Search

The prognosis after primary (chemo-)radiotherapy for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is affected by Human Papillomavirus (HPV) status, with a better prognosis in HPV-positive OPSCC. HPV-status is routinely assessed by p16 immunohistochemistry (IHC), but additional HPV DNA testing is debated. Also, there are numerous HPV genotypes, which prognostic role may need clarification. The purpose of this study was: (1) to test a custom-made targeted HPV next generation sequencing (NGS) panel in OPSCC, (2) to determine correlation with p16 IHC, and (3) to assess the impact of HPV DNA testing on outcome in the prospectively randomized clinical trial DAHANCA 19. We included 271 patients with OPSCC treated with primary (chemo-)radiotherapy in the DAHANCA 19 trial. Of these, 199 (73%) were p16-positive. HPV-status was determined by targeted HPV next generation sequencing (NGS), using a custom-made HPV genotyping panel. HPV was detected in 194 tumor samples. p16 IHC and NGS HPV status were concordant in 265 (98%) of 271 patients, whereas we did not detect HPV DNA in 5 p16-positive tumors. HPV16 accounted for 169 of 194 HPV-positive cases (87%). HPV genotypes 18, 31, 33, 35, and 59 were also detected. Loco-regional failure and overall survival were similar whether patients were separated by p16 IHC, or HPV DNA status (p < 0.0001 for all) and did not depend on HPV genotype (p = 0.9 and p = 0.7). In the present study, HPV DNA testing or typing in a Danish OPSCC cohort did not add additional information to p16 IHC, the most widely used and accepted prognostic indicator. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We compare outcomes in two large‐scale contemporaneously treated HPV‐positive (HPV+) oropharynx cancer (OPC) cohorts treated with definitive radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy (RT/CRT). p16‐confirmed HPV+ OPC treated between 2007 and 2015 at PMH and DAHANCA were identified. Locoregional failure (LRF), distant metastasis (DM), and overall survival (OS) were compared. Multivariable analysis (MVA) calculated adjusted‐hazard‐ratio (aHR) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI), adjusting for cohort, age, gender, performance status, smoking pack‐years, T‐category and N‐category and chemotherapy. Compared to PMH (n = 701), DAHANCA (n = 1174) contained lower TNM‐8T‐categories (T1‐T2: 77% vs 56%), N‐categories (N0‐N1: 77% vs 67%) and stages (stage I: 63% vs 44% (all P <.001). PMH used standard‐fractionation CRT in 69% (481) while 31% (220) received hypofractionated or moderately accelerated RT‐alone. All DAHANCA patients were treated with moderately accelerated RT; 96% (1129) received nimorazole (NIM) and 73% (856) concurrent weekly cisplatin. DAHANCA had shorter overall‐treatment‐time (P <.001), lower gross tumor (66‐68 vs 70 Gy) and elective neck (50 vs 56 Gy) doses. Median follow‐up was 4.8 years. DAHANCA had higher 5‐year LRF (13% vs 7%, aHR = 0.47 [0.34‐0.67]), comparable DM (7% vs 12%, aHR = 1.32 [0.95‐1.82]), but better OS (85% vs 80%, aHR = 1.30 [1.01‐1.68]). CRT patients had a lower risk of LRF (aHR 0.56 [0.39‐0.82]), DM (aHR 0.70 [0.50‐1.00]) and death (aHR 0.39 [0.29‐0.52]) vs RT‐alone. We observed exemplary outcomes for two large‐scale trans‐Atlantic HPV+ OPC cohorts treated in a similar manner. Concurrent chemotherapy was a strong, independent prognostic factor for all endpoints. Our findings underscore the need for a very careful approach to de‐intensification of treatment for this disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background and purpose Evaluate the prognostic and predictive impact of HPV-associated p16-expression and assess the combined prognostic impact of p16 and smoking on altered fractionated radiotherapy (AFRT) for oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) within the frames of the update of the Meta-Analysis of Radiotherapy in Carcinomas of Head and neck (MARCH). Materials and methods Patients with OPC, known tumor p16-status and smoking history were identified from the MARCH update, resulting in a dataset of 815 patients from four randomized trials (RTOG9003, DAHANCA6&7, RTOG0129, ARTSCAN). Analysis was performed using a Cox model stratified by trial and adjusted on gender, age, T-stage, N-stage, type of radiotherapy fractionation, p16, smoking. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Results In total, 465 patients (57%) had p16-positive tumors and 350 (43%) p16-negative. Compared to p16-negative, p16-positive patients had significantly better PFS (HR = 0.42 [95% CI: 0.34–0.51], 28.9% absolute increase at 10 years) and OS (HR = 0.40 [0.32–0.49], 32.1% absolute increase at 10 years). No interaction between p16-status and fractionation schedule was detected. Smoking negatively impacted outcome; in the p16-positive subgroup, never smokers had significantly better PFS than former/current smokers (HR = 0.49 [0.33–0.75], 24.2% survival benefit at 10 years). Conclusions No predictive impact of p16-status on response to AFRT could be detected but the strong prognostic impact of p16-status was confirmed and especially p16-positive never smoking patients have superior outcome after RT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and purpose HPV is found in head and neck cancer from all sites with a higher prevalence in oropharynx cancer (OPC) compared to non-OPC. HPV/p16-status has a significant impact on radiotherapy (RT) outcome in advanced OPC, but less is known about the influence in non-OPC. We analyzed HPV-associated p16-expression in a cohort of patients with stage III–IV pharynx and larynx cancer treated with primary, curatively intended (chemo-)RT, aiming to test the hypothesis that the impact of HPV/p16 also extends to tumors of non-oropharyngeal origin. Material and methods 1294 patients enrolled in previously conducted DAHANCA-trials between 1992 and 2012 were identified. Tumors were evaluated by p16-immunohistochemistry and classified as positive in case of staining in >70% of tumors cells. Results Thirty-eight percent (490/1294) of the tumors were p16-positive with a significantly higher frequency in OPC (425/815) than in non-OPC (65/479), p < .0001. In OPC p16-positivity significantly improved loco-regional control (LRC) (adjusted HR [95% CI]: 0.43 [0.32–0.57]), event-free survival (EFS) (HR 0.44 [0.35–0.56]), and overall survival (OS) (HR: 0.38 [0.29–0.49]), respectively, compared with p16-negativity. In non-OPC no prognostic impact of p16-status was found for either endpoint: LRC (HR: 1.13 [0.75–1.70]), EFS (HR: 1.06 [0.76–1.47]), and OS (HR: 0.82 [0.59–1.16]). Conclusions The independent influence of HPV-associated p16-expression in advanced OPC treated with primary RT was confirmed. However, RT-outcome in the group of non-OPC did not differ by tumor p16-status, indicating that the prognostic impact may be restricted to OPC only. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Aim: EGFR and HPV-associated p16 are among the most investigated biomarkers in head and neck cancer. The aim was to investigate the correlation and interaction between these two markers and to evaluate their potential prognostic significance when combined. Materials and methods: 336 Oropharyngeal carcinomas treated with primary radiotherapy (66–68Gy, 2fx/day, 10–12Gy/week) and with known EGFR/p16-status estimated semiquantitatively by immunohistochemistry were included in the study. Data were evaluated by EGFR-expression (high/low) and p16-status (positive/negative) consequently dividing tumours into four groups by combination of the biomarkers. Patient/tumour characteristics and complete 5-year follow-up were available. Results: Low EGFR-expression was significantly more common in p16-positive tumours compared to p16-negative, p <0.0001. p16 positivity showed a strong prognostic impact (p <0.0001, HR=0.22 [0.13–0.38]), whereas EGFR was a weak prognostic marker when local control was used as endpoint (p =0.03, HR=0.53 [0.29–0.94]). Combination of EGFR/p16 did not add significant information to p16 alone and by multivariable analysis only p16 showed significant prognostic information for all evaluated endpoints. Conclusions: Both EGFR and p16 bear prognostic information in oropharyngeal cancer, although p16 is, by far, the strongest prognostic factor. The markers seem to be correlated and this might have influence when evaluating the effect of EGFR inhibition in oropharyngeal tumours. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Background and purpose: Tumour HPV-positivity is a favourable prognostic factor in the radiotherapy of HNSCC, but the optimal radiotherapy regimen for HPV-positive HNSCC is not yet defined. Reducing overall treatment time is known to improve outcome in the radiotherapy of HNSCC as was also demonstrated in the randomised DAHANCA 6&7 trial. We aimed to assess the influence of tumour HPV-status, expressed by p16, on the response to accelerated fractionated radiotherapy in HNSCC through evaluation of the DAHANCA 6&7 trial. Materials and methods: Immunohistochemical detection of HPV-associated p16-expression was performed on FFPE-pre-treatment tumour-tissues from 794 patients enrolled in the DAHANCA 6&7 trial. The influence of tumour p16-status on loco-regional tumour control and survival as a function of fractionation schedule (5Fx/week vs 6Fx/week) was evaluated 5years after the completion of radiotherapy. Results: The significant and independent prognostic value of tumour p16-positivity in HNSCC radiotherapy was confirmed, with adjusted hazard ratios (HR) of 0.58 [0.43–0.78], 0.47 [0.33–0.67] and 0.54 [0.42–0.68] for loco-regional control, disease-specific and overall survival, respectively. Accelerated radiotherapy significantly improved loco-regional tumour control compared to conventional radiotherapy, adjusted HR: 0.73 [0.59–0.92] and the benefit of the 6Fx/week regimen was observed both in p16-positive (HR: 0.56 [0.33–0.96]) as well as in p16-negative tumours (HR: 0.77 [0.60–0.99]). Disease-specific survival was also significantly improved with accelerated radiotherapy in the group of p16-positive tumours (adjusted HR: 0.43 [0.22–0.82]). Conclusion: Accelerated radiotherapy significantly improves outcome in HNSCC compared to conventional fractionation. The observed benefit is independent of tumour p16-status and the use of a moderately accelerated radiotherapy regimen seems advantageous also for HPV/p16-positive HNSCC. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: The profound influence of Human papillomavirus (HPV) on the epidemiological pattern and clinical course of head and neck cancer (HNSCC) has led to a change in the traditional understanding of this disease entity. Separate therapeutic strategies based on tumour HPV status are under consideration and in this light provision of knowledge concerning the influence of tumour HPV on the radiation response in HNSCC appears highly relevant. This review provides a summary of the current understanding of the role of HPV in head and neck cancer with specific focus on the viral impact on radiotherapy outcome of HNSCC. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Background: HPV/p16-positive head and neck cancers (HNSCC) show superior response to radiotherapy, compared with virus-negative tumours. Tumour hypoxia induces radioresistance and the randomised DAHANCA 5 trial found that the hypoxic cell radiosensitiser nimorazole significantly improved the outcome in HNSCC. Using p16-status as a retrospective stratification parameter, we aimed to assess the influence of p16-expression on the response to nimorazole in HNSCC. Materials and methods: Pre-treatment tumour blocks were available from 331 of the 414 patients in the DAHANCA 5 trial and evaluated by immunohistochemistry for p16-expression. The influence of p16-expression on outcome was analysed as a function of treatment group (nimorazole/placebo) 5years after radiotherapy. Results: Overall, patients treated with nimorazole had significantly better loco-regional control than did those given placebo: hazard ratio (HR) 0.70 [95% CI 0.52–0.93]. Positive expression of p16 also significantly improved outcome after radiotherapy (0.41 [0.28–0.61]). In the subgroup of patients with p16-negative tumours, loco-regional failure was more frequent in the placebo group than in the nimorazole group (0.69 [0.50–0.95]). However, in the p16-positive group, patients treated with nimorazole had a loco-regional control rate similar to patients given placebo (0.93 [0.45–1.91]). Conclusions: HPV/p16-expression significantly improved outcome after radiotherapy in HNSCC. Hypoxic modification improved outcome in HPV/p16-negative tumours but was of no significant benefit in HPV/p16-positive tumours, suggesting that hypoxic radioresistance may not be clinically relevant in these tumours. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Purpose: Hypoxia is a cause of resistance to radiotherapy, especially in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The purpose of this study was to evaluate 18F-fluoroazomycin arabinoside (FAZA) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) hypoxia imaging as a prognostic factor in HNSCC patients receiving radiotherapy. Material and methods: Forty patients with HNSCC treated with radiotherapy (66–76Gy) were included. Static FAZA PET/CT imaging 2h post injection was conducted prior to irradiation. The hypoxic volume (HV) was delineated using a tumor-to-muscle value ⩾1.4. In 13 patients, a repetitive FAZA PET/CT scan was conducted during the radiotherapy treatment. Results: A hypoxic volume could be identified in 25 (63%) of the 40 tumors. FAZA PET HV varied considerably with a range from 0.0 to 30.9 (median: 0.3) cm3. The Tmax/Mmed ranged from 1.1 to 2.9 (median: 1.5). The distribution of hypoxia among the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) positive (12/16) and negative (13/24) tumors was not significant different. In the FAZA PET/CT scans performed during radiotherapy, hypoxia could be detected in six of the 13 patients. For these six patients the location of HV remained stable in location during radiotherapy treatment, though the size of the HV decreased. In 30 patients a positive correlation was detected between maximum FAZA uptake in the primary tumor and the lymph node. During a median follow up of 19months a significant difference in disease free survival rate with 93% for patients with non hypoxic tumors and 60% for patients with hypoxic tumors could be detected. Conclusion: This study emphasizes the role of FAZA PET/CT imaging as a suitable assay with prognostic potential for detection of hypoxia in HNSCC. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]