Search

Background: Over the past decade, antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens that include integrase strand inhibitors (INSTIs) have become the most commonly used for people with HIV starting ART. Although trials and observational studies have compared virological failure on INSTI-based with other regimens, few data are available on mortality in people with HIV treated with INSTIs in routine care. Therefore, we compared all-cause mortality between different INSTI-based and non-INSTI-based regimens in adults with HIV starting ART from 2013 to 2018. Methods: This cohort study used data on people with HIV in Europe and North America from the Antiretroviral Therapy Cohort Collaboration (ART-CC) and UK Collaborative HIV Cohort (UK CHIC). We studied the most common third antiretroviral drugs (additional to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor) used from 2013 to 2018: rilpivirine, darunavir, raltegravir, elvitegravir, dolutegravir, efavirenz, and others. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs; adjusted for clinical and demographic characteristics, comorbid conditions, and other drugs in the regimen) for mortality were estimated using Cox models stratified by ART start year and cohort, with multiple imputation of missing data. Findings: 62 500 ART-naive people with HIV starting ART (12 422 [19·9%] women; median age 38 [IQR 30-48]) were included in the study. 1243 (2·0%) died during 188 952 person-years of follow-up (median 3·0 years [IQR 1·6-4·4]). There was little evidence that mortality rates differed between regimens with dolutegravir, elvitegravir, rilpivirine, darunavir, or efavirenz as the third drug. However, mortality was higher for raltegravir compared with dolutegravir (aHR 1·49, 95% CI 1·15-1·94), elvitegravir (1·86, 1·43-2·42), rilpivirine (1·99, 1·49-2·66), darunavir (1·62, 1·33-1·98), and efavirenz (2·12, 1·60-2·81) regimens. Results were similar for analyses making different assumptions about missing data and consistent across the time periods 2013-15 and 2016-18. Rates of virological suppression were higher for dolutegravir than other third drugs. Interpretation: This large study of patients starting ART since the introduction of INSTIs found little evidence that mortality rates differed between most first-line ART regimens; however, raltegravir-based regimens were associated with higher mortality. Although unmeasured confounding cannot be excluded as an explanation for our findings, virological benefits of first-line INSTIs-based ART might not translate to differences in mortality. We would like to thank our funders (US National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism and UK Medical Research Council) and all patients and the clinical teams associated with the participating cohort studies. The antiretroviral therapy cohort collaboration is funded by the US National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (U01-AA026209). UK Collaborative HIV Cohort is funded by the UK Medical Research Council (grant numbers G0000199, G0600337, G0900274, and M004236/1). JACS is funded by National Institute for Health Research Senior Investigator award (NF-SI-0611-10168). AT is funded by the Wellcome Trust under a Sir Henry Wellcome Postdoctoral Fellowship (222770/Z/21/Z). Funding for the individual antiretroviral therapy cohort collaboration cohorts included in this analysis was from Alberta Health, Gilead, National Agency for AIDS Research (France REcherche Nord&Sud Sida-hiv Hépatites), the French Ministry of Health, the Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety, Stichting HIV Monitoring, the Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport through the Centre for Infectious Disease Control of the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, the TP-HIV by the German Centre for Infection Research (NCT02149004), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (through the Red Temática de Investigación Cooperativa en Sida [RD06/006, RD12/0017/0018, and RD16/0002/0006]) as part of the Plan Nacional I + D + i. Other funders of the individual cohorts participating data for this analysis are ISCIII-Subdirección General de Evaluación and the Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional, ViiV Healthcare, Preben og Anna Simonsens Fond, ANRS-Maladies infectieuses émergentes, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Merck, the US National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (U01-AA026230), the Spanish Ministry of Health, the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant 33CS30_134277), Centers for AIDS Research Network of Integrated Clinical Systems (1R24 AI067039-1, P30-AI-027757), the US Department of Veterans Affairs, the US National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (U01-AA026224, U01-AA026209, U24-AA020794), the Veterans Health Administration Office of Research and Development, and the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (Tennessee Center for AIDS Research P30 AI110527). Sí

