Search

gp120 and CD4 are two glycoproteins that are considered to interact together to allow the binding of HIV to CD4+ cells. We have utilized enzymatic digestion by endoglycosidases in order to analyze N-linked carbohydrate chains of these proteins and their possible role in the interaction of gp120 or gp160 with CD4. SDS denaturation was not necessary to obtain optimal deglycosylation of either molecule, but deglycosylation of CD4, nonetheless, depended on the presence of 1% Triton X-100. Endo H and Endo F that cleave high mannose type and biantennary glycans diminish the molecular mass of the glycoproteins from 120 or 160 Kd to 90 or 130 Kd, respectively; but these enzymes had no action on CD4 glycans. Endo F N-glycanase mixture, which acts on all glycan species, including triantennary chains, led to complete deglycosylation of gp120/160 and of CD4. Therefore, probably half of the glycan moieties of gp120/160 are composed of high mannose and biantennary chains, the other half being triantennary species. The carbohydrate structures of CD4 seems to be triantennary chains. To analyze the binding of gp120/160 to CD4, we used a molecular assay in which an mAb (110-4) coupled to Sepharose CL4B allowed the attachment of soluble gp120/160 to the beads; 125I-sCD4 was then added to measure the binding of CD4 to different amounts of gp120/160. Binding to gp160 was not modified when using completely deglycosylated 125I-sCD4, while deglycosylation of gp120 or of gp160 resulted in the decrease of the binding to native CD4 by two- and fivefold, respectively. Native and deglycosylated gp120/160 bound to CD4+ cells with comparable affinities. In addition, deglycosylated gp120 displaced 125I-gp160 binding to CD4+ cells and inhibited fusion of fresh Molt-T4 cells with CEM HIV1- or HIV2-infected cells to the same extent. Taken together, these results indicate that carbohydrates of CD4 and of gp120/160 do not play a significant role in the in vitro interaction between these two molecules.

We have investigated the possible involvement in the interaction between HIV gp110 and its CD4 receptor of epitopes different from the currently known binding site(s) of the molecule. Four monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) to gp110 were used (Genetic Systems Corporation, Seattle, Washington, USA): one (110-1) recognized a peptide corresponding to the C-terminal part of gp110 (494-517); the other three (110-3, 110-4, 110-5) recognized the same peptide located at position 308-328. HIV or purified gp110 obtained from a vaccinia recombinant (Transgene S.A., Strasbourg, France) were pre-incubated with the MAb prior to addition to CD4+ cells. Specific binding of viral particles or of the soluble molecule was then determined by flow cytometer analysis, compared with that of control preparations where the MAb was added after HIV or gp 110 had been allowed to bind CD4+ cells. Significant inhibition of HIV binding was noted with the three MAbs to peptide (308-328), but not with 110-1. At the molecular level, these same MAbs decreased the affinity of interaction between CD4 and soluble gp110, although they could still label the latter molecule after it had bound to CD4+ cells. Therefore, steric hindrance may account for neutralization of HIV binding by antibodies that are actually directed to epitopes topographically distinct from the site of binding of gp110 to CD4.

Human sera were tested for the presence of anti-nef antibodies by radioimmunoassay (RIA), with recombinant radiolabelled nef expressed in E. coli. Of the 300 HIV-positive sera tested by RIA, 70 +/- 5.3% were found to be anti-nef positive. Anti-nef antibodies bound to nef with a high affinity (K 0.5 = 2.2 x 10(-9) M). In 31 of the sera, the specificity of anti-nef antibodies was further analysed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with large synthetic peptides ranging from 31 to 66 amino acid residues and spanning the total sequence of nef from HIV-1. The results obtained showed that the immunodominant antigenic sites of nef were located close to the N- and C-terminal regions of the molecule.