Search

Background and purpose - The use of unipolar hemi-arthroplasties for femoral neck fractures is increasing in some countries due to reports of higher reoperation rates in bipolar prostheses. On the other hand, it has been proposed that bipolar hemiarthroplasties have clinical advantages and less cartilage wear than unipolar hemiarthroplasties. We compared cartilage wear between bipolar and unipolar hemiarthroplasties using radiostereometric analyses (RSA), in patients aged 70 years or older. Patients and methods - 28 ambulatory, lucid patients were randomized to treatment with a unipolar or a bipolar hemiarthroplasty for an acute femoral neck fracture. Migration of the prosthetic head into the acetabulum was measured using RSA. Secondary outcomes were Harris Hip Score (HHS), and EQ-5D scores. Patients were assessed at 3, 12. and 24 months. Results - 19 patients were available for follow-up at 2 years: mean proximal penetration was 0.83 mm in the unipolar group and 0.24 mm in the bipolar group (p = 0.01). Mean total point movement was 1.3 mm in the unipolar group and 0.95 mm in the bipolar group (p = 0.3). Median HHS was 78 (62-96) in the unipolar group and 100 (70-100) in the bipolar group (p = 0.004). Median EQ-5D Index Score was 0.73 (0.52-1.00) in the unipolar group and 1.00 (0.74-1.00) in the bipolar group (p = 0.01). Median EQ-5D VAS was 70 (50-90) in the unipolar group and 89 (70-95) in the bipolar group (p = 0.03) Interpretation - Patients with unipolar hemiarthroplasties had higher proximal cartilage wear and lower functional outcomes. Unipolar hemiarthroplasties should be used with caution in ambulatory, lucid patients.

Background and purpose - Hemiarthroplasty is the most common treatment in elderly patients with displaced femoral neck fracture. Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a feared complication. The infection rate varies in the literature, and there are limited descriptive data available. We investigated the characteristics and outcome of PJI following hemiarthroplasty over a 15-year period. Patients and methods - Patients with PJI were identified among 519 patients treated with hemiarthroplasty for a femoral neck fracture at Oslo University Hospital between 1998 and 2012. We used prospectively registered data from previous studies, and recorded additional data from the patients' charts when needed. Results - Of the 519 patients, we identified 37 patients (6%) with early PJI. 20 of these 37 patients became free of infection. Soft tissue debridement and retention of implant was performed in 35 patients, 15 of whom became free of infection with an intact arthroplasty. The 1-year mortality rate was 15/37. We found an association between 1-year mortality and treatment failure (p = 0.001). Staphylococcus aureus and polymicrobial infection were the most common microbiological findings, each accounting for 14 of the 37 infections. Enterococcus spp. was found in 9 infections, 8 of which were polymicrobial. There was an association between polymicrobial infection and treatment failure, and between polymicrobial infection and 1-year mortality. Interpretation - PJI following hemiarthroplasty due to femoral neck fracture is a devastating complication in the elderly. We found a high rate of polymicrobial PJIs frequently including Enterococcus spp, which is different from what is common in PJI after elective total hip arthroplasty.

