Search

In a context of continuous spread health technologies, in which particular intensive procedures are performed, the use of procedure volume indicators supports the decision making process in monitoring and improving the healthcare quality. The aim of our work focuses on the evaluation of the association between the volume of procedures performed by organizational units inside an Italian University Hospital and the results in terms of mortality and prolonged length of stay (LOS). Volume indicators concerning esophageal resection, pancreatic resection, abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, coronary artery bypass graft and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty were analysed according to the Agency of Health Care Research and Quality's criteria. A retrospective observational study was conducted analysing hospital discharged databases and operating room records for the period 2000-2005. Descriptive and inferential statistical analysis were performed using SPSS software 13.0 version. Regarding prolonged LOS, a statistical significant difference emerged among high and low volume organizational units for pancreatic resections, bypass, and angioplasty with respectively adjusted OR at 2.4 (C.I. 95% 1.04-5.53); 1.67 (C.I. 95% 1.29-2.16) and 3.34 (CI 95% 2.60-4.28). For mortality, a statistical significant difference emerged for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair and bypass with respectively OR at 21.02 (C.I. 95% 2.22-199.64) and 26.55 (C.I. 95% 15.30 - 46.07). The use of procedure volume indicators could help hospital administrators and medical professionals balance competing values such as control of cost and continuous quality improvement.

Monitoring and outcomes of experimental solutions adopted in management process reengineering of a teaching hospital ("Policlinico A. Gemelli") of approximately 1550 beds are reported. All monitored processes are considered. For each process, information flows are analyzed, specifying indicators used for monitoring of adopted organizational solutions. Different testing outcomes have shown that pre-established objectives have been attained, while corrections required for their improvement, are indicated.

Objectives To evaluate the prevalence of and the risk factors for Helicobacter pylori in a population of medical and non-medical workers at a teaching hospital in Rome, Italy. Design A cross-sectional study. Methods From January to October 1998, 655 subjects (65% of the total population) underwent a C-13-urea breath test to assess H. pylori infection. Subjects completed a questionnaire concerning sociodemographic characteristics, work departments and history of some gastrointestinal symptoms. Differences in means and proportions were evaluated and independent predictors of H. pylori infection status were assessed by multiple logistic regression analysis. Results Forty percent of the subjects were found to be H pylori infected. The mean age of positive subjects was significantly higher than that of negative ones (38 +/- 14 versus 34 +/- 12 years; P < 0.01). No significant difference was found between males and females concerning the infection status (40.2% males versus 39.9% females). Lower years of father's education [odds ratio (OP), 3.1; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.9-5.1] and age older than 35 years (OP, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.3-3.1) were the only independent predictors of the likelihood of H. pylori positivity. Prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms was similar in infected and uninfected subjects. Physicians were significantly less infected than nurses and auxiliary personnel (26% versus 47% versus 55%, respectively); however, a loss of association was observed after adjustment by multiple logistic regression (OP, 1.8; 95% CI, 0.9-3.7). In all groups, some specific departments appear to be associated with a higher infection status. Conclusions Among healthcare workers, H. pylori infection was associated with specific sociodemographic characteristics, such as age and level of father's education. The prevalence of H. pylori infection was not associated with different professional categories. However, some specific departments seem to increase infection risk. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 13:185-189 (C) 2001 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.