1. SCALING UP SAGEBRUSH CHEMISTRY WITH NEAR-INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY AND UAS-ACQUIRED HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGERY
- Author
-
Lisa A. Shipley, S. N. Barrett, Peter J. Olsoy, Jordan D. Nobler, T. Trevor Caughlin, Brecken C. Robb, Jennifer S. Forbey, Donna Delparte, Chelsea Merriman, Janet L. Rachlow, and M. D. Blocker
- Subjects
Technology ,geography ,Herbivore ,geography.geographical_feature_category ,biology ,Steppe ,Near-infrared spectroscopy ,Hyperspectral imaging ,Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) ,biology.organism_classification ,TA1501-1820 ,Spectroradiometer ,Threatened species ,Artemisia ,Applied optics. Photonics ,Ecosystem ,TA1-2040 ,Remote sensing - Abstract
Sagebrush ecosystems (Artemisia spp.) face many threats including large wildfires and conversion to invasive annuals, and thus are the focus of intense restoration efforts across the western United States. Specific attention has been given to restoration of sagebrush systems for threatened herbivores, such as Greater Sage-Grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) and pygmy rabbits (Brachylagus idahoensis), reliant on sagebrush as forage. Despite this, plant chemistry (e.g., crude protein, monoterpenes and phenolics) is rarely considered during reseeding efforts or when deciding which areas to conserve. Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) has proven effective in predicting plant chemistry under laboratory conditions in a variety of ecosystems, including the sagebrush steppe. Our objectives were to demonstrate the scalability of these models from the laboratory to the field, and in the air with a hyperspectral sensor on an unoccupied aerial system (UAS). Sagebrush leaf samples were collected at a study site in eastern Idaho, USA. Plants were scanned with an ASD FieldSpec 4 spectroradiometer in the field and laboratory, and a subset of the same plants were imaged with a SteadiDrone Hexacopter UAS equipped with a Rikola hyperspectral sensor (HSI). All three sensors generated spectral patterns that were distinct among species and morphotypes of sagebrush at specific wavelengths. Lab-based NIRS was accurate for predicting crude protein and total monoterpenes (R2 = 0.7–0.8), but the same NIRS sensor in the field was unable to predict either crude protein or total monoterpenes (R2 2&thinsp
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF