Search

HIV-1 transmission precipitates a stringent genetic bottleneck, with 75% of new infections initiated by a single genetic variant. Where multiple variants initiate infection, recipient set point viral load (SpVL) and the rate of CD4 + T cell decline may be elevated, but these findings remain inconsistent. Here, we summarised the evidence for this phenomenon, then tested whether previous studies possessed sufficient statistical power to reliably identify a true effect of multiple variant infection leading to higher SpVL. Next, we combined models of HIV-1 transmission, heritability and disease progression to understand whether available data suggest a faster CD4 + T cell decline would be expected to associated with multiple variant infection, without an explicit dependency between the two. First, we found that most studies had insufficient power to identify a true significant difference, prompting an explanation for previous inconsistencies. Next, our model framework revealed we would not expect to observe a positive association between multiple variant infections and faster CD4 + T cell decline, in the absence of an explicit dependency. Consequently, while empirical evidence may be consistent with a positive association between multiple variant infection and faster CD4 + T cell decline, further investigation is required to establish a causal basis.

Background: Although sex hormones are recognized to induce immune variations, the effect of hormonal therapy use on immunity is only poorly understood. Here, we quantified how hormonal therapy use affects HIV-1 immune markers in cis women (CW) and trans women and non-binary people (TNBP) with HIV., Methods: We considered CD4, CD8 and lymphocyte measurements from cis men (CM), CW and TNBP in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study. We modelled HIV-1 markers using linear mixed-effects models with an interaction between 'gender' (CW, TNBP) and 'hormonal therapy use' (yes/no). Models were adjusted on age, ethnicity, education level, time since start of antiretroviral therapy and use of intravenous drugs. We assessed the inflammatory effect of hormonal therapy use in 31 TNBP using serum proteomics measurements of 92 inflammation markers., Results: We included 54 083 measurements from 3092 CW and 83 TNBP, and 147 230 measurements from 8611 CM. Hormonal therapy use increased CD4 count and CD4:CD8 ratio in TNBP more than in CW (p interaction  = 0.02 and 0.007, respectively). TNBP with hormonal therapy use had significantly higher CD4 counts [median = 772 cells/μL, interquartile range (IQR): 520-1006] than without (617 cells/μL, 426-892). This was similar to the effect of CW versus CM on CD4 T cells. Hormonal therapy use did not affect serum protein concentrations in TNBP., Conclusion: This study highlights the potential role of hormonal therapy use in modulating the immune system among other biological and social factors, especially in TNBP with HIV., (© 2024 The Author(s). HIV Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British HIV Association.)

HIV-1 RNA genetic diversity predicts time since infection, which is important for clinical care and research. It is unclear, however, whether proviral DNA genetic diversity sampled under suppressive antiretroviral therapy can be used for this purpose. We tested whether proviral genetic diversity from next-generation sequencing predicts time since infection and recency in 221 people with HIV-1 with known infection time. Proviral diversity was significantly associated with time since infection (P < 5×10-7, R2 up to 25%) and predictive of treatment initiation during recent infection (area under the curve-receiver operating characteristic up to 0.85). This shows the utility of proviral genetic diversity as a proxy for time since infection., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. A. R. has received research grants from Gilead; travel expenses from Gilead and Pfizer; and honoraria for data safety monitoring board or advisory board consultations from MSD and Moderna, all paid to his institution. D. L. B. has received personal consulting fees from Gilead, MSD, and ViiV; personal honoraria for presentations from Gilead, Pfizer, MSD, and ViiV; and travel expenses from Gilead and ViiV, paid to his institution. E. B. has received research grants from MSD; consulting fees from Moderna; honoraria for presentations from Pfizer; travel expenses from ViiV, MSD, Gilead, and Pfizer; and honoraria for data safety monitoring board or advisory board consultations from ViiV, MSD, Pfizer, Gilead, Moderna, AstraZeneca, AbbVie, and Ely Lilly, all paid to his institution. H. F. G. has received research grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation, Swiss HIV Cohort Study, Yvonne Jacob Foundation, Gilead, ViiV, and Bill and Melinda Gates foundation, paid to his institution; personal honoraria for data safety monitoring board or advisory board consultations from Merck, ViiV Healthcare, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Johnson and Johnson, Novartis, and GSK; and personal travel expenses from Gilead. J. N. has received research grants from the Swiss HIV Cohort Study and the cantonal hospital St Gallen, paid to her institution. K. J. M. has received unrestricted research grants from Gilead and Novartis, paid to her institution; and personal honoraria for advisory board consultations from ViiV. M. C. has received research grants from Gilead, ViiV, and MSD; payment for expert testimony from Gilead, ViiV, and MSD; and travel expenses from Gilead, all paid to his institution. M. S. has received honoraria for data safety monitoring board advisory board consultations from Gilead, ViiV, Moderna, Pfizer, and MSD; and travel expenses for conferences from Gilead, all paid to his institution. P. F. has received personal travel expenses from the University Zurich; payment for equipment from the University Zurich; and personal honoraria for presentations from the University Zurich. R. D. K. has received research grants from Gilead and NIH, paid to his institution. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

