Search

Purpose: The randomized HD2000 trial compared six cycles of ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine), four escalated plus two standard cycles of BEACOPP (bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone), and six cycles of COPP-EBV-CAD (cyclophosphamide, lomustine, vindesine, melphalan, prednisone, epidoxorubicin, vincristine, procarbazine, vinblastine, and bleomycin; CEC) in patients with advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma. After a median follow-up of 42 months, patients who received BEACOPP were reported to have experienced better progression-free survival (PFS) but not better overall survival (OS) results than those receiving ABVD. We here report a post hoc analysis of this trial after a median follow-up of 10 years., Patients and Methods: Three hundred seven patients were enrolled, 295 of whom were evaluable. At the time of our analysis, the median follow-up for the entire group was 120 months (range, 4 to 169 months)., Results: The 10-year PFS results for the ABVD, BEACOPP, and CEC arms were 69%, 75%, and 76%, respectively; corresponding OS results were 85%, 84%, and 86%. Overall, 13 second malignancies were reported: one in the ABVD arm and six each in the BEACOPP and CEC arms. The cumulative risk of developing second malignancies at 10 years was 0.9%, 6.6%, and 6% with ABVD, BEACOPP, and CEC, respectively; the risk with either BEACOPP or CEC was significantly higher than that reported with ABVD (P = .027 and .02, respectively)., Conclusion: With these mature results, we confirm that patients with advanced Hodgkin lymphoma have similar OS results when treated with ABVD, BEACOPP, or CEC. However, with longer follow-up, we were not able to confirm the superiority of BEACOPP over ABVD in terms of PFS, mainly because of higher mortality rates resulting from second malignancies observed after treatment with BEACOPP and CEC., (© 2015 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.)

Polymorphisms of the Glutathione-S Transferase (GST) family may influence the prognosis in lymphoma patients. We aimed to validate the impact of GSTT1 and GSTM1 deletions and of the GSTP1Ile105Val polymorphism on outcome and toxicity in 140 patients with advanced Hodgkin's lymphoma enrolled in the prospective multicenter HD2000-GISL trial, comparing ABVD, BEACOPP and CEC regimens. Carriers of the GSTP1Ile105Val polymorphism had a higher rate of grade 3-4 anemia following treatment. Overall, our study failed to validate GST genotyping as prognostic factor for progression-free survival (PFS). Only the small cohort of patients with an international prognostic score (IPS) >3 and undeleted GSTT1 and/or GSTM1, treated with ABVD had worse progression-free survival (PFS) (GSTT1 + vs GSTT1-: HR 5.02, 95% C.I., 1.16-21.8, p = 0.031, GSTM1 + /GSTT1 + vs GSTM1-and/or GSTT1-: HR 4.61, 95% C.I. 1.28- 16.6, p = 0.019, respectively). No differences were observed for patients treated with intensified regimens, as BEACOPP and CEC. In conclusion, the prognostic role of GST polymorphism, if at all, is limited to a small subgroup of patients treated with standard ABVD regimen.

Clusterin (also called APOJ, SGP-2, XIP8) has thus far been only partially characterized in lymphomas contrary to other types of cancer. Its expression has been reported only for anaplastic large cell lymphomas and, more recently, in mycosis fungoides. Here, we demonstrate an up-regulation of intracellular clusterin in Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL)-derived cell lines L-428, KM-H2 and L-540, caused by different stimuli such as IFN-γ, doxorubicin and X-rays. These stimuli are relevant for the pathophysiology and therapy of HL and represent a first step in the characterisation of this glycoprotein known to have a role in drug chemoresistance. p53 up-regulation accompanies increases in clusterin levels accordingly with the onset of apoptosis. We also show that the cells secrete more clusterin after treatment with doxorubicin, which is consistent with the observed intracellular increase. These observations suggested that the levels of circulating clusterin should also be measured in the peripheral blood from HL patients both at the time of diagnosis and after two cycles of chemotherapy. In a preliminary study on patient sera we observed that an increase in clusterin is correlated with positron emission tomography (PET) positivity after two cycles of chemotherapy.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the apoptotic damage to bone marrow cells caused by three chemotherapy regimens for advanced Hodgkin's lymphoma, ABVD, COPPEBVCAD and BEACOPP, which were randomly administered in the HD 2000 GISL trial. Bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMMCs) stained with anti-CD34 antibody and Annexin V, were evaluated by flow cytometry before starting chemotherapy, 30 days after completing chemotherapy and after 6 months. Results are expressed as the percentages of BMMCs positive to anti-CD34, to Annexin V or to both. Fourteen patients treated with ABVD, 11 with COPPEBVCAD and 13 with BEACOPP were evaluated before and 30 days after treatment. Late assessments were made in 6, 7 and 8 of them, respectively. No differences were found among the pretherapeutic flow cytometry findings in relation to the staging characteristics (marrow involvement included). All the regimens increased the apoptotic fraction of the whole mononuclear bone marrow cells (COPPEBVCAD did so significantly) and increased the CD34+ compartment (with significant early differences after ABVD and BEACOPP, tending to late persistence for ABVD, only). All the regimens increased the apoptotic CD34+ cells within the whole BMMC population (significantly after BEACOPP), although with a general trend to decrease in their percentage within the CD34+ compartment over time, even after the most dose-dense regimens. Based on the variations induced in the apoptotic fraction of all mononuclear and CD34+ cells, ABVD was the least toxic regimen and COPPEBVCAD the most toxic one.

GISL recently conducted an exhaustive survey of 1078 patients with Hodgkin's Lymphoma (HL) enrolled between 1988 and 2002 in different prospective trials. Treatment failure was observed in 82 out of 1078 patients; of these 82 patients with refractory HL, complete information was available for 72, who form the evaluable population of the present study. After the initial therapy failure, 51 patients were treated with conventional salvage chemotherapy (CC) (n = 24) or high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) (n = 27); 4-year overall survival (OS) was 81% in the HDC group versus 38% in the CC group (P = 0.019). The remaining 21 patients had rapidly progressive disease and died. After a median follow-up of 2.8 years, the projected OS for all 72 patients is 58 and 49% at 3 and 5 years, respectively. Age <45 years, the absence of systemic symptoms and a PS <1 predicted a significantly longer OS. Interestingly, the majority of patients with two or three negative prognostic factors did not receive potentially curative therapy. In conclusion, HDC seems to be a reasonable option for selected patients with refractory HL, although the majority of them did not receive a transplant. Finally, patients with a high-risk score had little chance of receiving potentially curative treatment.