Author: "C.J. Zeebregts" / Topic: humans - Searchworks@Jio Institute Digital Library Search Results

Your search keyword '"C.J. Zeebregts"' showing total 21 results

Start Over Author "C.J. Zeebregts" Topic humans

21 results on '"C.J. Zeebregts"'

1. Editor's Choice - Randomised Clinical Trial of Supervised Exercise Therapy vs. Endovascular Revascularisation for Intermittent Claudication Caused by Iliac Artery Obstruction

Author: Mark J.W. Koelemay, Nick S. van Reijen, Susan van Dieren, Franceline A. Frans, Erik J.G. Vermeulen, Hessel C.J.L. Buscher, Jim A. Reekers, M.G.W. Dijkgraaf, R.J. de Haan, R. Balm, M.M. Idu, J.D. Blankensteijn, A.W. Hoksbergen, A.P. Conijn, R. Met, D.A. Legemate, S. Bipat, K.P. van Lienden, O.M. van Delden, E.J. Zijlstra, R. Lely, R.H.H. Engelbert, M.A. van Egmond, A. Poelgeest, E. Geleijn, A.J. de Nie, M.A. Schreve, A. Kamphuis, R.H.J. Kropman, J. Wille, J.P.M.M. de Vries, R.H. van de Mortel, H.D. van de Pavoord, D.A. van den Heuvel, M. van Leersum, M.J. van Strijen, J.A. Vos, D. Nio, A. Rijbroek, G.J.M. Akkersdijk, R. Metz, B.J. van Kelckhoven, H.J. van de Rest, V.J. Leijdekkers, A.C. Vahl, R.C. van Nieuwenhuizen, J.G. Blomjous, A.D. Montauban van Swijndregt, P.P.C. Poyck, M. van der Jagt, J.A. van der Vliet, L.J. Schultze Kool, P.L. Klemm, H.W. Slis, M.C.M. Willems, L.C. Huisman, J.H.D. de Bruine, M.J. Mallant, L. Smeets, S.M. van Sterkenburg, M.M. Reijnen, P.B. Veendrick, M.H. van Werkum, J.A. van Ostayen, B.H.P. Elsman, L.G. van der Hem, R.B.M. van Tongeren, C.F.M. Klok, W.E. Hellings, J.C. Aarts, A.M. Wiersema, T.A. van den Broek, A. Moolhuijzen, J.A. Teijink, M.R. van Sambeek, B.P. Keller, G.A. Vos, J.C. Breek†, J. Gravendeel, R. Oosterhof-Berktas, N.A. Koedam, E.J. Hollander, T. Pels Rijcken, S.S. van der Voort, B. Honing, D.M. Scharn, M.S. Lemson, J. Seegers, R.M. Krol, C.J. Buskens, C.J. Zeebregts, R.A. de Bie, H. van Overhagen, Surgery, ACS - Atherosclerosis & ischemic syndromes, Graduate School, APH - Personalized Medicine, APH - Quality of Care, APH - Methodology, Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Epidemiology and Data Science, AGEM - Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, ACS - Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Rehabilitation medicine, AMS - Rehabilitation & Development, ARD - Amsterdam Reproduction and Development, ACS - Diabetes & metabolism, ACS - Heart failure & arrhythmias, APH - Health Behaviors & Chronic Diseases, VU University medical center, Radiology and nuclear medicine, Other Research, ACS - Microcirculation, Man, Biomaterials and Microbes (MBM), RS: CAPHRI - R3 - Functioning, Participating and Rehabilitation, and Epidemiologie
Subjects: Randomised controlled trial, Endovascular revascularisation, Vascular damage Radboud Institute for Health Sciences [Radboudumc 16], Walking, Intermittent Claudication, Iliac Artery, Exercise Therapy, Reconstructive and regenerative medicine Radboud Institute for Health Sciences [Radboudumc 10], Peripheral Arterial Disease, Treatment Outcome, Intermittent Claudication/etiology, Quality of Life, Humans, Peripheral Arterial Disease/complications, Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Supervised exercise therapy
Abstract: Contains fulltext : 251517.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) OBJECTIVE: International guidelines recommend supervised exercise therapy (SET) as primary treatment for all patients with intermittent claudication (IC), yet primary endovascular revascularisation (ER) might be more effective in patients with iliac artery obstruction. METHODS: This was a multicentre RCT including patients with IC caused by iliac artery stenosis or occlusion (NCT01385774). Patients were allocated randomly to SET or ER stratified for maximum walking distance (MWD) and concomitant SFA disease. Primary endpoints were MWD on a treadmill (3.2 km/h, 10% incline) and disease specific quality of life (VascuQol) after one year. Additional interventions during a mean follow up of 5.5 years were recorded. RESULTS: Between November 2010 and May 2015, 114 patients were allocated to SET, and 126 to ER. The trial was terminated prematurely after 240 patients were included. Compliance with SET was 57/114 (50%) after six months. Ten patients allocated to ER (8%) did not receive this intervention. One year follow up was complete for 90/114 (79%) SET patients and for 104/126 (83%) ER patients. The mean MWD improved from 187 to 561 m in SET patients and from 196 to 574 m in ER patients (p = .69). VascuQol sumscore improved from 4.24 to 5.58 in SET patients, and from 4.28 to 5.88 in ER patients (p = .048). Some 33/114 (29%) SET patients had an ER within one year, and 2/114 (2%) surgical revascularisation (SR). Some 10/126 (8%) ER patients had additional ER within one year and 10/126 (8%) SR. After a mean of 5.5 years, 49% of SET patients and 27% of ER patients underwent an additional intervention for IC. CONCLUSION: Taking into account the many limitations of the SUPER study, both a strategy of primary SET and primary ER improve MWD on a treadmill and disease specific Qol of patients with IC caused by an iliac artery obstruction. It seems reasonable to start with SET in these patients and accept a 30% failure rate, which, of course, must be discussed with the patient. Patients continue to have interventions beyond one year.
Published: 2022
Full Text: View/download PDF

2. Type 2 Endoleak With or Without Intervention and Survival After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

Author: Sana Mulay, Anna C.M. Geraedts, Mark J.W. Koelemay, Ron Balm, R. Balm, J.W. Elshof, B.H.P. Elsman, J.F. Hamming, M.J.W. Koelemay, R.H.J. Kropman, P.P. Poyck, G.W.H. Schurink, A.A.E.A. de Smet, S.M. van Sterkenburg, C. Ünlü, A.C. Vahl, H.J.M. Verhagen, P.W.H.E. Vriens, J.P.P.M. de Vries, J.J. Wever, W. Wisselink, C.J. Zeebregts, Robotics and image-guided minimally-invasive surgery (ROBOTICS), Man, Biomaterials and Microbes (MBM), Graduate School, