Search

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is an adverse reaction to many drugs in common use that in a liver transplantation (LT) recipient may cause graft dysfunction and may even lead to graft loss and the need for retransplantation. However, several potential clinical scenarios, such as graft rejection and infection, can confound the diagnosis of suspected DILI in the setting of LT. This makes causal assessment of a new liver injury more uncertain and has traditionally precluded collection of bona fide cases of DILI affecting LT patients in prospective DILI registries and cohorts. Although no studies have yet determined a greater susceptibility of the transplant patient to DILI, these patients nevertheless present certain risk factors that can theoretically increase the risk of DILI. These include the fact that these patients are polymedicated, use drugs that are potentially hepatotoxic, and can have coexisting hepatitis B or C viruses in addition to other factors found in nontransplant patients, such as genetic variants. Therefore, awareness is crucial of any potential hepatotoxic effect of drugs used in the LT recipient and their possible implication in any case of liver dysfunction. In the present article, we review the most common drugs used in LT recipients from a liver safety perspective and address the main pitfalls in attributing causality in this clinical setting. We also affirm the need for further research and collaboration in this somewhat neglected topic in the field of DILI.

Alcohol-related liver disease (ARLD) is the most prevalent cause of advanced liver disease and liver cirrhosis in Europe, including Spain. According to the World Health Organization the fraction of liver cirrhosis attributable to alcohol use in Spain is 73.8% among men and 56.3% among women. ARLD includes various stages such as steatohepatitis, cirrhosis and hepatocellular cancer. In addition, patients with underlying ARLD and heavy alcohol intake may develop alcoholic hepatitis, which is associated with high mortality. To date, the only effective treatment to treat ARLD is prolonged withdrawal. There are no specific treatments, and the only treatment that increases life expectancy in alcoholic hepatitis is prednisolone. For patients with alcoholic hepatitis who do not respond to treatment, some centres offer the possibility of an early transplant. These clinical practice guidelines aim to propose recommendations on ARLD taking into account their relevance as a cause of advanced chronic liver disease and liver cirrhosis in our setting. This paper aims to answer the key questions for the clinical practice of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, as well as Internal Medicine and Primary Health Centres, making the most up-to-date information regarding the management and treatment of ARLD available to health professionals. These guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations for the clinical management of this disease.

[Background & Aims] Prospective drug-induced liver injury (DILI) registries are important sources of information on idiosyncratic DILI. We aimed to present a comprehensive analysis of 843 patients with DILI enrolled into the Spanish DILI Registry over a 20-year time period., [Methods] Cases were identified, diagnosed and followed prospectively. Clinical features, drug information and outcome data were collected., [Results] A total of 843 patients, with a mean age of 54 years (48% females), were enrolled up to 2018. Hepatocellular injury was associated with younger age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] per year 0.983; 95% CI 0.974–0.991) and lower platelet count (aOR per unit 0.996; 95% CI 0.994–0.998). Anti-infectives were the most common causative drug class (40%). Liver-related mortality was more frequent in patients with hepatocellular damage aged ≥65 years (p = 0.0083) and in patients with underlying liver disease (p = 0.0221). Independent predictors of liver-related death/transplantation included nR-based hepatocellular injury, female sex, higher onset aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and bilirubin values. nR-based hepatocellular injury was not associated with 6-month overall mortality, for which comorbidity burden played a more important role. The prognostic capacity of Hy’s law varied between causative agents. Empirical therapy (corticosteroids, ursodeoxycholic acid and MARS) was prescribed to 20% of patients. Drug-induced autoimmune hepatitis patients (26 cases) were mainly females (62%) with hepatocellular damage (92%), who more frequently received immunosuppressive therapy (58%)., [Conclusions] AST elevation at onset is a strong predictor of poor outcome and should be routinely assessed in DILI evaluation. Mortality is higher in older patients with hepatocellular damage and patients with underlying hepatic conditions. The Spanish DILI Registry is a valuable tool in the identification of causative drugs, clinical signatures and prognostic risk factors in DILI and can aid physicians in DILI characterisation and management., [Lay summary] Clinical information on drug-induced liver injury (DILI) collected from enrolled patients in the Spanish DILI Registry can guide physicians in the decision-making process. We have found that older patients with hepatocellular type liver injury and patients with additional liver conditions are at a higher risk of mortality. The type of liver injury, patient sex and analytical values of aspartate aminotransferase and total bilirubin can also help predict clinical outcomes., The present study has been supported by grants of Instituto de Salud Carlos III cofounded by Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional – FEDER (contract numbers: PI19/00883, PI16/01748, PI18/00901, PI18/01804, PI-0285-2016, PI-0274-2016, PI-0310-2018, PT17/0017/0020) and Agencia Española del Medicamento. CIBERehd and Plataforma ISCIII Ensayos Clinicos are funded by Instituto de Salud Carlos III. MRD holds a Joan Rodes (JR16/00015)/Acción B clinicos investigadores (B-0002-2019) and JSC a Rio Hortega (CM17/00243) research contract from ISCIII and Consejería de Salud de Andalucía.

Background Herbal and dietary supplements (HDS) consumption, a growing cause of hepatotoxicity, is a common practice among Latin-American populations. Objectives: To evaluate clinical, laboratory features and outcome in HDS-hepatotoxicity included in the Latin America-Drug Induced Liver Injury (LATINDILI) Network. Methods A total of 29 adjudicated cases of HDS hepatotoxicity reported to the LATINDILI Network from October 2011 through December 2019 were compared with 322 DILI cases due to conventional drugs and 16 due to anabolic steroids as well as with other series of HDS-hepatotoxicity. Results From 367 DILI cases, 8% were attributed to HDS. An increasing trend in HDS-hepatotoxicity was noted over time (p = .04). Camellia sinensis, Herbalife® products, and Garcinia cambogia, mostly used for weight loss, were the most frequently adjudicated causative agents. Mean age was 45 years (66% female). Median time to onset was 31 days. Patients presented typically with hepatocellular injury (83%) and jaundice (66%). Five cases (17%) developed acute liver failure. Compared to conventional medications and anabolic steroids, HDS hepatotoxicity cases had the highest levels of aspartate and alanine transaminase (p = .008 and p = .021, respectively), had more re-exposure events to the culprit HDS (14% vs 3% vs 0%; p = .026), and had more severe and fatal/liver transplantation outcomes (21% vs 12% vs 13%; p = .005). Compared to other DILI cohorts, less HDS hepatotoxicity cases in Latin America were hospitalized (41%). Conclusions HDS-hepatotoxicity in Latin-America affects mainly young women, manifests mostly with hepatocellular injury and is associated with higher frequency of accidental re-exposure. HDS hepatotoxicity is more serious with a higher chance of death/liver transplantation than DILI related to conventional drugs.

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the main cause of liver diseases in Spain and the incidence is raising due to the outbreak of type 2 diabetes and obesity. This CPG suggests recommendation about diagnosis, mainly non-invasive biomarkers, and clinical management of this entity. Life-style modifications to achieve weight loss is the main target in the management of NAFLD. Low caloric Mediterranean diet and 200 minutes/week of aerobic exercise are encouraged. In non-responders patients with morbid obesity, bariatric surgery or metabolic endoscopy could be indicated. Pharmacological therapy is indicated in patients with NASH and fibrosis and non-responders to weight loss measures. NAFLD could influence liver transplantation, as a growing indication, the impact of steatosis in the graft viability, de novo NAFLD rate after OLT and a raised cardiovascular risk that modify the management of this entity. The current CPG was the result of the First Spanish NAFLD meeting in Seville.

Introduction: In 2011, the Latin-American DILI-Network (LATINDILIN) set up under the guidance of the Spanish DILI Registry a network of hepatologists to prospectively identify and characterize DILI patients. Aim: To evaluate the drugs more frequently associated with DILI in LA, clinical phenotype and outcome. Methods: Demographics, clinical and biochemical parameters of all cases included in the LATINDILI Network were analysed according to the type of liver injury (hepatocellular, Hep; cholestatic, Chol and mixed, Mix). Results: 404 DILI cases were included. Anti-infectives (31%), musculoskeletal system drugs (13%) and herbal products (9.2%) were the main causative therapeutic drug classes. Mean age was 49 years (female sex, 61%). Hep injury predominated (62%) whereas Chol and Mix patterns were 24% and 15% of cases, respectively. Chol patients (mean age 56y) were older than Hep and Mix cases (47 and 50, p