The present study sought to describe the use of generic drugs and single-tablet regimen (STR) de-simplification for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection among 41 hospitals from the cohort of the Spanish HIV/AIDS Research Network (CoRIS). In June 2018, we collected information on when generic antiretroviral drugs (ARVs) were introduced in the different hospitals, how the decisions to use them were made, and how the information was provided to the patients. Most of the nine available generic ARVs in Spain by June 2018 had been introduced in at least 85% of the participating hospitals, except for zidovudine (AZT)/lamivudine (3TC) and AZT. The time difference between the effective marketing date of each generic ARV and its first dispensing date in the hospitals was much shorter for the more recently approved generic ARV since the year 2017. However, only up to 20% of the hospitals de-simplified efavirenz (EFV)/tenofovir disoproxil (TDF)/emtricitabine (FTC), dolutegravir (DTG)/abacavir (ABC)/3TC, and rilpivirine (RPV)/TDF/FTC (to generic EFV+TDF/FTC, DTG+generic ABC/3TC, and RPV+generic TDF/FTC, respectively), whereas the generic STR EFV/TDF/FTC was introduced in 87.8% of the centers. The median times between the date of effective marketing of generic TDF/FTC and the date of de-simplification of EFV/TDF/FTC and RPV/TDF/FTC were 723 [interquartile range (IQR): 369-1,119] and 234 (IQR: 142-264) days, respectively; this time was 155 (IQR: 28-287) days for de-simplification of DTG/ABC/3TC. In conclusion, despite the widespread use of generic ARVs, STRs de-simplification was only undertaken in20% of the hospitals. There was wide variability in the timing of the introduction of each generic ARV after they were available in the market.

Summary Background Factors affecting outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection in people living with HIV are unclear. We assessed the factors associated with SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis and severe outcomes among people living with HIV. Methods We did a retrospective cohort study using data from the PISCIS cohort of people with HIV in Catalonia (Spain) between March 1 and Dec 15, 2020. We linked PISCIS data with integrated health-care, clinical, and surveillance registries through the Public Data Analysis for Health Research and Innovation Program of Catalonia (PADRIS) to obtain data on SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis, chronic comorbidities, as well as clinical and mortality outcomes. Participants were aged at least 16 years in care at 16 hospitals in Catalonia. Factors associated with SARS-CoV-2 diagnoses and severe outcomes were assessed using univariable and multivariable Cox regression models. We estimated the effect of immunosuppression on severe outcomes (hospital admission for >24 h with dyspnoea, tachypnoea, hypoxaemia, asphyxia, or hyperventilation; or death) using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Findings We linked 20 847 (72·8%) of 28 666 participants in the PISCIS cohort with PADRIS data; 13 142 people had HIV. 749 (5·7%) people with HIV were diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2: their median age was 43·5 years (IQR 37·0–52·7), 131 (17·5%) were female, and 618 (82·5%) were male. 103 people with HIV (13·8%) were hospitalised, seven (0·9%) admitted to intensive care, and 13 (1·7%) died. SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis was more common among migrants (adjusted hazard ratio 1·55, 95% CI 1·31–1·83), men who have sex with men (1·42, 1·09–1·86), and those with four or more chronic comorbidities (1·46, 1·09–1·97). Age at least 75 years (5·2, 1·8–15·3), non-Spanish origin (2·1, 1·3–3·4), and neuropsychiatric (1·69, 1·07–2·69), autoimmune disease (1·92, 1·14–3·23), respiratory disease (1·84, 1·09–3·09), and metabolic disease (2·59, 1·59–4·23) chronic comorbidities were associated with increased risk of severe outcomes. A Kaplan-Meier estimator showed differences in the risk of severe outcomes according to CD4 cell count in patients with detectable HIV RNA (p=0·039) but no differences were observed in patients with undetectable HIV RNA (p=0·15). Interpretation People living with HIV with detectable HIV viraemia, chronic comorbidities, and some subpopulations could be at increased risk of severe outcomes from COVID-19. These groups should be prioritised in clinical management and SARS-CoV-2 vaccination programmes. Funding Fundacio "la Caixa". Translations For the Catalan, Spanish and Russian translations of the Summary see Supplementary Materials section.

Introduction: Since 2015, integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTI)-based regimens have been considered as the preferred option for antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naive patients. The main objective of this study was to identify the ART-regimens selected for treatment-naive patients during 2015 in two tertiary hospitals, determine the rate of virological failure at 24 and 48 weeks, and compare the results with those of previous years (2012-2014). Material and methods: Four-year retrospective study. Adult ART-naive patients who had started treatment between 2012 and 2015 were selected. Clinical data, laboratory tests performed, and ART selected were recorded. Results: A total of 536 patients were included, 137 from 2015 and 399 from 2012-2014. The most common ART regimens prescribed in 2015, compared to 2012-2014, were INSTI-based regimens (68.6% vs. 4.8%), followed by non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based regimens (20.4% vs. 52.8%) and PI-based regimens (10.9% vs. 42.5%). Most patients received a single-tablet regimen (78.8% vs. 51.9%). In 2015, 72.3% of patients had a viral load (VL) < 50 copies/ml at week 24 and 83.9% at week 48, compared to 55.1% and 74.7%, respectively, in 2012-2014. During the 48-week follow-up, the ART regimen was changed in 22.6% of patients in 2015 and 29.3% in 2012-2014. The main reason was simplification (45.2% vs. 22.2%) followed by side effects (25.8% vs. 38.5%). Conclusions: In 2015, INSTI-based regimens were prescribed in nearly 70% of ART-naive patients. This change in trend in the starting ART regimen results in a greater number of patients achieving a VL < 50 copies/ml at weeks 24 and 48 and in a reduction in ART changes due to adverse effects.

