Search

Introduction: Bleeding severity in severe haemophilic patients, with low thrombin generation (TG) capacity, can vary widely between patients, possibly reflecting differences in tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) level., Aim: To compare free TFPI (fTFPI) levels in patients with severe haemophilia A (sHA) and severe haemophilia B (sHB) and to investigate in these patients as a whole the relationships between bleeding and TG potential, between TG potential and fTFPI level and between fTFPI level and bleeding tendency., Methods: Data on bleeding episodes retrospectively recorded during follow-up visits over 5-10 years were collected and used to calculate the annualised joint bleeding rate (AJBR). fTFPI levels and basal TG parameters were determined in platelet-poor plasma (PPP) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) using calibrated automated tomography (CAT)., Results: Mean fTFPI levels did not differ significantly between sHA (n = 34) and sHB (n = 19) patients. Mean values of endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) and thrombin peak (peak) in PPP and PRP were two-fold higher when fTFPI levels < 9.4 versus > 14.3 ng/mL. In patients treated on demand, ETP and peak in PRP were doubled when AJBR was ≤ 4.9 $ \le 4.9$ , AJBR being halved in patients with a low fTFPI level (9.4 ng/mL). In patients on factor prophylaxis, no association was found between TG parameters and either fTFPI level or AJBR., Conclusion: In patients treated on demand, bleeding tendency was influenced by fTFPI levels, which in turn affected basal TG potential. In patients on prophylaxis, bleeding tendency is probably determined primarily by the intensity of this treatment., (© 2024 The Authors. Haemophilia published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

We report the observation of a 75-year-old patient referred for cervical lymphadenopathies. A pre-lymphadenectomy blood work revealed an asymptomatic elevation of aPTT with low factor VIII (FVIII) levels and high anti-FVIII antibodies titers, consistent with acquired hemophilia A (AHA). Histological work-up of a cervical lymphadenopathy revealed benign follicular hyperplasia with IgG4 + lymphoplasmacytic infiltration; and serum IgG4 levels were markedly elevated, compatible with IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD). He was successfully treated with a 9-month course of prednisone, secondarily associated with rituximab when an AHA relapse occurred. As this patient presented with an unusual association of rare diseases, we wondered whether there was a link between the two conditions. Our first hypothesis was that the anti-FVIII autoantibodies could be directly produced by the proliferating IgG4 + plasma cells as a result of broken tolerance to autologous FVIII. To test this assumption, we determined the anti-FVIII IgG subclasses in our patient and in a control group of 11 AHA patients without IgG4-RD. The FVIII inhibitor was mostly IgG4, with an anti-FVIII IgG4/IgG1 ratio of 42 at diagnosis and 268 at relapse in our patient; similar values were observed in non-IgG4-RD AHA patients. As a second hypothesis, we considered whether the anti-FVIII activity could be the result of a non-specific autoantibody production due to polyclonal IgG4 + plasma cell proliferation. To test this hypothesis, we measured the anti-FVIII IgG4/total IgG4 ratio in our patient, as well as in several control groups: 11 AHA patients without IgG4-RD, 8 IgG4-RD patients without AHA, and 11 healthy controls. We found that the median [min-max] ratio was higher in AHA-only controls (2.4 10 -2 [5.7 10 -4 -1.79 10 -1 ]), an oligoclonal setting in which only anti-FVIII plasma cells proliferate, than in IgG4-RD-only controls (3.0 10 -5 [2.0 10 -5 -6.0 10 -5 ]), a polyclonal setting in which all IgG4 + plasma cells proliferate equally. Our patient had intermediate ratio values (2.7 10 -3 at diagnosis and 1.0 10 -3 at relapse), which could plead for a combination of both mechanisms. Although no definitive conclusion can be drawn, we hypothesized that the anti-FVIII autoantibody production in our IgG4-RD AHA patient could be the result of both broken tolerance to FVIII and bystander polyclonal IgG4 + plasma cell proliferation., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2020 Sanges, Jeanpierre, Lopez, Russick, Delignat, Carpentier, Dubois, Dubucquoi, Guerrier, Hachulla, Hatron, Paris, Susen, Launay, Lacroix-Desmazes and Terriou.)