The development of broadly neutralizing antibody (bnAb)-based therapeutic HIV-1 vaccines and cure concepts depends on monitoring bnAb plasma activity in people with HIV (PWH) on suppressive antiretroviral therapy (ART). To enable this, analytical strategies must be defined to reliably distinguish antibody-based neutralization from drug inhibition. Here, we explore strategies that either utilize drug-resistant viruses or remove drugs from plasma. We develop ART-DEX (ART dissociation and size exclusion), an approach which quantitatively separates drugs from plasma proteins following pH-triggered release allowing accurate definition of antibody-based neutralization. We demonstrate that ART-DEX, alone or combined with ART-resistant viruses, provides a highly effective and scalable means of assessing antibody neutralization during ART. Implementation of ART-DEX in standard neutralization protocols should be considered to enhance the analytical capabilities of studies evaluating bnAb therapeutics and therapeutic vaccines, furthering the development of advanced ART and HIV-1 cure strategies., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests A.T. has received unrelated unrestricted research grants from the SNSF, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Gilead Sciences, Novartis Biomedical Research Foundation, University of Zurich (UZH) Foundation, UZH Clinical Research Priority Program, the SHCS, honoraria from Roche Diagnostics and the Institute for biomedical research Bellinzona for consultant and scientific board activity, and directs the Swiss National Reference Center for Retroviruses together with M.H. H.F.G. has received unrelated unrestricted research grants from the SNSF, the SHCS, Yvonne Jacob Foundation, University of Zurich Clinical Research Priority Program, Systems.X, the National Institutes of Health, Gilead Sciences, and Roche. H.F.G. has further received personal fees from Merck, Gilead Sciences, ViiV, Janssen, GSK, Johnson and Johnson, and Novartis for consultancy or DSMB membership and a travel grant from Gilead. M.H. directs the Swiss National Reference Center for Retroviruses and has received unrelated unrestricted research grant from the UZH Clinical Research Priority Program, the SNSF, the SHCS, and the ETH PHRT. I.A.A. has received honoraria from MSD and Sanofi, a travel grant from Gilead Sciences, a grant from ProMedica Foundation, and she is member of the EKIF (Eidgenössische Kommission für Impffragen) of the Federal Office of Public Health. R.D.K. has received grants from SNSF, the National Institutes of Health, and Gilead Sciences., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The pathogenesis of HIV-1 infection is governed by a highly dynamic, time-dependent interaction between the host and the viral genome. In this study, we developed a novel systematic approach to assess the host-virus interaction, using average pairwise viral diversity as a proxy for time since infection, and applied this method to nearly whole viral genome sequences (n = 4,464), human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genotyping data (n = 1,044), and viral RNA load (VL) measurements during the untreated chronic phase (n = 829) of Swiss HIV Cohort Study participants. Our systematic genome-wide screen revealed for 98 HLA/viral-variant pairs a signature of immune-driven selection in the form of an HLA-dependent effect of infection time on the presence of HIV amino acid variants. Of these pairs, 12 were found to have an effect on VL. Furthermore, 28/58 pairs were validated by time-to-event analyses and 48/92 by computational HLA-epitope predictions. Our diversity-based approach allows a powerful and systematic investigation of the interaction between the virus and cellular immunity, revealing a notable subset of such interaction effects. From an evolutionary perspective, these observations underscore the complexity of HLA-mediated selection pressures on the virus that shape viral evolution and pathogenesis., Competing Interests: K.J.M. has received travel grants and honoraria from Gilead Sciences, Roche Diagnostics, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Bristol-Myers Squibb, ViiV, and Abbott; and the University of Zurich has received research grants from Gilead Science, Novartis, Roche, and Merck Sharp & Dohme for studies in which K.J.M. serves as principal investigator, and advisory board honoraria from Gilead Sciences and ViiV. A.R. reports support to his institution for advisory board and/or travel grants from MSD, Gilead Sciences, Pfizer, and Moderna, and an investigator-initiated trial (IIT) grant from Gilead Sciences. All honoraria went to his home institution, not to A.R. personally, and all honoraria were provided outside of the submitted work. M.S. reports advisory board consultations from Gilead, ViiV, MSD, paid to his institution, and travel grants for conferences from Gilead, paid to his institution. E.B.’s institution has received research grants from Gilead and Merck unrelated to this work; E.B.’s institution has also received consultancy fees and travel grants from Gilead, ViiV, Merck, Pfizer, Astra Zeneca, Moderna, Abbvie, and Ely Lilly. J.N. has received travel grants from Gilead. H.F.G. has received grants from the Yvonne-Jacob Foundation, the Clinical Research Priority Program of the University of Zurich, and Gilead Sciences, and, outside of this study, grants for unrestricted research from the Swiss HIV Cohort Study, the Swiss National Science Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Gilead, and ViiV; and personal fees as a consultant for Merck, ViiV Healthcare, and Gilead Sciences and as a member of the Data and Safety Monitoring Board for Merck. H.F.G.’s institution has received educational grants unrelated to this work from Gilead, ViiV, MSD, Abbvie, Pfizer, and Sandoz. C.P. has received fellowships from the Collegium Helveticum. R.D.K. has received grants from Gilead Sciences, the National Institutes of Health, the Swiss National Science Foundation, and the Swiss HIV Cohort Study. N.N.J. has received support from the Swiss National Science Foundation and the Swiss HIV Cohort Study. All other authors report no potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright: © 2024 Neuner-Jehle et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Infections with the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) are incurable due the long-lasting, latent viral reservoir. The shock-and-kill cure approach aims to activate latent proviruses in HIV-1 infected cells and subsequently kill these cells with strategies such as therapeutic vaccines or immune enhancement. Here, we combined the dCas9-VPR CRISPR activation (CRISPRa) system with gRNA-V, the truncated Bid (tBid)-based suicide gene strategy and CD3-retargeted adenovirus (Ad) delivery vectors, in an all-in-one targeted shock-and-kill gene therapy approach to achieve specific elimination of latently HIV-1 infected cells. Simultaneous transduction of latently HIV-1 infected J-Lat 10.6 cells with a CD3-retargeted Ad-CRISPRa-V and Ad-tBid led to a 57.7 ± 17.0% reduction of productively HIV-1 infected cells and 2.4-fold ± 0.25 increase in cell death. The effective activation of latent HIV-1 provirus by Ad-CRISPRa-V was similar to the activation control TNF-α. The strictly HIV-1 dependent and non-leaky killing by tBid could be demonstrated. Furthermore, the high transduction efficiencies of up to 70.8 ± 0.4% by the CD3-retargeting technology in HIV-1 latently infected cell lines was the basis of successful shock-and-kill. This novel targeted shock-and-kill all-in-one gene therapy approach has the potential to safely and effectively eliminate HIV-1 infected cells in a highly HIV-1 and T cell specific manner., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the association of demographic and clinical characteristics, including HIV-specific parameters with the antibody response to a third dose of a severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) mRNA vaccine in people with HIV-1 (PWH)., Design: Post hoc analysis of data collected during the observational extension of the COrona VaccinE tRiAL pLatform trial (COVERALL-2) nested into the Swiss HIV Cohort Study (SHCS)., Methods: Serological measurements were conducted on a total of 439 PWH who had received a third dose of either mRNA-1273 (Moderna) or BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Antibody reactivity was assessed using the multifactorial ABCORA immunoassay that defines SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion and predicts neutralization activity. The association between log transformed antibody reactivity and various baseline factors, including vaccine type, demographics, immune and viral status, smoking status, comorbidities, infection history, and co-medication with chemotherapy and immunosuppressive drugs, was investigated using a multivariable linear regression model., Results: Antibody response to third SARS-CoV-2 vaccination was significantly lower among PWH with CD4 + cell count less than 350 cells/μl [ratio of means 0.79; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65-0.95]. Having a detectable HIV-1 viral load at least 50 copies/ml and being on concurrent chemotherapy was associated with an overall lower humoral immune response (ratio of means 0.75; 95% CI 0.57-1.00 and 0.34; 95% CI 0.22-0.52, respectively)., Conclusion: The study highlights the importance of optimal antiretroviral treatment for PWH, emphasizing the need for timely intervention to enhance the vaccine immunogenicity in this population. Moreover, it underscores the significance of sequential mRNA vaccination and provides important evidence for informing vaccine guidelines., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: People with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) (PWH) are frequently coinfected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) and at risk for progressing from asymptomatic latent TB infection (LTBI) to active tuberculosis (TB). LTBI testing and preventive treatment (TB specific prevention) are recommended, but its efficacy in low transmission settings is unclear., Methods: We included PWH enrolled from 1988 to 2022 in the Swiss HIV Cohort study (SHCS). The outcome, incident TB, was defined as TB ≥6 months after SHCS inclusion. We assessed its risk factors using a time-updated hazard regression, modeled the potential impact of modifiable factors on TB incidence, performed mediation analysis to assess underlying causes of time trends, and evaluated preventive measures., Results: In 21 528 PWH, LTBI prevalence declined from 15.1% in 2001% to 4.6% in 2021. Incident TB declined from 90.8 cases/1000 person-years in 1989 to 0.1 in 2021. A positive LTBI test showed a higher risk for incident TB (hazard ratio [HR] 9.8, 5.8-16.5) but only 10.5% of PWH with incident TB were tested positive. Preventive treatment reduced the risk in LTBI test positive PWH for active TB (relative risk reduction, 28.1%, absolute risk reduction 0.9%). On population level, the increase of CD4 T-cells and reduction of HIV viral load were the main driver of TB decrease., Conclusions: TB specific prevention is effective in selected patient groups. On a population level, control of HIV-1 remains the most important factor for incident TB reduction. Accurate identification of PWH at highest risk for TB is an unmet clinical need., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest . A. C. received grants from Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD), ViiV Healthcare, and Gilead Sciences for unrelated research. R. D. K. received grants from Gilead Sciences and National Institutes of Health (NIH) for unrelated research. D. L. B. received honoraria for working on the advisory board of Gilead Sciences, Merck, ViiV, Pfizer, and AstraZeneca. D. L. B. received honoraria for presentations from Gilead Sciences and Merck. E. B. received grants from MSD for unrelated research. E. B. received payments for travel reimbursement from ViiV, MSD, Gilead Sciences, Pfizer, and Abbvie. E. B. received honoraria for working on the advisory board of ViiV, MSD, Pfizer, Gilead Sciences, AstraZeneca, and Ely Lilly. H. H. H. received honoraria for working on the advisory board of AiCuris, Merck, Vera Dx, and Molecular Partners. H. H. H. received honoraria for presentations from Merck, Gilead Sciences, Biotest, and Vera Dx. J. N. received honoraria for presentations from Oxford Immunotec and ViiV. H. F. G. received honoraria for working on the advisory board of Gilead Sciences, Merck, ViiV, Janssen, Johnson and Johnson, Novartis, and GlaxoSmithKline (GSK). H. F. G. received payments for travel reimbursements from Gilead Sciences. H. F. G. received grants from NIH, Yvonne Jacob Foundation, and Gilead Sciences. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Background: The widespread use of the integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) dolutegravir in first-line and second-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) might facilitate emerging resistance. The DTG RESIST study combined data from HIV cohorts to examine patterns of drug resistance mutations (DRMs) and identify risk factors for dolutegravir resistance., Methods: We included cohorts with INSTI resistance data from two collaborations (ART Cohort Collaboration, International epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS in Southern Africa), and the UK Collaborative HIV Cohort. Eight cohorts from Canada, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Switzerland, South Africa, and the UK contributed data on individuals who were viraemic on dolutegravir-based ART and underwent genotypic resistance testing. Individuals with unknown dolutegravir initiation date were excluded. Resistance levels were categorised using the Stanford algorithm. We identified risk factors for resistance using mixed-effects ordinal logistic regression models., Findings: We included 599 people with genotypic resistance testing on dolutegravir-based ART between May 22, 2013, and Dec 20, 2021. Most had HIV-1 subtype B (n=351, 59%), a third had been exposed to first-generation INSTIs (n=193, 32%), 70 (12%) were on dolutegravir dual therapy, and 18 (3%) were on dolutegravir monotherapy. INSTI DRMs were detected in 86 (14%) individuals; 20 (3%) had more than one mutation. Most (n=563, 94%) were susceptible to dolutegravir, seven (1%) had potential low, six (1%) low, 17 (3%) intermediate, and six (1%) high-level dolutegravir resistance. The risk of dolutegravir resistance was higher on dolutegravir monotherapy (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 34·1, 95% CI 9·93-117) and dolutegravir plus lamivudine dual therapy (aOR 9·21, 2·20-38·6) compared with combination ART, and in the presence of potential low or low (aOR 5·23, 1·32-20·7) or intermediate or high-level (aOR 13·4, 4·55-39·7) nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) resistance., Interpretation: Among people with viraemia on dolutegravir-based ART, INSTI DRMs and dolutegravir resistance were rare. NRTI resistance substantially increased the risk of dolutegravir resistance, which is of concern, notably in resource-limited settings. Monitoring is important to prevent resistance at the individual and population level and ensure the long-term sustainability of ART., Funding: US National Institutes of Health, Swiss National Science Foundation., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests SMI reports grant funding from the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism for the work of ART-CC (payment to institution). AvS reports funding from the Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport for the maintenance of the ATHENA database, and grant funding from the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (payment to institution). MJG reports honoraria as an ad-hoc member of HIV National Advisory Boards from Merck, Gilead Sciences, and ViiV, and a leadership position as Medical Director of the Southern Alberta HIV Clinic. CAS has received funding from Gilead Sciences, ViiV Healthcare, and Janssen-Cilag for membership of Data Safety and Monitoring Committees and Advisory Committees and for preparation of educational material. HFG has received personal fees from Merck, Gilead Sciences, ViiV, GSK, Janssen, Johnson and Johnson, and Novartis, as an advisor or consultant or for Data Safety Monitoring Board membership, and has received a travel grant from Gilead. JACS reports funding for research in this publication from the NIH National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (payment to institution), UK National Institute for Health and Care Research (payment to institution), and the University of Bern (payment to institution). RL reports support for research in this publication by the NIH National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases under award number R01AI152772, and support from the NIH National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases under award number R01AI167699 for a separate project pertaining to HIV treatment strategies. ME reports funding for research in this publication from the Swiss National Science Foundation (32FP30-18949) and the NIH (Cooperative Agreement AI069924 and R01 AI152772-01). RDK reports funding for research in this publication from the Swiss National Science Foundation and the NIH National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and reports grant funding from Gilead Sciences. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection is treated with antiretroviral therapy (ART), usually consisting of 2-3 different drugs, referred to as combination ART (cART). Our recent randomized clinical trial comparing a switch to dolutegravir monotherapy with continuation of cART in early-treated individuals demonstrated sustained virological suppression over 48 weeks. Here, we characterize the longitudinal landscape of the HIV-1 reservoir in these participants, with particular attention to potential differences between treatment groups regarding evidence of evolution as a proxy for low-level replication. Near full-length HIV-1 proviral polymerase chain reaction and next-generation sequencing was applied to longitudinal peripheral blood mononuclear cell samples to assess proviral evolution and the potential emergence of drug resistance mutations (DRMs). Neither an increase in genetic distance nor diversity over time was detected in participants of both treatment groups. Single proviral analysis showed high proportions of defective proviruses and low DRM numbers. No evidence for evolution during dolutegravir monotherapy was found in these early-treated individuals., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. D. L. B. reports honoraria for advisory boards from Gilead, Merck, and ViiV, outside the present work. K. J. M. has received travel grants and honoraria from Gilead Sciences, Roche Diagnostics, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Bristol Myers Squibb, ViiV, and Abbott, and has received advisory board honoraria from Gilead Sciences and ViiV. The University of Zurich received research grants from Gilead Sciences, Novartis, Roche, and Merck Sharp & Dohme for studies for which K. J. M. serves as principal investigator. H. F. G. has received grants from the SNF, Swiss HIV Cohort Study, Yvonne Jacob Foundation, University of Zurich's Clinical Research Priority Program, Zurich Primary HIV Infection, Systems.X, NIH, Gilead Sciences, and Roche; personal fees from Merck, Gilead Sciences, ViiV, Janssen, GSK, Johnson & Johnson, and Novartis for consultancy or data and safety monitoring board membership; and a travel grant from Gilead. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Background: Genotypic resistance testing (GRT) is routinely performed upon diagnosis of HIV-1 infection or during virological failure using plasma viral RNA. An alternative source for GRT could be cellular HIV-1 DNA., Objectives: A substantial number of participants in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study (SHCS) never received GRT. We applied a method that enables access to the near full-length proviral HIV-1 genome without requiring detectable viraemia., Methods: Nine hundred and sixty-two PBMC specimens were received. Our two-step nested PCR protocol was applied to generate two overlapping long-range amplicons of the HIV-1 genome, sequenced by next-generation sequencing (NGS) and analysed by MinVar, a pipeline to detect drug resistance mutations (DRMs)., Results: Six hundred and eighty-one (70.8%) of the samples were successfully amplified, sequenced and analysed by MinVar. Only partial information of the pol gene was contained in 82/681 (12%), probably due to naturally occurring deletions in the proviral sequence. All common HIV-1 subtypes were successfully sequenced. We detected at least one major DRM at high frequency (≥15%) in 331/599 (55.3%) individuals. Excluding APOBEC-signature (G-to-A mutation) DRMs, 145/599 (24.2%) individuals carried at least one major DRM. RT-inhibitor DRMs were most prevalent. The experienced time on ART was significantly longer in DRM carriers (P = 0.001) independent of inclusion or exclusion of APOBEC-signature DRMs., Conclusions: We successfully applied a reliable and efficient method to analyse near full-length HIV-1 proviral DNA and investigated DRMs in individuals with undetectable or low viraemia. Additionally, our data underscore the need for new computational tools to exclude APOBEC-related hypermutated NGS sequence reads for reporting DRMs., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.)

