Search

Background Chronic hemodialysis (HD) patients exhibit severe morpho-functional cardiac alterations, putting them at a high risk of death and adverse cardiovascular (CV) outcomes. Despite the fact that an unbalanced expression of various microRNAs (miRNAs) has been related to pathological cardiac remodeling and worse CV outcomes, scarce evidence exists on their role in this setting. Methods We evaluated circulating levels of a selected miRNAs panel (30a-5p, 23a-3p, 451a and let7d-5p) in 74 chronic HD patients together with a thorough clinical and echocardiography assessment. Individuals were then prospectively followed (median 22 months). The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause and CV mortality and non-fatal CV events. Results Circulating levels of all miRNAs were lower in HD patients as compared with healthy controls and independently correlated to the severity of cardiac dysfunction. miRNA 30a-5p, 23a-3p and 451a expression was even lower in 30 subjects (40.5%) reaching the composite endpoint (P  < .001), while no differences were reported for let7d-5p. The predictive value of these miRNAs was supported by univariate followed by multivariate Cox regression analyses [hazard ratio (HR) ranging from 0.943 to 0.995; P  = .05 to.02] while Kaplan–Meier analyses confirmed a faster progression to the endpoint in individuals displaying miRNA levels below an optimal receiver operating characteristic–derived cut-off value (P ranging from.001 to <.0001; crude HRs 7.95 to 8.61). Conclusions Lower circulating levels of miRNA 30-5p, 23a-3p and 451a in HD patients may reflect cardiac abnormalities and predict a higher risk of worse clinical outcomes in the short mid-term. Future studies on larger HD populations are needed to generalize these findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. Diabetes mellitus is a frequent cause of the need for renal replacement therapy (RRT). Historically, RRT was started earlier in patients with diabetes, in an attempt to prevent complications of uraemia and diabetes. We did a systematic review to find support for this earlier start of dialysis in patients with versus without diabetes. Methods. The MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL databases were searched for articles about the timing of dialysis initiation in (subgroups of ) patients with diabetes and CKD Stage 5. Results. A total of 340 papers were screened and 11 papers were selected to be reviewed. Only three studies showed data of at least one subgroup of patients with diabetes. Two observational studies concluded that start of dialysis with a higher estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is beneficial with regard to survival, one did not find a difference and six observational studies concluded that start of dialysis with a lower eGFR is associated with better survival in patients with diabetes. The effect of timing of initiation of dialysis did not differ between patients with versus without diabetes. Lastly, one randomized controlled trial (two papers) reported that there was no difference in survival between start at higher versus lower eGFR overall and a P-value for the interaction with diabetes of P = 0.63, indicating no difference between patients with versus without diabetes with regard to the timing of start of dialysis and subsequent mortality on dialysis. Conclusions. There is no difference between early (eGFR) and late (lower eGFR) start of RRT with regard to mortality in patients with versus without diabetes. RRT should thus be initiated based on the same criteria in all patients, irrespective of the presence or absence of diabetes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Aims: In this corollary analysis of the EXCITE study, we looked at possible differences in baseline risk factors and mortality between subjects excluded from the trial because non-eligible (n=216) or because eligible but refusing to participate (n=116). Methods: Baseline characteristics and mortality data were recorded. Survival and independent predictors of mortality were assessed by Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses. Results: The incidence rate of mortality was higher in non-eligible vs. eligible non-randomized patients (21.0 vs. 10.9 deaths/100 persons-year; P<0.001). The crude excess risk of death in non-eligible patients (HR 1.96; 95% CI 1.36 to 2.77; P<0.001) was reduced after adjustment for risk factors which differed in the two cohorts including age, blood pressure, phosphate, CRP, smoking, diabetes, triglycerides, cardiovascular comorbidities and history of neoplasia (HR 1.60; 95% CI 1.10 to 2.35; P=0.017) and almost nullified after including in the same model also information on deambulation impairment (HR 1.16; 95% CI 0.75 to 1.80; P=0.513). Conclusions: Deambulation ability mostly explains the difference in survival rate in non-eligible and eligible non-randomized patients in the EXCITE trial. Extending data analyses and outcome reporting also to subjects not taking part in a trial may be helpful to assess the representability of the study population. © 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]