Search

The development of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in 1-year survivors after matched related or unrelated hematopoietic cell transplantation was shown to be associated with higher nonrelapse mortality (NRM) and worse overall survival (OS). The impact of chronic GVHD requiring immunosuppression (IS) for recipients of haploidentical transplantation (HIDT) with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) who have survived to 1 year post-transplantation has not been studied previously and was investigated for this analysis. A total of 322 adult patients who underwent HIDT at our center were included in this study. The effect of IS-free status on post-transplantation outcomes was assessed. The median follow-up for survivors was 63.9 months (range, 18.3 to 165 months). A total of 163 patients (65%) were IS-free at 1 year post-HIDT. Baseline characteristics of this group were similar to those of patients still requiring IS, except for higher percentages of female donor-male recipient pairs (28% versus 15%; P =.03) and female donors (48% versus 30%; P =.008). Logistic regression to identify patients more likely to be on IS at 1 year post-HIDT identified the use of a female donor as a significant risk factor (odds ratio, 2.11; P = .009). In a Cox regression analysis, patients requiring IS at 1 year post-transplantation had higher NRM (hazard ratio [HR], 4.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.80 to 6.72; P < .001) and showed a trend toward worse disease-free survival (DFS) (HR, 1.59; 95% CI, .95 to 2.66; P =.08), with no impact on OS (HR, 1.44; 95% CI, .90 to 2.31; P = .13) or relapse (HR, .77; 95% CI, .37 to 1.61; P = .49). These results indicate that use of a female donor is a significant risk factor for requiring IS at 1 year post-HIDT. Additionally, chronic GVHD requiring IS at 1-year post-HIDT no significant effect on relapse but is associated with higher NRM and a trend toward worse DFS., (Copyright © 2024 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Few patients with nonfavorable risk (NFR) acute leukemia and myeloid dysplasia syndrome (AL/MDS) undergo allogeneic transplantation (HCT). We assessed whether this could be improved by integrating HCT/leukemia care and the use of haploidentical donors. Of 256 consecutive patients aged <75 years who received initial therapy at our center for NFR AL/MDS from 2016 to 2021, 147 (57%) underwent planned HCT (70% for patients aged <60 years). In the logistic regression analysis, age (OR 1.50 per 10-year increment; P < .001) and race (Black vs White [OR 2.05; P = .023]) were significant factors for failure to receive HCT. Reasons for no HCT included comorbidities (37%), poor KPS, lack of caregiver support, refractory malignancy (19% each), and patient refusal (17%). Lack of donor or insurance were rarely cited (3% each). In older patients (≥60 years), comorbidities (49 vs 15%; P < .001) and KPS (25% vs 10%; P = .06) were more common, and lack of caregivers was less common (13% vs 30%; P = .031). In Black vs White patients, lack of caregivers (37% vs 11%; P = .002) was more frequent. The median time from initial treatment to HCT was 118 days and was similar for Black and White patients. Landmark analysis showed that HCT within 6 months of the initial treatment produced better survival. Multivariable analysis showed that HCT resulted in a significant survival benefit (HR 0.60; P = .020). With the above approach, most of the currently treated patients aged <75 years can access planned HCT. Black patients remain at greater risk of not receiving HCT., (© 2023 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Steroid refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (SR aGvHD) is a major limitation of successful allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) has been used to treat SR aGvHD effectively and with low treatment related toxicity. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of 103 Steroid Refractory aGvHD (SR aGvHD) patients to identify factors associated with improved outcomes including the use of ECP. A total of 79 patients received ECP as part of their SR aGVHD treatment compared to 24 patients who did not. Both groups had similar aGVHD grade and maximum organ stage at onset of aGVHD and treatment initiation. Patients in the group that received ECP had better OS (p = 0.01), DFS (p = 0.008), lower relapse (p = 0.05) and similar NRM compared to the group that did not receive ECP. Patients that received ECP treatment also had shorter hospital stays in the first 180 days after onset of SR aGvHD (20 vs. 38 days, p = 0.03). Multivariable analysis for OS indicated patient CMV status (CMV+ versus CMV-, HR 2.34, CI 1.16-4.69), regimen intensity (Myelo vs. non-Myeloablative, HR 0.39, CI 0.20-0.75), and the use of ECP (ECP vs. no ECP, HR 0.39, CI 0.20-0.75) were associated with OS. In summary, the use of ECP in the treatment of SR aGvHD results in improved overall survival secondary to lower relapse rates compared to other therapeutic modalities that do not incorporate ECP., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Single-agent high-dose melphalan (Mel) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) remains a standard of care in eligible patients with multiple myeloma (MM), and efforts to improve transplant outcomes by intensifying transplant conditioning have mostly failed. Bendamustine combines both alkylating and antimetabolite properties, can induce responses in MM resistant to other alkylators and represents a promising agent to combine with Mel prior to ASCT. We performed a phase II study to test the safety and efficacy of the high-dose chemotherapy combination of bendamustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan (BeEAM) in newly diagnosed MM patients up to 70 years of age. The primary study endpoint was the day 100 complete response rate. Sixty-five patients with a median (range) age of 59 (40-69) years underwent transplantation from 2015 to 2020. Other characteristics included Karnofsky performance status <80%, hematopoietic cell transplantation-comorbidity index ≥3, International Staging System III, and high-risk fluorescein in situ hybridization (FISH) in 35%, 46%, 26%, and 44%, respectively. ASCT after BeEAM was well tolerated, and there were no non-relapse deaths through 1 year after transplantation. Although at least 1 nonhematologic grade 3 toxicity was reported in 58 (89%) patients (including grade 3 febrile neutropenia in 48% and stomatitis/esophagitis in 28%), there were no grade ≥3 renal or hepatic toxicity and no grade ≥4 non-hematologic toxicity. The day 100 response rate was ≥CR1 and ≥ very good partial response (VGPR1) in 40% and 89%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 44 (13-70) months, the 3-year overall survival was 92%, 96%, and 90% for all patients and those with standard- and high-risk FISH, respectively. The corresponding values for 3-year progression-free survival was 57%, 72%, and 40%, respectively. When BeEAM-conditioned patients were compared to historical Mel-conditioned cohort, no significant differences were noted in relapse or survival outcomes in univariate or multivariable analysis. In summary, BeEAM was shown to be a safe and effective conditioning regimen before up-front autologous transplant for MM. Although the BeEAM regimen does not appear to offer a significant advantage over single-agent Mel, further studies combining bendamustine and melphalan in the front-line setting may be warranted., (Copyright © 2022 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

We previously reported the results of Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network (BMT CTN) 1101, a randomized comparison of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) performed with double umbilical cord blood units (dUCB) or with haploidentical bone marrow (haplo-BMT) with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) in the nonmyeloablative setting. Those results showed similar progression-free survival in the 2 treatment groups but lower nonrelapse mortality and better overall survival in the haplo-BM arm. In this secondary analysis, we sought to investigate whether transplantation center's previous experience with haplo-BM and/or dUCB HCT had an impact on outcomes. All patients randomized in BMT CTN 1101 were included. Center experience was assigned based on the number of transplantations with each platform performed in the year before initiation of the study according to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research. Centers were then classified as a dUCB center (>10 dUCB HCTs; n = 117 patients, 10 centers), a haplo-BM center (>10 haplo-BM HCTs and ≤10 dUCB HCTs; n = 110 patients, 2 centers), or other center (≤10 haplo and ≤10 dUCB HCTs; n = 140 patients, 21 centers). After adjusting for age, Karnofsky Performance Status, and Disease Risk Index, we found that haplo-BM centers had lower overall mortality with this donor type compared with dUCB centers (hazard ratio [HR], 2.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.44 to 4.56). In contrast, there were no differences in overall mortality between haplo-BM and dUCB in centers that were experienced with dUCB HCT (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, .59 to 1.79) or had limited to no experience with either dUCB or haplo-BM HCT (HR, 1.36; 95% CI, .83 to 2.21). The higher risk of treatment failure and overall mortality in dUCB HCT in haplo BM-experienced centers was driven by a significantly higher risk of relapse (HR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.07 to 2.97). With the exception of worse outcomes among dUCB HCT recipients in haplo-BM centers, transplantation center experience in the year before initiation of BMT CTN 1101 had a limited impact on the outcomes of this randomized clinical trial., (Copyright © 2022 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

We report a first in-depth comparison of immune reconstitution in patients with HIV-related lymphoma following autologous hematopoietic cell transplant (AHCT) recipients (n=37, lymphoma, BEAM conditioning), HIV(-) AHCT recipients (n=30, myeloma, melphalan conditioning) at 56, 180, and 365 days post-AHCT, and 71 healthy control subjects. Principal component analysis showed that immune cell composition in HIV(+) and HIV(-) AHCT recipients clustered away from healthy controls and from each other at each time point, but approached healthy controls over time. Unsupervised feature importance score analysis identified activated T cells, cytotoxic memory and effector T cells [higher in HIV(+)], and naïve and memory T helper cells [lower HIV(+)] as a having a significant impact on differences between HIV(+) AHCT recipient and healthy control lymphocyte composition (p<0.0033). HIV(+) AHCT recipients also demonstrated lower median absolute numbers of activated B cells and lower NK cell sub-populations, compared to healthy controls (p<0.0033) and HIV(-) AHCT recipients (p<0.006). HIV(+) patient T cells showed robust IFNγ production in response to HIV and EBV recall antigens. Overall, HIV(+) AHCT recipients, but not HIV(-) AHCT recipients, exhibited reconstitution of pro-inflammatory immune profiling that was consistent with that seen in patients with chronic HIV infection treated with antiretroviral regimens. Our results further support the use of AHCT in HIV(+) individuals with relapsed/refractory lymphoma., Competing Interests: PS, Seattle Genetics, Research funding. AK, Celgene, Consultancy, Speakers Bureau, Millennium/Takeda, Consultancy, Speakers Bureau, Onyx, Consultancy, Speakers Bureau, Janssen, Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Hofmeister, Signal Genetics, Inc., Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Celgene, Research Funding; Arno Therapeutics, Inc., Research Funding, Incyte, Corp, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Janssen, Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson, Research Funding, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Research Funding, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company, Research Funding, Teva, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. SF, Mustang Therapeutics, Other, Construct licensed by City of Hope. WN, Atara Biotherapeutics, employment, stock ownership. GL, Boehringer Ingelheim, Research Funding, Beckman Coulter, Research Funding, Stemline Therapeutics Inc., Research Funding, Genentech. RB, Prelude Therapeutics, Research Funding and Scientific Advisory Board, Viracta, Scientific Advisory Board. AN, Janssen, Membership on a Board or Advisory Committee; Medscape, Honoraria; Morphosys, Membership on a Board or Advisory Committee; Pharmacyclics, Research Funding, Honoraria; Rafael Pharma, Research Funding; Epizyme, Membership on a Board or Advisory Committee; Physician Education Resource, Consulting. MM and AMM are employed by EMMES Company. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Shindiapina, Pietrzak, Seweryn, McLaughlin, Zhang, Makowski, Ahmed, Schlotter, Pearson, Kitzler, Mozhenkova, Le-Rademacher, Little, Akpek, Ayala, Devine, Kaplan, Noy, Popat, Hsu, Morris, Mendizabal, Krishnan, Wachsman, Williams, Sharma, Hofmeister, Forman, Navarro, Alvarnas, Ambinder, Lozanski and Baiocchi.)