Introduction Previous studies have reported that the rate of FEV1 decline over time is increased in HIV patients but the mechanisms underlying this observation are unclear. Since current HIV treatment with Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy (HAART) results in very good immuneviral control, we hypothesized that HAART should normalize the elevated rate of FEV1 decline previously reported in HIV patients if it was somehow related to the immune alterations caused by HIV, particularly in never smokers or quitters, since smoking is a well established risk factor for accelerated FEV1 decline in the general population. Methods We explored this hypothesis in a prospectively recruited cohort of 188 HIV (smoker and non-smoker) patients treated with HAART in Palma de Mallorca (Spain) and followed-up for 6 years. The cross-sectional characteristics of this cohort have been published elsewhere. Results We found that: (1) HAART resulted in good immune-viral control; (2) the rate of FEV1 decline remained abnormally elevated, even in non-smokers and quitters; and, (3) alcohol abuse during follow-up was related to FEV1 decline in these patients. Discussion Despite adequate immune-viral control by HAART, lung function decline remains increased in most HIV patients, even in non-smokers and quitters. Alcohol abuse is a preventable risk factor to decrease the accelerated FEV1 decline in this population., This work was financed through ABAMI (Balearic Association of Infectious Diseases).The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Background: Integrase strand-transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) constitute at present one of the pillars of first-line ART. Objectives: To study the prevalence of and the trend in transmitted drug resistance (TDR) to INSTIs in ART-naive patients in Spain. Methods: During the period 2012-17, 1109 patients from CoRIS were analysed. The Stanford algorithm v8.7 was used to evaluate TDR and transmission of clinically relevant resistance. To describe individual mutations/polymorphisms, the most recent IAS list (for INSTIs) and the 2009 WHO list update (for the backbone NRTIs used in combination with INSTIs in first-line treatment) were used. Results: Clinically relevant resistance to the INSTI class was 0.2%: T66I, 0.1%, resistance to elvitegravir and intermediate resistance to raltegravir; and G163K, 0.1%, intermediate resistance to raltegravir and elvitegravir. No clinical resistance to dolutegravir or bictegravir was observed. The prevalence of INSTI TDR following the IAS-USA INSTI mutation list was 2.6%, with no trend towards changes in the prevalence throughout the study period. The overall prevalence of NRTI WHO mutations was 4.3%, whereas clinically relevant resistance to tenofovir, abacavir and emtricitabine/ lamivudine was 1.7%, 1.9% and 0.7%, respectively. Conclusions: Given the low prevalence of clinically relevant resistance to INSTIs and first-line NRTIs in Spain, it is very unlikely that a newly diagnosed patient will present with clinical resistance to a first-line INSTI-based regimen. These patients may not benefit from INSTI and NRTI baseline resistance testing.

Objective To assess the awareness, knowledge, use, and willingness to use and need of PrEP among men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women (TW) who attended World Gay Pride (WGP) 2017 in Madrid. Design and methods Online survey. Participants were recruited through gay-oriented dating apps and HIV Non-Governmental Organizations' social media. Inclusion criteria included being MSM or TW, age 18 years old or above, and having attended WGP in Madrid. Information regarding the participant's awareness and knowledge, use or willingness to use, and need for PrEP was collected, as well as sociodemographic characteristics. Participants were considered to be in need of PrEP if they met one of the following indication criteria: having practiced unprotected anal intercourse with more than 2 partners, having practiced chemsex, or having engaged in commercial sex-all in the preceding 6 months. Descriptive and multivariable analyses with logistic regression were conducted. Results 472 participants met the inclusion criteria and completed the questionnaire. The mean age was 38, 97.7% were MSM, 77% had a university education, and 85% were living in Spain, mostly in big cities. Overall, 64% of participants were aware of PrEP, but only 33% knew correctly what PrEP was. 67% of HIV-negative participants were willing to take PrEP, although only 5% were taking it during WGP, mostly due to lack of access. 43% of HIV-negative respondents met at least one PrEP indication criteria. For HIV-negative men living in Spain, university education and living in big cities was associated with PrEP awareness. Lower education level and meeting PrEP criteria was associated with willingness to use PrEP. Conclusions Our study shows that among MSM attending WGP 2017 in Madrid, there was limited PrEP awareness, low accuracy of PrEP knowledge, and a high need and willingness to use PrEP. Health authorities should strengthen existing preventive strategies and implement PrEP., This work has been supported by the Spanish Network of Excellence on HIV ((RIS) (RD16CIII/0002/) and CIBERESP.

