Search

Surveillance pouchoscopy is recommended for patients with restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis, with the surveillance interval depending on the risk of neoplasia. Neoplasia in patients with ileal pouches mainly have a glandular source and less often are of squamous cell origin. Various grades of neoplasia can occur in the prepouch ileum, pouch body, rectal cuff, anal transition zone, anus, or perianal skin. The main treatment modalities are endoscopic polypectomy, endoscopic ablation, endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic submucosal dissection, surgical local excision, surgical circumferential resection and re-anastomosis, and pouch excision. The choice of the treatment modality is determined by the grade, location, size, and features of neoplastic lesions, along with patients' risk of neoplasia and comorbidities, and local endoscopic and surgical expertise.

Whether preoperative treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) increases the risk of postoperative infectious complications remains controversial. The primary aim of this study was to determine whether preoperative exposure to TNFis is an independent risk factor for postoperative infectious complications within 30 days of surgery.We conducted a multicenter prospective observational study of patients with IBD undergoing intra-abdominal surgery across 17 sites from the Crohn'sColitis Foundation Clinical Research Alliance. Infectious complications were categorized as surgical site infections (SSIs) or non-SSIs. Current TNFi exposure was defined as use within 12 weeks of surgery, and serum was collected for drug-level analyses. Multivariable models for occurrence of the primary outcome, any infection, or SSI were adjusted by predefined covariates (age, sex, preoperative steroid use, and disease type), baseline variables significantly associated (P.05) with any infection or SSI separately, and TNFi exposure status. Exploratory models used TNFi exposure based on serum drug concentration.A total of 947 patients were enrolled from September 2014 through June 2017. Current TNFi exposure was reported by 382 patients. Any infection (18.1% vs 20.2%, P = .469) and SSI (12.0% vs 12.6%, P = .889) rates were similar in patients currently exposed to TNFis and those unexposed. In multivariable analysis, current TNFi exposure was not associated with any infection (odds ratio, 1.050; 95% confidence interval, 0.716-1.535) or SSI (odds ratio, 1.249; 95% confidence interval, 0.793-1.960). Detectable TNFi drug concentration was not associated with any infection or SSI.Preoperative TNFi exposure was not associated with postoperative infectious complications in a large prospective multicenter cohort.

Summary Pouchitis, Crohn's disease of the pouch, cuffitis, polyps, and extraintestinal manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease are common inflammatory disorders of the ileal pouch. Acute pouchitis is treated with oral antibiotics and chronic pouchitis often requires anti-inflammatory therapy, including the use of biologics. Aetiological factors for secondary pouchitis should be evaluated and managed accordingly. Crohn's disease of the pouch is usually treated with biologics and its stricturing and fistulising complications can be treated with endoscopy or surgery. The underlying cause of cuffitis determines treatment strategies. Endoscopic polypectomy is recommended for large, symptomatic inflammatory polyps and polyps in the cuff. The management principles of extraintestinal manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease in patients with pouches are similar to those in patients without pouches.

Background & Aims We aimed to compare safety and effectiveness of vedolizumab to tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-antagonist therapy in ulcerative colitis in routine practice. Methods A multicenter, retrospective, observational cohort study (May 2014 to December 2017) of ulcerative colitis patients treated with vedolizumab or TNF-antagonist therapy. Propensity score weighted comparisons for development of serious adverse events and achievement of clinical remission, steroid-free clinical remission, and steroid-free deep remission. A priori determined subgroup comparisons in TNF-antagonist–naive and –exposed patients, and for vedolizumab against infliximab and subcutaneous TNF-antagonists separately. Results A total of 722 (454 vedolizumab, 268 TNF antagonist) patients were included. Vedolizumab-treated patients were more likely to achieve clinical remission (hazard ratio [HR], 1.651; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.229-2.217), steroid-free clinical remission (HR, 1.828; 95% CI, 1.135-2.944), and steroid-free deep remission (HR, 2.819; 95% CI, 1.496-5.310) than those treated with TNF antagonists. Results were consistent across subgroup analyses in TNF-antagonist–naive and −exposed patients, and for vedolizumab vs infliximab and vs subcutaneous TNF-antagonist agents separately. Overall, there were no statistically significant differences in the risk of serious adverse events (HR, 0.899; 95% CI, 0.502-1.612) or serious infections (HR, 1.235; 95% CI, 0.608-2.511) between vedolizumab-treated and TNF-antagonist−treated patients. However, in TNF-antagonist−naive patients, vedolizumab was less likely to be associated with serious adverse events than TNF antagonists (HR, 0.192; 95% CI, 0.049-0.754). Conclusions Treatment of ulcerative colitis with vedolizumab is associated with higher rates of remission than treatment with TNF-antagonist therapy in routine practice, and lower rates of serious adverse events in TNF-antagonist−naive patients.

