Search

Beetles ( Coleoptera) are the most species-rich and ecologically diverse group of organisms in tropical rainforest canopies. This study reports on the distribution of the beetle community on five discrete canopy microhabitats (mature leaves, new leaves, flowers, fruit, and suspended dead wood) on 23 tree species in an Australian tropical rainforest. We tested the hypothesis that the beetle fauna will vary in community structure between microhabitats based on differences in the quantity, quality as a food source and availability of different canopy microhabitats., There was substantial variation in dominant beetle families in terms of abundance between microhabitats. All assemblages contained a high number of rare species, with flowers supporting most of the more abundant species. Consequently, the flower-visitor assemblage was more heterogeneous than expected by chance, whereas the mature leaf assemblage was more even in the proportional abundances of species than expected., The distribution of singletons was also non-random and flowers, which are spatially and temporally restricted, supported fewer singletons than expected by chance, whereas mature leaves and dead wood supported more. These differences were insensitive to beetle feeding guild, and are most likely related to variation in microhabitat distribution and availability, which influenced relative sampling efforts and the probability of random microhabitat/beetle associations., High dissimilarity in species overlap between microhabitats suggests that each microhabitat attracts a unique beetle assemblage, which has an additive effect on canopy-wide species richness patterns. Consequently, biodiversity studies that focus on single microhabitats may inadvertently omit a large proportion of canopy species. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Reliable estimates of host specificity in tropical rainforest beetles are central for an understanding of food web dynamics and biodiversity patterns. However, it is widely assumed that herbivores constitute the majority of host specific species, and that most herbivore species feed on leaves. We tested the generality of this assumption by comparing both plant host- and microhabitat-specificity between beetle communities inhabiting the foliage (flush and mature), flowers, fruit, and suspended dead wood from 23 canopy plant species in a tropical rainforest in north Queensland, Australia. Independent of host tree identity, 76/77 of the most abundant beetle species ( N ≥ 12 individuals) were aggregated on a particular microhabitat. Microhabitat specialization (measured by Sm and Lloyd's indices) was very high and did not differ between flower and foliage communities, suggesting that each newly-sampled microhabitat has a large additive effect on total species richness. In accordance with previous studies, host specificity of foliage-inhabiting beetles was most pronounced among herbivorous families ( Curculionidae, Chrysomelidae). By contrast, host specificity among flower-visitors was equally high among herbivorous and nonherbivorous families (e.g. Nitidulidae, Staphylinidae, Cleridae). Effective specialization ( FT) measures showed that traditional correction factors used to project total species richness in nonherbivorous groups fail to fully capture diversity in the flower-visiting beetle fauna. These results demonstrate that host specialization is not concentrated within folivores as previously assumed. © 2013 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2013, 109, 215-228. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Most plant species have a range of traits that deter herbivores. However, understanding of how different defences are related to one another is surprisingly weak. Many authors argue that defence traits trade off against one another, while others argue that they form coordinated defence syndromes., We collected a dataset of unprecedented taxonomic and geographic scope (261 species spanning 80 families, from 75 sites across the globe) to investigate relationships among four chemical and six physical defences., Five of the 45 pairwise correlations between defence traits were significant and three of these were tradeoffs. The relationship between species' overall chemical and physical defence levels was marginally nonsignificant ( P = 0.08), and remained nonsignificant after accounting for phylogeny, growth form and abundance. Neither categorical principal component analysis ( PCA) nor hierarchical cluster analysis supported the idea that species displayed defence syndromes., Our results do not support arguments for tradeoffs or for coordinated defence syndromes. Rather, plants display a range of combinations of defence traits. We suggest this lack of consistent defence syndromes may be adaptive, resulting from selective pressure to deploy a different combination of defences to coexisting species. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Leaves come in many sizes and shapes, and the relationships between leaf traits and the environments they occur in are better understood every day. However we still know very little about the ecological consequences of plants having either compound or simple leaves. We attempted to address this knowledge gap by comparing chemical and physical characteristics (leaf area, length:width ratio, water content, leaf mass per area, 'toughness' and C:N ratio), as well as rates of herbivory between compound and simple leaves across 34 species in adjacent rainforest, open woodland and wet sclerophyll (tall open forest) vegetation in northeastern Australia. We found C:N ratio to be lower in simple leaves, but this was the only leaf trait that differed significantly between leaf types and did not stand up under phylogenetic analysis. Overall, we found no differences in herbivory between simple and compound leaves. While it remains unclear what the advantages of having one leaf type over another might be, the differences do not seem to lie in construction, or in vulnerability to herbivores, at least in the Australian Wet Tropics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]