Search

Aims: To investigate Epstein‐Barr virus (EBV) latency types in 19 cases of EBV‐positive nodular lymphocyte‐predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL), as such information is currently incomplete. Methods and results: Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for CD20, CD79a, PAX5, OCT2, CD30, CD15, CD3 and programmed cell death protein 1 was performed. For EBV detection, in‐situ hybridisation (ISH) for EBV‐encoded RNA (EBER) was employed combined with IHC for EBV‐encoded latent membrane protein (LMP)‐1, EBV‐encoded nuclear antigen (EBNA)‐2, and EBV‐encoded BZLF1. In 95% of the cases, neoplastic cells with features of Hodgkin and Reed–Sternberg (HRS) cells were present, mostly showing expression of CD30. In all cases, the B‐cell phenotype was largely intact, and delineation from classic Hodgkin lymphoma (CHL) was further supported by myocyte enhancer factor 2B (MEF2B) detection. All tumour cells were EBER‐positive except in two cases. EBV latency type II was most frequent (89%) and type I was rare. Cases with latency type I were CD30‐negative. Five cases contained some BZLF1‐positive and/or EBNA‐2‐positive bystander lymphocytes. Conclusions: As HRS morphology of neoplastic cells and CD30 expression are frequent features of EBV‐positive NLPHL, preservation of the B‐cell transcription programme, MEF2B expression combined with NLPHL‐typical architecture and background composition facilitate distinction from CHL. EBER ISH is the method of choice to identify these cases. The majority present with EBV latency type II, and only rare cases present with latency type I, which can be associated with missing CD30 expression. The presence of occasional bystander lymphocytes expressing BZLF1 and/or EBNA‐2 and the partial EBV infection of neoplastic cells in some cases could indicate that EBV is either not primarily involved or is only a transient driver in the pathogenesis of EBV‐positive NLPHL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: High programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD‐L1) protein expression and copy number alterations (CNAs) of the corresponding genomic locus 9p24.1 in Hodgkin‐ and Reed–Sternberg cells (HRSC) have been shown to be associated with favourable response to anti‐PD‐1 checkpoint inhibition in relapsed/refractory (r/r) classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). In the present study, we investigated baseline 9p24.1 status as well as PD‐L1 and major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I and II protein expression in 82 biopsies from patients with early stage unfavourable cHL treated with anti‐PD‐1‐based first‐line treatment in the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG) NIVAHL trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03004833). All evaluated specimens showed 9p24.1 CNA in HRSC to some extent, but with high intratumoral heterogeneity and an overall smaller range of alterations than reported in advanced‐stage or r/r cHL. All but two cases (97%) showed PD‐L1 expression by the tumour cells in variable amounts. While MHC‐I was rarely expressed in >50% of HRSC, MHC‐II expression in >50% of HRSC was found more frequently. No obvious impact of 9p24.1 CNA or PD‐L1 and MHC‐I/II expression on early response to the highly effective anti‐PD‐1‐based NIVAHL first‐line treatment was observed. Further studies evaluating an expanded panel of potential biomarkers are needed to optimally stratify anti‐PD‐1 first‐line cHL treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]