We assessed differences in presentation and response to therapy in 394 consecutive patients who developed acute or chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after receiving their first allogeneic transplantation (HSCT) from a 10/10 HLA allele-matched unrelated donor (MUD; n = 179) using calcineurin inhibitors or a T cell-replete haploidentical donor (haplo; n = 215) and post-transplantation cyclophosphamide at our center between 2005 and 2017. The median duration of follow-up for survivors was 52.5 months. The cumulative incidences for grade II-IV and grade III-IV acute GVHD at day 180 post HCT were similar, at 39% and 14%, respectively, for haplo-HSCT compared with 50% and 16% for MUD HSCT (P not significant). Haplo-HSCT recipients had a lower cumulative incidence of moderate to severe chronic GVHD, at 22% (severe, 19%), compared with 31% (severe, 29%) for MUD HSCT recipients (P = .026). The time to onset of moderate to severe chronic GVHD was faster for haplo-HSCT recipients (213 days versus 280 days; P = .011). Among patients with grade II-IV acute GVHD, there was no significant between-group difference in organ involvement, with skin the most affected (75% for haplo-HSCT versus 70% for MUD HSCT), followed by the gastrointestinal tract (71% versus 69%) and liver (14% versus 17% MUD). For chronic GVHD, haplo-HSCT recipients had less involvement of the eyes (46% versus 75% for MUD; P < .001) and of the joints/fascia (12% versus 36%; P = .001). Also for cGVHD patients, haplo-HSCT recipients and MUD HSCT recipients had similar all-cause mortality (22% versus 18%; P = .89), but the former were more likely to be off immunosuppression at 2 years post-HCT (63% versus 43%; P = .03) compared with MUD., (Copyright © 2020 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

To evaluate the impact of psychosocial risks on post-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) outcomes, we prospectively conducted psychosocial assessment of 556 consecutive allogeneic HSCT patients who received their first allogeneic transplant at our center between 2003 and 2017. The Transplant Evaluation Rating Scale (TERS) score was prospectively assessed by a psychologist before transplantation, and patients were categorized as low, intermediate, or high risk based on their TERS score. Patients in the high-risk TERS group had significantly longer hospital stays during the first 180 days and 1 year post-allogeneic HSCT compared with the low-risk group (16 vs 13 and 21 vs 16 days; P = .05 and .02, respectively). The survival estimates for low-, intermediate-, and high-risk TERS groups at 3 year were as follows: overall survival (OS), 73%, 60%, and 65%; disease-free survival (DFS), 63%, 55%, and 60%; nonrelapse mortality (NRM), 11%, 20%, and 17%; and relapse, 26%, 25%, and 23%, respectively. In a multivariable analysis, intermediate- and high-risk TERS scores predicted for inferior OS, similar DFS, and higher NRM compared with low-risk TERS score. In a subset analysis of patients with low/intermediate risk per Disease Risk Index, multivariable analysis showed that high- and intermediate-risk TERS scores predicted for significantly worse OS, worse DFS, higher NRM, and similar relapse rates compared with low-risk TERS score. Our findings show that psychosocial factors as measured by TERS score are strong predictors of morbidity and mortality after HSCT among patients with low/intermediate disease risk., (© 2020 by The American Society of Hematology.)

Proteasome inhibition results in extensive immunomodulatory effects that augment natural killer cell cytotoxicity and inhibit aspects of T-cell, B-cell, and dendritic cell function. We performed a phase 2 study that examined the effects of ixazomib for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis (up to 12 cycles) with posttransplant cyclophosphamide and tacrolimus after standard nonmyeloablative haploidentical donor transplantation (HIDT). Ixazomib was started on day +5 (4 mg on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle), with dose reductions allowed in future cycles for toxicity. All patients received peripheral blood stem cells. Twenty-five patients were enrolled with a median age of 62 years (range, 35-77 years) who had acute leukemia (4), myelodysplastic syndrome (7), non-Hodgkin lymphoma/Hodgkin lymphoma/chronic lymphocytic leukemia (8), and myeloma (6). The hematopoietic cell transplant comorbidity index was ≥3 in 68% of the patients. After a median follow-up of 33.5 months, the cumulative incidence of relapse/progression at 1 year was 24% and 44% at 3 years, which failed to meet the statistically predefined goal of decreasing 1-year risk of relapse. Engraftment occurred in all patients with no secondary graft failure, and 3-year nonrelapse mortality (NRM) was 12%. Cumulative incidence of grade 3 to 4 acute GVHD was 8%, whereas moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD occurred in 19%. Nineteen patients survive with an estimated 1-year overall survival (OS) of 84% and 3-year OS of 74%. Hematologic and cutaneous toxicities were common but manageable. The substitution of ixazomib for mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) post-HIDT results in reliable engraftment, comparable rates of clinically significant GVHD, relapse and NRM, and favorable OS. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as # NCT02169791., (© 2020 by The American Society of Hematology.)

Due to perceived intolerance, many elderly AML patients do not receive therapy, and few are considered for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). To better understand "real-world" outcomes, 323 consecutive AML patients ≥ 60 years referred from 2009 to 2017 were evaluated (median age 70 [60-88] years); favorable (fav) in 48 (15%), intermediate (int) in 112 (35%) and poor risk in 161 (50%). Remission induction therapy, either intensive chemotherapy (IC, n = 205) or hypomethylating agents (HMA, n = 57), was given to all but 61 (19%) patients. With median f/u of 34 months, 2-year overall survival (OS) for the whole cohort was 31%; 40 and 33% for IC- and HMA-treated vs. 0% for untreated patients. Early mortality was 14%. Remission (CR/CRi) was achieved in 60% of patients, with approximately half of these surviving 2 years. In transplant-eligible patients (60-75-year-old, int/poor risk, achieving remission), 54 (46%) of 118 received HCT. Transplanted patients had improved 2- and 3-year post-remission survival of 59% and 40% compared to 26% and 18% in similar patients not receiving HCT (HR = 0.59, 95% CI 0.37-0.93, p = 0.023). These results suggest that survival of elderly AML patients may be improved through a coordinated approach of remission induction therapy for most patients followed by HCT when feasible.