Introduction: Idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a complex hepatic condition whose diagnosis is challenging due to lack of specific biomarkers. Objectives: We aimed to evaluate serum metabolomic differences between patients with DILI and with other causes of liver injury in search for specific DILI biomarkers. Methods: Metabolomic profiles of serum samples from 26 Spanish DILI patients, 34 with non-DILI acute liver injury (ALI) and 48 healthy controls, were analyzed using UHPLC-MS. To assess changes in disease progression, DILI and ALI patients were followed-up from detection (visit 1), one week (visit 2) and >30 days (visit 3). Data were analyzed using Shapiro-Wilk, Student's t and Wilcoxon tests. Results: Several amino acids, fatty acids (FAs), LPI and bile acids were increased, whereas the glycerophospholipids MEPE and MAPC were decreased (p0,05). Conclusion: Most metabolomic differences are found at times closer to DILI recognition (visits 1&2), although abnormal values of FAs remain during recovery. Some FAs species and the amino acids taurine, Phe-Phe glutamic acid, lysine, tryptophan and alanine seem promising DILI biomarker candidates that should be further explored. Funding: CIBERehd, ISCiii-FEDER PI18/00901, PI19/00883.

Background and Aims: Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) presents with a wide phenotypic spectrum requiring an extensive differential diagnosis. Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is not systematically ruled out during acute hepatitis assessment in Spain. The aims of this study were to establish the role of HEV infection and its phenotypic presentation in patients initially suspected of DILI and to determine the anti-HEV seroprevalence rate. Methods: An analysis of 265 patients with suspected DILI and considered for enrolment in the Spanish DILI Registry and 108 controls with normal liver profiles was undertaken. Anti-HEV Immunoglobulin (Ig) G antibodies were analyzed in serum from all subjects. In those with serum samples extracted within 6 months from liver damage onset (n=144), HEV antigen (Ag) and anti- HEV IgM antibodies were tested in duplicate by ELISA. In addition, RT-PCR was performed externally in 8 patients. Results: Out of 144 patients, 12 (8%) were positive for anti-HEV IgM, mean age 61 years. Underlying hepatic diseases (OR=23.4, p20 folds upper limit of normal (OR=10.9, p=0.002) were associated with the diagnosis of acute hepatitis E. The overall anti-HEV IgG seroprevalence rate was 35%, evenly distributed between patients with suspected DILI (34%), and controls (39%). Conclusions: HEV seroprevalence and acute hepatitis E rates are relatively high in Spain. A search for active HEV infection is therefore advised in patients assessed for suspicion of DILI, particularly in patients with underlying liver diseases and high transaminase levels. The present study has been supported by grants of the Instituto de Salud Carlos III cofounded by Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional FEDER (contract numbers: FIS PI0274-2016, PI-0285- 2016, PI 18-01804, PI 18-00901, PT17/0017/0020, CM17/00243, JR16/00015, B-0002-2019, UMA-18-FEDERJA-193 and by the Agencia Española del Medicamento. SCReN and CIBERehd are funded by Instituto de Salud Carlos III. European Cooperation in Science & Technology (COST) ACTION CA17112 Prospective European Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network, IMI2-Translational Safety Biomarker Pipeline (TransBioLine). The funding sources had no involvement in the study design, in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, in the writing of the report or in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a rare, unpredictable, and potentially serious adverse reaction. It is induced by many drugs, herbs, and dietary supplements and represents a diagnostic challenge to clinicians. Older people (aged 65 years and older) are often polymedicated, and their declining physiological function affects drug pharmacokinetics. There is no consistent evidence that age is a general risk factor for DILI; however, age might be a risk factor with specific medications, with antimicrobials and cardiovascular drugs being the most likely medications to cause DILI in older people. Ageing influences DILI phenotypes, making cholestatic damage and chronic DILI more likely. In older people with DILI, comorbidities act as confounding causes and account for higher mortality unrelated to the liver. There are no specific therapies for DILI and supportive measures are still the mainstay of management. This Review highlights current advances and gaps in DILI epidemiology, mechanisms, and diagnosis that are pertinent to older individuals.

