Search

Study Objective: To determine if single-injection bilateral posterior quadratus lumborum block (QLB) with ropivacaine would improve postoperative analgesia in the first 24 h after laparoscopic hepatectomy, compared with 0.9% saline., Design: Prospective, double blinded, randomized controlled trial., Setting: A single tertiary care center from November 2021 and January 2023., Patients: A total of 94 patients scheduled to undergo laparoscopic hepatectomy due to hepatocellular carcinoma., Interventions: Ninety-four patients were randomized into a QLB group (receiving 20 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine on each side, 150 mg in total) or a control group (receiving 20 mL of 0.9% saline on each side)., Measurements: The primary outcome was the cumulative opioid consumption during the initial 24-h post-surgery. Secondary outcomes included pain scores and intraoperative and recovery parameters., Main Results: The mean cumulative opioid consumption during the initial 24-h post-surgery was 30.8 ± 22.4 mg in the QLB group (n = 46) and 34.0 ± 19.4 mg in the control group (n = 46, mean differences: -3.3 mg, 95% confidence interval, -11.9 to 5.4, p = 0.457). The mean resting pain score at 1 h post-surgery was significantly lower in the QLB group than in the control group (5 [4-6.25] vs. 7 [4.75-8], p = 0.035). No significant intergroup differences were observed in the resting or coughing pain scores at other time points or in other secondary outcomes., Conclusions: Preoperative bilateral posterior QLB did not reduce cumulative opioid consumption during the first 24 h after laparoscopic hepatectomy., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None declared., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Laparoscopic donor hepatectomy is being increasingly adopted in transplant programs due to its numerous advantages. However, the role of intrathecal morphine (ITM) in laparoscopic donor hepatectomy has not been thoroughly investigated. This study aimed to compare the analgesic effects and safety of ITM between laparoscopic and open donor hepatectomy. This retrospective study included 742 donors who underwent hepatectomy with ITM between April 2007 and June 2019. Among them, 168 and 574 donors underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) and open hepatectomy (OH), respectively. Propensity score matching yielded two comparable groups of 168 donors each. The primary endpoint was the incidence of moderate-to-severe pain (maximum numerical rating scale [NRS] pain score ≥ 4) within 24 postoperative hours. The LH group had a significantly lower incidence of moderate-to-severe pain within 24 postoperative hours than the OH group (16.1% vs 64.3%, P < .001). Moreover, the cumulative rescue intravenous opioids (in morphine-equivalent dose) on postoperative day (POD) 1 was lower in the LH group than in the OH group (3.3 [0-8.3] mg vs 10 [3.3-17.3] mg; P < .001). There were no significant between-group differences in the incidence of respiratory depression (2.4% vs 0.6%; P = .371) and prescriptions for pruritus (14.3% vs 15.5%; P = .878). However, the prescriptions for postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) was significantly higher in the LH group than in the OH group (64.9% vs 41.7%; P < .001). The predictors of antiemetic agent prescription included the use of laparoscopic procedure (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 2.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-3.79; P = .021) and female sex (adjusted OR, 5.63; 95% CI, 3.19-9.92; P < .001). Preoperative ITM administration resulted in a significantly lower incidence of moderate-to-severe pain within 24 postoperative hours after laparoscopic donor hepatectomy than after open donor hepatectomy., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy (PLDRH) is not a standard procedure for living donor liver transplantation but is safe and reproducible in the hands of experienced surgeons. However, the perioperative outcomes of PLDRH have not been fully evaluated yet. We used propensity score matching to compare the perioperative complications and postoperative short-term outcomes of donors undergoing PLDRH and open donor right hepatectomy (ODRH). A total of 325 consecutive donors who underwent elective, adult-to-adult right hepatectomy were initially screened. After propensity score matching, all patients were divided into two groups: PLDRH (n = 123) and ODRH (n = 123) groups. Perioperative complications and postoperative outcomes were compared between the two groups. Postoperative pulmonary complications were significantly more common in the ODRH than in the PLDRH group (54.5 vs. 31.7%, P < 0.001). The biliary complications (leak and stricture) were higher in PLDRH group than in the ODRH group (8% vs. 3%), but it failed to reach statistical significance (P = 0.167). Overall, surgical complication rates were similar between the two groups (P = 0.730). The opioid requirement during the first 7 postoperative days was higher in the ODRH group (686 vs. 568 mg, P < 0.001). The hospital stay and time to the first meal were shorter in the PLDRH than in the ODRH group (P = 0.003 and P < 0.001, respectively). PLDRH reduced the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications and afforded better short-term postoperative outcomes compared to ODRH. However, surgical complication rates were similar in both groups.