T cell replete HLA-mismatched haploidentical transplantation (HIDT) with post-transplant cyclophosphamide is increasingly becoming an acceptable treatment approach for patients lacking timely access to a suitably matched related donor transplant (MRDT) or matched unrelated donor transplant (MUDT). Multiple recent registry and single-center studies have shown comparable overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates among HIDT, MRDT, and MUDT with a significantly lower risk of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) among HIDT recipients. Candidates for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) often have access to multiple donor sources, and a relevant question is whether outcomes can be improved with a younger HLA-mismatched haploidentical donor (≤35 years) rather than an older matched related donor (≥35 years) or matched unrelated donor (≥35 years). We analyzed 406 consecutive allogenic HSCT recipients, with a median age of 54 years (range, 19 to 77), after a MRDT with a donor age of ≥35 years (n = 222), MUDT with a donor age of ≥35 years (n = 91), and HIDT with a donor age of ≤35 years (n = 93). Median follow-up time for survivors was 51.5 months. Compared with MRDT and MUDT, HIDT recipients had a similar median age at time of HSCT, hematopoietic cell transplant comorbidity index, disease risk index distribution, and donor recipient sex matching. The survival estimates and relapse incidence at 3 years post-HSCT were OS (64% for MRDT, 54% for MUDT, and 62% for HIDT), DFS (55% for MRDT, 44% for MUDT, and 58% for HIDT), Transplant related mortality (TRM) (19% for MRDT, 16% for MUDT, and 18% for HIDT), and relapse (26% for MRDT, 37% for MUDT, and 24% for HIDT). HIDT recipients had better 3-year relapse rates compared with MUDT recipients (24% versus 37%, P= .048), with similar DFS and OS in a univariate analysis. MRDT recipients had a better relapse rate (26% versus 37%, P = .042) compared with MUDT recipients. Recipients of HIDT also had significantly lower rates of moderate to severe chronic GVHD compared with MRDT and MUDT recipients (P = .01). Multivariable analysis showed no effect of donor on OS, DFS, relapse, and TRM. Recipients of HIDT from a young donor ≤35 years had similar OS, lower rates of chronic GVHD, and better chronic GVHD-free, relapse-free survival compared with patients undergoing transplantation with an MRD or a MUD donor ≥35 years. This study suggests that given a situation where a choice between a young haploidentical relative and an older matched unrelated donor is to be made, one can achieve similar survival with a haploidentical donor and significantly lower rates of chronic GVHD., (Copyright © 2019 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The impact of conditioning intensity on different disease risk index (DRI) groups has not been evaluated. We retrospectively analyzed acute myelogenous leukemia (AML)/myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) recipients in 2 groups based on DRI, to assess the impact of conditioning intensity on overall survival (OS), disease free survival (DFS), relapse, and nonrelapse mortality (NRM). A total of 380 patients with either high/very high (n = 148) or low/intermediate DRI (n = 232) myeloid malignancy (AML, n = 278; MDS, n = 102) were included in the analysis. Median follow-up for survivors was 35 months. Median age was 58years (range, 18 to 75). Patient and transplant-related characteristics were 41% reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC), 59% myeloablative conditioning (MAC), 13% bone marrow graft, 29% matched related donor, 49% matched unrelated donor, 22% haploidentical donor, and 52% HCT-specific comorbidity index ≥ 3. Among patients with high/very high DRI, there was no difference in OS, DFS, relapse, and NRM between RIC and MAC conditioning groups. For low/intermediate risk DRI recipients of MAC had better 3-year OS estimate (69% versus 57%, P = .001), DFS (65% versus 51%, P = .003), and lower relapse (3-year cumulative incidence, 17% versus 32%; P = .01) but similar NRM (19% versus 17%, P = .04) to RIC recipients. On multivariable analysis MAC was associated with better DFS (hazard ratio [HR], .58; 95% confidence interval [CI], .39-.88; P = .01), lower relapse (HR, .56; 95% CI, .32 to .97; P = .038), and similar NRM (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, .54 to 2.26; P = .781) compared with RIC in the low/intermediate DRI group. Intensity had no impact on HCT outcomes in the high/very high DRI group. MAC improves DFS and relapse compared with RIC among AML/MDS patients with low/intermediate DRI. The finding of no such benefit in high/very high DRI needs to be further explored in a larger cohort with a longer follow-up., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Allografting from HLA-haploidentical donors (HID) is being increasingly utilized worldwide for patients lacking a conventional matched donor. However, its efficacy in older patients with AML and MDS is unclear. We analyzed 127 consecutive allografts for AML/MDS patients aged ≥ 60 years at our center to compare outcomes using HID to those of contemporaneous transplants using matched sibling (MRD) or matched unrelated (MUD) donors. Patient characteristics were similar except HID transplants were more likely in non-white patients and were more commonly performed with reduced intensity conditioning and a marrow graft. For MRD, MUD and HID transplants respectively, 2-year estimates of non-relapse mortality (17, 23, and 9%), relapse (32, 34, and 33%), overall survival (OS) (62, 55, and 67%) and disease-free survival (DFS) (51, 43, and 58%) were not significantly different. Maximum cumulative incidences of grade 2-4 acute GVHD were not different (27, 37, 39%), but incidences of NIH grade moderate to severe (39, 35, 15%, p = 0.028 MUD vs. HID, p = 0.026 MRD vs. HID) and severe chronic GVHD (9, 12, 0%, p = 0.030 MUD vs. HID, p = 0.009 MRD vs. HID) were significantly higher in MRD and MUD than in HID transplants. On multivariable analysis, donor type was not a significant determinant of OS, DFS, TRM, or relapse. However, male gender and high/very high Disease Risk Index (DRI) were associated with significantly higher rates of relapse (HR 1.94, p = 0.047 for male gender, HR 2.48, p = 0.004 for high/very high DRI) and lower OS (HR 1.94, p = 0.018 for male gender, HR 1.80, p = 0.025 for high/very high DRI). HIDs are an acceptable alternative to matched donors in older patients with AML and MDS.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality especially in the first year after HCT. In this study, we examine the long-term outcomes of patients who survived at least one year post HCT without evidence of relapse. We analyzed the records for 389 consecutive patients receiving an allogeneic transplant from 2005 to 2016 from a MRD, MUD, or haploidentical donor, who were alive and disease free at one year post-transplant. Patient characteristics and outcome parameters were extracted from our institutional database where they had been prospectively entered. A total of 389 patients met the selection criteria with donor graft including MRD 37%, MUD 39%, and Haploidenitcal relative 24%. The median follow-up of survivors from time of HCT was 48.2 months. The median overall survival and disease-free survival at 5 years after the first anniversary post HCT was 78 and 74%, respectively. The most common causes of late mortality were disease relapse, chronic GVHD and infections. The major risk factors for late mortality included chronic GVHD requiring immunosuppression, being transplanted between 2005 and 2009 compared to later years and male sex. Patients with high risk disease risk index (DRI) had worse OS compared to low risk DRI. The risk factors for late relapse included male sex and high/very high disease risk index. The projected long-term survival of 1-year survivors following allogeneic HCT is excellent. However, some patients remain at high risk of late relapse and late mortality. Early referral to transplant, adopting post-transplant consolidation strategies for high risk patients, and implementing newer GVHD prevention methods are potential interventions to help minimize the risk of late relapse and death.