This study focuses on actions at the political and administrative level in Spain in relation to the implementation of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). We analysed a whole range of different formal initiatives taken by the political and administrative actors involved. The information was obtained from official public data sources. As of February 2018, PrEP had not been implemented. The decision is dependent on both state and regional governments. The Ministry of Health and some Autonomous Regions are working on different interventions, but without providing an implementation timetable. The political parties have kept a very low profile in terms of initiatives related to the implementation of PrEP. From a legal point of view, proceedings are passing back and forth with the extension of the patent. The role of intergovernmental and interdepartmental institutions is very important for the implementation of PrEP in Spain.

In this update, antiretroviral therapy (ART) is recommended for all patients infected by type 1 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1). The strength and grade of the recommendation vary depending on the CD4+ T-lymphocyte count, the presence of opportunistic infections or comorbid conditions, age, and the efforts to prevent the transmission of HIV. The objective of ART is to achieve an undetectable plasma viral load (PVL). Initial ART should comprise three drugs, namely, two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI) and one drug from another family. Three of the recommended regimens, all of which have an integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) as the third drug, are considered a preferred regimen; a further seven regimens, which are based on an INSTI, an non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI), or a protease inhibitor boosted with ritonavir (PI/r), are considered alternatives. The reasons and criteria for switching ART are presented both for patients with an undetectable PVL and for patients who experience virological failure, in which case the rescue regimen should include three (or at least two) drugs that are fully active against HIV. The specific criteria for ART in special situations (acute infection, HIV-2 infection, pregnancy) and comorbid conditions (tuberculosis and other opportunistic infections, kidney disease, liver disease, and cancer) are updated. (C) 2015 Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. and Sociedad Espanola de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiologia Clinics. All rights reserved.

Objectives: Our aim is to describe the impact of emtricitabine (FTC)/tenofovir (TDF) versus other nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTIs)-based regimens on renal function of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) naiive patients >50 years old who started combination antiretroviral therapy (cART). Design: National, retrospective cohort analysis of patients >50 years old when they started cART (January 1, 2006-December 31, 2009). Methods: We compared renal safety (changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] during the first year, and time to renal events during 4 years of follow-up) in FTC/TDF versus non-FTC/TDF users. Among FTC/TDF users, we compared protease inhibitors vs non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and Lopinavir/ritonavir vs Efavirenz. Results: We included 103 patients: median age: 54.9 years, 84% males, median CD4 count 247 cells/mu l, median viral load 4.7 log; median follow up 18 months (max: 48 months); 73 started with FTC/TDF and 30 with other NRTIs. Change in eGFR was significantly worse for ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (LPV/r) vs efavirenz (EFV) users in the FTC/TDF group (71.2 vs 98.9 ml/min/1.73 m(2) at month 12, P= 50 years old, renal safety was similar for FTC/TDF and other NRTI-based regimens, but worse for LPV/r as compared to other regimens.

Background Interatrial blocks are considered a new important risk factor for atrial fibrillation and cerebrovascular events. Their prevalence and clinical implications have been reported in general population and several subgroups of patients but no data from HIV-infected populations, with a non-negligible prevalence of atrial fibrillation, has been previously reported. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study in a previously enrolled cohort of randomly selected middle-aged HIV-infected patients who attended our hospital and were clinically stable. Patients underwent both a 12-lead rest electrocardiogram and clinical questionnaires while epidemiological, clinical and HIV-related variables were obtained from electronic medical records and interviews with the patients. Electrocardiograms were then analyzed and codified using a standardized form by two trained members of the research team who were blinded to clinical variables. Results We obtained electrocardiograms from 204 patients with a mean age of 55.22 years, 39 patients (19.12%) presented an interatrial block, 9 (4.41%) advanced and 30 (14.71%) partial. Patients with interatrial block had a lower nadir lymphocyte CD4 count (124 vs 198 cells, p = 0.02) while advanced interatrial blocks were associated to older age (62.16 vs. 54.95 years, p = 0.046) and hypertension (77.8% vs. 32.3%, p = 0.009). We did not find differences regarding baseline CD4 lymphocyte count or CD4/CD8 lymphocyte ratio. Clinical variables and functional capacity among patients with or without interatrial block were similar. Conclusions In a cohort of clinically stable HIV infected patients the prevalence of interatrial blocks, specially advanced, is high and associated to previously known factors (age, hypertension) and novel ones (nadir CD4 lymphocyte count).