Donor safety and graft results of pure laparoscopic living donor right hepatectomy (LLDRH) have previously been compared with those of open living donor right hepatectomy (OLDRH). However, the clinical outcomes of recipients at 1-year follow-up have never been accurately compared. We aimed to compare 1-year outcomes of recipients of living donor right liver transplantation (LRLT) using pure LLDRH and OLDRH. From May 2013 to May 2017, 197 consecutive recipients underwent LRLT. Donor hepatectomies were performed either by OLDRH (n = 127) or pure LLDRH (n = 70). After propensity score matching, 53 recipients were included in each group for analysis. The clinical outcomes at 1-year follow-up were compared between the 2 groups. The primary outcome was recipient death or graft failure during the 1-year follow-up period. In the propensity-matched analysis, the incidence of death or graft failure during the 1-year follow-up period was not different between the 2 groups (3.8% versus 5.7%; odds ratio [OR], 1.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24-8.95; P = 0.69). However, the composite of Clavien-Dindo 3b-5 complications was more frequent in the pure LLDRH group (OR, 2.62; 95% CI, 1.15-5.96; P = 0.02). In conclusion, although pure LLDRH affords a comparable incidence of fatal complications in recipients, operative complications may increase at the beginning of the program. The safety of the recipients should be confirmed to accept pure LLDRH as a feasible option., (Copyright © 2019 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.)

Background: The innovative pure laparoscopic living donor right hepatectomy (LLDRH) procedure for liver transplantation has never been fully compared to open living donor right hepatectomy (OLDRH). We aimed to compare the donor safety and graft results of pure LLDRH to those of OLDRH., Methods: From May 2013 to July 2017, 288 consecutive donors underwent either OLDRH (n = 197) or pure LLDRH (n = 91). After propensity score matching, 72 donors were included in each group. The primary outcome was postoperative complications during a 90-day follow-up period. Comprehensive complication index, duration of hospital stay, need for additional pain control, readmission, and donor outcomes were also compared., Results: The incidence of major complication during the 90-day follow-up was higher in the LLDRH group than the OLDRH group (6.6% vs 15.4%, P = 0.017) but was not statistically significant in propensity-matched analysis (11.1% vs 13.9%, odds ratio [OR], 1.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.47-3.51; P = 0.62). A right hepatic duct <1 cm was independently associated with complication in the pure LLDRH group (odds ratio, 4.01; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-14.99; P = 0.04)., Conclusions: In the initial 91 pure LLDRH cases, incidence of major complication was higher than in the OLDRH group, but the difference was not significant in propensity-matched analysis. A right hepatic duct verified as <1 cm may be related to increased frequency of complications in pure LLDRH donors. Further analysis is needed.

Background: Recent advances in technology and accumulation of surgical experience have expanded the indications for laparoscopic liver resection (LLR). However, compared to open liver resection (OLR), the feasibility of laparoscopic anatomical liver resection for centrally located tumor (CLT) has not been clearly established. The aim of our study was to assess the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic anatomical major liver resection for CLT., Methods: From April 2011 to March 2016, 20 cases of anatomical LLR and 86 cases of OLR for CLTs such as central hepatectomy (CH) and right anterior sectionectomy (RAS) were performed at a single institution. We performed one-to-one propensity score matching and analyzed short-term outcomes between the LLR (n = 20) and OLR (n = 20) groups., Results: Among 20 cases in the LLR group, two cases underwent open conversion due to common bile duct injury and anatomical distortion, respectively. There were no statistically significant difference between the LLR and OLR groups regarding clamping time of the Pringle maneuver (p = 0.502), blood loss (p = 0.746), surgical margin (p = 0.198), or length of hospital stay (p = 0.110). However, surgical time was significantly longer in the LLR group than in the OLR group (388 vs 268 min; p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to morbidity rate or mean comprehensive complication index (p = 0.716 and p = 0.819, respectively)., Conclusion: Total anatomical LLR can be performed safely in selected CLT patients by experienced surgeons. Laparoscopic CH or RAS appears feasible with non-inferior perioperative outcomes compared to OLR.

