Search

Central Africa was the epicenter of the HIV type 1 (HIV-1) pandemic. Understanding the early epidemic in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, formerly Zaire, could provide insight into how HIV evolved and assist vaccine design and intervention efforts. Using enzyme immunosorbent assays, we tested 3,988 serum samples collected in Kinshasa in the mid-1980s and confirmed seroreactivity by Western blot. Polymerase chain reaction of gag p17, env C2V3C3, and/or gp41; DNA sequencing; and genetic analyses were performed. Gene regions representing all the HIV-1 group M clades and unclassifiable sequences were found. From two or three short gene regions, 37% of the strains represented recombinant viruses, multiple infections, or both, which suggests that if whole genome sequences were available, most of these strains would have mosaic genomes. We propose that the HIV epidemic was well established in central Africa by the early 1980s and that some recombinant viruses most likely seeded the early global epidemic.

We have investigated the genetic diversity and potential mosaic genomes of HIV-1 during the early part of the HIV-1 epidemic among commercial sex workers (CSWs) in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo (formerly Zaire). Serologic analysis revealed that 27 (28.7%) of the 94 specimens were seropositive by both peptide and whole-virus lysate EIAs and that 24 were positive by molecular screening assays, using generic primers that can detect all known groups of HIV-1. Phylogenetic analyses of the gag(p24), C2V3, and gp41 regions of these 24 specimens showed that all were group M; none of them had any evidence of group O, N, or SIVcpz-like sequences. On the basis of env sequence analysis, the 24 group M specimens were classified as subtypes G (37.5%), A (21%), F1 (12.5%), CRF01_AE (8%), D (4%), and H (4%); 3 (12.5%) were unclassifiable (U). Similar analysis of the gag(p24) region revealed that the majority of infections were subtype A; however, one-third of the specimens were subtype G. Parallel analysis of gag(p24) and env regions revealed discordant subtypes in many specimens that may reflect possible dual and/or recombinant viruses. These data suggest a predominance of subtype G (both pure G and recombinant CRF02_AG) during the early part of the epidemic in Kinshasa. Infections with group N or SIVcpz-like viruses were not present among these CSWs in Kinshasa.

Up to now, all known env subtype E viruses (CRF01-AE) have had the same mosaic structure with subtype A, and no other env subtype E HIV-1 viruses with non-A subtypes in their genomes have been described. In this report we describe the full-length genome sequence of an env subtype E isolate with a recombinant genome different from the prototype CRF01-AE strains. The 97CD-KTB49 strain, obtained from a tuberculosis patient in Kinshasa, has a complex mosaic genome involving subtypes A, E, G, H, J, K, and several unknown fragments. The U sequences formed well-separated clusters together with previously described unknown fragments from CRF04-cpx (subtype I), and from Z321, the oldest intersubtype recombinant isolated in 1976 in the Democratic Republic of Congo. The complex recombinant virus from our study is not an isolated strain; partial sequencing of a second strain, 97CD-KFE45, confirmed the breakpoints observed in the 97CD-KTB49 strain in the regions sequenced. The complexity of these recombinant strains suggests a longstanding presence of subtype E in Central Africa.

The purpose of this study was to document the genetic diversity of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC; formerly Zaire). A total of 247 HIV-1-positive samples, collected during an epidemiologic survey conducted in 1997 in three regions (Kinshasa [the capital], Bwamanda [in the north], and Mbuyi-Maya [in the south]), were genetically characterized in the env V3-V5 region. All known subtypes were found to cocirculate, and for 6% of the samples the subtype could not be identified. Subtype A is predominant, with prevalences decreasing from north to south (69% in the north, 53% in the capital city, and 46% in the south). Subtype C, D, G, and H prevalences range from 7 to 9%, whereas subtype F, J, K, and CRF01-AE strains represent 2 to 4% of the samples; only one subtype B strain was identified. The highest prevalence (25%) of subtype C was in the south, and CRF01-AE was seen mainly in the north. The high intersubtype variability among the V3-V5 sequences is the most probable reason for the low (45%) efficiency of subtype A-specific PCR and HMA (heteroduplex mobility assay). Eighteen (29%) of 62 samples had discordant subtype designations between env and gag. Sequence analysis of the entire envelope from 13 samples confirmed the high degree of diversity and complexity of HIV-1 strains in the DRC; 9 had a complex recombinant structure in gp160, involving fragments of known and unknown subtypes. Interestingly, the unknown fragments from the different strains did not cluster together. Overall, the high number of HIV-1 subtypes cocirculating, the high intrasubtype diversity, and the high numbers of possible recombinant viruses as well as different unclassified strains are all in agreement with an old and mature epidemic in the DRC, suggesting that this region is the epicenter of HIV-1 group M.

We recently reported a high divergence among African subtype F strains. Three well-separated groups (F1, F2, and F3) have been shown based on the phylogenetic analysis of the p24 gag and envelope sequences with genetic distances similar to those observed for known subtypes. In this study, we characterized the near-full-length genomes of two strains from epidemiological unlinked individual belonging to each of the subgroups: F1 (96FR-MP411), F2 (95CM-MP255 and 95CM-MP257), and F3 (96CM-MP535 and 97ZR-EQTB11). Phylogenetic analysis of the near-full-length sequences and for each of the genes separately showed the same three groups, supported by high bootstrap values. Diversity plotting, BLAST subtyping, and bootstrap plotting confirmed that the divergent F strains correspond to nonrecombinant viruses. The divergence between F1 and F2 is consistently lower than that seen in any other intersubtype comparison, with the exception of subtypes B and D. Based on all the different analyses, we propose to divide subtype F into two subclades, with F1 gathering the known subtype F strains from Brazil and Finland, and our African strain (96FR-MP411), and F2 containing the 95CM-MP255 and 95CM-MP257 strains from Cameroon. The F3 strains, 97ZR-EQTB11 from the Democratic Republic of Congo and 96CM-MP535 from Cameroon, meet the criteria of a new subtype designated as K. The equidistance of subtype K to the other subtypes of HIV-1 suggests that this subtype existed as long as the others, the lower distance between B and D, and between F1 and F2 suggest a more recent subdivision for these latter strains.

In this paper, we studied the variability of HIV-1 subtype F strains in Africa. For 11 viruses, mainly of Central African origin, different parts of the genome were genetically characterized. For all strains the V3-V5 region of the envelope gene was sequenced, and for 7 strains, the entire envelope gene was studied. For 10 strains, the p24 region of the gag gene was also sequenced. For each region studied, three subgroups in the F subtype were identified, F1, F2, and F3. These three subgroups were supported by high bootstrap values and the intra- and inter-subgroup F distances were comparable to those obtained for the known subtypes A, B, C, D, E, G, and H. In subgroup F1, some African strains clustered with previously described strains from Brazil and Romania, suggesting an African origin of the HIV-1 epidemic in these countries. A more detailed analysis of the gag and the envelope sequences allowed the identification of four recombinant viruses. Our data show a high diversity among subtype F strains, suggesting the presence of new subtypes in the regions studied. If biological differences exist among subtypes, it is important that these subtypes be well defined. The data from our study show that there is a need to clearly identify the different subgroups within the F subtype., (Copyright 1999 Academic Press.)