Opportunistic infections continue to be a cause of morbidity and mortality in HIV-infected patients. They often arise because of severe immunosuppression resulting from poor adherence to antiretroviral therapy, failure of antiretroviral therapy, or unawareness of HIV infection by patients whose first clinical manifestation of AIDS is an opportunistic infection. The present article is an executive summary of the document that updates the previous recommendations on the prevention and treatment of opportunistic infections in HIV-infected patients, namely, infections by parasites, fungi, viruses, mycobacteria, and bacteria, as well as imported infections. The article also addresses immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome. This document is intended for all professionals who work in clinical practice in the field of HIV infection. (C) 2016 Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. and Sociedad Espanola de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiologia Clinica. All rights reserved.

In 2010, the AIDS Study Group (Grupo de Estudio del SIDA [GESIDA]) developed 66 quality care indicators. The aim of this study is to determine which of these indicators are associated with mortality and hospital admission, and to perform a preliminary assessment of a prediction rule for mortality and hospital admission in patients on treatment and follow-up.A retrospective cohort study was conducted in the Hospital Universitario Son Espases (Palma de Mallorca, Spain). Eligible participants were patients with human immunodeficiency syndrome≥18 years old who began follow-up in the Infectious Disease Section between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2012. A descriptive analysis was performed to evaluate anthropometric variables, and a logistic regression analysis to assess the association between GESIDA indicators and mortality/admission. The mortality probability model was built using logistic regression.A total of 1,944 adults were eligible (median age: 37 years old, 78.8% male). In the multivariate analysis, the quality of care indicators associated with mortality in the follow-up patient group were the items 7, 16 and 20, and in the group of patients on treatment were 7, 16, 20, 35, and 38. The quality of care indicators associated with hospital admissions in the follow-up patients group were the same as those in the mortality analysis, plus number 31. In the treatment group the associated quality of care indicators were items 7, 16, 20, 35, 38, and 40.Some GeSIDA quality of care indicators were associated with mortality and/or hospital admissions. These indicators are associated with delayed diagnosis, regular monitoring, prevention of infections, and control of comorbidities.

The objective of the study is to validate the relevant GESIDA quality indicators for HIV infection, assessing the reliability, feasibility and adherence to them.The reliability was evaluated using the reproducibility of 6 indicators in peer review, with the second observer being an outsider. The feasibility and measurement of the level of adherence to the 22 indicators was conducted with annual fragmented retrospective collection of information from specific databases or the clinical charts of the nine participating hospitals.Reliability was very high, with interobserver agreement levels higher than 95% in 5 of the 6 indicators. The median time to achieve the indicators ranged between 5 and 600minutes, but could be achieved progressively from specific databases, enabling obtaining them automatically. As regards adherence to the indicators related with the initial evaluation of the patients, instructions and suitability of the guidelines for ART, adherence to ART, follow-up in clinics, and achieve an undetectable HIV by PCR at week 48 of the ART. Indicators of quality related to the prevention of opportunistic infections and control of comorbidities, the standards set were not achieved, and significant heterogeneity was observed between hospitals.The GESIDA quality indicators of HIV infection enabled the relevant indicators to be feasibly and reliably measured, and should be collected in all the units that care for patients with HIV infection.

