Search

Objective: To examine the role of antiretroviral drugs (ART), HIV-related and traditional risk factors on the incidence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in HIV-infected patients., Design: Prospective hospital-based cohort of HIV-infected patients from 2004 to 2012., Methods: CKD was defined using MDRD equation as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) less than 60 ml/mn/1.73 m(2) at 2 consecutive measurements ≥3 months apart. Poisson regression models were used to study determinants of CKD either measured at baseline or updated. ART exposure was classified as ever or never. We additionally tested the role of tenofovir (TDF), whether or not prescribed concomitantly with a Protease Inhibitor (PI), taking into account the cumulative exposure to the drug., Results: 4,350 patients (74% men) with baseline eGFR>60 ml/mn/1.73 m(2) were followed for a median of 5.8 years. At the end of follow-up, 96% had received ART, one third of them (35%) jointly received TDF and a PI. Average incidence rate of CKD was 0.95% person-years of follow-up. Incidence of CKD was higher among women (IRR = 2.2), older patients (>60 y vs <45 y: IRR = 2.5 and 45-60 y: IRR = 1.7), those with diabetes (IRR = 1.9), high blood pressure (IRR = 1.5), hyperlipidemia (IRR = 1.5), AIDS stage (IRR = 1.4), low baseline eGFR (IRR = 15.8 for 6090 and IRR = 7.1 for 70500/mm(3) (IRR = 2.5), and exposure to TDF (IRR = 2.0). Exposure to TDF was even strongly associated with CKD when co-administered with PIs (IRR = 3.1 vs 1.3 when not, p<0,001). A higher risk of CKD was found when tenofovir exposure was >12 months [IRR = 3.0 with joint PIs vs 1.3 without (p<0.001)]. A vast majority of those developing CKD (76.6%) had a baseline eGFR between 60 and 80 ml/mn/1.73 m(2)., Conclusion: In patients with eGFR between 60 and 80 mL/min/1.73 m(2), a thorough control of CKD risk factors is warranted. The use of TDF, especially when co-administered with PIs, should be mentioned as a relative contraindication in presence of at least one of these risk factors.

Objective: The effectiveness of antiretroviral treatment (ART) was compared in 416 naive patients from a French clinical cohort infected with B and non-B HIV-1 subtypes., Methods: Time to HIV viral load (VL) undetectability was calculated for each subtype group. Three other parameters were estimated 3, 6 and 12 months after enrolment: clinical progression (that is, AIDS-defining events or death), changes in CD4 cell counts from baseline and proportion of patients achieving an undetectable VL (<400 HIV-RNA copies/ml)., Results: In this cohort, 317 patients (76%) were infected with a B subtype and 99 (24%) with a non-B subtype. Median time to VL undetectability was similar in the B subtype group [147 days, 95% confidence interval (CI) 119-165] and non-B subtype group (168 days, 95% CI: 105-234; P=0.16). After adjusting for AIDS-defining events at enrolment, baseline CD4 cell counts and VL, and for the treatment on which patients were initiated, no association was found between HIV subtypes and time to VL undetectability (B subtype vs non-B subtype: hazard ratio=0.80, 95% CI: 0.62-1.02, P=0.07). In the 3, 6 and 12 months after enrolment, subtype had no impact on clinical progression, CD4 cell count or VL responses to ART. This suggests that B and non-B subtypes do not affect first-line therapy efficacy, which is encouraging in view of the worldwide spread of non-B HIV-1 subtypes and the increasing availability of ART in developing countries. However, in this study we did not take into account individual non-B subtype species, therefore further studies should be designed to evaluate the efficacy of these regimens in patients with particular non-B subtypes.

Aims: The aims of this study were to: (i) determine the incidence of thymidine-associated mutations (TAMs) in an observational clinical cohort of naive HIV-1 patients who stopped first-line therapy including either zidovudine or stavudine; and (ii) assess the immunological and virological responses to subsequent second-line therapy in patients who switched from zidovudine to stavudine or conversely., Patients and Methods: Plasma samples from 165 patients who stopped first-line antiretroviral therapy containing either zidovudine or stavudine were examined for the presence of drug-resistant genotypes. Subsequent second-line immunological and virological follow-up was performed in 136 patients who switched from zidovudine to stavudine and conversely., Results: Among the 93 patients who stopped first-line therapy including zidovudine and the 72 who stopped first-line therapy including stavudine, genotypic resistance testing was available for 67 (72%) and 54 (75%), respectively. The presence of TAMs was significantly more frequent in the zidovudine than the stavudine group (23.8% versus 5.5; P = 0.006). The short- and long-term immunological and virological responses to second-line therapy were comparable in the zidovudine and stavudine groups, despite different baseline profiles of viral resistance (median increase in CD4 cells/mm3 at 1 year of therapy, 118 versus 119; viral load <400 copies/mL, 47% versus 47%)., Conclusions: These results suggest that TAMs occur in more patients on antiretroviral regimens including zidovudine than on regimens including stavudine. Although the results from observational studies should be interpreted cautiously, these findings may be useful in determining the optimal sequencing of zidovudine and stavudine for the treatment of naive HIV-1-infected patients.