1. Histological mucous cell quantification and mucosal mapping reveal different aspects of mucous cell responses in gills and skin of shorthorn sculpins (Myoxocephalus scorpius).
- Author
-
Dang, Mai, Pittman, Karin, Sonne, Christian, Hansson, Sophia, Bach, Lis, Søndergaard, Jens, Stride, Megan, and Nowak, Barbara
- Subjects
- *
GILLS , *POLLUTANTS , *BODY size , *PARASITIC diseases , *SIZE of fishes , *NASAL mucosa - Abstract
In teleosts, the mucosal epithelial barriers represent the first line of defence against environmental challenges such as pathogens and environmental contaminants. Mucous cells (MCs) are specialised cells providing this protection through mucus production. Therefore, a better understanding of various MC quantification methods is critical to interpret MC responses. Here, we compare histological (also called traditional) quantification of MCs with a novel mucosal mapping method to understand the differences between the two methods' assessment of MC responses to parasitic infections and pollution exposure in shorthorn sculpins (Myoxocephalus scorpius). Overall, both methods distinguished between the fish from stations with different levels of pollutants and detected the links between MC responses and parasitic infection. Traditional quantification showed relationship between MC size and body size of the fish whereas mucosal mapping detected a link between MC responses and Pb level in liver. While traditional method gave numerical density, mucosal mapping gave volumetric density of the mucous cells in the mucosa. Both methods differentiated MC population in skin from those in the gills, but only mucosal mapping pointed out the consistent differences between filament and lamellar MC populations within the gills. Given the importance of mucosal barriers in fish, a better understanding of various MC quantification methods and the linkages between MC responses, somatic health and environmental stressors is highly valuable. • Both methods could distinguish between fish from stations with different level of pollution • Both methods detected links between mucous cell responses and parasitic infection • Both methods differentiated between mucous cell population in skin from those in gills • Traditional method gave numerical density, mucosal mapping resulted in volumetric density of mucous cells in mucosa • Mucosal mapping showed consistent differences between filament and lamellar mucous cell populations between gill filaments and gill lamellae [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF