59.3%. For patients who achieved a CR/CRh with blinatumomab followed by allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation while in continuous CR, the median OS was 18.1 months (95% CI, 10.3‐30.0 months) with a 3‐year survival rate of 37.2%. Conclusions: These data suggest that long‐term survival is possible after blinatumomab therapy. Lay Summary: Immuno‐oncology therapies such as blinatumomab activate the patient's own immune system to kill cancer cells.This study combined follow‐up data from 2 blinatumomab‐related clinical trials to evaluate long‐term survival in patients with relapsed and/or refractory B‐cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia at high risk for unfavorable outcomes.Among patients who achieved a deep response with blinatumomab, one‐third lived 3 years or longer. These findings suggest that long‐term survival is possible after treatment with blinatumomab. Patients achieving remission after blinatumomab can have a durable response. The survival plateau indicates a high probability of a cure in those patients responding to blinatumomab and alive after 3 years. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Survival outcomes from a single‐arm phase 2 blinatumomab study in patients with minimal residual disease (MRD)‐positive B‐cell precursor (BCP)‐acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) were compared with those receiving standard of care (SOC) in a historic data set. Methods: The primary analysis comprised adult Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)‐negative patients in first complete haematologic remission (MRD ≥ 10−3). Relapse‐free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between blinatumomab‐ and SOC‐treatment groups. Baseline differences between groups were adjusted by propensity scores. Results: The primary analysis included 73 and 182 patients from the blinatumomab and historic data sets, respectively. When weighted by age to the blinatumomab‐treatment group, median RFS was 7.8 months and median OS was 25.9 months in the SOC‐treated group. In the blinatumomab study, median RFS was 35.2 months; median OS was not evaluable. Propensity score weighting achieved balance with seven baseline prognostic factors. With adjustment for haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) status, a 50% reduction in risk of relapse or death was observed with blinatumomab vs SOC. Median RFS, unadjusted for HSCT status, was 35.2 months with blinatumomab and 8.3 months with SOC. Conclusions: These analyses suggest that blinatumomab improves RFS, and possibly OS, in adults with MRD‐positive Ph‐negative BCP‐ALL vs SOC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Approximately 30% to 50% of adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in hematologic complete remission after multiagent therapy exhibit minimal residual disease (MRD) by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction or flow cytometry. MRD is the strongest predictor of relapse in ALL. In this open-label, single-arm study, adults with B-cell precursor ALL in hematologic complete remission with MRD (≥10-3) received blinatumomab 15 μg/m2 per day by continuous IV infusion for up to 4 cycles. Patients could undergo allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation any time after cycle 1. The primary end point was complete MRD response status after 1 cycle of blinatumomab. One hundred sixteen patients received blinatumomab. Eighty-eight (78%) of 113 evaluable patients achieved a complete MRD response. In the subgroup of 110 patients with Ph-negative ALL in hematologic remission, the Kaplan-Meier estimate of relapse-free survival (RFS) at 18 months was 54%. Median overall survival (OS) was 36.5 months. In landmark analyses, complete MRD responders had longer RFS (23.6 vs 5.7 months; P = .002) and OS (38.9 vs 12.5 months; P = .002) compared with MRD nonresponders. Adverse events were consistent with previous studies of blinatumomab. Twelve (10%) and 3 patients (3%) had grade 3 or 4 neurologic events, respectively. Four patients (3%) had cytokine release syndrome grade 1, n = 2; grade 3, n = 2), all during cycle 1. After treatment with blinatumomab in a population of patients with MRD-positive B-cell precursor ALL, a majority achieved a complete MRD response, which was associated with significantly longer RFS and OS compared with MRD nonresponders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The outcome of adult acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) has improved significantly during the past decade, mainly due to intensive paediatric-based chemotherapy. Less improvement has been observed in older patients. A significantly lower rate of complete remissions, higher early mortality, higher relapse rate and poorer survival is observed in older compared with younger ALL patients. Most importantly, intensive chemotherapy with or without stem-cell transplantation is less well tolerated in older patients. In addition, there is an increasing incidence of poor prognostic factors with increasing age. Progress has been made with the development of age-adapted, moderately intensive chemotherapy protocols for Ph/BCR-ABL-negative ALL and combinations of tyrosine kinase inhibitors with chemotherapy in Ph/BCR-ABL-positive ALL. Future progress can be expected from new targeted therapies, particularly novel immunotherapies, moderately intensified consolidation strategies and reduced intensity stem-cell transplantation. For this purpose, prospective clinical trials for older patients are urgently needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Older adults with relapsed/refractory B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (r/r ALL) are reported to have a poor prognosis and few therapeutic options. In the current study, the authors evaluated treatment with single-agent blinatumomab in adults aged ≥65 years with r/r ALL.Methods: A total of 261 adults with r/r ALL who were examined across two phase 2 studies received blinatumomab in cycles of 4-week continuous infusion and 2-week treatment-free intervals. The primary endpoint in each study was complete remission (CR) or CR with partial hematologic recovery (CRh) during the first 2 cycles. Data were pooled and analyzed according to patient age at screening (aged ≥65 years vs aged <65 years).Results: Of 36 older adults, 56% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 38%-72%) achieved CR/CRh during the first 2 cycles compared with 46% (225 patients) (95% CI, 40%-53%) of younger adults. Complete minimal residual disease responses were 60% in older and 70% in younger responders. Three older responders (15%) and 61 younger responders (59%) proceeded to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Kaplan-Meier curves overlapped for relapse-free and overall survival for both age groups. Older adults were found to have a similar incidence of grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) as younger adults (86% vs 80%) but more grade ≥3 neurologic events (28% vs 13%). Cytokine release syndrome occurred in 7 older (19%) (1 case of grade 3) and 23 younger (10%) (4 cases of grade ≥3) adults. There were no treatment-related fatal AEs reported.Conclusions: Older adults with r/r ALL who were treated with single-agent blinatumomab were found to have similar hematologic response rates and incidence of grade ≥3 AEs compared with younger adults but had more neurologic events, which were reversible and primarily resolved with treatment interruption. Cancer 2016;122:2178-85. © 2016 American Cancer Society. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]