1. Cost-effectiveness modelling of birth and infant dose vaccination against hepatitis B virus in Ontario from 2020 to 2050.
- Author
-
Biondi MJ, Estes C, Razavi-Shearer D, Sahdra K, Lipton N, Shah H, Capraru C, Janssen HLA, Razavi H, and Feld JJ
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Infant, Child, Humans, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Ontario epidemiology, Hepatitis B Vaccines, Vaccines, Combined, Vaccination, Hepatitis B virus, Hepatitis B epidemiology, Hepatitis B prevention & control
- Abstract
Background: The World Health Organization recommends universal birth dose vaccination for hepatitis B virus (HBV), yet only 3 provinces and territories in Canada provide birth dose vaccination, and Canadian-born children in Ontario are acquiring HBV before adolescent vaccination. We sought to determine whether birth and/or infant HBV vaccination is cost-effective., Methods: We used a dynamic HBV model that incorporates population by year, disease stage, sex and the influence of immigration to quantify the disease and economic burden of chronic HBV infection in Ontario from 2020 to 2050. We compared 4 vaccination scenarios, which included a birth dose vaccine and variations of the 2 subsequent doses (either alone or as a part of the hexavalent vaccine) and a hexavalent-only strategy in infancy with the current adolescent vaccination strategy. Our costing estimates were based on values from 2020., Results: All 4 infant vaccination approaches prevented an additional 550-560 acute and 160 chronic pediatric HBV infections from 2020 to 2050 compared with adolescent vaccination. Whereas birth dose could be cost-effective, incorporating vaccination into a hexavalent vaccine was cost saving. By 2050, the hexavalent approach led to $428 000 in cost savings per disability-adjusted life years averted., Interpretation: At the current prevalence in Ontario, a switch to birth dose or infant dose will be cost-effective or even cost saving. Introducing any form of infant HBV immunization in Ontario will prevent acute and chronic pediatric HBV infections., Competing Interests: Competing interests: Harry Janssen has received consultant fees and honoraria from Aligos, Antios, Arbutus, Eiger, Gilead Sciences, GSK, Janssen, Merck, Roche, VBI Vaccines, Vir Biotechnology and Viroclinics. Jordan Feld has received consultant fees from AbbVie, Antios, Arbutus, Eiger, Enanta, BlueJay, GSK, Janssen and Roche. Mia Biondi has received honoraria from Gilead and AbbVie. Hemant Shah has received consultant fees and honoraria from AbbVie, Gilead, Intercept and Lupin SCOPE. He has also received travel support and is a member of the advisory boards of AbbVie, Gilead, Intercept and Lupin. Homie Razavi was a member of the advisory boards of Gilead, AbbVie, Abbott, Merck, Janssen, Roche and VBI Vaccines. He is also a member of the board of directors of the Center for Disease Analysis Foundation. No other competing interests were declared., (© 2022 CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF