Search

Objective: Reinfection poses a challenge to hepatitis C virus (HCV) elimination. This analysis assessed incidence of, and factors associated with reinfection among people treated for recent HCV (duration of infection <12 months)., Methods: Participants treated for recent HCV (primary infection or reinfection) in an international randomized trial were followed at 3-monthly intervals for up to 2 years to assess for reinfection. Reinfection incidence was calculated using person-time of observation. Factors associated with HCV reinfection were assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis., Results: Of 222 participants treated for recent HCV, 196 (62% primary infection, 38% reinfection) were included in the cohort at risk for reinfection, of whom 87% identified as gay or bisexual men, 71% had HIV and 20% injected drugs in the month prior to enrolment. During 198 person-years of follow-up, 28 cases of HCV reinfection were identified among 27 participants, for an incidence of 14.2 per 100 person-years [95% confidence interval (CI) 9.8-20.5]. Reinfection was associated with prior HCV reinfection [adjusted hazards ratio (aHR) 2.42; 95% CI 1.08-5.38], injection drug use posttreatment (aHR 2.53; 95% CI 1.14-5.59), condomless anal intercourse with casual male partners (aHR 3.32; 95% CI 1.14-9.65) and geographic region (United Kingdom, aHR 0.21; 95% CI 0.06-0.75). Among gay and bisexual men (GBM), reinfection was also associated with sexualized drug use involving injecting posttreatment (aHR 2.97; 95% CI 1.10-8.02)., Conclusion: High reinfection incidence following treatment for recent HCV among people with ongoing sexual and drug use risk behaviour highlights the need for posttreatment surveillance, rapid retreatment of reinfection and targeted harm reduction strategies., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Using direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) for recently acquired hepatitis C virus (RAHCV) infections, particularly in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive men who have sex with men (MSM), dramatically reduced the incidence of hepatitis C. However, implementation into clinical practice is challenging. The aim of this study was to analyze spontaneous clearance (SC) rates of RAHCV and to identify predictors of SC., Methods: The PROBE-C study is an observational European cohort on RAHCV infections in HIV-positive MSM. Between 2007 and 2017, RAHCV infections were documented with ≥12 months of follow-up. Fisher exact, χ2, and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for statistical analysis., Results: A total of 464 RAHCV infections were documented; 457 of 464 patients (98%) were male, and the median age (interquartile range [IQR]) was 41 (38-46) years. The main risk group for hepatitis C virus (HCV) transmission was MSM (98.9%). Most participants were infected with HCV genotype 1 (78.3%). The median baseline HCV RNA level (IQR) was 230 000 (135 000-474 432) IU/mL, and the median CD4+ T-cell count was 574/µL (547-604/µL. Of all cases, 92% received combination antiretroviral therapy, with 91% showing suppressed HIV RNA levels (<200 copies/mL). The median maximum alanine aminotransferase level (IQR) was 445 (402-522) U/L. SC of RAHCV infection occurred in 55 of 464 cases (11.9%). A >2-log decline in HCV RNA levels 4 weeks after diagnosis of RAHCV infection was the strongest predictor of SC (P < .001; sensitivity, 96.4%; specificity, 97.5%; positive predictive value, 84.1%; negative predictive value, 99.5%)., Conclusions: SC of RAHCV in HIV-positive MSM is found in only 11.9% of cases and a <2-log drop in HCV RNA level at week 4 after diagnosis should prompt early DAA-based treatment. However, immediate DAA treatment for RAHCV infection may also be favored in patients with ongoing transmission risk behavior., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. M. B. M. reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Gilead and Virology Education and support for attending meetings and/or travel from Gilead. S. S. reports honoraria for lectures and/or consultancies from AbbVie, Gilead, Janssen, GSK, MSD, ViiV Healthcare, Theratechnologies, and INSTO (paid to the author); grants or contracts from Kassenarztlicher Vereinigung Northrhine (as a physician in the compulsory health system), AOK Rheinland-Hamburg (integrated hepatitis C care contract), Immuno Heiddelberg (Match 1 and Match 2 studies), ViiV (TANGO, SALSA, SOLAR, DOMINO, CARLOS, DYNAMIC, URBAN, and JUNGLE studies), Gilead (BICSTAR study), Robert-Koch-Institut (Serokonverter study), Deutsche Leberhilfe (Hepatitis C Register study), Technische Universitat Muchen (Swapti study), INSTO (VMQ), Kompetenznetz Pneumonie (CAPNETZ study), and Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (TOP-HIV study); payment for expert testimony from ViiV and Gilead; support for attending meetings and/or travel from Gilead, Janssen, and GSK; participation on a data safety monitoring board (DSMB) or advisory board for ViiV, Gilead, MSD, and Theratech (paid to the author); and unpaid service to Landeskommision AIDS Northrhinewestfalia (as a board member), Arbeitsgemeinschaft niedergelassener Ärzte in der Versorgung