Background: Intermittent hepatic inflow occlusion (IHIO) is associated with acute hyperglycemia during living donor hepatectomy when the ischemia is prolonged. Bilirubin is a potent antioxidant to play an important role for maintaining insulin sensitivity and preventing hyperglycemia. Thus, we aimed to test whether serum bilirubin level is associated with prolonged IHIO-induced intraoperative hyperglycemia., Methods: Seventy-five living liver donors who underwent a prolonged IHIO with a >30 minute cumulative ischemia were included. The association between preoperative serum bilirubin concentrations and the risk of intraoperative hyperglycemia (blood glucose concentration >180 mg/dl) was analyzed using binary logistic regression with adjusting for potential confounders including age and steatosis., Results: The number of donors who underwent 3, 4, 5, and 6 rounds of IHIO was 41, 22, 7, and 5, respectively. Twenty-nine (35%) donors developed intraoperative hyperglycemia. Total bilirubin concentration was inversely associated with hyperglycemia risk (odds ratio [OR] 0.033, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.004-0.313, P = 0.003). There was an interaction between age and total bilirubin concentration: the effect of lower serum total bilirubin (≤0.7 mg/dl) on the development of hyperglycemia was greater in older donors (>40 years) than in younger donors (P = 0.0.028 versus P = 0.212). Both conjugated bilirubin (OR 0.001 95% CI 0.001-0.684) and unconjugated bilirubin (OR 0.011 95% CI 0.001-0.246) showed an independent association with hyperglycemia risk., Conclusions: Lower preoperative serum bilirubin was associated with greater risk of prolonged IHIO-induced hyperglycemia during living donor hepatectomy particularly in older donors. Thus, more meticulous glycemic management is recommended when prolonged IHIO is necessary for surgical purposes in old living donors with lower serum bilirubin levels.

Postoperative analgesia and care for living liver donors have become particular interests for clinicians as the use of living donor liver transplantation has increased. Local anesthetic-based analgesia has been known to provide effective pain control. In this prospective, randomized study, we compared the postoperative analgesic efficacy of local anesthetic-based analgesia (PainBuster) with the efficacy of opioid-based analgesia [intrathecal morphine (ITM) with intravenous (IV) fentanyl] in liver donors. Forty adult donors were randomly allocated to 1 of 2 groups: an ITM/IV fentanyl group (n = 21) and a PainBuster group (n = 19). Donors in the PainBuster group received 0.5% ropivacaine via a multi-orifice catheter (ON-Q PainBuster) placed at the wound. Donors in the ITM/IV fentanyl group received ITM sulfate (400 μg) preoperatively and a continuous IV fentanyl infusion postoperatively. A visual analogue scale (VAS) at rest and with coughing and rescue IV fentanyl and meperidine consumption were assessed for 72 hours after the operation. Side effects, including sedation, dizziness, nausea, vomiting, pruritus, respiratory depression, wound seroma or hematoma, and the first time to flatus, were recorded. The VAS score at rest during the first 12 postoperative hours was significantly lower for the ITM/IV fentanyl group. At other times, the VAS scores were comparable between the groups. In the PainBuster group, rescue IV fentanyl and meperidine use was significantly reduced 24 to 48 hours and 48 to 72 hours after surgery in comparison with the first 24 postoperative hours. The time to first flatus was significantly reduced in the PainBuster group. There were no differences in side effects. In conclusion, analgesia was more satisfactory with ITM/IV fentanyl versus PainBuster during the first 12 hours after surgery, but they became comparable thereafter, with a shortened bowel recovery time in the PainBuster group. The concurrent use of ITM with PainBuster may be considered in a future investigation., (© 2013 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.)

The healthy condition of living donors makes their tolerance to pain particularly low, and clinicians are often challenged to come up with an analgesic technique that is effective yet ensures donor safety. This study compared, in donor right hepatectomy, the efficacy and safety of preoperative intrathecal morphine (ITM) combined with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) with IV-PCA alone. Forty adult patients were randomly allocated into 2 groups: ITM+IV-PCA group (n = 20) and IV-PCA-only group (n = 20). Patients in the ITM+IV-PCA group received morphine sulfate (400 microg). The visual analog scale (VAS) at rest and when coughing and supplementary meperidine and IV-PCA (fentanyl) consumption were assessed at 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48 56, 64, and 72 hours after surgery. Also, side effects such as sedation, dizziness, nausea, vomiting, pruritus, and respiratory depression were evaluated. The ITM+IV-PCA group showed significantly less pain at rest and when coughing for up to 30 hours and 24 hours, respectively. Cumulative postoperative consumption of meperidine and IV-PCA (fentanyl) were significantly less in the ITM+IV-PCA group. The incidence of side effects were comparable between the 2 groups except for pruritus; its incidence was significantly higher in the ITM+IV-PCA group during the first 24 hours, but no treatment was required due to its mild severity. The results of our study suggest that preoperative ITM combined with IV-PCA may be considered as an effective and safe pain management regimen in living liver donors who have characteristics of low tolerance to pain and postoperative coagulation derangement., (Copyright 2009 AASLD.)

Various volatile anesthetics have been used in hepatectomy in living donors, and their effects on major organs have been extensively evaluated. However, the impact of total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) on postoperative liver and renal functions after large liver resections has been less extensively investigated than that of volatile agents. The aim of this study was to compare the postoperative hepatic and renal functions between volatile anesthesia with desflurane and TIVA with propofol-remifentanil in living donors undergoing right hepatectomy. Seventy adult patients were randomly allocated into 2 groups: the desflurane group (n = 35) and TIVA group (n = 35). Aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, prothrombin time (PT), albumin, total bilirubin (TB), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine (Cr), BUN/Cr ratio, estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR), platelet count, and hemoglobin levels were analyzed in the preoperative period, immediately after the operation, and on the first, second, third, fifth, seventh, and thirtieth postoperative days (PODs). Most of the liver function test results were not significantly different between the 2 groups. However, PT (international normalized ratio) and TB were significantly greater on POD 5 in the TIVA group. Among the renal function tests, Cr was significantly higher and estimated GFR was significantly lower on POD 1 in the TIVA group. The platelet counts and hemoglobin levels were similar between the 2 groups. In conclusion, the results of our study suggest that living related donors for liver transplant may have a better outcome following anesthesia with desflurane. However, further testing will be necessary to prove this hypothesis.

The safety of living donors is a matter of cardinal importance in addition to obtaining optimal liver grafts to be transplanted. Central venous pressure (CVP) is known to have significant correlation with the amount of bleeding during parenchymal transection and many centers have adopted CVP monitoring for right hepatectomy. However, central line cannulation can induce some serious complications. Peripheral venous pressure (PVP) has been suggested as a comparable alternative to CVP. The aim of this study was to determine whether a clinically acceptable agreement or a reliable correlation between CVP and PVP exist and if CVP can be replaced by PVP in living liver donors. A central venous catheter was placed through the right internal jugular vein and a peripheral venous catheter was inserted at antecubital fossa in the right arm. CVP and PVP were recorded in 15-minute intervals in 50 adult living donors. The paired data were divided into 3 stages: preparenchymal transection, parenchymal transection, and postparenchymal transection. A total of 1,430 simultaneous measurements of CVP and PVP were recorded. Overall, the PVP, CVP, and bias were 7.0+/-2.46, 5.9+/-2.32, and 1.16+/-1.12 mmHg, respectively. A total of 88.9% of all measurements were clinically within acceptable limits of bias (+/-2 mmHg). Regression analysis showed a high correlation coefficient between PVP and CVP (r=0.893; P<0.001) and the limits of agreement were -1.03 to 3.34 overall. In conclusion, frequencies of differences, bias, correlation coefficient, and limits of agreement between PVP and CVP remained relatively constant throughout the operation. Therefore, PVP measurement in the arm can be an alternative to predict CVP and further, obviate central venous catheter-related complications in living liver donors., (Copyright (c) 2007 AASLD.)

Numerous living donor hepatectomy are being performed safely. However, donors are still exposed to various complications including hepatic failure. We examined the donor's potential risk and morbidity depending on the type of hepatectomy: left lateral segmentectomy (group LLS, n = 30), left lobectomy (group LL, n = 15), and right lobectomy (group RL, n = 128). The charts and computerized hospital data of 173 donors from March 2000 to September 2003 were retrospectively reviewed. We analyzed liver function tests (LFT), RBC transfusion, and complications. Although the graft weight was greatest, and surgical and anesthetic times were longest in the group RL, there were no significant differences in postoperative hospital stay, RBC transfusion, and major complications among the groups. However, minor complications were significantly higher in group RL than group LLS. Postoperative prothrombin time and total bilirubin were significantly higher in the group RL than the other groups (P < 0.05). Living donor hepatectomy is relatively safe, and it is evidenced by rapid recovery of LFT and low occurrence of major complications. However, noticeable depression of LFT and frequent minor complications occur after hepatectomy, especially RL.

