Search

Context: Acylated ghrelin (AG) has been discovered as a natural ligand of the GH secretagogue receptor type 1a and is now recognized as an important orexigenic factor. Besides stimulation of GH secretion and appetite, it exerts other central and peripheral actions including modulation of insulin secretion, glucose and lipid metabolism., Objective: To define the effects of the continuous iv infusion of AG in humans with particular attention to metabolic parameters., Materials and Methods: We studied the effects of 16- h (from 21:00 to 13:00 h) infusion of AG (0.5 microg/kg/h) or saline in 8 young volunteers who were provided with isocaloric balanced meals. GH, cortisol, insulin, glucose, free fatty acid (FFA), and ghrelin levels were assayed every 20 min., Results: AG infusion increased circulating total ghrelin to a steady state that was maintained over 16 h infusion of the peptide. With respect to saline, AG infusion significantly modified GH, cortisol, insulin, and glucose profiles and decreased FFA area under the curve (p<0.01). AG increased GH pulse frequency and approximate entropy (p<0.05). AG enhanced the glucose response to both dinner (p<0.02) and breakfast (p<0.03). AG infusion blunted the early insulin response to dinner (p<0.03) but enhanced the second-phase insulin response to dinner and breakfast (p<0.05)., Conclusions: The continuous exposure to AG in humans enhances somatotroph secretion but also worsens glucose metabolism, although it inhibits lipolysis. These findings in normal young volunteers are consistent with data from studies in animals and suggest that acylated ghrelin is likely to play a negative role in glucose metabolism.

Ghrelin, a 28 amino acid-acylated peptide predominantly produced by the stomach, displays strong growth hormone (GH)-releasing activity. It is mediated by the hypothalamic-pituitary GH secretagogue (GHS) receptors, which are specific to a family of synthetic, orally active molecules known as GHSs. However, despite their potent and reproducible GH-releasing activity, the potential clinical use of GHSs as orally active growth-promoting agents or anabolic anti-aging drugs has not been confirmed. Ghrelin and GHSs also exert other actions mediated through central and peripheral receptors, including stimulation of adrenocorticotrophic hormone and prolactin secretion, influence on insulin secretion and glucose metabolism, orexigenic effects and modulatory activity on the neuroendocrine and metabolic response to starvation, influence on exocrine gastro-entero-pancreatic functions, cardiovascular effects and modulation of cell proliferation and apoptosis. The discovery of ghrelin and the characterization of these GH-independent biological activities has widened the knowledge of some critical aspects of neuroendocrinology and suggests possible roles for GHSs and ghrelin in the treatment of pathophysiological conditions, including those unrelated to disorders of GH secretion.

To clarify the impairment of the GH/IGF-I axis in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS), in 13 adult male patients with OSAS (OSA) as well as 15 weight-matched patients with simple obesity (OB) and 10 normal lean male subjects (NS), we studied: 1) the GH response to GHRH (1 micro g/kg iv) plus arginine (30 g iv); and 2) the IGF-I and IGF binding protein-3 responses to a very low dose recombinant human (rh)GH treatment (5.0 microg/kg sc per day for 4 d). The GH response to arginine plus GHRH in OSA was lower than in OB (P < 0.05), which in turn was lower than in NS (P < 0.001). Basal IGF-I levels in OSA were lower than in OB (P < 0.05), which in turn were lower than in NS (P < 0.03). As opposed to OB and NS, in OSA a very low rhGH dose did not affect IGF-I. Adjusting for age and basal values, rhGH-induced IGF-I rise in OSA was lower than in OB (P < 0.01). IGF binding protein-3, glucose, and insulin levels in the three groups were not modified by rhGH. OSA show a more marked impairment of the maximal secretory capacity of somatotroph cells together with reduced IGF-I sensitivity to rhGH stimulation. These findings suggest that OSAS is connoted by a concomitant impairment of GH secretion and sensitivity.

The aim of this study was to compare several parameters of GH/IGF-I axis activity in septic and trauma patients during Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay. To this goal, 13 patients with sepsis (SEP) and 16 with trauma (TRA) were studied. Thirty-three adult subjects (AS) were studied as controls. Serum IGF-I and -II, IGFBP-1, -2 and -3, GH and GHBP levels were studied on day 1, 3, 5 and 7 after ICU admission, during comparable artificial nutrition in SEP and TRA and basally in AS. In 5 patients with SEP and 6 with TRA, the GH response to GHRH was evaluated on day 3. On ICU day 1, IGF-I and -II and IGFBP-3 in SEP were lower (p<0.05) than in TRA which, in turn, were lower (p<0.01) than in AS. IGF-I increased (p<0.05) both in SEP and TRA, but, on ICU day 7, those in SEP persisted lower than in TRA, which became similar to those in AS. IGF-II levels increased (p<0.05) in SEP only, persisting lower (p<0.05) than in TRA. On ICU day 1, GH in SEP and TRA were similar and did not vary until day 7, overlapping those in AS. The GH response to GHRH in SEP and TRA was similar and lower (p<0.01) than in AS. These findings indicate that IGF-I activity is impaired more in septic than in trauma patients. Reduced IGF-I activity probably reflects peripheral GH resistance though basal and GHRH-induced GH levels were not increased in these conditions.

The aim of this study was to clarify the activity of GH/IGF-1 axis as well as the variations of nutritional parameters following a thermal injury in man. To this goal, in 22 patients with burn [BURN, age (mean+/-SE): 46.5+/-3.4 yr, BMI: 25.0+/-0.8 kg/m2, % burn surface area: 26.0+/-3.0%, ROI score: 0.22+/-0.1] we evaluated IGF-1, IGF binding protein (IGFBP-3), GH, GH binding protein (GHBP), pre-albumin (pre-A), albumin (A) and transferrin (TRA) levels on days 1, 3, 7, 14 and 28 after intensive care unit (ICU) admission. IGF-1, IGFBP-3, GH and GHBP levels were also assayed basally in 29 normal subjects (Ns) (Ns, age: 47.5+/-2.8 yr, BMI: 22.0+/-1.4 kg/m2) and in 34 panhypopituitary patients with severe GH deficiency (GHD, age: 42.7+/-2.5 yr, BMI: 25.6+/-0.8 kg/m2). On ICU day 1, IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 in BURN were higher than those in GHD (p<0.05 for both, respectively) and lower than those in Ns (p<0.05) while GH levels in BURN did not differ from those in Ns and higher than GHD (p<0.01). In BURN, IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels showed a progressive decline (p<0.05) with nadir on day 14, when they overlapped those in GHD, and then an increase on day 28, though persisting lower than in Ns, while GH levels did not vary during ICU stay. IGF-I levels were associated neither to burn extension nor to ROI score. On ICU day 1 pre-A, A and TRA levels were similar to those in Ns, but underwent a progressive decrease with nadir on day 7 (p<0.001) for pre-A and TRA, and later, on day 14 (p<0.05) for A; pre-A and TRA but not A showed a rebound increase (p<0.01) on day 14, though persistingly lower than in Ns. In conclusion, our present data firstly show the time course variation of IGF-I levels in burn patients as function of nutritional and hormonal variables. It has to be emphasized that in the most critical phase after burn injuries, IGF-1 levels are as low as in hypopituitary patients with severe GHD. The physiological basis which leads to the impairment of this endogenous anabolic drive in this phase is, however, not clear yet.