Search

Arm reaching is often impaired in individuals with stroke. Nonetheless, how aiming directions influence reaching performance and how such differences change with motor recovery over time remain unclear. Here, we elucidated kinematic parameters of reaching toward various directions in people with poststroke hemiparesis in the subacute phase. A total of 13 and 15 participants with mild and moderate-to-severe hemiparesis, respectively, performed horizontal reaching in eight directions with their more-affected and lessaffected sides using an exoskeleton robotic device at the time of admission to and discharge from the rehabilitation ward of the hospital. The movement time, path length, and number of velocity peaks were computed for the mild group (participants able to reach toward all eight directions). In addition, the total amount of displacement (i.e., movement quantity) toward two simplified directions (mediolateral or anteroposterior) was evaluated for the moderate-to-severe group (participants who showed difficulty in completing the reaching task). Motor recovery was evaluated using the Fugl-Meyer assessment. The mild group showed worse values of movement parameters during reaching in the anteroposterior direction, irrespective of the side of the arm or motor recovery achieved. The moderate-to-severe group exhibited less movement toward the anteroposterior direction than toward the mediolateral direction at admission; however, this direction-dependent bias in movement quantity decreased, with the movement expanding toward the anteroposterior direction with motor recovery at discharge. These results suggest that direction-dependent differences in the quality and quantity of reaching performance exist in people after stroke, regardless of the presence or severity of hemiparesis. This highlights the need to consider the task work area when designing rehabilitative training. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Arm reaching, a fundamental function required for the upper extremities, is often impaired after stroke due to muscle weakness and abnormal synergies. Nonetheless, how aiming directions influence performance remains unclear. Here, we report that direction-dependent differences in the quality and quantity of reaching performance exist, surprisingly regardless of the presence or severity of hemiparesis. This result highlights the need to consider the task work area when designing rehabilitative training. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Various robotic technologies have been developed recently for objective and quantitative assessment of movement. Among them, robotic measures derived from a reaching task in the KINARM Exoskeleton device are characterized by their potential to reveal underlying motor control in reaching movements. The aim of this study was to examine the clinical usefulness and validity of these robot-derived measures in hemiparetic stroke patients. Methods: Fifty-six participants with a hemiparetic arm due to chronic stroke were enrolled. The robotic assessment was performed using the Visually Guided Reaching (VGR) task in the KINARM Exoskeleton, which allows free arm movements in the horizontal plane. Twelve parameters were derived based on motor control theory. The following clinical assessments were also administered: the proximal upper limb section in the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA-UE(A)), the proximal upper limb part in the Stroke Impairment Assessment Set (SIAS-KM), the Modified Ashworth Scale for the affected elbow flexor muscles (MAS elbow), and seven proximal upper limb tasks in the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT). To explore which robotic measures represent deficits of motor control in the affected arm, the VGR parameters in the paretic arm were compared with those in the non-paretic arm using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Then, to explore which VGR parameters were related to overall motor control regardless of the paresis, correlations between the paretic and non-paretic arms were examined. Finally, to investigate the relationships between the robotic measures and the clinical scales, correlations between the VGR parameters and clinical scales were investigated. Spearman's rank correlation coefficients were used for all correlational analyses. Results: Eleven VGR parameters on the paretic side were significantly different from those on the non-paretic side with large effect sizes (∣effect size∣ = 0.76–0.87). Ten VGR parameters correlated significantly with FMA-UE(A) (∣r∣ = 0.32–0.60). Eight VGR parameters also showed significant correlations with SIAS-KM (∣r∣ = 0.42–0.49), MAS elbow (∣r∣ = 0.44–0.48), and the Functional Ability Scale of the WMFT (∣r∣ = 0.52–0.64). Conclusions: The robot-derived measures could successfully differentiate between the paretic arm and the non-paretic arm and were valid in comparison to the well-established clinical scales. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]