Summary Background We have observed an increase in hepatotoxicity (DILI) reporting related to the use of anabolic androgenic steroids (AAS) for bodybuilding. Aim To characterise phenotype presentation, outcome and severity of AAS DILI. Methods Data on 25 cases of AAS DILI reported to the Spanish (20) and Latin-American (5) DILI Registries were collated and compared with previously published cases. Results AAS DILI increased from representing less than 1% of the total cases in the Spanish DILI Registry in the period 2001–2009 to 8% in 2010–2013. Young men (mean age 32 years), requiring hospitalisation, hepatocellular injury and jaundice were predominating features among the AAS cases. AAS DILI caused significantly higher bilirubin values independent of type of damage when compared to other drug classes (P = 0.001). Furthermore, the cholestatic AAS cases presented significantly higher mean peak bilirubin (P = 0.029) and serum creatinine values (P = 0.0002), compared to the hepatocellular cases. In a logistic regression model, the interaction between peak bilirubin values and cholestatic damage was associated with the development of AAS-induced acute kidney impairment (AKI) [OR 1.26 (95% CI: 1.035–1.526); P = 0.021], with 21.5 ×ULN being the best bilirubin cut-off point for predicting AKI risk (AUCROC 0.92). No fatalities occurred. Conclusions Illicit recreational AAS use is a growing cause of reported DILI that can lead to severe hepatic and renal injury. AAS DILI is associated with a distinct phenotype, characterised by considerable bilirubin elevations independent of type of damage. Although hepatocellular injury predominates, acute kidney injury develops in cholestatic cases with pronounced jaundice.

A chronic adverse reaction may occur in some instances of drug-induced liver injury (DILI), even despite drug cessation. In our study, we obtained records from a Spanish registry and evaluated cases of DILI with biochemical evidence of long-term damage. Chronic outcome was defined as a persistent biochemical abnormality of hepatocellular pattern of damage more than 3 months after drug withdrawal or more than 6 months after cholestatic/mixed damage. Data on 28 patients with a chronic clinical evolution (mean follow-up 20 months) between November 1995 and October 2005 were retrieved (18 female; overall mean age 55 yr) and accounted for 5.7% of total idiosyncratic DILI cases (n = 493) submitted to the registry. The main drug classes were cardiovascular and central nervous system (28.5% and 25%, respectively), which, in contrast, represented only 9.8% and 13%, respectively, of all DILI cases. The most frequent causative drugs were amoxicillin–clavulanate (4 of 69 cases), bentazepam (3 of 7 cases), atorvastatin (2 of 7 cases), and captopril (2 of 5 cases). Patients with cholestatic/mixed injury (18 of 194 cases [9%]) were more prone to chronicity than patients with hepatocellular injury (10 of 240 cases; P < .031). In the case of chronic hepatocellular injury, 3 patients progressed to cirrhosis and 2 to chronic hepatitis. In the cholestatic/mixed group, liver biopsy indicated cirrhosis in 1 patient and ductal lesions in 3 patients. In conclusion, cholestatic/mixed type of damage is more prone to become chronic while, in the hepatocellular pattern, the severity is greater. Cardiovascular and central nervous system drugs are the main groups leading to chronic liver damage. (HEPATOLOGY 2006;44:1581–1588.)

Resumen La importancia de las reacciones adversas hepaticas estriba principalmente en su potencial gravedad, no en vano son la causa mas frecuente de retirada de medicamentos del mercado farmaceutico. Las reacciones hepatotoxicas son casi siempre impredecibles (idiosincrasicas), es decir, que ocurren muy raras veces en individuos que toman dosis terapeuticas del compuesto, y no son detectadas casi nunca durante la fase de desarrollo. Aunque el cuadro clinico que se observa mas frecuentemente sea la hepatitis aguda icterica, las lesiones producidas por farmacos pueden simular cualquier enfermedad hepatica conocida. A pesar de que cualquier sustancia ajena al organismo puede ser causa de enfermedad hepatica, hay farmacos con mayor potencial hepatotoxico. Los grupos farmacologicos incriminados mas a menudo en casos de hepatotoxicidad son los antiinflamatorios no esteroideos, entre los cuales el mas comun es el diclofenaco, los antibioticos encabezados por la amoxicilina-acido clavulanico y los antituberculosos. El diagnostico se basa en la sospecha clinica inicial y se sustenta en una anamnesis exhaustiva con una secuencia temporal adecuada y la exclusion de causas alternativas de enfermedad hepatica. Por ultimo, dado que no hay una terapia especifica, salvo excepciones como la N-acetilcisteina, en la intoxicacion por paracetamol el tratamiento fundamental es la deteccion precoz del cuadro con la consiguiente retirada del agente causal. En este articulo se realiza una revision y descripcion de las caracteristicas de las reacciones de hepatotoxicidad producidas por los farmacos mas ampliamente prescritos en la poblacion general, incluyendo analgesicos, antimicrobianos, antidiabeticos, farmacos para el sistema cardiovascular y psicofarmacos.