The combination of indinavir, a protease inhibitor, and reverse-transcriptase inhibitors is widely used in the treatment of HIV-1 infection. However, precipitation of indinavir crystals in the renal tubular lumen due to the drug's aqueous insolubility may result in characteristic symptoms of flank pain or classic renal colic. An in vitro study has shown that addition of escin to synthetic urine containing indinavir delayed the crystallization time of indinavir.This study examined the efficacy and tolerability of the addition of escin to highly active antiretroviral therapy containing indinavir to delay the crystallization time of indinavir in urine.This was a multicenter, randomized, open-label, controlled, 4-period crossover trial in which each period lasted 4 weeks. HIV-1-infected adults receiving treatment with indinavir plus 2 nucleoside analogue reverse-transcriptase inhibitors in whom plasma viral loads had been undetectable (HIV-1 RNA200 copies/mL) for at least 6 months were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups based on the timing of the initiation of escin. Group I received escin during the second and third treatment periods, and group II received escin during the first and fourth treatment periods. The primary end point was the in vitro crystallization time of indinavir in 24-hour urine specimens, determined at the end of each 4-week period. Tolerability was assessed based on the number of patients with a rebound in plasma viral load and on the numbers of clinically and biologically relevant adverse events (including those requiring discontinuation of treatment). Clinical and laboratory evaluations were performed throughout each 4-week period.Fifty HIV-1-infected patients were enrolled, 47 were randomized to treatment (40 [85.1%] men, 7 [14.9%] women; median [interquartile range] age, 36 [34-45] years), and 30 completed the study. Urine pH and plasma and urine indinavir concentrations were unaffected by the addition of escin to antiretroviral treatment. The mean time to the onset of crystallization was 14.7 minutes with escin (95% Cl, 11.8-17.5) and 9.9 minutes without it (95% Cl, 6.7-13.1). Therefore, the addition of escin increased the mean crystallization time by 5.5 minutes (95% Cl, 1.5-9.5; P = 0.008), representing the overall capacity of study treatment to inhibit indinavir crystallization in the urine. Three of 47 patients had mild gastrointestinal symptoms associated with escin treatment. No episodes of nephrolithiasis were recorded during the study or after the completion of study treatment.The results of this prospective clinical trial of the effect of escin on indinavir crystallization time support the possibility that indinavir-associated nephrolithiasis may be prevented by means other than overhydration. Further research is needed in greater numbers of patients over longer follow-up times.

Objectives: Current antiretroviral guidelines state that being older than 50 to 55 years of age is an indication to start antiretroviral therapy (ART), regardless of CD4 status. However, no references to the preferred combination ART (cART) for these patients have been described. Our study compares emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (FTC/TDF) versus other nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) regimens in HIV ART-naive patients who are >= 50 years. Design: National, retrospective cohort analysis of patients who were >= 50 years old when they began the first cART (January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2009). Methods: We compared safety, effectiveness, and persistence of treatment in FTC/TDF versus non-FTC/TDF users. Among FTC/TDF users, we compared protease inhibitor (PI) versus NNRTI users and lopinavir/r versus efavirenz users. Results: We included 161 patients: median age was 54.6 years, 83% were men, median CD4 count was 191 cells/mu L, median viral load was 4.7 log, and median follow-up was 19 months (maximum, 48 months). Of these participants, 112 started with FTC/TDF and 49 with other nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). During follow-up, 21.9% of subjects developed at least one laboratory event >= grade 3, 5.6% interrupted cART due to adverse events, 19.3% had virologic failure, and 49.1% modified cART. There were no statistically significant differences between FTC/TDF and non-FTC/TDF users for any output except for persistence: The proportion of subjects who changed cART was 71.4% for non-FTC/TDF users and 38.6% for FTC/TDF users (log rank 0.001; adjusted hazard ratio, 2.10; 95% Cl, 1.34-3.29). Conclusions: In a population of HIV-infected subjects who were years old, our study suggests that the use of FTC/TDF is generally safe and effective, with a longer persistence as compared to other regimens.

Despite the huge advance that antiretroviral therapy represents for the prognosis of infection by the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), opportunistic infections (OIs) continue to be a cause of morbidity and mortality in HIV-infected patients. OIs often arise because of severe immunosuppression resulting from poor adherence to antiretroviral therapy, failure of antiretroviral therapy, or unawareness of HIV infection by patients whose first clinical manifestation of AIDS is an OI. The present article updates our previous guidelines on the prevention and treatment of various OIs in HIV-infected patients, namely, infections by parasites, fungi, viruses, mycobacteria, and bacteria, as well as imported infections. The article also addresses immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome.

Before the advent of the influenza A(H1N1)pdm virus in 2009, the information available about the clinical manifestations and prognosis of influenza in immunosuppressed patients was scarce. With the 2009 pandemic, knowledge of the behavior, severity and importance of antiviral therapy for influenza A infection in immunocompromised hosts has increased considerably. The aim of the present manuscript is to review the main challenges of influenza in the most representative immunosuppressed populations such as solid organ transplant recipients, hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients, patients with solid and hematological cancer and human immunodeficiency virus infected patients.