Background: There are conflicting data regarding baseline determinants of virological nonsuppression outcomes in persons with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) starting antiretroviral treatment (ART). We evaluated the impact of different baseline variables in the RESPOND cohort., Methods: We included treatment-naive participants aged ≥18 who initiated 3-drug ART, in 2014-2020. We assessed the odds of virological suppression (VS) at weeks 48 and 96 using logistic regression. Viral blips, low-level viremia (LLV), residual viremia (RV), and virological failure (VF) rates were assessed using Cox regression., Results: Of 4310 eligible participants, 72% started integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI)-based regimens. At 48 and 96 weeks, 91.0% and 93.3% achieved VS, respectively. At 48 weeks, Kaplan-Meier estimates of rates were 9.6% for viral blips, 2.1% for LLV, 22.2% for RV, and 2.1% for VF. Baseline HIV-1 RNA levels >100 000 copies/mL and CD4+ T-cell counts ≤200/µL were negatively associated with VS at weeks 48 (adjusted odds ratio, 0.51 [95% confidence interval, .39-.68] and .40 [.27-.58], respectively) and 96 and with significantly higher rates of blips, LLV, and RV. CD4+ T-cell counts ≤200/µL were associated with higher risk of VF (adjusted hazard ratio, 3.12 [95% confidence interval, 2.02-4.83]). Results were consistent in those starting INSTIs versus other regimens and those starting dolutegravir versus other INSTIs., Conclusions: Initial high HIV-1 RNA and low CD4+ T-cell counts are associated with lower rates of VS at 48 and 96 weeks and higher rates of viral blips, LLV, and RV. Low baseline CD4+ T-cell counts are associated with higher VF rates. These associations remain with INSTI-based and specifically with dolutegravir-based regimens. These findings suggest that the impact of these baseline determinants is independent of the ART regimen initiated., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. H. A. has received support for attending meetings from Janssen-Cilag, Gilead Sciences and ViiV Healthcare and honoraria for presentations from Gilead Sciences and ViiV Healthcare, outside the present work. A. M. has received payments or honoraria for lectures, presentations and travel support from ViiV Healthcare and Gilead Sciences and consultancy fees as an expert witness for Eiland and Bonnin, outside the submitted work. H. F. G. has received unrestricted research grants and a travel grant from Gilead Sciences; fees for data and safety monitoring board membership from Merck; consulting/advisory board membership fees from Gilead Sciences, Merck, Johnson & Johnson, Janssen, Novartis, GSK and ViiV Healthcare; and grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation, Yvonne Jacob Foundation, and the National Institutes of Health, outside the present work. C.S. reports payment or honoraria for speaking engagements from Gilead Sciences. F. W. reports membership on the advisory board for ViiV. C. L. reports grants or contracts (paid to the institution) from the German federal ministry of education and research, the Federal Joint Committee (Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss Innovationsausschuss), the Ministerium für Kultur und Wissenschaft in Nordrhein-Westfalen, and the German Center for Infection Research; payment for speaking engagements from Pfizer, ViiV, Gilead, Novartis, MSD, and Biontech; travel support for the 2023 Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI 2023) from Pfizer; and participation on a data safety monitoring or advisory board for ViiV, Pfizer, and Biontech. C. M. reports a research grant from Gilead (paid to the institution), consulting fees (paid to the author) from ViiV, MSD, Gilead, and Janssen, and participation on a data safety monitoring or advisory board for Corimuno. J. C. W. has received payments or honoraria for lectures from Merck Sharp & Dohme. A. S. reports grants or contracts from Gilead Sciences, participation on data safety monitoring or advisory board for GlaxoSmithKline and Gilead Sciences, and a role on the Swedish Reference Group of Antiviral Therapy. C. Smith Stephan has received grants or contracts from the Robert Koch Institute (ClinSurv Steering committee and grant) abd Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (Hospital Partnership Developing Project [Esther]); consulting fees from Gilead Sciences (speaker fees and advisory board membership) and from Janssen Cilag, Merck Sharp & Dohme, ViiV Healthcare (advisory board membership); payment for expert testimony for Verwaltungsgericht Berlin; and support for attending meetings form Gilead Sciences (Conference on Retrovirus and Opportunistic Infection [American Retrovirus Conference]), Janssen-Cilag (European AIDS Conference travel grant), and AbbVie (Dagnä-Workshop travel grant), outside the present work. K. P. has received grants or contracts from ViiV Healthcare Australia and Gilead Sciences Australia, outside the present work. V. V. is an employee and shareholder of ViiV Healthcare. J. G. is an employee and shareholder of Gilead Sciences. R. M. I. has received payments for presentations in meetings and symposia as a speaker in HIV Clinical Topics (22–23 September 2022; lecture about late human immunodeficiency virus [HIV] presentation) and from the HIV Nordic Symposium (September 2022; role as chairman in a session about long-acting cabotegravir/rilpivirine [GSK]) and reports participation on an advisory board for GSK (November–December 2022) (personal consulting fee in relation to an advisory board regarding new data on dolutegravir-lamivudine and long-acting treatment with cabotegravir-rilpivirine), outside the present work. L. Y. reports other financial or nonfinancial interests with Merck Sharp & Dohme. J. M. L. has received payments or honoraria for lectures, presentations, or speakers bureau participation from Janssen-Cilag, Gilead Sciences, Thera Technologies, and ViiV Healthcare; consulting fees from and participation on a data safety monitoring or advisory board for Janssen-Cilag, Gilead Sciences, and ViiV Healthcare; and support for attending meetings from Gilead Sciences, outside the present work. A.C. reports grants or contracts (paid to institution) from ViiV Healthcare, consulting fees, payment for speaking engagements, and participation on data safety monitoring or advisory boards for Janssen Cilag, Gilead, MSD, and ViiV Healthcare (alls support paid to author). All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is gradually replacing Sanger sequencing (SS) as the primary method for HIV genotypic resistance testing. However, there are limited systematic data on comparability of these methods in a clinical setting for the presence of low-abundance drug resistance mutations (DRMs) and their dependency on the variant-calling thresholds., Methods: To compare the HIV-DRMs detected by SS and NGS, we included participants enrolled in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study (SHCS) with SS and NGS sequences available with sample collection dates ≤7 days apart. We tested for the presence of HIV-DRMs and compared the agreement between SS and NGS at different variant-calling thresholds., Results: We included 594 pairs of SS and NGS from 527 SHCS participants. Males accounted for 80.5% of the participants, 76.3% were ART naive at sample collection and 78.1% of the sequences were subtype B. Overall, we observed a good agreement (Cohen's kappa >0.80) for HIV-DRMs for variant-calling thresholds ≥5%. We observed an increase in low-abundance HIV-DRMs detected at lower thresholds [28/417 (6.7%) at 10%-25% to 293/812 (36.1%) at 1%-2% threshold]. However, such low-abundance HIV-DRMs were overrepresented in ART-naive participants and were in most cases not detected in previously sampled sequences suggesting high sequencing error for thresholds <3%., Conclusions: We found high concordance between SS and NGS but also a substantial number of low-abundance HIV-DRMs detected only by NGS at lower variant-calling thresholds. Our findings suggest that a substantial fraction of the low-abundance HIV-DRMs detected at thresholds <3% may represent sequencing errors and hence should not be overinterpreted in clinical practice., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Despite effective prevention approaches, ongoing human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1) transmission remains a public health concern indicating a need for identifying its drivers., Methods: We combined a network-based clustering method using evolutionary distances between viral sequences with statistical learning approaches to investigate the dynamics of HIV transmission in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study and to predict the drivers of ongoing transmission., Results: We found that only a minority of clusters and patients acquired links to new infections between 2007 and 2020. While the growth of clusters and the probability of individual patients acquiring new links in the transmission network was associated with epidemiological, behavioral, and virological predictors, the strength of these associations decreased substantially when adjusting for network characteristics. Thus, these network characteristics can capture major heterogeneities beyond classical epidemiological parameters. When modeling the probability of a newly diagnosed patient being linked with future infections, we found that the best predictive performance (median area under the curve receiver operating characteristic AUCROC = 0.77) was achieved by models including characteristics of the network as predictors and that models excluding them performed substantially worse (median AUCROC = 0.54)., Conclusions: These results highlight the utility of molecular epidemiology-based network approaches for analyzing and predicting ongoing HIV transmission dynamics. This approach may serve for real-time prospective assessment of HIV transmission., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest . R. D. K. has received grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation (for this work) and Gilead Sciences (outside the submitted work). H.F.G has received unrestricted research grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation, NIH, Yvonne Jacob Foundation and Gilead Sciences; fees for data and safety monitoring board, consultancy or advisory board membership from Merck, Gilead, ViiV, Johnson and Johnson, Janssen, and Novartis. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

The 2022 edition of the IAS-USA drug resistance mutations list updates the Figure last published in September 2019. The mutations listed are those that have been identified by specific criteria for evidence and drugs described. The Figure is designed to assist practitioners to identify key mutations associated with resistance to antiretroviral drugs, and therefore, in making clinical decisions regarding antiretroviral therapy.

Background: Studying human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) superinfection is important to understand virus transmission, disease progression, and vaccine design. But detection remains challenging, with low sampling frequencies and insufficient longitudinal samples., Methods: Using the Swiss HIV Cohort Study (SHCS), we developed a molecular epidemiology screening for superinfections. A phylogeny built from 22 243 HIV-1 partial polymerase sequences was used to identify potential superinfections among 4575 SHCS participants with longitudinal sequences. A subset of potential superinfections was tested by near-full-length viral genome sequencing (NFVGS) of biobanked plasma samples., Results: Based on phylogenetic and distance criteria, 325 potential HIV-1 superinfections were identified and categorized by their likelihood of being detected as superinfections due to sample misidentification. NFVGS was performed for 128 potential superinfections; of these, 52 were confirmed by NFVGS, 15 were not confirmed, and for 61 sampling did not allow confirming or rejecting superinfection because the sequenced samples did not include the relevant time points causing the superinfection signal in the original screen. Thus, NFVGS could support 52 of 67 adequately sampled potential superinfections., Conclusions: This cohort-based molecular approach identified, to our knowledge, the largest population of confirmed superinfections, showing that, while rare with a prevalence of 1%-7%, superinfections are not negligible events., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. The institution of E. B. received fees for E. B. participation in advisory boards and travel grants from Gilead Sciences, MSD, ViiV Healthcare, Pfizer, AbbVie, and Sandoz. K. J. M. has received advisory board honoraria from Gilead Sciences; has received travel grants and honoraria from Gilead Sciences, Roche Diagnostics, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Bristol-Myers Squibb, ViiV, and Abbott; the University of Zurich received research grants from Gilead Science, Novartis, Roche, and Merck Sharp & Dohme for studies for which K. J. M. serves as principal investigator. H. F. G. has received unrestricted research grants from Gilead Sciences and Roche; fees for data and safety monitoring board membership from Merck; consulting/advisory board membership fees from Gilead Sciences, Merck, and ViiV Healthcare; and grants from SystemsX, and the National Institutes of Health. The institution of H. F. G. received educational grants from Gilead Sciences, ViiV, MSD, AbbVie, and Sandoz. All other authors report no potential conflicts of interest. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: HIV-1 replication capacity (RC) of transmitted/founder viruses may influence the further course of HIV-1 infection., Methods: RCs of 355 whole-genome primary HIV-1 isolates derived from samples acquired during acute and recent primary HIV-1 infection (PHI) were determined using a novel high-throughput infection assay in primary cells. The RCs were used to elucidate potential factors that could be associated with RC during PHI., Results: Increased RC was found to be associated with increased set point viral load (VL), and significant differences in RCs among 13 different HIV-1 subtypes were discerned. Notably, we observed an increase in RCs for primary HIV-1 isolates of HIV-1 subtype B over a 17-year period. Associations were not observed between RC and CD4 count at sample date of RC measurement, CD4 recovery after initiation of antiretroviral treatment, CD4 decline in untreated individuals, and acute retroviral syndrome severity scores., Conclusions: These findings highlight that RCs of primary HIV-1 isolates acquired during the acute and recent phase of infection are more associated with viral factors, that is set point VL, than with host factors. Furthermore, we observed a temporal increase in RC for HIV-1 subtype B viruses over a period of 17 years., Clinical Trials Registration: NCT00537966., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objectives: Phylogenetic analyses of 2 or more countries allow to detect differences in transmission dynamics of local HIV-1 epidemics beyond differences in demographic characteristics., Methods: A maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree was built using pol -sequences of the Swiss HIV Cohort Study (SHCS) and the Austrian HIV Cohort Study (AHIVCOS), with international background sequences. Three types of phylogenetic cherries (clusters of size 2) were analyzed further: (1) domestic cherries; (2) international cherries; and (3) SHCS/AHIVCOS-cherries. Transmission group and ethnicities observed within the cherries were compared with the respective distribution expected from a random distribution of patients on the phylogeny., Results: The demographic characteristics of the AHIVCOS (included patients: 3'141) and the SHCS (included patients: 12'902) are very similar. In the AHIVCOS, 36.5% of the patients were in domestic cherries, 8.3% in international cherries, and 7.0% in SHCS/AHIVCOS cherries. Similarly, in the SHCS, 43.0% of the patients were in domestic cherries, 8.2% in international cherries, and 1.7% in SHCS/AHIVCOS cherries. Although international cherries in the SHCS were dominated by heterosexuals with men who have sex with men being underrepresented, the opposite was the case for the AHIVCOS. In both cohorts, cherries with one patient belonging to the transmission group intravenous drug user and the other one non-intravenous drug user were underrepresented., Conclusions: In both cohorts, international HIV transmission plays a major role in the local epidemics, mostly driven by men who have sex with men in the AHIVOS, and by heterosexuals in the SHCS, highlighting the importance of international collaborations to understand global HIV transmission links on the way to eliminate HIV., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Little is known about whether and how variation in the HIV-1 genome affects its transmissibility. Assessing which genomic features of HIV-1 are under positive or negative selection during transmission is challenging, because very few virus particles are typically transmitted, and random genetic drift can dilute genetic signals in the recipient virus population. We analyzed 30 transmitter-recipient pairs from the Zurich Primary HIV Infection Study and the Swiss HIV Cohort Study using near full-length HIV-1 genomes. We developed a new statistical test to detect selection during transmission, called Selection Test in Transmission (SeTesT), based on comparing the transmitter and recipient virus population and accounting for the transmission bottleneck. We performed extensive simulations and found that sensitivity of detecting selection during transmission is limited by the strong population bottleneck of few transmitted virions. When pooling individual test results across patients, we found two candidate HIV-1 genomic features for affecting transmission, namely amino acid positions 3 and 18 of Vpu, which were significant before but not after correction for multiple testing. In summary, SeTesT provides a general framework for detecting selection based on genomic sequencing data of transmitted viruses. Our study shows that a higher number of transmitter-recipient pairs is required to improve sensitivity of detecting selection.

We discovered a highly virulent variant of subtype-B HIV-1 in the Netherlands. One hundred nine individuals with this variant had a 0.54 to 0.74 log 10 increase (i.e., a ~3.5-fold to 5.5-fold increase) in viral load compared with, and exhibited CD4 cell decline twice as fast as, 6604 individuals with other subtype-B strains. Without treatment, advanced HIV-CD4 cell counts below 350 cells per cubic millimeter, with long-term clinical consequences-is expected to be reached, on average, 9 months after diagnosis for individuals in their thirties with this variant. Age, sex, suspected mode of transmission, and place of birth for the aforementioned 109 individuals were typical for HIV-positive people in the Netherlands, which suggests that the increased virulence is attributable to the viral strain. Genetic sequence analysis suggests that this variant arose in the 1990s from de novo mutation, not recombination, with increased transmissibility and an unfamiliar molecular mechanism of virulence.

Objective: Persistence of the viral reservoir is the main barrier to curing HIV. Initiation of ART during acute HIV infection can limit the size and diversity of the reservoir. In depth characterization of the reservoir in individuals who initiate ART during acute infection will be critical for clinical trial design and cure strategies., Methods: Four cohorts with participants who initiated ART during acute infection or during chronic infection were enrolled in a cross-sectional, noninterventional study. Viral reservoir was evaluated by the Intact Proviral DNA Assay (IPDA), the Total HIV DNA Assay (THDA) and the Quantitative Viral Outgrowth Assay (QVOA). Viral diversity and susceptibility to V3-glycan bNAbs were determined by genotyping of the viral envelope gene., Results: Participants who initiated ART during the acute Fiebig I-IV stages had lower level of total HIV DNA than participants who initiated ART during chronic infection whereas no difference was observed in intact HIV DNA or outgrowth virus. Participants who initiated ART during Fiebig I-IV also had lower viral diversity and appeared to have higher susceptibility to bNAbs than participants initiating ART during chronic infection., Conclusion: Individuals initiating ART during Fiebig I-IV had small viral reservoirs, low viral diversity, and high susceptibility to bNAbs, and would be an optimal target population for proof-of-concept HIV cure trials., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: In Switzerland, HIV-1 transmission among men who have sex with men (MSM) has been dominated by subtype B, whilst non-B subtypes are commonly attributed to infections acquired abroad among heterosexuals. Here, we evaluated the temporal trends of non-B subtypes and the characteristics of molecular transmission clusters (MTCs) among MSM., Methods: Sociodemographic and clinical data and partial pol sequences were obtained from participants enrolled in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study. For non-B subtypes, maximum likelihood trees were constructed, from which Swiss MTCs were identified and analyzed by transmission group., Results: Non-B subtypes were identified in 8.1% (416/5116) of MSM participants. CRF01&#95;AE was the most prevalent strain (3.5%), followed by subtype A (1.2%), F (1.1%), CRF02&#95;AG (1.1%), C (0.9%), and G (0.3%). Between 1990 and 2019, an increase in the proportion of newly diagnosed individuals (0/123 [0%] to 11/32 [34%]) with non-B subtypes in MSM was found. Across all non-B subtypes, the majority of MSM MTCs were European. Larger MTCs were observed for MSM than heterosexuals., Conclusions: We found a substantial increase in HIV-1 non-B subtypes among MSM in Switzerland and the occurrence of large MTCs, highlighting the importance of molecular surveillance in guiding public health strategies targeting the HIV-1 epidemic., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Understanding the genetic interplay between human hosts and infectious pathogens is crucial for how we interpret virulence factors. Here, we tested for associations between HIV and host genetics, and interactive genetic effects on viral load (VL) in HIV-positive antiretroviral treatment-naive clinical trial participants., Methods: HIV genomes were sequenced and the encoded amino acid (AA) variants were associated with VL, human single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), and imputed HLA alleles using generalized linear models with Bonferroni correction., Results: Human (388 501 SNPs) and HIV (3010 variants) genetic data were available for 2122 persons. Four HIV variants were associated with VL (P < 1.66 × 10-5). Twelve HIV variants were associated with a range of 1-512 human SNPs (P < 4.28 × 10-11). We found 46 associations between HLA alleles and HIV variants (P < 1.29 × 10-7). HIV variants and immunotypes when analyzed separately were associated with lower VL, whereas the opposite was true when analyzed in concert. Epitope binding predictions supported our observations., Conclusions: Our results show the importance of immunotype specificity on viral antigenic determinants, and the identified genetic interplay emphasizes that viral and human genetics should be studied in the context of each other.Clinical Trials Registration: NCT00867048., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