HIV-Infizierter Nordrhein e.V. (NÄAGNO) (as a member of the governing board), AIDS Hilfe Cologne (as a consultant), and Deutsche Arbeitsgemeinschaft niedergelassener Ärzte in der Versorgung HIV-Infizierter e. V. (dagnä e.V.). C. D. S. reports grants and personal fees from AbbVie, Janssen-Cilag, MSD, ViiV Healthcare (during the conduct of the study), BioNtech, and Eli Lilly; grants, fees, and nonfinancial support from Gilead Sciences; grants from Cepheid; personal fees from GSK, Eli Lilly, Formycon, Molecular Partners, Roche, and SOBI; fees from AstraZeneca; other support from Apeiron; grants, personal fees and nonfinancial support from BBraun Melsungen; and grants or contracts from Pfizer and Synairgen. T. R. reports grants, consulting fees, speaking honoraria, and advisory board fees from AbbVie, Gilead, and MSD and support for attending meetings and/or travel from AbbVie and Gilead. S. M. has received honoraria for lectures and/or consultancies from AdBoard, Gilead, Janssen, MSD, ViiV, and Gilead. J. K. R. has received honoraria for lectures and/or consultancies from CCO, Medscape, Virology Education, Abivax, Galapagos, Gilead, Merck, Janssen, Theratechnologies, and ViiV and has participated on a DSMB or advisory board for Abivax and Galapagos. C. B. has received honoraria for lectures and/or consultancies; support for attending meetings and/or travel from AbbVie, Gilead, Janssen, MSD, and ViiV; and funding from Dt Leberstiftung, German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF), Hector Stiftung, and the NEAT ID Foundation. C. B. has also participated on a DSMB or advisory board for the MAVMET study (unpaid participation) and serves on the European AIDS Clinical Society governing board and as scientific secretary for DAIG. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: HIV and hepatitis C virus (HCV) have shared routes of transmission among men who have sex with men (MSM). Routine testing facilitates early diagnosis and treatment, thereby preventing morbidity and onward transmission. We evaluated factors associated with HIV and HCV testing in a behaviorally vulnerable cohort of predominantly MSM., Methods: From June 2018 through June 2019, the BRAHMS study enrolled adults at ten German outpatient clinics that serve gender and sexual minority populations. Participants completed behavioral questionnaires that captured prior experience with HIV and HCV testing. Multivariable robust Poisson regression was used to evaluate factors potentially associated with testing in the previous 6 months., Results: Among 1017 participants with median age 33 (interquartile range 28-39) years, 1001 (98.4%) reported any lifetime history of HIV testing and 787 (77.4%) reported any HCV testing, including 16 (1.6%) known to be living with HCV. Testing within the last 6 months was reported by 921 (90.6%) and 513 (50.4%) for HIV and HCV, respectively. Recent HIV testing was more common among participants with higher education level and recent HCV testing. Recent HCV testing was more common among participants with non-cisgender identity, lifetime history of illicit drug use, hepatitis B immunity or infection, and recent HIV testing., Conclusion: Prior testing for HIV was common in this cohort, but interventions are needed to improve HCV risk stratification and access to testing. HIV testing infrastructure can be successfully leveraged to support HCV testing, but differentiated preventive care delivery is needed for some vulnerable populations., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Background: Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) lead to high cure rates of Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) infections in HIV/HCV coinfected patients. Recent data suggest that treatment failures occur more often in HIV/HCV coinfected persons., Objective: We aimed to identify risk factors for treatment failure in coinfected patients., Methods: We analyzed data collected from the German Hepatitis C-Registry (DHC-R, Trials Registration number DRKS00009717). 437 HIV/HCV coinfected patients were included. Sustained virological response (SVR) rates and the impact of CD4+ count, HIV viral load, liver cirrhosis and splenomegaly were evaluated., Results: 83.5% (365/437) of the patients were male (average age: 46.6 ± 9.2 y). Most patients received antiretroviral therapy (ART) (88.1%; 385/437), had a HIV RNA ≤40 copies/ml (88.5%; 285/322) and were infected with HCV genotype (GT) 1 (77.6%; 339/437). Overall SVR12 rate was 92% (402/437). In patients with HIV RNA ≤40 copies/ml and >40 copies/ml SVR12 rates were 93.2% (272/292) and 85.3%, respectively (29/34; p = .11). SVR12 rates were 91.8% (45/49) and 92.7% (253/273; p = .84) in patients with a CD4+ <350/µl and ≥350/µl. We observed no difference in either of the subgroups in patients with cirrhosis or splenomegaly. In the univariate logistic regression analysis none of the analyzed HIV or HCV specific parameters, liver cirrhosis or splenomegaly were associated with treatment outcome., Conclusion: We found high SVR12 rates in HIV/HCV coinfected patients and no significant difference was observed due to the patients CD4+ cell count, HIV viral load, portal hypertension or liver cirrhosis.