Spain has some tradition of quality assurance systems, although less than in Anglo-Saxon countries. However, there is scarce implantation of these systems in the field of HIV infection. While this scarcity could be explained by the uncertainty surrounding the disease at the beginning of the epidemic, for several years there has been solid scientific evidence on many features of the approach to this disease, established in the various treatment and clinical practice guidelines. Consequently, the AIDS Study Group [Grupo de Estudio del Sida (GESIDA)] designed the present quality of care indicators for persons with HIV/AIDS. The first draft was developed by a committee of health professionals, with the guidance of the Avedis Donebadian University Institute. This draft was then evaluated by a team of external reviewers and posted on the Web page of the Society's web page. Some of the suggestions were included in the final document, with 66 indicators (structure: 5, process: 45, results: 16) in the following areas: structural conditions, diagnosis and evaluation, follow-up and preventive interventions, follow-up of patients under treatment, specific aspects in women, comorbidities, hospitalization, mortality rates, training and research. In each indicator, the sections guaranteeing the indicators' validity and reliability are specified: justification of the indicator as a measure of quality, the healthcare dimension evaluated, mathematical formula, explanation of terms, population, type of indicator (structure, process result), data source, the standard to be achieved and commentaries on the validity of the indicator. Finally, 22 indicators deemed relevant were chosen. GESIDA believes that these indicators should be constantly monitored in all HIV units to identify their results at all times and thus be able to introduce improvement measures.

Objective: The aim of the study was to describe the clinical presentation and prognosis in HIV-1-infected patients with hospital admission and pandemic influenza A 2009 (H1 N1) confirmed, and compare this data with those of a general population. Design: This is a prospective study in nature. Methods: All adult patients admitted to 13 hospitals in Spain with confirmed influenza A 2009(H1 N1) virus infection by real-time reverse transcriptase PCR assay or culture from June 12 to November 10, 2009 were recruited and followed up until 1 month after discharge. In the HIV group risk factors for HIV infection, AIDS criteria, last CD4 cell count and viral load, and antiretroviral therapy and pneumococcal vaccines were collected. Results: Five hundred and eighty-five patients were recruited, 26 with HIV-1 infection and 559 non-HIV. The HIV patients had a long-term well controlled infection with a median CD4 cell count 503 cells/μl and 84% with undetectable viral load, although more frequently they had chronic liver and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. No significant differences were observed about reported symptoms and physical findings on hospital admission. About 50% of patients in both groups present radiological infiltrates and 30% present respiratory failures. Practically all the patients in both groups received influenza antiviral therapy and in each group 80% received antibacterial therapy. No differences were observed in clinical outcomes. Conclusion: In HIV patients, well controlled on HAART, the pandemic influenza virus AH1 N1 had a similar clinical outcome and prognosis to that of non-HIV patients.

Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is considered an opportunistic infection in immunocompromised patients. We review the clinical, laboratory, and therapeutic data in 63 patients (eight new cases and 55 cases reported in the literature) with Mediterranean VL (kala azar) and HIV-1 infection to determine whether VL should be considered an opportunistic infection in HIV-infected adults. We conclude that: (1) in areas where both leishmaniasis and HIV-1 infection are endemic, VL may be more frequent among HIV-infected adults; (2) in HIV-infected patients, the clinical picture did not differ significantly from classical kala azar, although it often ran a recurrent course, with resistance to antimonial therapy. We propose the inclusion of VL in the IVC-2 subgroup of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) clinical classification of HIV-1 infection while prospective and larger studies further define whether there are clinical presentations that could justify adding VL to the list of opportunistic infections indicative of AIDS.

The incidence of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP) in HIV-infected patients has decreased thanks to sulfa prophylaxis and combined antiretroviral therapy. The influence of P. jirovecii dihydropteroate synthase (DHPS) gene mutations on survival is controversial and has not been reported in Spain. This prospective multicenter study enrolled 207 HIV-infected patients with PCP from 2000 to 2004. Molecular genotyping was performed on stored specimens. Risk factors for intensive care unit (ICU) admission and mortality were identified using a logistic regression model. Seven patients (3.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-7.5%) had DHPS mutations. Overall mortality was 15% (95% CI, 10-21%), rising to 80% (95% CI, 61-92%) in patients requiring mechanical ventilation. None of the patients with DHPS mutants died, nor did they need ICU admission or mechanical ventilation. PaO(2)

To describe the methodology and baseline results of the Spanish cohort of naïve HIV-infected patients included in the Research Network on HIV/AIDS (CoRIS).CoRIS is a multicenter, hospital-based prospective cohort of HIV sero-prevalent, retroviral-naïve subjects, over 13 years old, and seen at 17 hospitals in 8 of the 17 Autonomous Regions in Spain from January 2004 to October 2005. The socio-demographic characteristics, as well as epidemiological, clinical, laboratory and treatment data were recorded, and biological samples were collected at baseline and during follow-up.A total of 1,591 subjects have been included in CoRIS; 24% are women, median age at cohort entry is 36 years, and 74% were diagnosed during 2004 or 2005. Twenty-seven percent came from countries other than Spain, mainly Latin-America (16%) and sub-Saharan Africa (5%). Thirty-two percent had completed secondary education and 16% university studies. The most frequent categories of transmission were men having sex with men (37%) and heterosexual sex (36%); only 21% were injection drug users. At cohort entry, median CD4 count was 317 cells/mm 3 and median viral load was 52,300 copies/mL; 18% were diagnosed with AIDS. Main AIDS-defining illnesses were Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia (6.1%), esophageal candidiasis (3.3%) and tuberculosis (extrapulmonary, 3.0% and pulmonary 2.7%). There were 35 deaths (2.2%). Thirty-three percent of patients gave a baseline sample to the BioBank.CoRIS offers relevant information about the current epidemiological profile of HIV infection in Spain, where sexual transmission has become predominant. The type and amount of information obtained from clinical and epidemiological data collection together with biological samples demonstrate the viability of the project, which offers many possibilities for future research.

The aims of this study were to describe the process of implementation of the PISCIS cohort, and to describe the clinical and epidemiological characteristics and trends of antiretroviral treatment (ART) among patients enrolled from 1998 through 2003.Prospective cohort study of HIV-infected patients agedor = 16 years newly attended in 10 Catalonian hospitals and one Balearic Islands hospital. Analysis were done using the Mantel's chi2 test for trend.A total of 5,968 patients (mean age 39 yrs; 75% men) were recruited with a mean follow-up of 26.4 months (13,130 person-years). A total of 2,763 patients were newly diagnosed and among these, the most frequent transmission route was the heterosexual one (43%), followed by homosexual (31%). We observed an increasing trend in the proportion of persons35 years and immigrants. Among newly diagnosed, 43% had200 CD4 T cells/microl in the nearest determination from HIV diagnosis. In the year 2003, 83% of patients were on ART. A decrease of the protease inhibitor-based regimen (from 85% in 1998 to 25% in 2003; p0.001) and an increase of nucleoside and non-nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors-containing regimens were observed over time among naive patients who started ART with three or more drugs.HIV infected patients' cohorts are feasible in our setting and are an important tool in clinical and public health. The heterosexual route of transmission was the most frequent among newly diagnosed patients. The diagnosis delay is high and, on the other hand, ARV regimens have been changing according to the recommended guidelines.

Our objective was to evaluate the impact of antiretroviral therapy (ART) in the prevention of maternal-fetal HIV transmission in a population of HIV-infected pregnant women.We studied prospectively all HIV-infected pregnant women attended in our hospital from January 1995 to December 2000. We offered treatment with zidovudine (ZDV) alone or in combination according to women's requirements.There were 98 mother-infant pairs and we studied 93 of them. The rate of vertical transmission was 1.4% when ART was started in pregnancy. Risk of HIV transmission was greater in mothers not being treated with ART during pregnancy (relative risk [RR]: 18; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.2-145.4), in mothers who only received ZDV at delivery and child vs those who received ART during pregnancy (RR: 16.4; 95% CI: 1.8-145.6) and in mothers who were active intravenous drug users (RR: 9.3; 95% CI: 2.2-38.5), with significant differences between vaginal delivery and caesarean section.We observed a substantial benefit from ART, especially in the group of HIV-infected pregnant women who started treatment during pregnancy. Preventive interventions are needed.

Objetivo: El objetivo principal de este trabajo es determinar la tasa de fracaso virológico (FV) en pacientes naive que inician tratamiento antirretroviral (TAR) a 24 y 48 semanas en vida real en un hospital de tercer nivel.Material y método: Estudio retrospectivo de 3 años de duración. Se seleccionaron pacientes adultos VIH naive que iniciaron TAR entre 2012 y 2014.Se registraron datos demográficos (edad, sexo y nacionalidad), clínicos (mecanismo de trasmisión y estadio clínico), de laboratorio (carga viral (CV), linfocitos CD4 basales y existencia de test de mutaciones previo) y TAR elegido. Tras 24 y 48 semanas se registraron: CV y CD4, adherencia, seguimiento, problemas relacionados con la medicación, cambios de TAR y motivos de cambio.Resultados: Se seleccionaron 253 pacientes. 244 y 226 contaban con datos analíticos a las 24 y 48 semanas respectivamente. 142 (58,23%) tenían CV