Search

AlphaScreen is one of the most widely used assay technologies in drug discovery due to its versatility, dynamic range and sensitivity. However, a presence of false positives and frequent hitters contributes to difficulties with an interpretation of measured HTS data. Although filters do exist to identify frequent hitters for AlphaScreen, they are frequently based on privileged scaffolds. The development of such filters is time consuming and requires deep domain knowledge. Recently, machine learning and artificial intelligence methods are emerging as important tools to advance drug discovery and chemoinformatics, including their application to identification of frequent hitters in screening assays. However, the relative performance and complementarity of the Machine Learning and scaffold-based techniques has not yet been comprehensively compared. In this study, we analysed filters based on the privileged scaffolds with filters built using machine learning. Our results demonstrate that machine-learning methods provide more accurate filters for identification of frequent hitters in AlphaScreen assays than scaffold-based methods and can be easily redeveloped once new data are measured. We present highly accurate models to identify frequent hitters in AlphaScreen assays., (© 2021 Wiley-VCH GmbH.)

Background: High-throughput screening (HTS) and virtual screening (VS) have been widely used to identify potential hits from large chemical libraries. However, the frequent occurrence of 'noisy compounds' in the screened libraries, such as compounds with poor drug-likeness, poor selectivity or potential toxicity, has greatly weakened the enrichment capability of HTS and VS campaigns. Therefore, the development of comprehensive and credible tools to detect noisy compounds from chemical libraries is urgently needed in early stages of drug discovery., Results: In this study, we developed a freely available integrated python library for negative design, called Scopy, which supports the functions of data preparation, calculation of descriptors, scaffolds and screening filters, and data visualization. The current version of Scopy can calculate 39 basic molecular properties, 3 comprehensive molecular evaluation scores, 2 types of molecular scaffolds, 6 types of substructure descriptors and 2 types of fingerprints. A number of important screening rules are also provided by Scopy, including 15 drug-likeness rules (13 drug-likeness rules and 2 building block rules), 8 frequent hitter rules (four assay interference substructure filters and four promiscuous compound substructure filters), and 11 toxicophore filters (five human-related toxicity substructure filters, three environment-related toxicity substructure filters and three comprehensive toxicity substructure filters). Moreover, this library supports four different visualization functions to help users to gain a better understanding of the screened data, including basic feature radar chart, feature-feature-related scatter diagram, functional group marker gram and cloud gram., Conclusion: Scopy provides a comprehensive Python package to filter out compounds with undesirable properties or substructures, which will benefit the design of high-quality chemical libraries for drug design and discovery. It is freely available at https://github.com/kotori-y/Scopy., (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

A significant challenge in high-throughput screening (HTS) campaigns is the identification of assay technology interference compounds. A Compound Interfering with an Assay Technology (CIAT) gives false readouts in many assays. CIATs are often considered viable hits and investigated in follow-up studies, thus impeding research and wasting resources. In this study, we developed a machine-learning (ML) model to predict CIATs for three assay technologies. The model was trained on known CIATs and non-CIATs (NCIATs) identified in artefact assays and described by their 2D structural descriptors. Usual methods identifying CIATs are based on statistical analysis of historical primary screening data and do not consider experimental assays identifying CIATs. Our results show successful prediction of CIATs for existing and novel compounds and provide a complementary and wider set of predicted CIATs compared to BSF, a published structure-independent model, and to the PAINS substructural filters. Our analysis is an example of how well-curated datasets can provide powerful predictive models despite their relatively small size., (© 2019 The Authors. Published by Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA.)

High-throughput screening (HTS) hits include compounds with undesirable properties. Many filters have been described to identify such hits. Notably, pan-assay interference compounds (PAINS) has been adopted by the community as the standard term to refer to such filters, and very useful guidelines have been adopted by the American Chemical Society (ACS) and subsequently triggered a healthy scientific debate about the pitfalls of draconian use of filters. Using an inhibitory frequency index, we have analyzed in detail the promiscuity profile of the whole GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) HTS collection comprising more than 2 million unique compounds that have been tested in hundreds of screening assays. We provide a comprehensive analysis of many previously published filters and newly described classes of nuisance structures that may serve as a useful source of empirical information to guide the design or growth of HTS collections and hit triaging strategies.

False-positive assay readouts caused by badly behaving compounds-frequent hitters, pan-assay interference compounds (PAINS), aggregators, and others-continue to pose a major challenge to experimental screening. There are only a few in silico methods that allow the prediction of such problematic compounds. We report the development of Hit Dexter, two extremely randomized trees classifiers for the prediction of compounds likely to trigger positive assay readouts either by true promiscuity or by assay interference. The models were trained on a well-prepared dataset extracted from the PubChem Bioassay database, consisting of approximately 311 000 compounds tested for activity on at least 50 proteins. Hit Dexter reached MCC and AUC values of up to 0.67 and 0.96 on an independent test set, respectively. The models are expected to be of high value, in particular to medicinal chemists and biochemists who can use Hit Dexter to identify compounds for which extra caution should be exercised with positive assay readouts. Hit Dexter is available as a free web service at http://hitdexter.zbh. uni-hamburg.de., (© 2018 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.)

The goal of this study is the understanding of biologically promiscuous compounds (frequent hitters) in HTS outcomes through their chemical behavior estimated via reactivity descriptors. Chemical reactivity is often an undesirable property due to the lack in biological selectivity of compounds comprised in HTS libraries. In this study the reactivity indexes have been computed within the DFT formalism, at different levels of theory, for two classes of representative compounds compiled from PubChem database, one comprising frequent hitters and the second one comprising rare hitters (biologically more selective compounds). We found that frequent hitters exert increased reactivity, mainly due to their electrophilic character, compared to the more selective class of compounds., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)