Introduction: Women with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) endorse a tremendous amount of concern about medication exposure during pregnancy and their effects on the fetus. Medical providers caring for this patient population should be well informed and feel comfortable counseling their patients for the best pregnancy outcome possible.Areas covered: It is of particular importance to understand the implications of use of biologics in preconception, pregnancy, and postpartum timeframes. Herein, we aim to inform the clinician about the impact of uncontrolled inflammation during pregnancy, the mechanisms of biologic transport through the placenta, the effects of biologics in maternal and neonatal outcomes, and additional postpartum considerations such as breastfeeding and vaccination safety.Expert opinion: The groundwork already set by previous research in terms of safety of biologic therapy during pregnancy has been reassuring. With the advent of more mechanisms of action but similar protein structure, i.e. they are IgG1 antibodies; the authors anticipate the recommendation of continuation of therapy throughout pregnancy will be sustained.

Introduction Vulvar involvement is a rare complication of Crohn's disease (CD). The optimal treatment of vulvar CD is unknown. Methods We conducted a 25-year retrospective cohort study of vulvar CD from 3 referral centers. Clinical features and outcomes were studied. Results Fifty patients were identified. The most common vulvar symptoms were pain (74%), edema (60%), ulcerations (46%), nodules (36%), and abscess (34%). Medical management leading to symptomatic improvement varied, and 5 patients ultimately required surgery. Discussion Vulvar CD manifests with a broad spectrum of symptoms. Aggressive medical management was frequently effective, although surgery was required in 10% of cases.

Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is an option for most patients with ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis who require colectomy. Although the construction of an ileal pouch substantially improves patients' health-related quality of life, the surgery is, directly or indirectly, associated with various structural, inflammatory, and functional adverse sequelae. Furthermore, the surgical procedure does not completely abolish the risk for neoplasia. Patients with ileal pouches often present with extraintestinal, systemic inflammatory conditions. The International Ileal Pouch Consortium was established to create this consensus document on the diagnosis and classification of ileal pouch disorders using available evidence and the panellists' expertise. In a given individual, the condition of the pouch can change over time. Therefore, close monitoring of the activity and progression of the disease is essential to make accurate modifications in the diagnosis and classification in a timely manner.

This comparative effectiveness analysis of commercial administrative claims uses propensity score matching to investigate the effectiveness of medical therapy for reducing risk of perianal fistulizing complications among young people with Crohn disease., Key Points Question Does steroid-sparing therapy for Crohn disease reduce the risk of developing perianal fistulizing complications? Findings In this comparative effectiveness analysis 2214 young people with Crohn disease without perianal fistulizing complications were matched via propensity score. Almost 20% developed perianal fistulizing complications within 2 years of Crohn disease diagnosis. Steroid-sparing therapy use was statistically significantly associated with a 59% reduction in perianal fistulizing complications, and fewer underwent ostomy among those who developed perianal fistulizing complications and who had been previously treated with steroid-sparing therapy. Meaning Steroid-sparing therapy should be considered for treatment of Crohn disease to reduce the risk of perianal fistulizing complications., Importance Perianal fistulizing complications (PFCs) develop in 15% to 30% of patients with Crohn disease (CD), are difficult to treat, worsen quality of life, increase cost of care, and commonly recur. Evidence-based strategies to prevent PFCs are lacking. Objectives To investigate the effectiveness of medical therapy for reducing risk of PFCs among young people with CD and to test the hypothesis that steroid-sparing therapy (SST) use would be associated with reduced risk of PFC development. Design, Setting, and Participants In this comparative effectiveness analysis of commercial administrative claims from January 1, 2001, through June 30, 2016, patients who did or did not initiate SST were matched via propensity score to adjust for all available confounders. Using Optum’s Clinformatics Data Mart, a deidentified database of US commercial administrative claims, all patients aged 5 to 24 years with CD (January 1, 2001, through June 30, 2016) were identified. The index date was the CD diagnosis date. Patients with PFCs or SST use at or before CD diagnosis were excluded. The dates of analysis were October 2017 to February 2020. Exposures The primary exposure of interest was SST initiation, including immunomodulators and/or anti–tumor necrosis factor α (anti-TNFα) medications, initiated before either PFC development or the end of the study period. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was PFC development. Propensity score matching was used to balance baseline characteristics. Cox proportional hazards multivariable regression analyses were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs for PFC development. Results Among 2214 young people with CD without PFCs identified, the mean (SD) age at CD diagnosis was 17.0 (4.5) years, and 1151 (52.0%) were male. Among the cohort, 1242 patients (56.1%) initiated SST before PFC development or the end of 24-month follow-up. After propensity score matching, 972 patients remained in each treatment group. Overall, 384 of 1944 (19.8%) developed PFCs within 2 years of the index date. The use of SST was associated with a 59% decreased risk of PFC development (hazard ratio [HR], 0.41; 95% CI, 0.33-0.52; P

