Search

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapies have shown tremendous results against various hematologic cancers. Prior to cell infusion, a host preconditioning regimen is required to achieve lymphodepletion and improve CAR-T cell pharmacokinetic exposure, leading to greater chances of therapeutic success. To better understand and quantify the impact of the preconditioning regimen, we built a population-based mechanistic pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model describing the complex interplay between lymphodepletion, host immune system, homeostatic cytokines, and pharmacokinetics of UCART19, an allogeneic product developed against CD19 + B cells. Data were collected from a phase I clinical trial in adult relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia and revealed three different UCART19 temporal patterns: (i) expansion and persistence, (ii) transient expansion with subsequent rapid decline, and (iii) absence of observed expansion. On the basis of translational assumptions, the final model was able to capture this variability through the incorporation of IL-7 kinetics, which are thought to be increased owing to lymphodepletion, and through an elimination of UCART19 by host T cells, which is specific to the allogeneic context. Simulations from the final model recapitulated UCART19 expansion rates in the clinical trial, confirmed the need for alemtuzumab to observe UCART19 expansion (along with fludarabine cyclophosphamide), quantified the importance of allogeneic elimination, and suggested a high impact of multipotent memory T-cell subpopulations on UCART19 expansion and persistence. In addition to supporting the role of host cytokines and lymphocytes in CAR-T cell therapy, such a model could help optimizing the preconditioning regimens in future clinical trials., Significance: A mathematical mechanistic pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model supports and captures quantitatively the beneficial impact of lymphodepleting patients before the infusion of an allogeneic CAR-T cell product. Mediation through IL-7 increase and host T lymphocytes decrease is underlined, and the model can be further used to optimize CAR-T cell therapies lymphodepletion regimen., Competing Interests: T. Derippe reports grants from Servier during the conduct of the study; grants from Servier outside the submitted work. S. Fouliard reports personal fees from Servier during the conduct of the study. I. Marchiq reports other from Allogene Therapeutics during the conduct of the study; and I. Marchiq is an employee of Servier. S. Dupouy reports personal fees from Servier and other from Allogene Therapeutics during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Servier outside the submitted work. M. Almena-Carrasco reports personal fees from Institut de Rechercher International Servier outside the submitted work. J. Geronimi reports personal fees from Servier and other from Allogene Therapeutics during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Servier outside the submitted work. D.E. Mager reports grants from Servier during the conduct of the study. No disclosures were reported by the other author., (© 2022 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Background: UCART19 is an "off-the-shelf" genome-edited anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell product, manufactured from unrelated healthy donor cells., Methods: UCART19 was administered to 25 adult patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) in the CALM trial. All patients underwent lymphodepletion with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide ± alemtuzumab and received one of three ascending doses of UCART19. Given the allogeneic nature of UCART19, we analyzed the impact of lymphodepletion, HLA disparities, and host immune system reconstitution on its kinetics, along with other factors known to affect autologous CAR-T cell clinical pharmacology., Results: Responder patients (12/25) had higher UCART19 expansion ( C max ) and exposure (AUCT last ) than nonresponders (13/25), as measured by transgene levels in peripheral blood. The persistence of CAR + T cells did not exceed 28 days in 10/25 patients and lasted beyond 42 days in 4/25. No significant correlation was found between UCART19 kinetics and administered cell dose, patient and product characteristics or HLA disparities. However, the number of prior lines of therapy and absence of alemtuzumab negatively impacted UCART19 expansion and persistence. Alemtuzumab exposure positively affected IL7 and UCART19 kinetics, while negatively correlating with host T lymphocyte AUC 0-28 ., Conclusions: UCART19 expansion is a driver of response in adult patients with R/R B-ALL. These results shed light on the factors associated with UCART19 kinetics, which remain highly affected by the impact of alemtuzumab on IL7 and host-versus-graft rejection., Significance: First description of the clinical pharmacology of a genome-edited allogeneic anti-CD19 CAR-T cell product showing the crucial role of an alemtuzumab-based regimen in sustaining UCART19 expansion and persistence through increased IL7 availability and decreased host T lymphocyte population., Competing Interests: S. Dupouy reports