The V3 loop of the HIV-1 envelope (Env) protein elicits a vigorous, but largely non-neutralizing antibody response directed to the V3-crown, whereas rare broadly neutralizing antibodies (bnAbs) target the V3-base. Challenging this view, we present V3-crown directed broadly neutralizing Designed Ankyrin Repeat Proteins (bnDs) matching the breadth of V3-base bnAbs. While most bnAbs target prefusion Env, V3-crown bnDs bind open Env conformations triggered by CD4 engagement. BnDs achieve breadth by focusing on highly conserved residues that are accessible in two distinct V3 conformations, one of which resembles CCR5-bound V3. We further show that these V3-crown conformations can, in principle, be attacked by antibodies. Supporting this conclusion, analysis of antibody binding activity in the Swiss 4.5 K HIV-1 cohort (n = 4,281) revealed a co-evolution of V3-crown reactivities and neutralization breadth. Our results indicate a role of V3-crown responses and its conformational preferences in bnAb development to be considered in preventive and therapeutic approaches., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Background: Weight gain effects of individual antiretroviral drugs are not fully understood. We investigated associations between a prespecified clinically significant increase (>7%) in body-mass index (BMI) and contemporary antiretroviral use., Methods: The International Cohort Consortium of Infectious Diseases (RESPOND) is a prospective, multicohort collaboration, including data from 17 well established cohorts and over 29 000 people living with HIV. People with HIV under prospective follow-up from Jan 1, 2012, and older than 18 years were eligible for inclusion. Each cohort contributed a predefined minimum number of participants related to the size of the specific cohort (with a minimum of 1000 participants). Participants were required to have CD4 cell counts and HIV viral load measurement in the 12 months before or within 3 months after baseline. For all antiretroviral drugs received at or after RESPOND entry, changes from pre-antiretroviral BMI levels (baseline) were considered at each BMI measurement during antiretroviral treatment. We used logistic regression to identify individual antiretrovirals that were associated with first occurrence of a more than 7% increase in BMI from pre-antiretroviral BMI. We adjusted analyses for time on antiretrovirals, pre-antiretroviral BMI, demographics, geographical region, CD4 cell count, viral load, smoking status, and AIDS at baseline., Results: 14 703 people were included in this study, of whom 7863 (53·5%) had a more than 7% increase in BMI. Compared with lamivudine, use of dolutegravir (odds ratio [OR] 1·27, 95% CI 1·17-1·38), raltegravir (1·37, 1·20-1·56), and tenofovir alafenamide (1·38, 1·22-1·35) was significantly associated with a more than 7% BMI increase, as was low pre-antiretroviral BMI (2·10, 1·91-2·31 for underweight vs healthy weight) and Black ethnicity (1·61, 1·47-1·76 vs White ethnicity). Higher CD4 count was associated with a reduced risk of BMI increase (0·97, 0·96-0·98 per 100 cells per μL increase). Relative to lamivudine, dolutegravir without tenofovir alafenamide (OR 1·21, 95% CI 1·19-1·32) and tenofovir alafenamide without dolutegravir (1·33, 1·15-1·53) remained independently associated with a more than 7% increase in BMI; the associations were higher when dolutegravir and tenofovir alafenamide were used concomitantly (1·79, 1·52-2·11, and 1·70, 1·44-2·01, respectively)., Interpretation: Clinicians and people with HIV should be aware of associations between weight gain and use of dolutegravir, tenofovir alafenamide, and raltegravir, particularly given the potential consequences of weight gain, such as insulin resistance, dyslipidaemia, and hypertension., Funding: The CHU St Pierre Brussels HIV Cohort, The Austrian HIV Cohort Study, The Australian HIV Observational Database, The AIDS Therapy Evaluation in the Netherlands national observational HIV cohort, The EuroSIDA cohort, The Frankfurt HIV Cohort Study, The Georgian National AIDS Health Information System, The Nice HIV Cohort, The ICONA Foundation, The Modena HIV Cohort, The PISCIS Cohort Study, The Swiss HIV Cohort Study, The Swedish InfCare HIV Cohort, The Royal Free HIV Cohort Study, The San Raffaele Scientific Institute, The University Hospital Bonn HIV Cohort and The University of Cologne HIV Cohorts, ViiV Healthcare, and Gilead Sciences., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests JMM received a personal 80:20 research grant from Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain, during 2017–21. JMM also reports grants and personal fees from AbbVie, Angelini, Contrafect, Cubist, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, Jansen, Lysovant, Medtronic, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and ViiV Healthcare, outside the submitted work. DLB reports honoraria from ViiV Healthcare, Gilead Sciences, and Merck, outside the submitted work. OK reports personal fees from Gilead Sciences, ViiV Healthcare, and Merck, outside the submitted work. ML reports grants from Gilead Sciences, Janssen-Cilag, and ViiV Healthcare, outside the submitted work. JH reports reimbursement to their institute from Gilead Sciences, ViiV Healthcare, and MSD, outside the submitted work. HFG reports grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation, National Institutes of Health (NIH), and the Swiss HIV Cohort Study, unrestricted research grants from Gilead Sciences, Roche, and Yvonne Jacob Foundation, personal fees from consulting or advisory boards or data safety monitoring boards for Merck, Gilead Sciences, ViiV Healthcare, Mepha, and Sandoz. HFG's institution received money for participation in the following clinical COVID-19 studies: 540-7773/5774 (Gilead), TICO (ACTIV-3, INSIGHT/NIH), and the Morningsky study (Roche). CSt reports personal fees and non-financial support from Gilead Sciences, ViiV Healthcare, and Janssen, outside the submitted work. VV is a salaried employee of ViiV Healthcare and receives GlaxoSmithKline stock. CD reports grants and personal fees from MSD, Gilead Sciences, and ViiV Healthcare, outside the submitted work. SDW reports grants from Gilead Sciences, MSD, Janssen, and ViiV Healthcare, outside the submitted work. FW reports membership of advisory boards for ViiV Healthcare and Gilead Sciences. JL reports personal fees from ViiV Healthcare, Gilead Sciences, and Janssen Cilag, outside the submitted work. CSm reports personal fees from Gilead Sciences, outside the submitted work. AdM reports grants from Gilead Sciences and ViiV Healthcare, during the conduct of the study, and personal fees from ViiV Healthcare, Gilead Sciences, Eiland, and Bonnin, outside the submitted work. NC reports personal fees from Virology Education, outside the submitted work. CO reports personal fees from ViiV Healthcare, Neola, and MSD, outside the submitted work. CO is also an elected member of the European AIDS Society governing body and of the EuroSIDA Steering Committee. JJV reports personal fees from MSD, Gilead Sciences, Pfizer, Astellas Pharma, Basilea, German Centre for Infection Research, University Hospital Freiburg, Congress and Communication, Academy for Infectious Medicine, University of Manchester, German Society for Infectious Diseases, Arztekammer Nordrhein, University Hospital Aachen, Back Bay Strategies, German Society for Internal Medicine, Shionogi, Molecular Health, Netzwerk Universitätsmedizin, Janssen, and NordForsk, and grants from MSD, Gilead Sciences, Pfizer, Astellas Pharma, Basilea, German Centre for Infection Research, German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, University of Bristol, and Rigshospitalet Copenhagen. JG is a paid employee of Gilead Sciences. ND reports he is a board member of non-governmental associations and initiatives (not for profit) that receive financial support from pharmaceutical companies and foundations for various projects. Those that have contributed are: GlaxoSmithKline, ViiV Healthcare, AbbVie, BMS, Gilead, Janssen-Cilag, MSD, AIDS Healthcare Foundation, Positive Action, Novartis, Roche, Mylam ELPEN, Cepheid, IPSEN, AstraZeneca, Amgen, Bayer, Pamaserve-Lilly, Roche Diagnostics, Sanofi, Pfizer, Theratechnologies, Vianex, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Chiesi, Takeda, and Leo Pharma. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Although combination antiretroviral therapies seem to be effective at controlling HIV-1 infections regardless of the viral subtype, there is increasing evidence for subtype-specific drug resistance mutations. The order and rates at which resistance mutations accumulate in different subtypes also remain poorly understood. Most of this knowledge is derived from studies of subtype B genotypes, despite not being the most abundant subtype worldwide. Here, we present a methodology for the comparison of mutational networks in different HIV-1 subtypes, based on Hidden Conjunctive Bayesian Networks (H-CBN), a probabilistic model for inferring mutational networks from cross-sectional genotype data. We introduce a Monte Carlo sampling scheme for learning H-CBN models for a larger number of resistance mutations and develop a statistical test to assess differences in the inferred mutational networks between two groups. We apply this method to infer the temporal progression of mutations conferring resistance to the protease inhibitor lopinavir in a large cross-sectional cohort of HIV-1 subtype C genotypes from South Africa, as well as to a data set of subtype B genotypes obtained from the Stanford HIV Drug Resistance Database and the Swiss HIV Cohort Study. We find strong support for different initial mutational events in the protease, namely at residue 46 in subtype B and at residue 82 in subtype C. The inferred mutational networks for subtype B versus C are significantly different sharing only five constraints on the order of accumulating mutations with mutation at residue 54 as the parental event. The results also suggest that mutations can accumulate along various alternative paths within subtypes, as opposed to a unique total temporal ordering. Beyond HIV drug resistance, the statistical methodology is applicable more generally for the comparison of inferred mutational networks between any two groups., Competing Interests: I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: H. F. G. has received unrestricted research grants from Gilead Sciences and Roche, fees for data and safety monitoring board membership from Merck; consulting/advisory board membership fees from Gilead Sciences, Viiv and Merck; and grants from SystemsX, and the National Institutes of Health.