Aim: To compare early complications after the posterior and the direct lateral (transgluteal) approach, when using hemiarthroplasty in the treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly., Patients and Methods: A prospective clinical study from four Norwegian hospitals, consisting of 583 patients with 1year follow-up. All the hospitals used the same uncemented femoral stem and bipolar heads. Data were collected for gender, age, surgical approach, prosthetic dislocation, postoperative infection, perioperative fracture, duration of surgery, ASA score, diabetes, alcoholism, cognitive failure, BMI, 30-day mortality and 1-year mortality., Results: Mean age was 83 years (SD 7.8) and 434/583 (74%) were female. There were no relevant differences between the treatment groups. A higher risk was found for prosthetic dislocation in the posterior group compared to the lateral group (15/186 (8%) vs. 4/397 (1%); RR=8.0, 95% CI 2.7-23.8, p-value<0.001), both as a one-time event and for the risk of recurrent dislocations (9/186 (5%) vs. 2/395 (0.5%); RR 9.6, 95% CI 2.1-44.0, p-value=0.001). 11/19 patients with dislocation had recurrent dislocations. 10/11 patients with more than one dislocation needed further open surgery. Of those 6/10 needed more than one additional open procedure. Three patients had a resection arthroplasty and one patient had a chronic infection as final result after a dislocation. No other risk factor for dislocation than surgical approach was identified. There were no differences between the approach groups for other complications., Conclusion: There was an 8-fold increased risk for prosthetic dislocations after the posterior approach compared to lateral approach. There was a high risk for recurrent prosthetic dislocations and a subsequent risk for further surgeries and a poor end result. The potential advantages of the posterior approach have not been demonstrated after femoral neck fractures and we advise against its continued use., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Cartilage wear is a concern after hemiarthroplasty. The precise pattern of the progression of wear has not been evaluated. We previously reported the application of radiostereonetric analysis (RSA) for the measurement of cartilage wear in patients. The purpose of this study was to report the amount and the orientation of the steady state wear of cartilage between 1 and 3 years after bipolar hemiarthroplasty., Methods: 22 patients with a bipolar hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fracture were included. 10 patients completed the mean follow up of 37 months. The cartilage wear was evaluated by calculating the migration of the bipolar head in reference to the markers in the acetabulum using RSA., Results: The mean age of the patients at the final follow-up was 80 (range 67-91) years. The 3-D migration was -0.02 mm (SD 0.30) between 1 and 3 years. The migration in each direction was 0.03 mm (SD 0.49) in medial, 0.03 mm (SD 0.14) in proximal and 0.11 mm (SD 0.29) in posterior directions. 2 patients showed migration of more than 0.2 mm. The large initial migration seen in some patients up to 1 year did not progress further. Total wear after 37 months was 0.43 mm (SD 0.17)., Conclusions: Cartilage wear progressed slowly in 2 of 10 patients from 1 to 3 years. No pelvic penetration was seen. We believe that RSA will give a basic knowledge about the development and the progression of cartilage wear after hemiarthroplasty.

Background: Displaced femoral neck fractures usually are treated with hemiarthroplasty. However, the degree to which the design of the implant used (cemented or uncemented) affects the outcome is not known and may be therapeutically important., Questions/purposes: In this randomized controlled trial, we sought to compare cemented with cementless fixation in bipolar hemiarthroplasties at 5 years in terms of (1) Harris hip scores; (2) femoral fractures; (3) overall health outcomes using the Barthel Index and EQ-5D scores; and (4) complications, reoperations, and mortality since our earlier report on this cohort at 1-year followup., Methods: We present followup at a median of 5 years after surgery (range, 56-65 months) from a randomized trial comparing a cemented hemiarthroplasty (112 hips) with an uncemented, hydroxyapatite-coated hemiarthroplasty (108 hips), both with a bipolar head. Results were previously reported at 1-year followup. Harris hip scores, Barthel Index, and EQ-5D scores were assessed by one research nurse and one orthopaedic surgeon. Complications and reoperations were determined by chart review and radiographs examined by three orthopaedic surgeons. Sixty patients (56%) had died in the cemented group and 63 (60%) in the uncemented group. Respectively, three and two patients (2.7% and 1.9%) were completely lost to followup., Results: Harris hip scores at 5 years were higher in the uncemented group than in the cemented group (86.2 versus 76.3; mean difference 9.