Search

Background: Ovarian aging, often leads to increased use of a donor oocyte, which is associated with greater risk for age-related diseases. Objective: To evaluate the association between women conceiving through oocyte donation (OD) and future cancer-related morbidity, as compared with women conceiving through IVF (in vitro fertilization) with autologous oocytes (AO), spontaneous conceptions (SC), and nulliparas. Methods: This retrospective, cohort study was based on the electronic health records of a very large health maintenance organization. The cohort included mothers who delivered before age 45, during 2000–2019. The index date for surveillance was the delivery date of the relevant pregnancy. Each woman from the OD group was matched to a woman the same age at delivery and with the same number of children. Cancer diagnosis was the main outcome. Results: Matching: 664 OD cases to 664 AO, 700 OD cases to 700 SC, and 700 OD cases to 700 nulliparas. Mean follow-up times were 8.9 ± 3.8 OD, 10 ± 4.1 AO, and 6.4 ± 4.1 years SC. Cancer-related morbidity rates were comparable between OD and the other groups, but compared with nulliparas, a trend was noted (1.6% and 3.1%, respectively, p = 0.07). Survival analysis curves were not significantly different, although a trend was shown in the curve comparing to nulliparity (p = 0.07). In a Cox regression model corrected for BMI, smoking and hormone replacement therapy exposure, cancer in the OD group did not differ compared to the other groups. Conclusion: Women conceiving through OD do not have increased risk for cancer-related morbidity in the decade following delivery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Since the introduction of anti-COVID-19 mRNA vaccination, few studies have shown that reproductive outcomes in artificial reproductive technology (ART) treatments are not impaired, after receiving the two-dose regimen. Our aim was to investigate whether a boosting dose of the Pfizer–BioNtech mRNA vaccine affects reproductive outcomes in ART patients. Materials and Methods: This is a prospective observational study, including 157 consecutive in-vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles between October 1, 2021, and November 24, 2021, in a single university affiliated IVF unit. We included female patients going through an ART procedure and male partners in cases of utilization of a fresh sperm sample. The study population was divided into four groups according to exposure status: vaccinated and boosted patients (three total doses of Pfizer–BioNtech mRNA vaccine), patients who were vaccinated without the booster dose (one or two vaccine doses), PCR-confirmed convalescent COVID-19 patients, and unvaccinated nonconvalescent patients. Main outcome measure was clinical pregnancy rate. Results: In total, 99 (63%) female patients were vaccinated three times, 24 (15.3%) were vaccinated without the booster dose, 21 (13.4%) were convalescent, and 13 were (8.3%) unexposed. Although age differed between study groups, vaccination exposure status did not affect treatment outcome: clinical pregnancy rates, maximal estradiol levels, and number of oocytes retrieved did not differ significantly between study groups (p = 0.78, 0.50, and 0.97, respectively). Vaccinated patients who received a boosting vaccine dose were treated within 43.3 ± 30.9 days after receiving the last dose, whereas vaccinated, nonboosted, or convalescent patients were treated 168.7 ± 53 and 209.6 ± 85.1 days after their last exposure, respectively. We stratified the male cohort according to boosting vaccine dose status. Sperm concentration and motility did not differ significantly after boosting (p = 0.49 and 0.49, respectively). Conclusions: Our results provide further reassurance that IVF outcomes are not affected by the anti-SARS-CoV-2 Pfizer–BioNtech mRNA vaccine, in particular the three-dose regimen. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The objective was to evaluate the outcomes of in vitro maturation (IVM) cycles using gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-ag) triggering. A retrospective cohort of IVM cycles from January 2015 to December 2019 in a single university-affiliated centre was examined. Main outcome measures were: (i) IVM maturation rate; and (ii) IVM maturation result. Secondary outcome measures were: (i) metaphase II (MII) rate on the day of egg retrieval; (ii) final MII maturation rate; and (iii) pregnancy rates. A total of 98 IVM cycles were performed during the study period: 50 (51%) were triggered with GnRH-ag (17 received FSH priming and 33 did not) and 48 cycles (49%) were triggered by hCG (37 with FSH priming and 11 without). A significant (p = 0.01) difference was noticed in maturation rate on egg retrieval day, in favour of the GnRH-ag group, although not in the final maturation rate achieved. Pregnancy rates were comparable between treatment sub-groups. GnRH-ag triggering in IVM cycles is an optional triggering mode and can be considered an acceptable option, especially when fertility preservation is a concern. GnRH agonists resulted in higher maturation rate on day of oocyte retrieval, but no difference in the total maturation rate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To evaluate the number of oocytes retrieved as a criterion - when to use a "freeze-all" or low-dose "rescue human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG)" strategy.Methods: A retrospective study. Instead of the classic hCG trigger, an E2 level of ≥3,000 pg/mL was used to trigger ovulation with GnRH agonist. The decision whether to "freeze all" or perform fresh embryo transfer (ET) with a bolus of hCG was made based on a maximum number of 20 oocytes retrieved. Beyond this cut off, a "freeze-all" strategy was implemented. Below this cut-off value, a fresh ET using a single bolus of 62.5 µg hCG on day 3 following oocyte pick-up was performed. The main outcome measures were clinical pregnancy rates and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS).Results: E2 and progesterone levels increased after the rescue hCG bolus administration (E2 from 643.4 ± 311.1 to 1,086.1 ± 574.7 pg/mL, p = 0.003 and progesterone from 13.1 ± 4.8 to 39.2 ± 28.7 ng/mL, p < 0.0001). The clinical pregnancy rates were 25% in the freeze-all group and 32% in the rescue hCG group (p = 0.57). OHSS was not reported in either group.Conclusions: Both strategies seem to be efficacious and safe. An upper limit of 20 retrieved oocytes appears to be safe for applying a rescue hCG strategy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To investigate whether temporarily withholding FSH and adding androgen could improve follicular response during a microdose flare protocol in women with slow follicular growth or asynchronous follicular development.Design: Observational pilot study.Setting: University-affiliated private fertility center.Patient(s): Twenty-six women aged 34-47 years with poor response to stimulation or a previous cancelled IVF cycle and with slow or asynchronous follicular growth during a microdose flare cycle.Intervention(s): For 13 women, after initiation of ovarian stimulation using the microdose flare protocol, gonadotropin administration was interrupted and transdermal testosterone gel was added for several days (4.4 ± 1.2 d) starting after cycle day 7 (mean cycle day 10 ± 2.6).Main Outcome Measure(s): FSH, E2, follicular growth, and total number of mature oocytes retrieved were determined for all of the patients. Cycle cancellation rate as well as pregnancy rate following embryo transfer were also documented when applicable.Result(s): FSH levels declined (25.2 ± 6.5 to 6.8 ± 3.2 IU/L), E2 levels increased (896 ± 687 to 2,163 ± 1,667 pmol/L), and follicular growth improved significantly during gonadotropin interruption and were tracked for 2 days during this time frame. The average number of oocytes retrieved was 5.3 ± 2.6, and the ratio of mature to total oocytes was 4:5. Four of the 13 women in the interruption group conceived following frozen embryo transfer, whereas none in the control group did.Conclusion(s): The androgen-interrupted FSH protocol may improve follicular response to gonadotropins in cycles that might otherwise be cancelled. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]