Drug-induced idiosyncratic liver disease (DIILD) depends largely on host susceptibility factors. Small studies support the genetic influence of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class II molecules on the predisposition to DIILD. We sought associations between HLA-DRB and -DQB alleles and DIILD considered collectively or according to the biochemical expression of liver damage. We studied a total of 140 patients with a definitive or probable diagnosis of DIILD, as assessed with the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences scale, with 635 volunteer bone marrow and blood donors serving as controls. HLA-DRB1* and -DQB1* genotyping was performed by hybridization with sequence-specific oligonucleotides after genomic amplification. The group with DIILD did not differ from control subjects with regard to the distribution of HLA-DRB and -DQB antigens. The frequencies of alleles DRB1*15 (35.4% vs. 18.6% of controls; P = .002; odds ratio [OR] 2.31) and DQB1*06 (61.5% vs. 40.8%; P = .001; OR 2.32) were significantly increased in patients with the cholestatic/mixed type of liver damage in comparison to healthy subjects. By contrast, frequencies of alleles DRB1*07 (16.9% vs. 35.4%; P = .003; OR 0.37) and DQB1*02 (32.3% vs. 55.8%; P = .0003; OR 0.39) were significantly decreased. In conclusion, there is no association between any specific HLA allele and the propensity to develop DIILD. However, the genetic influence associated with HLA class II alleles appears to play a role in the biochemical expression of liver injury in cholestatic/mixed hepatotoxicity and may explain why a given drug may cause different patterns of liver damage. (HEPATOLOGY 2004;39:1603–1612.)

We report a patient who developed cholestatic hepatitis shortly after starting therapy with irbesartan, one of the new, recently marketed angiotensin II antagonists. Serological studies and ultrasonography ruled out viral hepatitis and extrahepatic obstructive jaundice, respectively. A percutaneous liver biopsy showed a portal inflammatory infiltrate with eosinophils and marked cholestatic features in the perivenular area. Irbesartan was discontinued and the patient's jaundice resolved slowly over a period of several weeks, although mild biochemical cholestasis lasted for more than 1 year. There have been seven prior cases of angiotensin II antagonist-induced hepatotoxicity reported in the literature. A class warning for hepatotoxicity for these compounds should probably be considered.

TO THE EDITOR: Infl iximab, a chimeric monoclonal antibody directed against tumor necrosis factor (TNF-), is marketed for the treatment of refractory or fi stulizing Crohn’s disease. Because the activities of TNF- antagonist in immune response are incompletely understood, concern exists regarding its ability to increase the risk for malignancy, among other severe adverse effects. We have recently seen a patient who developed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) shortly after a course of infl iximab. A 40-yr-old man had a 4-yr history of ileocolic CD disease with perineal fi stula. He was unresponsive to 5-aminosalicilic acid, and a course of azathioprine was assessed but had to be stopped because of GI intolerance. Thereafter, methotrexate 25 mg/wk was also started, without any improvement in symptoms. Surgical drainage of the fi stula was then indicated, followed by three infusions of infl iximab 5 mg/kg body weight. After the second dose, the drainage from the fi stula almost ceased. His blood cell counts during infl iximab therapy were within normal range. Eight days after the last dose of infl iximab, the patient complained of asthenia, anorexia

SummaryDiagnosis of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) remains a challenge and eagerly awaits the development of reliable hepatotoxicity biomarkers. Several methods have been developed in order to facilitate hepatotoxicity causality assessments. These methods can be divided into three categories: (1) expert judgement, (2) probabilistic approaches, and (3) algorithms or scales. The last category is further divided into general and liver-specific scales.The Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) scale, also referred to as the Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM), although cumbersome and difficult to apply by physicians not acquainted with DILI, is used by many expert hepatologists, researchers, and regulatory authorities to assess the probability of suspected causal agents. However, several limitations of this scale have been brought to light, indicating that a number of adjustments are needed. This review is a detailed timely criticism to alert the readers of the limitations and give insight into what would be needed to improve the scale. Instructions on how to approach DILI diagnosis in practice are provided, using CIOMS as an aid to emphasize the topics to be addressed when assessing DILI cases.Amendments of the CIOMS scale in the form of applying authoritative evidence-based criteria, a simplified scoring system and appropriate weighting given to individual parameters based on statistical evaluations with large databases will provide wider applicability in the clinical setting.