The composite endpoint graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) has recently been introduced as a tool to assess the success of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and has been incorporated into recent randomized trials of GVHD prophylaxis by the Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network. As developed, GRFS incorporates "chronic GVHD requiring systemic immunosuppression" as a measure of clinically significant chronic GVHD (cGVHD). However, the decision to start patients on immunosuppressive therapy for cGVHD is subjective and physician-dependent. We elected to assess a modification of the GRFS (m-GRFS) that uses a potentially more objective measure of cGVHD, specifically the development of National Institutes of Health grade moderate or severe cGVHD. A total of 613 patients who underwent a first allogeneic HSCT after an HLA-identical sibling (matched related donor [MRD]; n = 212), an 8/8 matched unrelated donor (MUD; n = 251) or T cell-replete haploidentical donor (HID) transplant with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (n = 150) were included in this analysis. In the HID group, 86 patients (54%) received peripheral blood stem cells as the graft source. The median duration of follow-up was 50.2 months. The unadjusted Kaplan-Meier estimates for 1- and 2-year m-GRFS were 36% (95% confidence interval [CI], 32% to 40%) and 28% (95% CI, 25% to 32%), respectively. The 2-year m-GRFS was 30% (95% CI, 24% to 36%) for MRD graft recipients, 24% (95% CI, 19% to 30%) for MUD graft recipients, and 33% (95% CI, 26% to 41%) for HID graft recipients. A multivariate Cox model for m-GRFS identified donor type, Disease Risk Index (DRI) risk, donor-recipient sex mismatch, and year of transplantation as significant predictors of m-GRFS. Patients who received a MUD graft had worse m-GRFS compared to MRD graft recipients (hazard ratio [HR], 1.39; P = .003), whereas HID graft recipients had a similar m-GRFS as MRD graft recipients (HR, 1.10; P = .43). HID was associated with better m-GRFS compared with MUD (HR, .79; P = .046). These data show that m-GRFS is significantly affected by several modifiable factors, including donor type, donor-recipient sex match, and DRI. Adjusting donor choice and earlier referral of patients for evaluation of transplantation to improve the DRI can potentially overcome the negative impact of these factors., (Copyright © 2017 The American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

An accurate measure of allogeneic transplant efficacy should take into account quality-of-life issues associated with graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). However, unlike death and relapse, GVHD morbidity is temporary in many patients, and this fact must be reflected in such an outcome measure. Therefore, we have defined a new composite endpoint, called current GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (CGRFS), which is the probability, at any time post-transplant, of being alive, in remission, and without clinically significant chronic GVHD, defined as moderate-severe by the National Institutes of Health consensus criteria. Chronic GVHD is considered a dynamic event, which can resolve once manifestations are quiescent and systemic immunosuppression discontinued. CGRFS is achieved through linear combination of relevant Kaplan-Meier estimates. We evaluated 422 consecutive patients receiving an allogeneic transplant at a single institution between January 2010 and July 2015. With a median follow-up of 36 months, estimated 3-year overall and disease-free survival was 60% and 54%, respectively. Conventionally defined GRFS at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years was 33%, 26%, 23%, and 22%, respectively. In contrast, the corresponding rates of CGRFS were 45%, 46%, 47%, and 49%, respectively. Patients living with active moderate-severe chronic GVHD decreased over time, quantitated at 23%, 14%, 7%, and 4%, respectively, at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years post-transplant. Whereas only approximately one-fourth of patients achieve transplant success as defined by conventional GRFS, nearly half of patients, by CGRFS, are considered cured without the morbidity of ongoing GVHD. We propose that CGRFS may represent a more dynamic and accurate estimate of long-term transplant effectiveness., (Copyright © 2017 The American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) is considered the most potent postremission antileukemic therapy in adults with acute leukemia. We analyzed 172 consecutive acute leukemia patients transplanted in complete remission after a T cell-replete alloHCT from either a matched related (MRD, n = 54), unrelated (MUD, n = 67), or haploidentical (haplo, n = 51) donor to look for patient-, disease-, and transplant-related factors associated with post-transplant outcomes. Patients included 123 acute myeloid leukemia patients (first complete remission [CR], n = 94; second CR, n = 28; third CR, n = 1) and 49 acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients (first CR, n = 39; second CR, n = 9; third CR, n = 1) with a median age of 50 years (range, 19 to 74). Median follow-up for surviving patients was 38 months. Cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality at 1 and 3 years was 6% and 17%, respectively. The estimated rates of 3-year overall survival, disease-free survival, and relapse incidence were 59%, 50%, and 33%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, risk factors for inferior survival included diagnosis of ALL, high risk disease risk index, and use of a female donor for a male recipient. Donor type (MRD, MUD, haplo) had no impact on any transplant outcome. Given the favorable outcomes associated with alloHCT in acute leukemia and lack of effect of donor type, a strong case can be made for transplanting acute leukemia patients in remission as soon as any donor becomes available., (Copyright © 2016 The American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Autologous hematopoietic cell transplant (AHCT) for HIV-infected patients is largely limited to centers with HIV-specific expertise. The Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network 0803/AIDS Malignancy Consortium 071 trial is a multicenter phase 2 study of AHCT for patients with HIV-related lymphoma (HRL). Eligible patients had chemotherapy-sensitive relapsed/persistent HRL, were >15 years of age, and had treatable HIV infection. Patients were prepared using carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan and received consistent management of peritransplant antiretroviral treatment. The primary endpoint was 1-year overall survival. Forty-three patients were enrolled; 40 underwent AHCT. Pretransplant HIV viral load was undetectable (<50 copies/mL) in 32 patients (80%); the median CD4 count was 249/μL (range, 39-797). At a median follow-up of 24.8 months, 1-year and 2-year overall survival probabilities were 87.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 72.1-94.5) and 82% (95% CI, 65.9-91), respectively. The probability of 2-year progression-free survival was 79.8% (95% CI, 63.7-89.4). One-year transplant-related mortality was 5.2%. Median time to neutrophil and platelet recovery was 11 days and 18 days, respectively. Nine patients experienced a total of 13 unexpected grade 3-5 adverse events posttransplant (10 grade 3 and 3 grade 4 events). Twenty-two patients had at least 1 infectious episode posttransplant. At 1 year post-AHCT, median CD4(+) T-cell count was 280.3 (range, 28.8-1148.0); 82.6% had an undetectable HIV viral load. Trial patients were compared with 151 matched Center for International Bone Marrow Transplant Research controls. Outcomes between HIV-infected patients and controls were not statistically significantly different. HRL patients should be considered candidates for AHCT if they meet standard transplant criteria. The trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01141712.