Emicizumab, a bispecific humanised monoclonal antibody restoring to some extent the function of activated FVIII deficient in haemophilia A, represents a major therapeutic advance in the management of haemophilia A patients. No dosage adjustment is required, which leads to a major change for patients used to regular biological monitoring which is particularly burdensome in the case of substitution therapy. In some circumstances, such as before an invasive procedure or in case of bleeding, biological monitoring will be necessary and emicizumab's interference with haemostasis tests, particularly those based on an activated partial thromboplastin times (aPTT), must be known to best interpret the tests and to select the most appropriate methods to guide therapy. The normalisation of aPTT in patients treated with emicizumab is not sufficient to consider haemostasis as normalised. In the event of administration of FVIII to a patient receiving emicizumab, the determination of FVIII should use a chromogenic method using non-human reagents. Coagulation global tests have been proposed to evaluate the biological response when using bypassing agents in patients treated with emicizumab, but the usefulness must be confirmed. The French group BIMHO presents proposals for biological monitoring of a patient treated with emicizumab according to clinical situations., (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Replacement therapy with plasma-derived or recombinant FVIII and FIX (pdFVIII/pdFIX or rFVIII/rFIX) concentrates is the standard of treatment in patients with haemophilia A and B, respectively. Measurement of factor VIII (FVIII:C) or factor IX (FIX:C) levels can be done by one-stage clotting assay (OSA) or chromogenic substrate assay (CSA). The French study group on the Biology of Hemorrhagic Diseases (a collaborative group of the GFHT and MHEMO network) presents a literature review and proposals for the monitoring of FVIII:C and FIX:C levels in treated haemophilia A and B patients, respectively. The use of CSA is recommended for the monitoring of patients treated with pdFVIII or rFVIII including extended half-life (EHL) rFVIII. Except for rFVIII-Fc, great caution is required when measuring FVIII:C levels by OSA in patients substituted by EHL-rFVIII. The OSA is recommended for the monitoring of patients treated with pdFIX or rFIX. Large discordances in the FIX:C levels measured for extended half-life rFIX (EHL-rFIX), depending on the method and reagents used, must lead to great attention when OSA is used for measuring FIX:C levels in patients substituted by EHL-rFIX. Data of most of recent studies, obtained with spiked plasmas, deserve to be confirmed in plasma samples of treated patients., (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

The use of enhanced half-life (EHL) FVIII has improved the quality of prophylaxis in haemophilia A, but with a benefit that may vary from one patient to another. We analysed the pharmacokinetic data obtained with efmoroctocog alfa (rFVIII-Fc) in 114 patients and, in 47 cases, compared them to those previously measured with non-EHL FVIII. The in vivo recovery (IVR) of rFVIII-Fc measured with one stage clotting assay (OSA) and chromogenic assay (CSA) was 2.2 and 2.8 IU/mL per IU/kg, respectively. The median half-life (T 1/2 ) of rFVIII-Fc was 14.5 hours whatever the FVIII:C assay used, but variable and correlated with preinfusion VWF:Ag levels (r = .76). Both IVR and T 1/2 were lower in patients under 12 years old (2.4 IU/mL per IU/kg and 11.1 hours, respectively; CSA). PK study of rFVIII-Fc vs non-EHL FVIII showed a T 1/2 ratio of 1.4 in favour of rFVIII-Fc, regardless of the patient's age. However the relative increase in T 1/2 with rFVIII-Fc was lower than 30% in one-third of patients evaluated, particularly when the previous FVIII administered was a BHK-derived product. This study therefore suggests that analysis of individual PK profile in response to a specific FVIII concentrate is potentially useful before a switch in haemophilia A patients., (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Replacement therapy with plasma-derived or recombinant FVIII (pdFVIII or rFVIII) concentrates is the standard of treatment in patients with hemophilia A. The reference method used for measuring factor VIII (FVIII:C) levels in patients treated by FVIII concentrates is the chromogenic substrate assay (CSA). However, the one-stage clotting assay (OSA) is predominantly used in current clinical practice, but this method depends on the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) reagent and the coagulation analyzer used, and wide variations in the measurements of FVIII recovery have been reported with some factor concentrates. The French study group on the biology of hemorrhagic diseases (a collaborative group of the GFHT and MHEMO network) presents a review of the literature and proposals for the monitoring of FVIII:C levels in treated hemophilia A patients. The use of CSA calibrated with a plasma reference tested against the current FVIII WHO (World Health Organization) International Standard is recommended for the monitoring of patients treated with pdFVIII or rFVIII including extended half-life (EHL) rFVIII. OSA are adequate for the monitoring of patients treated with pdFVIII or with most of rFVIII concentrates. However, preliminary comparison with CSA is mandatory before measuring FVIII:C by OSA in patients treated by Refacto AF ® . For rFVIII-EHL, OSA are only acceptable for Elocta®. Great caution is therefore required when measuring FVIII:C levels by OSA in patients substituted by other EHL-rFVIII. Indeed, most of recent studies reported data obtained with spiked plasmas, which deserve to be confirmed on plasma samples collected in treated patients.