Background: Intrathecal morphine (ITM) injection is an effective postoperative analgesic strategy in open or laparoscopic donor hepatectomy; however, the optimal dose has not been determined. In this trial, we compared the post‐operative analgesic effects of two doses (300 vs. 400 μg) of ITM injections. Methods: In this prospective randomized non‐inferiority trial, 56 donors were divided into either the 300 μg or 400 μg ITM group (n = 28, each). The primary outcome was the resting pain score at 24 h postoperatively. Pain scores, cumulative opioid consumption, and side effects (postoperative nausea and vomiting [PONV]) were compared up to 48 h postoperatively. Results: Fifty‐five donors participated in the entire study. The mean resting pain scores at 24 h after surgery were 1.7 ± 1.6 and 1.7 ± 1.1 in the ITM 300 and ITM 400 groups, respectively (mean difference, 0 [95% CI, −.8 to.7], p =.978). The upper limit of the 95% CI was lower than the prespecified non‐inferiority margin (δ = 1), indicating that non‐inferiority had been established. The incidence of PONV was lower in the ITM 300 group than in the ITM 400 group at 18 (p =.035) and 24 h postoperatively (p =.015). There were no significant differences in the resting and coughing pain scores and cumulative opioid consumption at any time point. Conclusion: For laparoscopic donor hepatectomy, preoperative ITM 300 μg exhibited non‐inferior postoperative analgesic effects compared to ITM 400 μg, with a lower incidence of PONV. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The second-generation laryngeal mask airway (LMA) provides a higher sealing pressure than classical LMA and can insert the gastric drainage tube. We investigated the difference in respiratory variables according to the use of second-generation LMA and endotracheal tube (ETT) in laparoscopic living liver donor hepatectomy (LLDH). In this single-blind randomized controlled trial, intraoperative arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure at 2 h after the airway devices insertion (PaCO2_2h) was compared as a primary outcome. Participants were randomly assigned to the following groups: Group LMA (n = 45, used Protector LMA), or Group ETT (n = 43, used cuffed ETT). Intraoperative hemodynamic and respiratory variables including mean blood pressure (MBP), heart rate (HR), and peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) were compared. Postoperative sore throat, hoarseness, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and pulmonary aspiration were recorded. The PaCO2_2h were equally effective between two groups (mean difference: 0.99 mmHg, P = 0.003; 90% confidence limits: − 0.22, 2.19). The intraoperative change in MBP, HR, and PIP were differed over time between two groups (P < 0.001, P = 0.015, and P = 0.039, respectively). There were no differences of the incidence of postoperative complications at 24 h following LLDH (sore throat and hoarseness: P > 0.99, PONV: P > 0.99, and P = 0.65, respectively). No case showed pulmonary aspiration in both groups. Compared with endotracheal tube, second-generation LMA is equally efficient during LLDH. The second-generation LMA can be considered as the effective airway devices for securing airway in patients undergoing prolonged laparoscopic surgery. Trial Registration This study was registered at the Clinical Trial Registry of Korea (https://cris.nih.go.kr. CRiS No. KCT0003711). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Objective: To determine if continuous bilateral erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks would improve the postoperative analgesia in the first 48 h after laparoscopic donor hepatectomy, compared to intrathecal morphine (ITM).Design: Prospective, randomized controlled trial.Setting: A single tertiary care center from October 2019 and September 2020.Patients: A total of 60 donors scheduled to undergo elective laparoscopic right hepatectomy.Interventions: Sixty donors were randomized to receive either bilateral continuous T8 ESP blocks with a programmed intermittent bolus regimen of 10 mL 0.2% ropivacaine every 3 h for 48 h (n = 30) or 400 μg ITM (n = 30), in addition to IV fentanyl PCA and multimodal analgesia.Measurements: The primary outcome was cumulative opioid consumption over the first 48 h, expressed as IV morphine equivalents. Secondary outcomes included pain scores, Quality of Recovery-15 scores, ambulation within 24 h, time to first flatus, and opioid-related adverse drug events over 72 h.Main Results: Fifty-nine donors were analyzed. Cumulative 48-h opioid consumption was similar between the ITM and ESP groups (29.8 ± 18.2 vs. 35.1 ± 21.9 mg, mean difference (ESP-ITM) (95% CI), 5.3 (-11.5 to 22) mg; p > 0.99). Resting pain scores at 48 and 72 h postoperatively were significantly