The ideal outcome of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is based on survival that is free of morbidity. The most common causes of treatment failure and morbidity after HCT are relapse, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and nonrelapse death. A composite endpoint that measures survival free of clinically significant negative events may be a useful way to determine the success of allo-HCT. We assessed GVHD and relapse-free survival (GRFS) where the events were acute GVHD grades III to IV, chronic GVHD requiring immunosuppression, relapse, or death in 531 consecutive adult patients who received an allo-HCT between 2006 and 2014 at our center. Median follow-up of living patients was 46 months (range, 12 to 123). HLA matched related donor (MRD, n = 198, 37%), matched unrelated donor (MUD, n = 205, 39%), and haploidentical donor with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (HID, n = 128, 24%) were used. Thirty-six percent of patients had a high/very-high Dana Farber disease risk index (DRI). Estimated rates of GRFS at 1 and 2 years after MRD, MUD, and HID transplantations were 34% and 26%, 26% and 17%, and 33% and 31%, respectively, with MRD recipients having a better GRFS than MUD (P < .05). On multivariable analysis, peripheral blood stem cell source (HR, 1.34; P = .04), MUD (HR, 1.41; P = .003), and high/very high DRI (HR, 1.66; P = .001) were all associated with a worse GFRS post-HCT. These data suggest that GRFS can be predicted by patient disease risk, stem cell source, and donor type. Importantly, MUDs produce inferior GRFS to MRDs, whereas HIDs do not., (Copyright © 2016 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Relapse remains a major cause of mortality among patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). The impact of donor type on post-relapse survival (PRS) has not been widely examined. We compared the survival outcomes for patients relapsing after haploidentical donor transplantation (HIDT) using post-transplant cyclophosphamide with those relapsing after matched-related donor transplantation (MRDT) or matched-unrelated donor transplantation (MUDT) at our institution. Two hundred and thirty-seven consecutive HCT recipients with relapse occurring after HIDT (N=48), MUDT (N=87) and MRDT (N=102) were included in this analysis. Median age was 49 years (19-77 years) and the median time to relapse was 156 days (12-2465) after HCT. HIDT recipients had similar median time to relapse (5.8 vs 4.8 vs 5.5 months, P=0.638) compared with MUDT and MRDT, respectively. One-year PRS was worse among HIDT recipients compared with MRDT and MUDT (17% vs 46% vs 40%, P<0.05). In a multivariate analysis, time to relapse (<3 vs >3 months post transplant), no use of donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) following relapse, higher Dana Farber disease risk index and HCT comorbidity index scores at the time of transplant and delayed platelet engraftment post transplant were all predictive of worse PRS. This analysis shows that 1-year PRS is inferior among HIDT when compared with MRDT or MUDT. Lower use of DLI after HIDT may have contributed to this inferior survival.

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is a significant determinant of overall outcome and quality of life in survivors of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Standard initial therapy of cGVHD is based on prolonged use of corticosteroids and a calcineurin inhibitor and has not changed for over 3 decades, despite limited efficacy and long-term toxicity. Rituximab is an attractive agent for the upfront treatment of cGVHD because of its favorable toxicity profile, efficacy in steroid-refractory cGVHD, and ability to serve as a steroid-sparing agent in autoimmune diseases. We hypothesized that a corticosteroid-free regimen incorporating rituximab would result in improved outcomes when used for the initial treatment of cGVHD. Twenty-five patients (median age, 56 years; range, 29 to 77) with extensive cGVHD were enrolled on a prospective phase II trial. Enrollment was limited to patients with first onset extensive cGVHD requiring systemic immunosuppression and without residual or concurrent acute graft-versus-host disease. cGVHD was classified as de novo, interrupted, and progressive in 12, 11, and 2 patients, respectively. cGVHD severity (National Institutes of Health grade) was mild, moderate, and severe in 3, 14, and 8 patients, respectively. All patients received rituximab 375 mg/m(2) × 4 weekly doses, then 1 dose every 3 months × 4 doses, in addition to mycophenolate mofetil and either tacrolimus or sirolimus. No other systemic immunosuppression was permitted, and only a short-course of steroids (≤4 weeks) was allowed at physician discretion; otherwise, treatment was deemed a failure and patients were treated off study. Twenty-two of 25 patients (88%) responded to treatment. Of the 22 responding patients, the median time to maximum response was 161 days (range, 35 to 300 days) with maximum response being complete in 21 of 22 patients and partial in 1 patient. Excluding the 3 patients taken off study for treatment failure, corticosteroids were used sparingly, with only 2 patients receiving any steroids for a median of 15 days (range, 13 to 18 days). Immunosuppression was discontinued in 17 of 22 evaluable patients (77%) with a median time to discontinuation of 300 days (range, 138 to 488 days). After immunosuppression discontinuation, cGVHD did recur in 7 patients after a median of 166 days (range, 21 to 393 days), requiring reinstitution of systemic immunosuppression (estimated cGVHD recurrence rate of 37%). With a median follow-up of 27 months, estimated 2-year overall survival is 82%. This regimen utilizing rituximab in the initial therapy of cGVHD is effective and avoids the use of corticosteroids in the majority of patients. In permitting early discontinuation of immunosuppression while obviating the need for prolonged exposure to systemic corticosteroids, this regimen may result in reduced treatment-related morbidity and mortality associated with cGVHD and its treatment., (Copyright © 2015 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

We enrolled 30 patients on a prospective phase II trial utilizing a total body irradiation (TBI)-based myeloablative preparative regimen (fludarabine 30 mg/m2/day × 3 days and TBI 150 cGy twice per day on day -4 to -1 [total dose 1200 cGy]) followed by infusion of unmanipulated peripheral blood stem cells from a haploidentical family donor (haplo). Postgrafting immunosuppression consisted of cyclophosphamide 50 mg/kg/day on days 3 and 4, mycophenolate mofetil through day 35, and tacrolimus through day 180. Median patient age was 46.5 years (range, 24 to 60). Transplantation diagnosis included acute myelogenous leukemia (n = 16), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (n = 6), chronic myelogenous leukemia (n = 5), myelodysplastic syndrome (n = 1), and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (n = 2). Using the Dana Farber/Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research/Disease Risk Index (DRI), patients were classified as low (n = 4), intermediate (n = 12), high (n = 11), and very high (n = 3) risk. All patients engrafted with a median time to neutrophil and platelet recovery of 16 and 25 days, respectively. All evaluable patients achieved sustained complete donor T cell and myeloid chimerism by day +30. Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) grades II to IV and III and IV was seen in 43% and 23%, respectively. The cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD was 56% (severe in 10%). After a median follow-up of 24 months, the estimated 2-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), nonrelapse mortality, and relapse rate were 78%, 73%, 3%, and 24%, respectively. Two-year DFS and relapse rate in patients with low/intermediate risk disease was 100% and 0%, respectively, compared with 39% and 53% for patients with high/very high risk disease. When compared with a contemporaneously treated cohort of patients at our institution receiving myeloablative HLA-matched unrelated donor (MUD) transplantation (acute myelogenous leukemia [n = 17], acute lymphoblastic leukemia [n = 15], chronic myelogenous leukemia [n = 7], myelodysplastic syndrome [n = 7], non-Hodgkin lymphoma [n = 1], chronic lymphoblastic leukemia [n = 1]), outcomes were statistically similar, with 2-yr OS and DFS being 78% and 73%, respectively after haplo transplantation versus 71% and 64%, respectively, after MUD transplantation. In patients with DRI low/intermediate risk disease, 2-yr DFS was superior after haplo compared with MUD transplantations (100% versus 74%, P = .032), whereas there was no difference in DFS in patients with high/very high risk disease (39% versus 37% for haplo and MUD respectively, P = .821). Grade II to IV acute GVHD was seen less often after haplo compared with MUD transplantation (43% versus 63%, P = .049), as was moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD (22% versus 58%, P = .003). Myeloablative haplo transplantation using this regimen is a valid option for patients with advanced hematologic malignancies who lack timely access to a conventional donor. Outcomes appear at least equivalent to those seen in contemporaneous patients who underwent transplantation from MUD., (Copyright © 2015 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Inadequate T-cell chimerism following reduced-intensity conditioning transplantation may contribute to graft rejection and disease relapse. Anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) enhances early donor T-cell chimerism, but may also deplete donor T cells, increasing risks of infection and relapse. We prospectively tested administration of rabbit ATG (rATG) ⩾14 days before the infusion of the graft, followed by in vivo decay of active rATG levels, to selectively deplete host T cells. Twenty-three patients received rATG total dose 4.5 mg/kg on days -16 and -15, fludarabine 30 mg/m(2) per day on day -7 through -3, IV busulfan 130 mg/m(2) per day on days -4 and -3 and cyclophosphamide 1500 mg/m(2) on day -2. rATG levels were therapeutic in all patients on day -14, but were sub-therapeutic (<1 μg/mL) by day 0 in 82% of patients. Median donor T-cell chimerisms on days 30 and 180 were 100% (75-100%) and 100% (90-100%), respectively. Non-relapse mortality and relapse/progression at 48 months were 17 and 30%. Cumulative incidences of acute GvHD grades II-IV and III-IV were 39 and 9%. Median follow-up is 64 months (46-79 months). Survival and disease-free survival at 48 months were 70 and 52%. These data suggest that selective depletion of host T cells using this regimen is a feasible and effective strategy.

Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) form the foundation of current graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis regimens. We hypothesized that a CNI-free regimen consisting of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) and brief-course sirolimus would reduce chronic GVHD and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) after reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT). Twenty-six patients (median age, 61 years) underwent unmanipulated PBSCT from an 8/8 locus-matched donor (matched related donor, n = 17; natched unrelated donor, n = 9). GVHD prophylaxis consisted of PTCy and brief-course sirolimus. Donor engraftment occurred in all patients. The cumulative incidence (CI) of grade II-IV acute GVHD, grade III-IV acute GVHD, and chronic GVHD was 46%, 15%, and 31% respectively. One-year NRM was 4%. The median time to immunosuppression discontinuation was day +138. With a median follow-up of 20 months, the estimated 2-year overall survival was 71%, estimated disease-free survival was 64%, and estimated relapse incidence was 32%. In patients with a lymphoid malignancy (eg, chronic lymphoblastic leukemia, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, Hodgkin disease), 2-year disease-free survival was 100%, and there were no relapses. Good immune reconstitution was evidenced by low cytomegalovirus reactivation rate of 21% (4 of 19 at-risk patients). GVHD prophylaxis with PTCy and sirolimus achieves consistent donor engraftment, low rates of chronic GVHD and NRM, and excellent outcomes in recipients of HLA-identical related and unrelated donor allogeneic PBSCT., (Copyright © 2014 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Although pretransplant alemtuzumab can reduce GVHD following allogeneic transplantation, it may also increase the risk of mixed donor T-cell chimerism and infections. We hypothesized that the early use of DLI without withdrawal of immunosuppressive drugs in patients with mixed T-cell chimerism would lower the risk of relapse without significantly increasing the risk of GVHD post DLI. Thirty-six patients (median age 59 years) were treated in this phase II trial using reduced-intensity conditioning including s.c. alemtuzumab (total dose 43 mg) and a PBSC graft from a matched unrelated donor (UD). DLI without withdrawal of immunosuppressive drugs was administered to all 25 patients with <50% donor T-cell chimerism on day +60. The cumulative risks of acute and chronic GVHD were 42% and 59%, respectively. Estimated probabilities of non-relapse mortality (NRM) at day 100 and 1 year were 3% and 14%, respectively. With a median follow up 2.4 years, estimated survivals at day 100, 1 and 2 years were 97%, 71% and 57%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, the occurrence of acute GVHD was associated with an increased risk of mortality, whereas the occurrence of chronic GVHD had a protective effect, associated with decreased relapse and improved disease-free survival. Low-dose alemtuzumab and preemptive DLI provides favorable transplant outcomes including low NRM in an older patient population with high-risk malignancies undergoing UD transplantation.

Purpose: T-cell-replete grafts from haploidentical donors using post-transplantation cyclophosphamide may represent a solution for patients who require allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) but lack a conventional donor. We compared outcomes of alloHCT using haploidentical donors with those of transplantation using conventional HLA-matched sibling donors (MRDs) and HLA-matched unrelated donors (MUDs)., Patients and Methods: Outcomes of 271 consecutive patients undergoing T-cell-replete first alloHCT for hematologic malignancies performed contemporaneously at a single center (53 using haploidentical donors; 117, MRDs; 101, MUDs) were compared. Overall and disease-free survival (DFS) were adjusted for effects of significant patient-, disease-, and transplantation-related covariates using a stratified Cox model., Results: Patient characteristics were similar between the three donor groups. For patients undergoing MRD, MUD, and haploidentical transplantation, 24-month cumulative incidences of nonrelapse mortality were 13%, 16%, and 7% and of relapse were 34%, 34%, and 33%, respectively (P not significant [NS]). Cumulative incidences of grades 3 to 4 acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) at 6 months were 8%, 11%, and 11%, respectively (P NS); extensive chronic GVHD occurred in 54%, 54%, and 38% of patients, respectively (P < .05 for those undergoing haploidentical donor v MRD or MUD transplantation). Adjusted 24-month probabilities of survival were 76%, 67%, and 64% and of DFS were 53%, 52%, and 60%, respectively; these were not significantly different among the three donor groups., Conclusion: Haploidentical transplantation performed using T-cell-replete grafts and post-transplantation cyclophosphamide achieves outcomes equivalent to those of contemporaneous transplantation performed using MRDs and MUDs. Such transplantation represents a valid alternative for patients who lack a conventional donor.

Historically, myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic SCT (HSCT) has required prolonged in-patient hospitalization due to the effects of mucosal toxicity and prolonged cytopenias. We explored the safety and feasibility of outpatient management of these patients. A total of 100 consecutive patients underwent a matched-related donor myeloablative allogeneic HSCT for a hematologic malignancy at a single institution. Patients were hospitalized briefly for stem-cell infusion and thereafter only for complications more safely managed in the in-patient setting. The median hospital length of stay from the start of the preparative regimen to day +30 and day +100 post-transplant was 12 and 15 days, respectively. Planned hospital discharge occurred in 79 patients after stem cell infusion. Patients were readmitted to hospital at median of day +7 post transplant, with neutropenic fever being the primary cause for readmission. In total, 18 patients required no in-patient care in the first 100 days. Non-relapse mortality at day 100 and 6 months was 10 and 15%, respectively, for all patients, and 0 and 5%, respectively, for standard risk patients. In summary, outpatient myeloablative allogeneic HSCT with expectant in-patient management can be accomplished safely with low treatment-related morbidity and mortality. Clinical outcomes seem comparable to those reported for traditional in-patient management.

We report our experience with oral busulfan (BU) in 159 consecutive patients to evaluate the safety of home administration. Patients received a myeloablative BU-containing regimen, including oral anticonvulsant and antiemetic prophylaxis, followed by hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Comprehensive verbal and written education was provided. Pharmacokinetic monitoring was performed and dose adjustments were made to target an area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of 900-1500 micromol.min/l. Safety was assessed by evaluating therapy-related toxicities, including seizures, venoocclusive disease (VOD) and patient tolerability. The utilization of pharmacokinetic monitoring was reviewed as a secondary end point. Of the 143 patients evaluated for BU-related seizures and VOD, only two (1.4%) experienced a generalized seizure and four patients (3%) were diagnosed with VOD. VOD resolved in three patients and was a contributing cause of death in one patient. Additional BU dosing owing to nausea and/or vomiting occurred in 28 patients (18%) and five patients (3%) were hospitalized. The median measured AUC was 1405 micromol.min/l, 68% of patients required a dose adjustment, and the median total administered BU dose was 13.6 mg/kg. In conclusion, high-dose oral BU can be safely administered on an outpatient basis.