Résumé: Une surveillance biologique des hémophiles substitués est nécessaire pour ajuster la dose de facteurs administrés qu'ils soient d'origine plasmatique ou recombinante. La méthode de référence pour le dosage de l'activité du facteur VIII (FVIII:C) chez les patients hémophiles A substitués est la méthode chromogénique, mais elle est peu répandue dans les laboratoires qui utilisent le plus souvent la méthode chronométrique basée sur la mesure du temps de céphaline avec activateur (TCA). Le nombre important de réactifs de TCA et les différents couples automates/réactifs expliquent les difficultés de standardisation de ces dosages. Le groupe français d'études de la biologie des maladies hémorragiques (groupe collaborateur du GFHT et de la filière MHEMO), présente une revue de la littérature et des propositions pour le suivi biologique des patients hémophiles A substitués. Une méthode chromogénique, calibrée avec un standard raccordé à l'étalon international de l'Organisation mondiale de la santé (OMS), est recommandée pour le suivi des patients traités par FVIII plasmatique (pdFVIII) ou recombinant (rFVIII) y compris pour les nouveaux rFVIII à demi-vie allongée (extended half life : EHL). Une méthode chronométrique est acceptable pour le pdFVIII et la plupart des rFVIII. Pour la surveillance d'un traitement par Refacto AF®, une comparaison préalable avec la méthode chromogénique est requise. Concernant les rFVIII-EHL, la méthode chronométrique n'est acceptable aujourd'hui que pour l'Elocta®. Une grande vigilance doit être apportée lors de l'utilisation d'une méthode chronométrique pour les autres rFVIII-EHL. La majorité des études présente des résultats obtenus avec des plasmas surchargés qui doivent être confirmés avec des plasmas de patients traités. Replacement therapy with plasma-derived or recombinant FVIII (pdFVIII or rFVIII) concentrates is the standard of treatment in patients with hemophilia A. The reference method used for measuring factor VIII (FVIII:C) levels in patients treated by FVIII concentrates is the chromogenic substrate assay (CSA). However, the one-stage clotting assay (OSA) is predominantly used in current clinical practice, but this method depends on the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) reagent and the coagulation analyzer used, and wide variations in the measurements of FVIII recovery have been reported with some factor concentrates. The French study group on the biology of hemorrhagic diseases (a collaborative group of the GFHT and MHEMO network) presents a review of the literature and proposals for the monitoring of FVIII:C levels in treated hemophilia A patients. The use of CSA calibrated with a plasma reference tested against the current FVIII WHO (World Health Organization) International Standard is recommended for the monitoring of patients treated with pdFVIII or rFVIII including extended half-life (EHL) rFVIII. OSA are adequate for the monitoring of patients treated with pdFVIII or with most of rFVIII concentrates. However, preliminary comparison with CSA is mandatory before measuring FVIII:C by OSA in patients treated by Refacto AF®. For rFVIII-EHL, OSA are only acceptable for Elocta®. Great caution is therefore required when measuring FVIII:C levels by OSA in patients substituted by other EHL-rFVIII. Indeed, most of recent studies reported data obtained with spiked plasmas, which deserve to be confirmed on plasma samples collected in treated patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]