Background: Antibody responses to hepatitis C virus (HCV) occur delayed and overly decline after viral clearance indicating that the B-cell response to HCV is abnormal. Virus-specific memory B-cells have recently been found in infected individuals, but the viral exposure requirements for the generation of these cells is unknown., Objectives: The primary goal of this study was to quantify and compare the HCV-specific memory B-cell response between chronic and resolved HCV-infected individuals. A secondary goal was to examine if HIV-specific memory B-cell responses are maintained during HCV co-infection., Study Design: HCV core protein- and HIV-specific memory B-cell responses were examined in HIV/HCV-infected individuals treated 4-30 weeks after HCV diagnosis. Memory B-cell frequencies were compared between chronically and transiently infected individuals., Results: Chronically infected individuals had vigorous HCV-specific memory B-cell responses and antibodies, whereas subjects with transient viremia showed low or undetectable virus-specific B-cell responses. In addition, chronically HIV/HCV-infected subjects had robust HIV-specific memory B-cell responses., Conclusions: Whereas chronic HCV infection induces virus-specific antibodies and memory B-cells, transient infection in individuals with sustained viral response to therapy does not stimulate a durable HCV-specific B-cell response indicating that the formation of long-lived virus-specific B-cells is suppressed in the early phase of infection. This may contribute to the inability to spontaneously clear HCV infection., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Outbreaks of sexually transmitted acute HCV infection have been described recently in several cities in the western world. The epidemic affects mainly MSM who are coinfected with HIV and is supposably linked to certain sexual risk practices. Here, we compared our findings with current knowledge and recommendations., Methods: HIV-positive patients with the diagnosis of acute HCV infection were included in the retrospective analysis. The patients came from outpatient infectious disease centers in northern German cities. We looked at markers of HIV and HCV infection and compared patients who received treatment and those who did not. Treated patients were followed up to 72 weeks., Results: Three hundred nineteen HIV-positive patients with the diagnosis of acute hepatitis C between 2001 and 2008 and were included in the analysis. All patients were male, 315 (99%) patients were of caucasian origin, 296 (93%) declared homosexual contacts as a risk factor for HCV infection, intravenous drug use was declared in 3 (1%) cases. Median age at HCV diagnosis was 40 years (range 20-69 years). Median HCV viral load was 1.2 x 106 IU/mL, 222 patients (70%) had HCV genotype 1, 59 (18%) genotype 4. The median time of HIV infection was 5.5 years (range 0 to 22.4 years). Median HIV viral load was 110 copies/mL (range 25 to 10x106 copies/mL). The median CD 4 count was 461 cells/mm3 (range 55-1331 cells/mm3). Two hundred and fourty-six patients (77%) received anti-HCV treatment, and 175 (55%) had completed therapy by the time of the analysis. Median treatment duration was 33 weeks (IQR 24.1-49.9). 93 of the 175 treated patients (53%) reached a sustained virological response (SVR). In the multivariate analysis, ART at diagnosis, HCV RNA drop at week 12, hemoglobin levels and higher platelets were associated with SVR. Treatment duration was significantly higher in the SVR group (40.6 weeks vs 26.6 weeks, p<0.0001). Seventy-three patients (23%) did not receive anti-HCV treatment. In 19 of the untreated patients (26%) the hepatitis C virus was cleared spontaneously., Conclusions: Our findings confirm that acute hepatitis C in HIV infected patients affects mainly MSM who acquire HCV sexually. Patients had a short duration of HIV infection and a stable immunological situation. In this real-life setting from urban regions in northern Germany, treatment rates appear to be high and effective.

Objectives: The European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) treatment recommendations for hepatitis C no longer discriminate between HIV/hepatitis C virus (HCV)‐coinfected and HCV‐monoinfected patients. However, recent data from Spain are questioning these recommendations on the basis of the findings of higher relapse rates and lower cure rates in HIV/HCV‐infected subjects. The aim of our study was to compare HCV cure rates in monoinfected and coinfected patients from Germany. Methods: Data acquired from the Deutsches Hepatitis C‐Registry were analysed. A total of 5657 HCV‐monoinfected subjects and 488 HIV/HCV‐coinfected patients were included in the study. Rates of sustained virological response 12 weeks after the scheduled end of therapy (SVR12) were collected in both subgroups and in cirrhotic and noncirrhotic patients. Results: HIV/HCV‐coinfected patients were more frequently male (84.6% vs. 56.4%, respectively; P < 0.001) and younger than HCV‐monoinfected subjects (46.5 ± 9 vs. 53.8 ± 12.5 years, respectively; P < 0.001). The CD4 blood cell count was > 350 cells/μL in 63.1% of HIV‐positive subjects and 88.7% were on antiretroviral therapy. SVR12 rates were 90.3% (5111 of 5657) in our HCV‐monoinfected cohort and 91.2% (445 of 488) in our coinfected patients. Liver cirrhosis was confirmed in 1667 of 5657 (29.5%) monoinfected patients and 84 of 488 (17.2%; P < 0.001) coinfected patients. SVR12 rates did not differ between HCV‐monoinfected and HIV/HCV‐coinfected patients with liver cirrhosis (87.8% vs. 89.3%, respectively; P = 0.864). A treatment duration of 8 weeks did not reduce the percentage of patients with SVR12 in either subgroup (93.7% in both groups). Conclusions: We found high SVR12 rates in monoinfected as well as coinfected individuals. No differences were detected between the two subgroups regardless of whether there was accompanying liver cirrhosis or a shortened treatment duration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

7-11 November 2010, Tenth International Congress on Drug Therapy in HIV Infection, Glasgow, UK [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]