Search

Purpose: 18F-FDG PET/MR has been applied to the diagnosis and preoperative staging in various tumor types; however, reports using PET/MR in hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA) are rare. We investigated the value of PET/MR for preoperative staging and compared it with PET/CT in HCCA. Methods: Fifty-eight patients with HCCA confirmed by pathology were retrospectively analyzed. 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging was performed first, followed with whole-body PET/MR imaging. SUVmax of tumor and normal liver tissue were measured. Paired T test was used to compare SUVmax of tumor and normal liver tissue of PET/CT and PET/MR. In addition, McNemar test was used to compare the accuracy of TNM staging and Bismuth-Corlette typing between PET/CT and PET/MR. Results: There was no significant difference in SUVmax between PET/CT and PET/MR in primary tumor lesions (6.6 ± 5.5 vs. 6.8 ± 6.2, P = 0.439). SUVmax of PET/CT and PET/MR in normal liver parenchyma was significantly different (3.0 ± 0.5 vs. 2.1 ± 0.5, P < 0.001). The accuracy of PET/MR in diagnosing T staging and N staging was significantly higher than those of PET/CT (72.4% vs. 58.6%, P = 0.022 and 84.5% vs. 67.2%, P = 0.002). There was no significant difference between PET/CT and PET/MR in M staging (94.8% vs. 98.3%, P = 0.5). The classification accuracy of PET/MR in Bismuth-Corlette was significantly higher than that of PET/CT (89.7% vs. 79.3%), P = 0.031. Conclusions: The diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/MR was superior to that of PET/CT in preoperative T staging, N staging, and Bismuth–Corlette classification of HCCA. In M staging, the diagnostic accuracy of PET/MR was similar to that of PET/CT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of dual-time point 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging in the primary diagnosis and staging of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA). Methods: Dual-time point FDG PET/CT findings, including early phase whole-body scanning and abdominal delayed phased performed 1 and 2 h after radiotracer injection, respectively, were retrospective reviewed in 69 patients conformed HCCA by histology. PET/CT was evaluated based on visual interpretation and the semiquantitative index of SUVmax and tumor-to-normal liver tissue ratio (TNR) for both early and delayed images. Results: For all 69 HCCA patients, the mean SUVmax of the lesion and TNR in delayed phase was significantly higher than that in early phase (6.1 ± 4.7, 2.2 ± 1.7, vs 5.1 ± 3.4, 1.6 ± 1.1; P < 0.001). The sensitivity and accuracy value of detection primary lesions was 69.6% and 70% in early phase vs 76.8% and 76.8% in delay phase, respectively. There was a significant correlation between lesion SUVmax and Ki67 index in both dual-time imaging (r = 0.462, P < 0.001 in early phase vs r = 0.47, P < 0.001 in delay phase). The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy value of metastatic lymph nodes prediction was 50%, 67.3% and 71% in early phase vs 62.5%, 73.3% and 76.8% in delayed phase, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of FDG PET/CT in detecting distant metastasis in our study was 75%, 100% and 97.1%. There was no difference of predicting distant metastasis between early phase and delayed phase. Conclusion: Delayed phase in dual-time point 18F-FDG PET/CT scan provides additional usefulness for detection primary tumor and lymph nodes metastases in HCCA, but there was no added benefit of delayed PET/CT imaging in detection of distant metastases in this study. SUVmax in early and delayed phase could be used to assess tumor aggressiveness in pre-treatment HCCA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]