1. The Stop-Only-While-Shocking algorithm reduces hands-off time by 17% during cardiopulmonary resuscitation - a simulation study
- Author
-
Lars Folkestad, Jacob Broder Brodersen, Mikkel Brabrand, Thomas Morris Hey, Magnus Pedersen, Rasmus Carter-Storch, Kristoffer Bendix, Morten Rix Hansen, Lars Koch Hansen, Anna Mohammed, and Nicolaj Lyhne Christensen
- Subjects
chest compressions ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Electric Countershock ,cardiac arrest ,Heart Massage ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,Manikins ,cardiopulmonary resuscitation ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,medicine ,hands-off time ,Humans ,Cardiopulmonary resuscitation ,Off time ,business.industry ,030208 emergency & critical care medicine ,defibrillator charging ,medicine.disease ,simulation study ,Shock delivery ,Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ,Heart Arrest ,Anesthesia ,Emergency Medicine ,Medical emergency ,business ,Perfusion ,Algorithms - Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Reducing hands-off time during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is believed to increase survival after cardiac arrests because of the sustaining of organ perfusion. The aim of our study was to investigate whether charging the defibrillator before rhythm analyses and shock delivery significantly reduced hands-off time compared with the European Resuscitation Council (ERC) 2010 CPR guideline algorithm in full-scale cardiac arrest scenarios.METHODS: The study was designed as a full-scale cardiac arrest simulation study including administration of drugs. Participants were randomized into using the Stop-Only-While-Shocking (SOWS) algorithm or the ERC2010 algorithm. In SOWS, chest compressions were only interrupted for a post-charging rhythm analysis and immediate shock delivery. A Resusci Anne HLR-D manikin and a LIFEPACK 20 defibrillator were used. The manikin recorded time and chest compressions.RESULTS: Sample size was calculated with an α of 0.05 and 80% power showed that we should test four scenarios with each algorithm. Twenty-nine physicians participated in 11 scenarios. Hands-off time was significantly reduced 17% using the SOWS algorithm compared with ERC2010 [22.1% (SD 2.3) hands-off time vs. 26.6% (SD 4.8); PCONCLUSION: In full-scale cardiac arrest simulations, a minor change consisting of charging the defibrillator before rhythm check reduces hands-off time by 17% compared with ERC2010 guidelines.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF