Search

Background The association between hepatitis C virus ( HCV) infection and the occurrence of type II diabetes remains controversial. Prospective studies are needed to assess its causal temporality. Methods A cohort of 21 559 adults enrolled from seven townships in Taiwan during 1991-1992 and followed till the end of 2010. Incident diabetes over a study time period from 2000 to 2010 was ascertained through computerized linkage with the National Health Insurance database and the National Death Certification profiles. Cox's proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios ( HRs) with 95% confidence intervals ( CIs). Antibodies against HCV (anti- HCV) were tested for all participants, and serum HCV RNA levels were measured for anti- HCV seropositives. Results During 180 244 person-years of follow-up, there were 1917 incident diabetes cases recorded. The cumulative risk for diabetes was 10.9% for anti- HCV seronegatives and 16.7% for anti- HCV seropositives respectively. The HR for diabetes of anti- HCV seropositivity was 1.53 (95% CI: 1.29-1.81) compared with anti- HCV seronegatives after adjustment for risk predictors. The adjusted HRs were 1.63 (1.31-2.02) for anti- HCV seropositives with positive HCV RNA compared to anti- HCV seronegatives ( P<.001). Conclusion Chronic HCV infection was associated with an increased risk for diabetes after adjustment for other risk predictors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a heterogeneous disease. We explored whether any specific subgroups of patients may gain more survival benefits from sorafenib as the first-line therapy for advanced HCC. Methods: PubMed and the Cochrane library were searched for phase III clinical trials that compared sorafenib with other treatments as first-line therapy for advanced HCC. We retrieved data from the published articles and then calculated synthesized hazard ratios (HRs) of overall mortality for patients of different subgroups, using patients who received other treatments as the reference. Results: Four phase III clinical trials comparing sorafenib with other treatments were included in this study. The HRs were not significantly different between patients from various geographic regions (p = 0.183), patients with different Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance statuses (p = 0.699), or patients with different tumor involvement (p = 0.221). By contrast, the synthesized HR for hepatitis C virus (HCV)+ patients was 0.65 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53-0.80], which was significantly lower than that for HCV- patients (0.87, 95% CI 0.79-0.96, p = 0.013). Conclusions: As the first-line therapy for advanced HCC, sorafenib might provide more survival benefits to HCV+ patients than to HCV- patients. © 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aims of this study were to investigate associations between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) near the genes IFNL2, IFNL3, and IFNL4 and spontaneous clearance of hepatitis C virus (HCV) and to evaluate variants for their risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) among subjects in whom spontaneous HCV RNA clearance did not occur. In the first study, 889 untreated anti-HCV-seropositive patients without HCC symptoms were followed from 1991 to 2005. The spontaneous HCV clearance rate was found to be 33.1%. The TT variant of rs8099917 near IFNL3 was associated with increased spontaneous HCV RNA clearance, with an adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) of 2.78 (1.43-5.39), as was the newly-identified TT/TT dinucleotide variant rs368234815 near IFNL4 (adjusted odds ratio 2.68, 95% CI: 1.42-5.05). In the second study, associations between SNPs and HCC risk were examined in 483 HCC cases with detectable HCV RNA and 516 controls. In participants with HCV genotype 1, unfavorable genotypes for HCV clearance near IFNL3were associated with increased HCC risk, the adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) for rs12979860 and rs8099917 being 1.73 (1.00-2.99) and 1.84 (1.02-3.33), respectively. Host characteristics should be considered to identify high-risk patients to prioritize the use of new antiviral agents and intensive screening. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]