Background: HIV envelope (env) diversity represents a significant challenge for the use of broadly neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs) in HIV treatment and cure studies. Screening for viral sensitivity to bNAbs to select eligible trial participants will be important to improve clinical efficacy; however, no universal approach has been established., Methods: Pre-antiretroviral therapy plasma virus from participants in the Zurich Primary HIV Infection (ZPHI) study was genotyped and phenotyped for sensitivity to the bNAbs elipovimab (EVM, formerly GS-9722) and 3BNC117. The genotyping and phenotyping assessments were performed following the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 guidelines as required for entry into clinical trials. The genotypic-based prediction of bNAb sensitivity was based on HIV env amino acid signatures identified from a genotypic-phenotypic correlation algorithm using a subtype B database., Results: Genotyping the plasma virus and applying env sensitivity signatures, ZPHI study participants with viral sensitivity to EVM and 3BNC117 were identified. ZPHI study participants with virus sensitive to EVM and 3BNC117 were also identified by phenotyping the plasma virus. Comparison of the genotypic and phenotypic sensitivity assessments showed strong agreement between the 2 methodologies., Conclusions: The genotypic assessment was found to be as predictive as the direct measurement of bNAb sensitivity by phenotyping and may, therefore, be preferred because of more rapid turnaround time and assay simplicity. A significant number of the participants were predicted to have virus sensitive to EVM and 3BNC117 and could, thus, be potential participants for clinical trials involving these bNAbs., Competing Interests: B.M., A.P., R.M., C.P., M.B., N.T., S.C., R.G., and C.C. are employees and stockholders of Gilead Sciences. H.F.G. has received unrestricted research grants from Gilead Sciences and Roche; fees for data and safety monitoring board membership from Merck; consulting/advisory board membership fees from Gilead Sciences, Merck, and ViiV Healthcare; and grants from SystemsX and the National Institutes of Health. The institution of H.F.G. received educational grants from Gilead Sciences, ViiV, MSD, Abbvie, and Sandoz. D.L.B. received honoraria and travel grants from Gilead, ViiV, and Merck outside of the submitted work. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Identifying local outbreaks and their drivers is a key step toward curbing human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission and potentially achieving HIV elimination. Such outbreaks can be identified as transmission clusters extracted from phylogenetic trees constructed of densely sampled viral sequences. In this study, we combined phylogenetic transmission clusters with extensive data on virological suppression and behavioral risk of cluster members to quantify the drivers of ongoing transmission over 10 years., Methods: Using the comprehensive Swiss HIV Cohort Study and its drug-resistance database, we reconstructed phylogenetic trees for each year between 2007 and 2017. We identified HIV transmission clusters dominated by men who have sex with men (MSM) and determined their annual growth. We used Poisson regression to assess if cluster growth was associated with a per-cluster infectivity and behavioral risk score., Results: Both infectivity and behavioral risk scores were significantly higher in growing MSM transmission clusters compared to nongrowing clusters (P ≤ .01). The fraction of transmission clusters without infectious members acquiring new infections increased significantly over the study period. The infectivity score was significantly associated with per-capita incidence of MSM transmission clusters in 8 years, while the behavioral risk score was significantly associated with per-capita incidence of MSM transmission clusters in 3 years., Conclusions: We present a phylogenetic method to identify hotspots of ongoing transmission among MSM. Our results demonstrate the effectiveness of treatment as prevention at the population level. However, the significantly increasing number of new infections among transmission clusters without infectious members highlights a relative shift from diagnosed to undiagnosed individuals as drivers of HIV transmission in Swiss MSM., (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

HIV-1 is capable of integrating its genome into that of its host cell. We examined the influence of the activation state of CD4+ T cells, the effect of antiretroviral therapy (ART), and the clinical stage of HIV-1 infection on HIV-1 integration site features and selection. HIV-1 integration sites were sequenced from longitudinally sampled resting and activated CD4+ T cells from 12 HIV-1-infected individuals. In total, 589 unique HIV-1 integration sites were analyzed: 147, 391, and 51 during primary, chronic, and late presentation of HIV-1 infection, respectively. As early as during primary HIV-1 infection and independent of the activation state of CD4+ T cells collected on and off ART, HIV-1 integration sites were preferentially detected in recurrent integration genes, genes associated with clonal expansion of latently HIV-1-infected CD4+ T cells, cancer-related genes, and highly expressed genes. The preference for cancer-related genes was more pronounced at late stages of HIV-1 infection. Host genomic features of HIV-1 integration site selection remained stable during HIV-1 infection in both resting and activated CD4+ T cells. In summary, characteristic HIV-1 integration site features are preestablished as early as during primary HIV-1 infection and are found in both resting and activated CD4+ T cells.

HIV-1 replication capacity is an important characteristic to understand the replication competence of single variants or virus populations. It can further aid in the understanding of HIV-1 pathogenicity, disease progression, and drug resistance mutations. To effectively study RC, many assays have been established. However, there is still demand for a high throughput replication capacity assay using primary cells which is robust and reproducible. In this study, we established such an assay and validated it using 346 primary HIV-1 isolates from patients enrolled in the Zurich Primary HIV Infection study (ZPHI) and two control viruses, HIV-1 JR-CSF WT and HIV-1 JR-CSF K65R&#95;M184V . Replication capacity was determined by measuring the viral growth on PBMCs over 10 days by longitudinally transferring cell culture supernatant to TZM-bl reporter cells. By utilizing the TZM-bl luciferase reporter assay, we determined replication capacity by measuring viral infectivity. The simplicity of the experimental setup allowed for all 346 primary HIV-1 isolates to be replicated at one time. Although the infectious input dose for each virus was normalized, a broad range of replication capacity values over 4 logs was observed. The approach was confirmed by two repeated experiments and we demonstrated that the reproducibility of the replication capacity values is statistically comparable between the two separate experiments. In summary, these results endorse our high throughput replication capacity assay as reproducible and robust and can be utilized for large scale HIV-1 replication capacity experiments in primary cells.

Background: Rising resistance of HIV-1 to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) threatens the success of the global scale-up of antiretroviral therapy (ART). The switch to WHO-recommended dolutegravir (DTG)-based regimens could reduce this threat due to DTG's high genetic barrier to resistance. We used mathematical modeling to predict the impact of the scale-up of DTG-based ART on NNRTI pretreatment drug resistance (PDR) in South Africa, 2020 to 2040., Methods and Findings: We adapted the Modeling Antiretroviral drug Resistance In South Africa (MARISA) model, an epidemiological model of the transmission of NNRTI resistance in South Africa. We modeled the introduction of DTG in 2020 under 2 scenarios: DTG as first-line regimen for ART initiators, or DTG for all patients, including patients on suppressive NNRTI-based ART. Given the safety concerns related to DTG during pregnancy, we assessed the impact of prescribing DTG to all men and in addition to (1) women beyond reproductive age; (2) women beyond reproductive age or using contraception; and (3) all women. The model projections show that, compared to the continuation of NNRTI-based ART, introducing DTG would lead to a reduction in NNRTI PDR in all scenarios if ART initiators are started on a DTG-based regimen, and those on NNRTI-based regimens are rapidly switched to DTG. NNRTI PDR would continue to increase if DTG-based ART was restricted to men. When given to all men and women, DTG-based ART could reduce the level of NNRTI PDR from 52.4% (without DTG) to 10.4% (with universal DTG) in 2040. If only men and women beyond reproductive age or on contraception are started on or switched to DTG-based ART, NNRTI PDR would reach 25.9% in 2040. Limitations include substantial uncertainty due to the long-term predictions and the current scarcity of knowledge about DTG efficacy in South Africa., Conclusions: Our model shows the potential benefit of scaling up DTG-based regimens for halting the rise of NNRTI resistance. Starting or switching all men and women to DTG would lead to a sustained decline in resistance levels, whereas using DTG-based ART in all men, or in men and women beyond childbearing age, would only slow down the increase in levels of NNRTI PDR., Competing Interests: I have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: HFG has received unrestricted research grants from Gilead Sciences and Roche; fees for data and safety monitoring board membership from Merck; consulting/advisory board membership fees from ViiV, Gilead Sciences, Sandoz and Mepha. ME is a member of the Editorial Board of PLOS Medicine. The other authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Background: The primary hurdle for the eradication of HIV-1 is the establishment of a latent viral reservoir early after primary infection. Here, we investigated the potential influence of human genetic variation on the HIV-1 reservoir size and its decay rate during suppressive antiretroviral treatment., Setting: Genome-wide association study and exome sequencing study to look for host genetic determinants of HIV-1 reservoir measurements in patients enrolled in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study, a nation-wide prospective observational study., Methods: We measured total HIV-1 DNA in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from study participants, as a proxy for the reservoir size at 3 time points over a median of 5.4 years, and searched for associations between human genetic variation and 2 phenotypic readouts: the reservoir size at the first time point and its decay rate over the study period. We assessed the contribution of common genetic variants using genome-wide genotyping data from 797 patients with European ancestry enrolled in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study and searched for a potential impact of rare variants and exonic copy number variants using exome sequencing data generated in a subset of 194 study participants., Results: Genome-wide and exome-wide analyses did not reveal any significant association with the size of the HIV-1 reservoir or its decay rate on suppressive antiretroviral treatment., Conclusions: Our results point to a limited influence of human genetics on the size of the HIV-1 reservoir and its long-term dynamics in successfully treated individuals.

With the current widespread use of dolutegravir in low-income countries, the understanding of the impact of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI-) associated mutations on the efficacy of dolutegravir-containing antiretroviral therapy (ART) is of utmost importance. We describe a rare case of a patient with pre-existing M184V/I mutation and virological failure on a dolutegravir/lamivudine/abacavir regimen with the emergence of integrase strand transfer inhibitor resistance mutations. Additional risk factors, which may have triggered the virological failure, included suboptimal adherence and low nadir CD4+ cell count. This case illustrates that dolutegravir-containing triple-therapy should be prescribed with caution to patients with pre-existing M184V/I mutation and poor efficacy of the reverse transcriptase inhibitor backbone. In addition, this case highlights the need for viral load monitoring in patients on dolutegravir-containing regimens in settings with a high prevalence of the M184V/I mutation such as in low-income countries.

Background: Dolutegravir (DTG)-based dual therapy is becoming a new paradigm for both the initiation and maintenance of HIV treatment. The SIMPL'HIV study investigated the outcomes of virologically suppressed patients on standard combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) switching to DTG + emtricitabine (FTC). We present the 48-week efficacy and safety data on DTG + FTC versus cART., Methods and Findings: SIMPL'HIV was a multicenter, open-label, non-inferiority randomized trial with a factorial design among treatment-experienced people with HIV in Switzerland. Participants were enrolled between 12 May 2017 and 30 May 2018. Patients virologically suppressed for at least 24 weeks on standard cART were randomized 1:1 to switching to DTG + FTC or to continuing cART, and 1:1 to simplified patient-centered monitoring versus standard monitoring. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients virologically suppressed with <100 copies/ml through 48 weeks. The secondary endpoints included virological suppression at 48 weeks according to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) snapshot analysis. Non-inferiority of DTG + FTC versus cART for viral suppression was assessed using a stratified Mantel-Haenszel risk difference, with non-inferiority declared if the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval was greater than -12%. Adverse events were monitored to assess safety. Quality of life was evaluated using the PROQOL-HIV questionnaire. Ninety-three participants were randomized to DTG + FTC, and 94 individuals to cART. Median nadir CD4 count was 246 cells/mm3; median age was 48 years; 17% of participants were female. DTG + FTC was non-inferior to cART. The proportion of patients with viral suppression (<100 copies/ml) through 48 weeks was 93.5% in the DTG + FTC arm and 94.7% in the cART arm in the intention-to-treat population (risk difference -1.2%; 95% CI -7.8% to 5.6%). Per-protocol analysis showed similar results, with viral suppression in 96.5% of patients in both arms (risk difference 0.0%; 95% CI -5.6% to 5.5%). There was no relevant interaction between the type of treatment and monitoring (interaction ratio 0.98; 95% CI 0.85 to 1.13; p = 0.81). Using the FDA snapshot algorithm, 84/93 (90.3%) participants in the DTG + FTC arm had an HIV-1 RNA viral load of <50 copies/ml compared to 86/94 (91.5%) participants on standard cART (risk difference -1.1%; 95% CI -9.3% to 7.1%; p = 0.791). The overall proportion of patients with adverse events and discontinuations did not differ by randomization arm. The proportion of patients with serious adverse events was higher in the cART arm (16%) compared to the DTG + FTC arm (6.5%) (p = 0.041), but none was considered to be related to the study medication. Quality of life improved more between baseline and week 48 in the DTG + FTC compared to the cART arm (adjusted difference +2.6; 95% CI +0.4 to +4.7). The study's main limitations included a rather small proportion of women included, the open label design, and its short duration., Conclusions: In this study, DTG + FTC as maintenance therapy was non-inferior to cART in terms of efficacy, with a similar safety profile and a greater improvement in quality of life, thus expanding the offer of 2-drug simplification options among virologically suppressed individuals., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03160105., Competing Interests: I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: KJM has received travel grants and honoraria from Gilead Sciences, Roche Diagnostics, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Bristol-Myers Squibb, ViiV and Abbott; and the University of Zurich received research grants from Gilead Science, Roche, and Merck Sharp & Dohme for studies that Dr Metzner serves as principal investigator, and advisory board honoraria from Gilead Sciences. AC is a member of the WHO guidelines panel (GSG) from 2017 up to 2020. The HIV Unit of Geneva University Hospitals (HUG) received unrestricted educational grants from ViiV, AbbVie, Gilead and MSD; ViiV, Gilead and MSD also provided financial support to the LIPO group and metabolism (day hospital) in the HIV/AIDS Unit of HUG. HFG has received unrestricted Research Grants from Gilead Sciences and Roche; fees for data and safety monitoring board membership from Merck; consulting/advisory board membership fees from Gilead Sciences, ViiV, Merck, Sandoz and Mepha. MS has received advisory board honoraria (paid to the institution) from Gilead, MSD Janssen, ViiV, Sandoz and Mepha and travel/conference Grants from Gilead and MSD. MC institution received Research Grants from Gilead and Viiv, and expert opinion’s fees from Abbvie, Gilead, MSD, Viiv and Sandoz. DLB has received honoraria and travel grants from Merck, Gilead and ViiV. GW has received research grants from Gilead Sciences and travel grants/honoraria from Gilead Sciences, AbbVie and ViiV, (paid to the institution). ME is a member of the Editorial Board of Plos Medicine. DS, AM, MB, ME, SY, LD, AL, PS, EB and PV have no competing of interests to declare.

The HIV-1 reservoir is the major hurdle to curing HIV-1. However, the impact of the viral genome on the HIV-1 reservoir, i.e. its heritability, remains unknown. We investigate the heritability of the HIV-1 reservoir size and its long-term decay by analyzing the distribution of those traits on viral phylogenies from both partial-pol and viral near full-length genome sequences. We use a unique nationwide cohort of 610 well-characterized HIV-1 subtype-B infected individuals on suppressive ART for a median of 5.4 years. We find that a moderate but significant fraction of the HIV-1 reservoir size 1.5 years after the initiation of ART is explained by genetic factors. At the same time, we find more tentative evidence for the heritability of the long-term HIV-1 reservoir decay. Our findings indicate that viral genetic factors contribute to the HIV-1 reservoir size and hence the infecting HIV-1 strain may affect individual patients' hurdle towards a cure.

Background: Self-reported neurocognitive impairment (SRNI) in people living with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection is frequent. We use longitudinal information on SRNI in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study (SHCS) to identify and characterize groups of patients with persisting SRNI over time., Methods: We included all SHCS patients who were assessed for SRNI during at least 5 visits spanning at least 2.5 years in 2013-2017. We first compared patients with SRNI to those without SRNI over the whole study period. Second, we used a hierarchical cluster algorithm to identify groups of patients with similar changes of SRNI over time. In both analyses, we studied clinical and demographic factors potentially influencing SRNI., Results: In total, 79 683 questionnaires of 11 029 patients contained information about SRNI, and 8545 of 11 029 (77.5%) patients had longitudinal information. The overall percentage of patients with SRNI decreased from 19.6% in 2013 to 10.7% in 2017. Compared to patients in the cluster with low-level SRNI over time, patients in the cluster with high-level persisting SRNI more often had a prior opportunistic infection of the central nervous system (CNS) (odds ratio [OR], 3.7; P < .001), imperfect adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART) (OR, 2.8; P < .001), and depression (OR, 1.9; P < .001)., Conclusions: Although overall SRNI is decreasing in the SHCS, there is a group of patients with persisting SRNI over time. Past opportunistic infections of the CNS, imperfect adherence to ART, and depression were associated most with persisting SRNI. Patients with these characteristics should be preferentially tested for neurocognitive impairment.Although overall self-reported neurocognitive impairment (SRNI) is decreasing in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study, there is a group of patients with persisting SRNI over time, characterized by more past opportunistic infections of the central nervous system, imperfect adherence to antiretroviral therapy, and depression., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Perturbations in B cells are a hallmark of HIV-1 infection. This is signified by increased numbers of exhausted CD21 neg memory B cells, driven by continuous antigen-specific and bystander activation. Using high-dimensional flow cytometry, we demonstrate that this exhausted phenotype is also prevalent among peripheral antigen-inexperienced naive and marginal zone (MZ) B cells in acute and chronic HIV-1 infection. A substantial fraction of naive and MZ B cells exhibit down-regulated CD21 levels and diminished response to B cell receptor (BCR)-dependent stimulation. Compared with CD21 pos subsets, the CD21 neg naive and MZ B cells differ in the expression of chemokine receptors and activation markers. Effective antiretroviral treatment normalizes peripheral naive and MZ B cell populations. Our results emphasize a more widely spread impairment of B cells in HIV-1 infection than previously appreciated, including antigen-inexperienced cells. This highlights the importance of monitoring functional capacities of naive B cells in HIV-1 infection, as exhausted CD21 neg naive B cells may severely impair induction of novel B cell responses., (© 2019 Liechti et al.)

The 2019 edition of the IAS-USA drug resistance mutations list updates the Figure last published in January 2017. The mutations listed are those that have been identified by specific criteria for evidence and drugs described. The Figure is designed to assist practitioners in identifying key mutations associated with resistance to antiretroviral drugs, and therefore, in making clinical decisions regarding antiretroviral therapy.

The HIV-1 reservoir is the major hurdle to a cure. We here evaluate viral and host characteristics associated with reservoir size and long-term dynamics in 1,057 individuals on suppressive antiretroviral therapy for a median of 5.4 years. At the population level, the reservoir decreases with diminishing differences over time, but increases in 26.6% of individuals. Viral blips and low-level viremia are significantly associated with slower reservoir decay. Initiation of ART within the first year of infection, pretreatment viral load, and ethnicity affect reservoir size, but less so long-term dynamics. Viral blips and low-level viremia are thus relevant for reservoir and cure studies.

To systematically test whether coinfections spread along the HIV-1 transmission network and whether similarities in HIV-1 genomes predict AIDS-defining illnesses and comorbidities, we analyzed the distribution of these variables on the HIV phylogeny of the densely sampled Swiss HIV Cohort Study. By combining different statistical methods, we could detect, quantify, and explain the clustering of diseases. Infectious conditions such as hepatitis C, but also Kaposi sarcoma, clustered significantly, suggesting transmission of these infections along the HIV-1 transmission network. The clustering of patients with neurocognitive complaints could not be completely explained by the clustering of patients with similar demographic risk factors, which suggests a potential impact of viral genetics. In summary, the consistent and robust signal for coinfections and comorbidities highlights the strong interaction of HIV-1 and other infections and shows the potential of combining phylogenetic methods to identify disease traits that are likely to be related to virus genetic factors., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Contemporary antiretroviral therapies (ART) and management strategies have diminished both human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) treatment failure and the acquired resistance to drugs in resource-rich regions, but transmission of drug-resistant viruses has not similarly decreased. In low- and middle-income regions, ART roll-out has improved outcomes, but has resulted in increasing acquired and transmitted resistances. Our objective was to review resistance to ART drugs and methods to detect it, and to provide updated recommendations for testing and monitoring for drug resistance in HIV-infected individuals., Methods: A volunteer panel of experts appointed by the International Antiviral (formerly AIDS) Society-USA reviewed relevant peer-reviewed data that were published or presented at scientific conferences. Recommendations were rated according to the strength of the recommendation and quality of the evidence, and reached by full panel consensus., Results: Resistance testing remains a cornerstone of ART. It is recommended in newly-diagnosed individuals and in patients in whom ART has failed. Testing for transmitted integrase strand-transfer inhibitor resistance is currently not recommended, but this may change as more resistance emerges with widespread use. Sanger-based and next-generation sequencing approaches are each suited for genotypic testing. Testing for minority variants harboring drug resistance may only be considered if treatments depend on a first-generation nonnucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitor. Different HIV-1 subtypes do not need special considerations regarding resistance testing., Conclusions: Testing for HIV drug resistance in drug-naive individuals and in patients in whom antiretroviral drugs are failing, and the appreciation of the role of testing, are crucial to the prevention and management of failure of ART.

Background: Nucleoside (or nucleotide) reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) cause side effects in some patients, prompting the use of either partly or fully NRTI-sparing regimens., Methods: We used data from the Swiss HIV Cohort Study to estimate the effectiveness of two new dolutegravir dual regimens relative to the alternative NRTI-sparing dual regimens that our clinicians used previously. We emulated two trials by propensity score matching case patients on the dolutegravir regimen with control patients on an alternative regimen. We analysed the case control sets using a Bayesian Cox model and estimated effectiveness as the percentage still on their trial regimen without virological failure at 48 weeks., Results: In a comparison of partly NRTI-sparing regimens, 58 cases treated with dolutegravir were matched to 17 controls treated with boosted darunavir (both with lamivudine or emtricitabine). The estimated difference in effectiveness was 15% (95% credible interval [CrI] 2-33) and 12% (95% CrI 0-26) in two sequential analyses 1 year apart. In a comparison of fully NRTI-sparing regimens, 54 cases treated with dolutegravir were matched to 32 controls treated with raltegravir (both with boosted darunavir). The estimated difference in effectiveness was 9% (95% CrI -1-21) and 5% (95% CrI -4-15) in the two sequential analyses., Conclusions: Estimates of relative effectiveness suggest that both dolutegravir regimens are not inferior to these alternative regimens. All four regimens seem suitable for patients needing an NRTI-sparing regimen: there were few virological failures and few treatment changes due to toxicity.

Understanding the determinants of broadly neutralizing antibody (bNAb) evolution is crucial for the development of bNAb-based HIV vaccines 1 . Despite emerging information on cofactors that promote bNAb evolution in natural HIV-1 infections, in which the induction of bNAbs is genuinely rare 2 , information on the impact of the infecting virus strain on determining the breadth and specificity of the antibody responses to HIV-1 is lacking. Here we analyse the influence of viral antigens in shaping antibody responses in humans. We call the ability of a virus strain to induce similar antibody responses across different hosts its antibody-imprinting capacity, which from an evolutionary biology perspective corresponds to the viral heritability of the antibody responses. Analysis of 53 measured parameters of HIV-1-binding and neutralizing antibody responses in a cohort of 303 HIV-1 transmission pairs (individuals who harboured highly related HIV-1 strains and were putative direct transmission partners or members of an HIV-1 transmission chain) revealed that the effect of the infecting virus on the outcome of the bNAb response is moderate in magnitude but highly significant. We introduce the concept of bNAb-imprinting viruses and provide evidence for the existence of such viruses in a systematic screening of our cohort. The bNAb-imprinting capacity can be substantial, as indicated by a transmission pair with highly similar HIV-1 antibody responses and strong bNAb activity. Identification of viruses that have bNAb-imprinting capacities and their characterization may thus provide the potential to develop lead immunogens.

Background: Little is known about prevalence of drug resistance among HIV-infected Ugandans, a setting with over 15 years of public sector access to antiretroviral therapy (ART) and where virological monitoring was only recently introduced., Setting: This study was conducted in the adults' out-patient clinic of the Infectious Diseases Institute, Kampala, Uganda., Methods: HIV genotyping was performed in ART-naive patients and in treatment-experienced patients on ART for ≥6 months with virological failure (≥1000 copies/mL)., Results: A total of 152 ART-naive and 2430 ART-experienced patients were included. Transmitted drug resistance was detected in 9 (5.9%) patients. After a median time on ART of 4.7 years [interquartile range: 2.5-8.7], 190 patients (7.8%) had virological failure with a median viral load of 4.4 log10 copies per milliliter (interquartile range: 3.9-4.9). In addition, 146 patients had a viral load between 51 and 999 copies per milliliter. Most patients with virological failure (142, 74.7%) were on first-line ART. For 163 (85.8%) ART-experienced patients, genotype results were available. Relevant drug-resistance mutations were observed in 135 (82.8%), of which 103 (63.2%) had resistance to 2 drug classes, and 11 (6.7%) had resistance to all drug classes available in Uganda., Conclusion: The prevalence of transmitted drug resistance was lower than recently reported by the WHO. With 92% of all patients virologically suppressed on ART, the prevalence of virological failure was low when a cutoff of 1000 copies per milliliter is applied, and is in line with the third of the 90-90-90 UNAIDS targets. However, most failing patients had developed multiclass drug resistance.

Long-lived latently HIV-1-infected cells represent a barrier to cure. We developed a dual-fluorescence HIV-1-based vector containing a pair of genetic insulators flanking a constitutive fluorescent reporter gene to study HIV-1 latency. The protective effects of these genetic insulators are demonstrated through long-term (up to 394 days) stable fluorescence profiles in transduced SUP-T1 cells. Analysis of 1,941 vector integration sites confirmed reproduction of HIV-1 integration patterns. We sorted monoclonal cells representing latent HIV-1 infections and found that both vector integration sites and integrity of the vector genomes influence the reactivation potentials of latent HIV-1 promoters. Interestingly, some latent monoclonal cells exhibited a small cell subpopulation with a spontaneously reactivated HIV-1 promoter. Higher expression levels of genes involved in cell cycle progression are observed in these cell subpopulations compared to their counterparts with HIV-1 promoters that remained latent. Consistently, larger fractions of spontaneously reactivated cells are in the S and G2 phases of the cell cycle. Furthermore, genistein and nocodazole treatments of these cell clones, which halted cells in the G2 phase, resulted in a 1.4-2.9-fold increase in spontaneous reactivation. Taken together, our HIV-1 latency model reveals that the spontaneous reactivation of latent HIV-1 promoters is linked to the cell cycle.

Objectives: To determine the most recent prevalence, transmission patterns and risk factors of transmitted drug-resistance mutations (TDRMs) in Cameroon, we initiated a multicentre study monitoring HIV-1 drug resistance in newly HIV-1-diagnosed individuals using a novel next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay applicable to fingerprick dried blood spot (DBS) samples., Methods: Fingerprick DBS samples and questionnaires were collected from 360 newly HIV-1-diagnosed individuals in four hospitals in urban areas in Cameroon in the years 2015-16. We developed an HIV-1 protease and reverse transcriptase drug resistance genotyping assay applicable to DBS samples and HIV-1 genomes of groups M, N and O. The WHO 2009 list of mutations for surveillance of transmitted drug-resistant HIV strains was used to analyse TDRMs., Results: Applying our 'DBS-NGS-genotypic resistance test', baseline HIV-1 drug resistance data were successfully obtained from 82.8% (298/360) of newly diagnosed individuals. At nucleotide frequencies >15%, TDRMs to NRTIs were observed in 3.0% (9/298), to NNRTIs in 4.0% (12/298) and to PIs in 1.3% (3/240). The NNRTI mutation K103N was most commonly detected (2.7%). Expanding the analysis to low-abundance TDRMs, i.e. 3%-15%, 12 additional individuals (4.0%) harbouring TDRMs were identified. Having unprotected sex with a known HIV-1-positive person was significantly associated with the transmission of DRMs (adjusted OR 9.6; 95% CI 1.79-51.3)., Conclusions: The prevalence of transmitted HIV-1 drug resistance is currently low in the study sites in Cameroon. Evidence of some risky sexual behaviours depicts a public health problem with possible implications for the prevention of new HIV-1 infections.

Understanding pathways that promote HIV-1 broadly neutralizing antibody (bnAb) induction is crucial to advance bnAb-based vaccines. We recently demarcated host, viral, and disease parameters associated with bnAb development in a large HIV-1 cohort screen. By establishing comprehensive antibody signatures based on IgG1, IgG2, and IgG3 activity to 13 HIV-1 antigens in 4,281 individuals in the same cohort, we now show that the same four parameters that are significantly linked with neutralization breadth, namely viral load, infection length, viral diversity, and ethnicity, also strongly influence HIV-1-binding antibody responses. However, the effects proved selective, shaping binding antibody responses in an antigen and IgG subclass-dependent manner. IgG response landscapes in bnAb inducers indicated a differentially regulated, IgG1-driven HIV-1 antigen response, and IgG1 binding of the BG505 SOSIP trimer proved the best predictor of HIV-1 neutralization breadth in plasma. Our findings emphasize the need to unravel immune modulators that underlie the differentially regulated IgG response in bnAb inducers to guide vaccine development., (© 2018 Kadelka et al.)

CD161 is a C-type lectin-like receptor expressed on the majority of natural killer (NK) cells; however, the significance of CD161 expression on NK cells has not been comprehensively investigated. Recently, we found that CD161 expression identifies a transcriptional and innate functional phenotype that is shared across various T cell populations. Using mass cytometry and microarray experiments, we demonstrate that this functional phenotype extends to NK cells. CD161 marks NK cells that have retained the ability to respond to innate cytokines during their differentiation, and is lost upon cytomegalovirus-induced maturation in both healthy and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients. These pro-inflammatory NK cells are present in the inflamed lamina propria where they are enriched for integrin CD103 expression. Thus, CD161 expression identifies NK cells that may contribute to inflammatory disease pathogenesis and correlates with an innate responsiveness to cytokines in both T and NK cells.