Background & Aims In women with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), exposure to immunomodulator or biologic therapy has not been associated with adverse events during pregnancy or outcomes of newborns. We investigated whether exposure of patients to these agents during pregnancy affects serologic responses to vaccines in newborns. Methods We collected data from the Pregnancy in IBD and Neonatal Outcomes registry, which records outcomes of pregnant women with diagnosis of IBD receiving care at multiple centers in the United States, from 2007 through 2016. Serum samples collected from infants at least 7 months old were analyzed for titers of antibodies to Haemophilus influenzae B (HiB) or tetanus toxin; mothers completed a survey of vaccine practices and outcomes from July 2013 through October 2016. Umbilical cord blood samples from 33 infants were assayed for concentration of biologic agents. Vaccination response was compared between infants born to mothers exposed to biologic therapy (infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, golimumab, natalizumab, vedolizumab, or ustekinumab—either as a single agent or in combination with an immunomodulator, at any time between conception and delivery) and infants born to unexposed mothers. Results A total of 179 women completed the vaccine survey (26 biologic unexposed, 153 exposed to a biologic agent). We found no significant difference in proportions of infants with protective antibody titers against HiB born to exposed mothers (n = 42, 71%) vs unexposed mothers (n = 8, 50%) ( P = .41). We also found no difference in the proportion of infants with protective antibody titers to tetanus toxoid born to exposed mothers (80%) vs unexposed mothers (75%) ( P = .66). The median concentration of infliximab in cord blood did not differ significantly between infants with vs without protective antibody titers to HiB ( P = .30) or tetanus toxoid ( P = .93). Mild reactions were observed in 7/40 infants who received rotavirus vaccine and whose mothers had been exposed to biologic therapies. Conclusions Vaccination of infants against HiB and tetanus toxin, based on antibody titers measured when infants were at least 7 months old, does not appear to be affected by in utero exposure to biologic therapy.

Ileocolonoscopy remains the mainstay of objective disease assessment in Crohn's Disease, and various validated indices are used to grade severity of the disease. The most commonly used indices are the Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (including the size of ulcers) and the Crohn's Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity (including the depth of ulcers). These measurements are highly subjective, especially the depth of an ulcer, and are based solely on the discretion of the endoscopist coupled with the imaging capabilities of the colonoscope and adequacy of the bowel prep. Narula et al. undertook a post hoc analysis of baseline predictors of endoscopic remission (ER) at week 26 in a subset (172 of 508) of moderate-severe Crohn's disease patients participating in the SONIC trial. The authors found no significant differences in the odds of achieving ER when comparing overall or segmental severe inflammation (high Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease [>16 overall or >3 per segment] or Crohn's Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity [>12 overall or >3 per segment] scores) with moderate inflammation. The number of affected segments involved also did not impact the likelihood of achieving week 26 ER. The authors then found a potentially synergistic effect with large and deep ulcers in the ileum and rectum. The optimal time to assess whether ulcers ultimately heal or not is unknown, but waiting longer than 26 weeks may negate any lead time bias regarding ulcer size. Therefore, similar to many areas of life, it is likely that size ultimately does not matter, but instead location, location, and location.

Introduction Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) management is changing at a rapid rate, with the emergence of multiple new therapies and evolving care goals. In addition, the quality and quantity of IBD fellowship education is highly variable, based on patient populations and institutional expertise. Therefore, it is crucial to develop improved ways to educate our trainees. Here, we describe an educational initiative designed to familiarize first year gastroenterology (GI) fellows to key concepts in the management of IBD. Methods IBD 101 is a one-day course designed to introduce first-year GI fellows to various clinical topics relevant to the management of IBD. The program was held on September 14, 2019. Fellows from U.S. allopathic GI training programs were selected by their training directors for participation. The course included small group didactic sessions led by expert faculty members and group observed structured clinical examinations (OSCEs), in which fellows observed encounters between expert faculty and standardized patients followed immediately by debrief sessions to reinforce key concepts. The topics included need for surgery in IBD, pregnancy and IBD, escalation of care for acute severe UC, initiating biologic therapy, treatment of mild-moderate IBD, treatment of moderate-severe IBD and managing loss of response to therapy. A review of supplemental opportunities for education in IBD was presented at the conclusion of the course. Pre- and post-course surveys using Likert scoring (1=“strongly disagree” through 4=“strongly agree”) were administered to assess baseline knowledge and educational impact of the course on each addressed topic. Results 55 fellows from 32 programs participated. 49/55 (89%) completed pre- and post-course surveys to assess the educational impact of the program on the didactic sessions and on the group OSCE format. 100% of fellows felt that the course content was appropriate for their scope of clinical practice. Substantial improvement in comfort with all addressed clinical topics was noted (figure 1). In the post-course survey, all fellows reported an improved ability to manage and treat patients with IBD. Comparing career interest in IBD, more participants expressed interest in pursuing a career in IBD after participating (pre: 63% vs post: 75%). 96% of attendees stated that they would strongly recommend this course to future GI fellows. Conclusions This single day course for first-year GI trainees was effective and well-received, and offers a novel intervention to address the challenges of IBD education and training. Follow-up of this cohort of trainees and expansion for next year is planned.

The global incidence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has increased considerably during the past few decades.1 IBDs, composed of Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), are characterized by heterogeneous presentation and widely variable clinical course. The therapeutic goals are to induce and maintain remission. Despite the current treatments available, many patients do not achieve this goal.

Background & aimsWe created and validated a clinical decision support tool (CDST) to predict outcomes of vedolizumab therapy for ulcerative colitis (UC).MethodsWe performed logistic regression analyses of data from the GEMINI 1 trial, from 620 patients with UC who received vedolizumab induction and maintenance therapy (derivation cohort), to identify factors associated with corticosteroid-free remission (full Mayo score of 2 or less, no subscore above 1). We used these factors to develop a model to predict outcomes of treatment, which we called the vedolizumab CDST. We evaluated the correlation between exposure and efficacy. We validated the CDST in using data from 199 patients treated with vedolizumab in routine practice in the United States from May 2014 through December2017.ResultsAbsence of exposure to a tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonist (+3 points), disease duration of 2 y or more (+3 points), baseline endoscopic activity (moderate vs severe) (+2 points), and baseline albumin concentration (+0.65 points per 1 g/L) were independently associated with corticosteroid-free remission during vedolizumab therapy. Patients in the derivation and validation cohorts were assigned to groups of low (CDST score, 26 points or less), intermediate (CDST score, 27-32 points), or high (CDST score, 33 points or more) probability of vedolizumab response. We observed a statistically significant linear relationship between probability group and efficacy (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.65), as well as drug exposure (P < .001) in the derivation cohort. In the validation cohort, a cutoff value of 26 points identified patients who did not respond to vedolizumab with high sensitivity (93%); only the low and intermediate probability groups benefited from reducing intervals of vedolizumab administration due to lack of response (P = .02). The vedolizumab CDST did not identify patients with corticosteroid-free remission during TNF antagonist therapy.ConclusionsWe used data from a trial of patients with UC to develop a scoring system, called the CDST, which identified patients most likely to enter corticosteroid-free remission during vedolizumab therapy, but not anti-TNF therapy. We validated the vedolizumab CDST in a separate cohort of patients in clinical practice. The CDST identified patients most likely to benefited from reducing intervals of vedolizumab administration due to lack of initial response. ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT00783718.

We assessed the real-world effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab (VDZ) in moderate-severe Crohn's disease (CD).Retrospective cohort study of seven medical centers, from May 2014 to December 2015. Adults with moderate-severe CD treated with VDZ, with follow-up after initiation of therapy, were included. Using the multivariable Cox proportional hazard analyses, we identified independent predictors of clinical remission or mucosal healing with VDZ. Rates of serious infection (requiring antibiotics, resulting in discontinuation of VDZ, hospitalization or death) and serious adverse events (discontinuation of VDZ, hospitalization or death) were described quantitatively.We included 212 patients with moderate-severe CD (median age 34 years; 40% male; 90% tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-antagonist exposed) with a median follow-up (IQR) of 39 weeks (25-53). Twelve-month cumulative rates of clinical remission, mucosal healing, and deep remission (clinical remission+mucosal healing) were 35%, 63%, and 26%, respectively. Individuals with prior TNF-antagonist exposure (hazard ratio (HR) 0.40; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.20-0.81), smoking history (HR 0.47; 95% CI: 0.25-0.89), active perianal disease (HR 0.49; 95% CI: 0.27-0.88), and severe disease activity (HR 0.54; 95% CI: 0.31-0.95) were less likely to achieve clinical remission. Those with prior TNF-antagonist exposure (HR 0.29; 95% CI: 0.12-0.73), and severe disease activity (HR 0.54; 95% CI: 0.31-0.95) were less likely to achieve mucosal healing. During 160 patient years of follow-up (PYF) and 1,433 VDZ infusions, 5 patients developed infusion reactions (3.5 per 1,000 infusions), 21 developed serious infections (13 per 100 PYF), and 17 developed serious adverse events (10 per 100 PYF). A minority of adverse events required discontinuation of therapy (6 per 100 PYF).VDZ is a safe and effective treatment option for moderate-severe CD in routine practice. Clinical remission and deep remission (clinical remission and mucosal healing) can be achieved in 1/3 of individuals, and a minority of individuals require discontinuation of therapy due to adverse events.

Background & Aims As more treatment options for inflammatory bowel diseases become available, it is important to identify patients most likely to respond to different therapies. We created and validated a scoring system to identify patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) who respond to vedolizumab. Methods We collected data from the GEMINI 2 phase 3 trial of patients with active CD treated with vedolizumab for 26 weeks (n = 814) and performed logistic regression analysis to identify factors associated with clinical, steroid-free, and durable remission (derivation set). We used these data to develop a clinical decision support tool, which we validated using data from 366 participants in a separate clinical practice observational cohort of patients with active CD treated with vedolizumab for 26 weeks (the VICTORY cohort). We evaluated the ability of this tool to identify patients in clinical remission or corticosteroid-free remission, or those with mucosal healing (MH), clinical remission with MH, or corticosteroid-free remission with MH after vedolizumab therapy using receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (AUC) analyses. The primary outcome was to develop and validate a list of factors associated with achieving remission by vedolizumab in patients with active CD. Results In the derivation analysis, we identified absence of previous treatment with a tumor necrosis factor antagonist (+3 points), absence of prior bowel surgery (+2 points), absence of prior fistulizing disease (+2 points), baseline level of albumin (+0.4 points per g/L), and baseline concentration of C-reactive protein (reduction of 0.5 points for values between 3.0 and 10.0 mg/L and 3.0 points for values >10.0 mg/L) as factors associated with remission. In the validation set, our model identified patients in clinical remission with an AUC of 0.67, patients in corticosteroid-free remission with an AUC of 0.66, patients with MH with an AUC of 0.72, patients in clinical remission with MH with an AUC of 0.73, and patients in corticosteroid-free clinical remission with MH with an AUC of 0.75. A cutoff value of 13 points identified patients in clinical remission after vedolizumab therapy with 92% sensitivity, patients in corticosteroid-free remission with 94% sensitivity, patients with MH with 98% sensitivity, patients with clinical remission and MH with 100% sensitivity, and patients with corticosteroid-free clinical remission with MH with 100% sensitivity. Conclusions We developed and validated a scoring system to identify patients with CD most likely to respond to 26 weeks of vedolizumab therapy. Further studies are needed to optimize its accuracy in select populations and determine its cost-effectiveness.

The impact of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) activity and treatment on fertility and pregnancy outcomes is important for men and women. In women, remission at conception determines better pregnancy outcomes,1,2 and most maternal IBD medication exposures are safe.2 In contrast, less is known about the impact of paternal disease activity and medication use on fertility and pregnancy outcomes in men with IBD.3.