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9-17.9). The prevalence of postoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures was 7.4% in the uncemented group and 0.9% in the cemented group (hazard ratio [HR], 9.3; 95% CI, 1.16-74.5). Barthel Index and EQ-5D scores were not different between the groups. Between 1 and 5 years, we found no additional infections or dislocations. The mortality rate was not different between the groups (HR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.82-1.7)., Conclusions: Both arthroplasties may be used with good medium-term results after displaced femoral neck fractures. The uncemented hemiarthroplasty may result in higher hip scores but appears to carry an unacceptably high risk of later femoral fractures., Level of Evidence: Level I, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Introduction Cartilage wear is a concern after hemiarthroplasty. The precise pattern of the progression of wear has not been evaluated. We previously reported the application of radiostereonetric analysis (RSA) for the measurement of cartilage wear in patients. The purpose of this study was to report the amount and the orientation of the steady state wear of cartilage between 1 and 3 years after bipolar hemiarthroplasty. Methods 22 patients with a bipolar hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fracture were included. 10 patients completed the mean follow up of 37 months. The cartilage wear was evaluated by calculating the migration of the bipolar head in reference to the markers in the acetabulum using RSA. Results The mean age of the patients at the final follow-up was 80 (range 67-91) years. The 3-D migration was -0.02 mm (SD 0.30) between 1 and 3 years. The migration in each direction was 0.03 mm (SD 0.49) in medial, 0.03 mm (SD 0.14) in proximal and 0.11 mm (SD 0.29) in posterior directions. 2 patients showed migration of more than 0.2 mm. The large initial migration seen in some patients up to 1 year did not progress further. Total wear after 37 months was 0.43 mm (SD 0.17). Conclusions Cartilage wear progressed slowly in 2 of 10 patients from 1 to 3 years. No pelvic penetration was seen. We believe that RSA will give a basic knowledge about the development and the progression of cartilage wear after hemiarthroplasty. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cartilage wear is a concern after hemiarthroplasty. The precise pattern of the progression of wear has not been evaluated. We previously reported the application of radiostereonetric analysis (RSA) for the measurement of cartilage wear in patients. The purpose of this study was to report the amount and the orientation of the steady state wear of cartilage between 1 and 3 years after bipolar hemiarthroplasty.~Introduction~Background~22 patients with a bipolar hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fracture were included. 10 patients completed the mean follow up of 37 months. The cartilage wear was evaluated by calculating the migration of the bipolar head in reference to the markers in the acetabulum using RSA.~Methods~Methods~The mean age of the patients at the final follow-up was 80 (range 67-91) years. The 3-D migration was -0.02 mm (SD 0.30) between 1 and 3 years. The migration in each direction was 0.03 mm (SD 0.49) in medial, 0.03 mm (SD 0.14) in proximal and 0.11 mm (SD 0.29) in posterior directions. 2 patients showed migration of more than 0.2 mm. The large initial migration seen in some patients up to 1 year did not progress further. Total wear after 37 months was 0.43 mm (SD 0.17).~Results~Results~Cartilage wear progressed slowly in 2 of 10 patients from 1 to 3 years. No pelvic penetration was seen. We believe that RSA will give a basic knowledge about the development and the progression of cartilage wear after hemiarthroplasty.~Conclusions~Conclusions [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Surgical site infection (SSI) is a feared complication in hip arthroplasty, especially following femoral neck fracture in the elderly, associated with substantially increased morbidity, mortality, and costs. Gentamicin-containing collagen sponges are widely used for prevention of SSIs, but their effectiveness in joint replacement surgery remains unclear. Methods: We performed a multicenter, randomized trial between February 2011 and July 2013. Eligible patients with femoral neck fracture undergoing hemiarthroplasty were randomly assigned to receive either intravenous antimicrobial prophylaxis alone or with the addition of 2 gentamicin-containing collagen sponges into the hip joint perioperatively. The primary end point was SSI according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria within 30 days after surgery. Results: Seven hundred thirty-nine patients were randomly assigned, 684 of whom were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. There was no statistical significant difference in SSI between the gentamicin-collagen group (16 of 329 patients [4.9%]) and the control group (19 of 355 patients [5.4%]) (relative risk [RR], 0.91 [95% confidence interval, .48-1.79]; P = .77). No significant differences were observed between the groups in superficial SSI (2 of 329 [0.6%] vs 3 of 355 [0.8%]; P = .99) and deep SSI (14 of 329 [4.3%] vs 16 of 355 [4.5%]; P = .87). There were no significant differences between the groups regarding type of bacteria isolated. Conclusions: Locally administered gentamicin-collagen sponges did not reduce the incidence of SSI in elderly patients treated with a hemiarthroplasty because of femoral neck fracture. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: We report 11 cases of interprosthetic dislocation of the Charnley/Hastings hemiarthroplasty in a retrospective study of 350 consecutive patients treated for an acute femoral neck fracture. We found a total of 14 dislocations (4.0%), 11 were interprosthetic. The median age of the 350 patients was 79 (36–99) years and the median age of the 11 patients with an interprosthetic dislocation was 85 years (82–94). The median time from surgery to radiologically acknowledged dislocation was 18 (4–64) days. These interprosthetic dislocations may be caused by either an assembly mistake perioperatively, by maximum angulation and impingement between the components, or by trauma. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]