personal fees from Servier and other from Allogene Therapeutics during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Servier outside the submitted work. I. Marchiq reports other from Allogene Therapeutics during the conduct of the study; and I. Marchiq is an employee of Servier. T. Derippe reports grants from Servier during the conduct of the study; grants from Servier outside the submitted work. M. Almena-Carrasco reports personal fees from Servier Laboratoires and other from Allogene Therapeutics during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Servier Laboratoires outside the submitted work. S. Fouliard reports personal fees from Servier and other from Allogene Therapeutics during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Servier outside the submitted work. J. Geronimi reports personal fees from Servier and other from Allogene Therapeutics during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Servier outside the submitted work. C. Graham reports grants from Servier during the conduct of the study. N. Jain reports grants, personal fees, and non-financial support from Servier during the conduct of the study; grants, personal fees, and non-financial support from Cellectis, Precision Biosciences, Abbvie, Genentech, Loxo Oncology, Fate Therapeutics; grants from Takeda outside the submitted work. M.V. Maus reports other from 2Seventy Bio outside the submitted work; in addition, M.V. Maus has a patent to Patents in CAR T cells for multiple indications pending; and M.V. Maus is an inventor on patents related to adoptive cell therapies, held by Massachusetts General Hospital (some licensed to Promab) and University of Pennsylvania (some licensed to Novartis). M.V. Maus holds Equity in 2SeventyBio, Century Therapeutics, Neximmune, Oncternal, and TCR2 and has served as a consultant for multiple companies involved in cell therapies; board of directors: 2Seventy Bio; M.V. Maus is a consultant for: Adaptimmune, Agenus, Allogene, Arcellx, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Atara, Bayer, BMS, Cabaletta Bio (SAB), Cellectis (SAB), CRISPR therapeutics, Genocea, In8bio (SAB), Intellia, GSK, Kite Pharma, Micromedicine/BendBio, Neximmune, Novartis, Oncternal, Sanofi, TCR2 (SAB), Tmunity, and WindMIL (SAB); M.V. Maus has had Grant/Research support : CRISPR therapeutics, Kite Pharma, Servier, Novartis; speaker's bureau: none. M. Mohty reports grants and personal fees from Jazz, Janssen, Sanofi; personal fees from Amgen, Takeda, Pfizer, Adaptive, Novartis, Astellas, GSK, Oncopeptides, and BMS outside the submitted work. N. Boissel reports personal fees from SERVIER during the conduct of the study; grants and personal fees from AMGEN; personal fees from Pfizer, Gilead, and Novartis outside the submitted work. T. Teshima reports grants from Sanofi, Chugai, Astellas, Teijin Pharma, Fuji Pharma, Nippon Shinyaku; personal fees from Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb; grants and personal fees from Kyowa Kirin; non-financial support from Janssen; grants, personal fees, and non-financial support from Novartis, and personal fees from Takeda outside the submitted work. K. Kato reports grants from Kyowa-Kirin, Novartis, Chugai, Takeda, AbbVie, Eisai, Janssen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Ono, and Daiichi Sankyo during the conduct of the study. R. Benjamin reports grants from Servier and Allogene during the conduct of the study. No disclosures were reported by the other authors., (© 2022 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Background: The prognosis for adults with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia remains poor. UCART19, an allogeneic genome-edited anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell product derived from healthy donors and available for immediate clinical use, offers a potential therapeutic option for such patients. The CALM trial is a first-in-human study evaluating the safety and antileukaemic activity of UCART19 in adult patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia., Methods: This phase 1, open-label study was conducted at eight centres across France, the UK, the USA, and Japan. Adult patients aged 16-70 years with CD19-positive relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia who had morphological relapse or a minimal residual disease level of at least 1 × 10 -3 and had exhausted standard treatment options were enrolled in the study, which comprised a dose-escalation phase of up to three UCART19 doses followed by a safety expansion phase. Patients underwent lymphodepletion with fludarabine (30 mg/m 2 per day intravenously for 3 days) and cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m 2 per day intravenously for 3 days) with or without alemtuzumab (1 mg/kg or 40 mg or 60 mg over 5 days) and received UCART19 doses of 6 × 10 6 , 6-8 × 10 7 , or 1·8-2·4 × 10 8 total CAR T cells intravenously, followed by safety evaluation and disease response assessments. The primary endpoint was incidence and severity of adverse events. Secondary endpoints were the overall response rate, duration of response, relapse-free survival, progression-free survival, and overall survival. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02746952) and is complete., Findings: Between Aug 1, 2016, and June 30, 2020, 25 patients were enrolled in the study and treated with UCART19. Median duration of follow-up was 12·8 months (IQR 2·8-24·8). Median age was 37 years (IQR 28-45). 14 (56%) patients were male and 11 (44%) female. 17 (68%) patients were White, two (8%) Black, two (8%) Asian, and four (16%) from other racial or ethnic groups. Three patients developed dose-limiting toxicities (one at each dose level); one had grade 4 cytokine release syndrome and two had grade 4 prolonged cytopenias. Grade 3 or higher cytokine release syndrome was reported in six (24%) patients and grade 3 or higher neurological toxicity in one (4%) patient. Grade 3 or higher infections occurred in seven (28%) patients, and grade 4 prolonged cytopenia in four (16%) patients. Two (8%) patients developed grade 1 acute cutaneous graft-versus-host disease. 14 patients died, nine from progressive disease and five from infections or other complications, of which four were considered to be related to UCART19 or lymphodepletion, or both. After a median of follow-up of 12·8 months (IQR 2·8-24·8), overall response rate was 48% (95% CI 28-69; 12 of 25 patients), duration of response and median relapse-free survival were 7·4 months (95% CI 1·8 to not calculable), progression-free survival was 2·1 months (95% CI 1·2-2·8), and overall survival was 13·4 months (95% CI 4·8-23·0)., Interpretation: UCART19 had a manageable safety profile, and showed evidence of antileukaemic activity in heavily pretreated adult patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. This study shows that allogeneic off-the-shelf CAR T cells can be used safely to treat patients with relapsed B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia., Funding: Servier., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests RB received research funding from Servier and Allogene and has participated in advisory boards for Kite/Gilead, Novartis, Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb, Cellectis, and Enara Bio. NJ reports grants and personal fees from Servier during the conduct of the study; grants, personal fees, and non-financial support from Pharmacyclics, AstraZeneca, Genentech, Verastem, Pfizer, AbbVie, ADC Therapeutics, Precision Biosciences, and Adaptive Biotechnologies; personal fees and non-financial support from Janssen; and grants and non-financial support from Bristol-Myers Squib, Celgene, Seattle Genetics, Incyte, and Cellectis, outside the submitted work. MVM is an inventor on patents related to adoptive cell therapies held by Massachusetts General Hospital and the University of Pennysylvania (some of which are licensed to Novartis), holds equity in TCR2 and Century Therapeutics, and has served as a consultant for multiple companies involved in cell therapies. NB, CG, and AJ received research funding from Servier. DY reports grants and non-financial support from Servier during the conduct of the study, and non-financial support from Amgen and personal fees from Pfizer, outside the submitted work. MK reports grants and other from AbbVie, F. Hoffman La-Roche, Stemline Therapeutics, Forty-Seven, and Genentech; grants from Eli Lilly, Cellectis, Calithera, Ablynx, Agios, Ascentage, Astra Zeneca, Rafael Pharmaceutical, and Sanofi; and honoraria from Reata Pharmaceutical and Janssen outside the submitted work. MK also has a patent US 7,795,305 B2 “CDDO-compounds and combination therapies thereof” with royalties paid to Reata Pharm, a patent “Combination therapy with a mutant IDH1 inhibitor and a BCL-2” licensed to Eli Lilly, and a patent 62/993,166 “Combination of a MCL-1 inhibitor and midostaurin, uses and pharmaceutical compositions thereof” pending to Novartis. MJF has advisory roles with Kite/Gilead, Novartis, Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb, Arcellx, and Iovance, and recieves trial support from Kite/Gilead and Novartis. TT reports personal fees from Merck Sharp & Dohme; grants and personal fees from Kyowa Kirin; personal fees from Takeda, Pfizer, and Bristol-Myers Squibb; grants from Chugai, Sanofi, Astellas, Teijin Pharma, Fuji Pharma, Nippon Shinyaku, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI (17H04206), and The Center of Innovation Program from Japan Science and Technology Agency; non-financial support from Janssen; and grants, personal fees, and non-financial support from Novartis, outside the submitted work. KK reports grants and personal fees from AbbVie, Chugai, Eisai, Janssen, Novartis, Daiichi Sankyo, Takeda, and Kyowa-Kirin, and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Celgene, Ono, MSD, Mundi, Dainippon-Sumitomo, and Bristol-Myers Squibb, outside the submitted work. FBo, FBi, IM, SD, MA-C, MP, and SF are employees of Servier. SB and AG-B were previous employees of Servier. EB reports personal fees from Novartis, Astellas, Alexion, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, and Gilead outside the submitted work. MM reports grants and personal fees from Sanofi and Jazz Pharmaceuticals; personal fees from Janssen, Celgene, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Takeda, and Amgen; and grants from Roche, outside the submitted work., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)