lower in the ESP group (0 [0-2] vs. 3 [1.5-3], and 0 [0-2] vs. 3 [1-3] respectively, both p<0.001) (Goldaracena and Barbas, 2019; Ko et al., 2009; Choi et al., 2007 [1-3]) respectively, both p < 0.001). The ESP group had significantly lower incidences of postoperative nausea, vomiting, and pruritus at all timepoints. There were no differences in recovery outcomes.Conclusions: Continuous ESP blocks did not reduce cumulative 48-h opioid consumption compared to 400 μg ITM after laparoscopic donor hepatectomy, but it was associated with a significantly reduced risk of postoperative nausea, vomiting and pruritus.Clinical Trial Number and Registry Url: Clinical Trial Registry of Korea; https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/index.jsp and identifier: KCT0004313; date of registration: October 15, 2019; principal investigator's name: Justin Sangwook Ko. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• We compared open living donor right hepatectomy (OLDH) and laparoscopic living donor right hepatectomy (LLDH) from the perspective of the anesthesiologist. • LLDH was associated with a shorter length of hospital stay, shorter duration of anesthesia, and less intraoperative hourly fluid infusion than OLDH, without increasing the amount of transfusion. • As operation changes from open to laparoscopic, anesthetic management also becomes less invasive. In our hospital, open living donor hepatectomy (OLDH) began in 1996 and laparoscopic living donor hepatectomy (LLDH) began in 2013. In this study, we focus on the change of anesthetic management from OLDH to LLDH. Under the approval of the Institutional Review Board of our hospital, medical records of the last 2 years (2011 and 2012 vs 2019 and 2020) of each OLDH and LLDH era were collected. Left hepatectomy in any period and OLDH during the LLDH era were excluded. There were 175 OLDHs and 213 LLDHs. We performed 836 cases of OLDH before 2011 and 206 cases of LLDH before 2019. Laryngeal mask airway replaced intubation in half of LLDH cases. Erector spinae plane block was performed in a quarter of LLDH cases. Lung-protective ventilation with low tidal volume and positive end-expiratory pressure were applied for LLDH. Additional peripheral venous line was decreased, and there was no central venous catheterization. Anesthesia duration time was reduced and crystalloid infusion per hour was also decreased. There was no intraoperative transfusion and there was no difference in postoperative transfusion incidence. Reoperation rate was not different. Only 1 donor in OLDH transferred to the intensive care unit after the operation because of uncontrolled hypertension. Length of hospital stay was decreased. As the surgical tactics for living liver donors become less invasive, the anesthetic strategy also becomes less invasive. In addition, new types of airway management, ventilation method, and analgesic technique have been introduced. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Objective: How perioperative heart rate variability (HRV) indices differ according to the anxiety or depressed mood of patients scheduled to undergo a major surgical procedure for cancer.Design: Prospective observational study.Setting: Operating room.Patients: Forty-one male patients between 40 and 70 years of age with hepatocellular carcinoma were included in the final analysis.Interventions: HRV was measured on the day before surgery (T1), impending anesthesia (T2), and after anesthetic induction (T3). Preoperative anxiety and depressed mood of all patients were evaluated using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory and Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS).Measurements and Results: HRV was significantly different among T1, T2, and T3. At T2, high frequency (HF) (normalized units of HF [nuHF]) was decreased and low frequency (LF) (normalized units of LF) and LF/HF were increased compared with those at T1 and T3. In the subgroup analysis between high and low SDS groups, high SDS group showed significantly decreased nuHF (P = .035), increased nuLF (P = .039), and increased LF/HF (P = .020) compared to low SDS group at T1. However, these values at T2 and T3 were not different between 2 groups. In analysis within the groups, low SDS group showed significant differences in nuHF, nuLF, and LF/HF among T1, T2, and T3 (P < .05, respectively), but no changes in these values were observed in high SDS group among the 3 different time points.Conclusions: HRV decreased significantly immediately before anesthesia and recovered to baseline with anesthetic induction. Preoperative, more depressed patients showed increased sympathetic tone at baseline and blunted response to impending anesthesia on the HRV measurements. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]