Search

We evaluated the prevalence of high weight status in children ages 0 to 24 months (m) using data from electronic health records (EHR) and NHANES. We also examined relationships between weight status during infancy and obesity at 24 months of age.EHR data from 4 institutions in North and South Carolina included patients born January 1, 2013-October 10, 2017 (N = 147,290). NHANES data included study waves from 1999 to 2018 (unweighted N = 5121). We calculated weight-for-length (WFL), weight-for-age (WFA), and body mass index (BMI), excluding implausible values, and categorized weight status (85th, 85th to95th, or ≥95th percentile), assessing prevalence at birth, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Utilizing individual, longitudinal EHR data, we used separate regression models to assess obesity risk at 24 months based on anthropometrics at birth, 6, 12, and 18 months, adjusting for sex, race/ethnicity, insurance, and health system.Prevalence of BMI ≥95th percentile in EHR data at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months were 9.7%, 15.7%, 19.6%, and 20.5%, respectively. With NHANES the prevalence was 11.6%, 15.0%, 16.0%, and 8.4%. For both, the prevalence of high weight status was higher in Hispanic children. In EHR data, high weight status at 6, 12, and 18 months was associated with obesity at 24 months, with stronger associations as BMI category increased and as age increased.High weight status is common in infants and young children, although lower at 24 months in NHANES than EHR data. In EHR data, high BMI at 6, 12, and 18 months was associated with increased risk of obesity at 24 months.

Blood pressure (BP) assessment and management are important aspects of care for youth with obesity. This study evaluates data of youth with obesity seeking care at 35 pediatric weight management (PWM) programs enrolled in the Pediatric Obesity Weight Evaluation Registry (POWER). Data obtained at a first clinical visit for youth aged 3-17 years were evaluated to: (1) assess prevalence of BP above the normal range (high BP); and (2) identify characteristics associated with having high BP status. Weight status was evaluated using percentage of the 95

The patient-centered medical home (PCMH) strives to improve the quality of care in the primary care setting. Recently, certification programs for patient-centered coordinated care have expanded to subspecialty care. Children with chronic conditions are particularly in need of patient-centered and coordinated care. Our objective was to compare parent perceptions of PCMH elements at primary care and specialty practices for children receiving specialty care.Cross-sectional survey study.We surveyed the parents of children returning for specialty care in a hospital-based pediatric subspecialty clinic on the presence of National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) PCMH elements in their primary care practice and in their main specialty care practice.More parents perceived good appointment access at primary care practices than they did at specialty practices (93% vs 87%, respectively; P.001). They perceived good care coordination and referral follow-up both at primary care and specialty practices (89% vs 88% and 92% vs 92%, respectively). However, parents less frequently perceived the presence of 7 other PCMH elements at primary care practices compared with specialty practices; these included appointment and tests due reminders, distributing handouts, electronic prescribing, sharing test results, surveying experiences, and e-mail capability.Despite an emphasis on PCMHs in primary care settings, parents of children seeking specialty care are more likely to perceive the presence of NCQA PCMH elements in specialty rather than primary care clinics. Future PCMH efforts should address parents' perceptions and interpretations of these services.

This study assessed the prevalence and consistency of high values of weight, height, and BMI considered to be biologically implausible (BIV) using cut points proposed by WHO among 8.8 million low-income children (13.7 million observations).Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses were performed among 2- to 4-year-olds who were examined from 2008 through 2011.Overall, 2.7% of the body size measurements were classified as BIVs; 95% of these BIVs were very high. Among the subset of children (3.6 million) examined more than once, most of those who initially had a high weight or BMI BIV also had a high BIV at the second examination; odds ratios were250. Based on several alternative classifications of BIVs, the current cut points likely underestimate the prevalence of obesity by about 1%.Many of the extremely high values of body size currently flagged as BIVs are unlikely to be errors. Increasing the z-score cut points or using a percentage of the maximum values in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, could improve the balance between removing probable errors and retaining those that are likely correct.