1. A clinical trial to compare the quality of life of HIV+ patients who start monotherapy with LPV/r versus continuing triple therapy with a boosted PI.
- Author
-
Pasquau, J, Hidalgo, C, Vergara, A, Montes, M, Vergas, J, Sanjoaquín, I, Hernández-Quero, J, Aguirrebengoa, K, Orihuela, F, Rodríguez-Baño, J, Imaz, A, and García-Vallecillos, C
- Subjects
HIV-positive persons ,THERAPEUTICS ,HIV infections ,QUALITY of life ,CLINICAL trials ,ANTIRETROVIRAL agents ,HIV protease inhibitors - Abstract
Purpose of the study Efficacy, toxicity and complexity of antiretroviral (ARV) regimens may impact the quality of life (QoL). Since over the past years the simplification approach of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) as monotherapy (MT) has been shown to be non-inferior to triple therapy (TT) in virological and immunological efficacy, the objective of this study was to compare several health- and treatment-related outcomes between both ARV strategies with LPV/r. Methods A phase IV national, multicenter, controlled, randomized (2:1), open label, parallel-group clinical trial to compare the QoL in patients on ARV TT containing any boosted protease inhibitor (PI), undetectable viral load (VL< 50 cop/mL) in the past 6 months and a CD4 nadir > 100 cells/µL, versus those who were simplified to LPV/r MT, for 24 weeks. QoL and health outcomes were evaluated by the Medical Outcomes Study HIV Health Survey (MOS-HIV) and the five-dimensional EuroQol questionnaire (EQ-5D). Treatment satisfaction was assessed by the Spanish Questionnaire of Satisfaction with ARV Treatment (CESTA). Treatment adherence was assessed by the Spanish Multifactorial Adherence questionnaire (GEEMA) and a visual analog scale (VAS). Tolerability, safety and virological and immunological efficacy at week 24 were also analyzed. Summary of results 225 patients from 29 sites were enrolled (MT: 146, 64.5%; TT: 79, 35.1%). Mean age (years) was 44.5 in MT and 45.2 in TT (p=0.745); mean duration (years) from HIV infection was 13.4 in MT and 12.8 in TT (p=0.587) and 71% were male in both arms. 87.6% of patients completed correctly the study (MT: 88.4%; TT: 86.1%; p=0.674). Health and treatment outcomes evaluated at final study visit are shown in 1. At study end, 84.1% in MT and 89.6% in TT had undetectable VL (p=0.313) and mean CD4 count were 742.8 cells/µL in MT and 646.5 cells/µL in TT (p=0.060). There were no significant differences in the percentage of patients with virological failure at week 24 as VL >50 cop/mL (MT: 8.2%; TT: 3.9%; p=0.271) and as VL >200 cop/mL (MT: 3.4%; TT: 0%; p=0.167). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF