Search

Background: Breastfeeding is not recommended for women living with HIV (WLWH) in Canada. We described the prevalence of breastfeeding and explored experiences of care, support, and stigma related to infant feeding. Setting: Quebec, Ontario, and British Columbia (Canada). Methods: Data were obtained from the HIV Women's Sexual and Reproductive Health Cohort Study (CHIWOS) surveys, conducted between 2013 and 2018. Results: Breastfeeding was reported by 73.5% of the 786 women who delivered before HIV diagnosis and 7.3% of the 289 women who delivered after HIV diagnosis. Among them, earlier year of delivery, delivery outside of Canada, and African, Caribbean, Black ethnicity were independently associated with increased odds of breastfeeding. Among WLWH who had a live birth during the last year, 77% (40/52) felt that they had received support regarding infant feeding practices, and 77% (23/30) were concerned that not breastfeeding could lead to them being identified as WLWH. Among 71 women within one year postpartum at any one of the study waves, 89% reported having an undetectable viral load. Conclusion: Breastfeeding experiences were common among WLWH, most often prior to HIV diagnosis. Fear of unintentional HIV status disclosure when not breastfeeding and challenges to maintain an undetectable HIV viral load are important issues to address during postpartum care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Antiretroviral therapy effectively prevents sexual and vertical transmission of HIV. Yet, some women living with HIV report having unmet needs for reproductive health care. This study measured the prevalence of women discussing reproductive goals with any current healthcare provider and assessed the effect of the current HIV care provider's gender on such discussions and whether comfort was a mediator. We analysed baseline and 18-month survey data from 533 women living with HIV enrolled in the Canadian HIV Women's Sexual and Reproductive Health Cohort Study (CHIWOS) (2013–2017), a community-based participatory study, restricting the analysis to participants aged 16–45 years. We used causal mediation analysis to estimate direct and indirect effects of the gender of one's HIV care provider on reproductive discussions, incorporating mediating and interaction effects of women having any provider with whom they felt comfortable discussing reproductive goals. Between the baseline and 18-month follow-up surveys, 34.3% (183/533) of women discussed their reproductive goals with a healthcare provider. Having a woman HIV care provider was associated with a 1.18 excess relative risk (ERR) of discussion (95%CI: 0.15, 2.20). The mediating effect of comfort was primarily explained by the fact that those participants with women providers felt more comfortable discussing their reproductive goals compared to participants with men providers, accounting for 66% (95%CI: 32%, 99%) of the total effect. Findings support that HIV provider gender affects women's comfort and whether they discuss reproductive goals, which must be acknowledged and addressed in care delivery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Women living with HIV in Canada experience barriers to comprehensive HIV care. We sought to describe care gaps across a typology of care. Methods: We analyzed baseline data from the Canadian HIV Women's Sexual and Reproductive Health Cohort Study (CHIWOS). A typology of care was characterized by primary HIV physician and care setting. Quality-ofcare indicators included the following: Pap test, Pap test discussions, reproductive goal discussions, breast cancer screening, antiretroviral therapy (ART) use, adherence, HIV viral load, and viral load discussions. We defined comprehensive care with three indicators: Pap test, viral load, and either reproductive goal discussions over last 3 years or breast cancer screening, as indicated. Multivariable logistic regression analyses measured associations between care types and quality-of-care indicators. Results: Among women living with HIV accessing HIV care, 56.4% (657/1,164) experienced at least one gap in comprehensive care, most commonly reproductive goal discussions. Women accessed care from three types of care: (1) physicians (specialist and family physicians) in HIV clinics (71.6%); (2) specialists in non-HIV clinics (17.6%); and (3) family physicians in non-HIV clinics (10.8%), with 55.5%, 63.9%, and 50.8% gaps in comprehensive care, respectively. Type 3 care had double the odds of not being on ART: adjusted odds ratio (AOR 2.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16-3.75), while Type 2 care had higher odds of not having discussed the importance of Pap tests (AOR 1.48, 95% CI 1.00-2.21). Discussion: Women continue to experience gaps in care, across types of care, indicating the need to evaluate and strengthen women-centered models of care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]