Acute cholangitis (AC) requires prompt diagnosis and treatment for optimal management. To examine whether a putative “weekend effect” impact outcomes of patients hospitalized for AC. We conducted a retrospective study of patients admitted with AC between 2009 and 2012. After excluding those not meeting Tokyo consensus criteria for AC, the cohort was categorized into weekend (Saturday–Sunday) and weekday (Monday–Friday) hospital admission and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) groups. Primary outcome was length of stay (LOS); secondary outcomes included ERC performance, organ failure, and mortality. Groups were compared with Chi-square and t tests; predictors of LOS were assessed with linear regression. The cohort consisted of 181 patients (mean age 63.1 years, 62.4 % male). Choledocholithiasis was the most common etiology of AC (29.4 %). Fifty-two patients (28.7 %) were admitted on a weekend and 129 (71.3 %) on a weekday. One hundred forty-one patients (78 %) underwent ERC, of which 120 (85 %) were on a weekday. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics, LOS, proportion undergoing ERC, time to ERC, organ failure, or mortality between weekend and weekday admission groups. Similarly, there were no significant differences between weekend and weekday ERC groups. In multivariate analyses, international normalized ratio (p

Women are counselled that surgery for ulcerative colitis leads to infertility and that they could require assisted reproductive technology (ART) to conceive. But how successful is ART, compared with women who do not have a history of ulcerative colitis? New data suggests that ART is less effective in women with ulcerative colitis, but its success is not reduced after surgery to treat the disease.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to quantify the safety and effectiveness of vedolizumab (VDZ) when used for UC, and to identify predictors of response to treatment. METHODS: Retrospective review (May 2014 – December 2016) of VICTORY Consortium data. Adults with follow-up after starting VDZ for clinically active UC were included. Primary effectiveness outcomes were cumulative rates of clinical remission (resolution of all UC related symptoms) and endoscopic remission (Mayo endoscopic sub-score 0). Key secondary effectiveness outcomes included cumulative rates of corticosteroid-free remission and deep remission (clinical remission and endoscopic remission). Cox-proportional hazard analyses were used to identify independent predictors of treatment effectiveness. Non-response imputation (NRI) sensitivity analyses were performed for effectiveness outcomes. Key safety outcomes were rates of serious infection, serious adverse events, and colectomy. RESULTS: We included 321 UC patients (71% prior TNFα antagonist exposure, median follow-up 10 months). Twelve month cumulative rates of clinical remission and endoscopic remission were 51% and 41%, respectively. Corresponding rates for corticosteroid-free remission and deep remission were 37% and 30%, respectively. Using NRI, 12-month rates were 20% (n=64/321) for clinical remission, 17% (n=35/203) for endoscopic remission, 15% (n=30/195) for corticosteroid-free remission, and 14% (n=28/203) for deep remission. A majority of the patients without adequate follow-up at 12-months who were deemed non-responders using NRI, had already achieved clinical remission (n=70) or a significant clinical response (n=36) prior to 12 months. VDZ discontinuation prior to 12 months was observed in 91 patients, for lack of response (n=56), need for surgery (n=29), or adverse event (n=6). On multi-variable analyses prior exposure to a TNFα antagonist was associated with a reduced probability of achieving clinical remission (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.38–0.75) and endoscopic remission (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.29–0.88). Serious adverse events and serious infections were reported in 6% and 4% of patients, respectively. Overall cumulative rates of colectomy over 12 months were 13%, with lower rates observed in patients naïve to TNFα antagonist therapy (2%) than those who had been exposed to TNFα antagonists (19%). CONCLUSION: In this large real-world cohort we observed that VDZ was well tolerated and effective in achieving key clinical outcomes.

Management of inflammatory bowel disease in women of reproductive age requires special attention. Even though fertility in women without previous pelvis surgery is similar to the general population, active disease at conception and during pregnancy can lead to unfavorable pregnancy and fetal outcomes. In general, most medications needed to treat inflammatory bowel disease are low risk during pregnancy and breastfeeding. Achieving and maintaining disease remission, patient education, and a multidisciplinary team approach is the key to a successful pregnancy.

Infliximab was the first FDA approved biologic for the treatment of Crohn's disease. Data for its use before and during pregnancy in both females and males have been increasing over the last decade, but most studies have had fewer than 100 patients and inconsistent comparison to healthy control outcomes. New data from the TREAT Safety Registry have a robust N of female and male patients exposed to infliximab with known birth outcomes from both academic and community settings. There does not appear to be any increase in adverse pregnancy outcomes from this population.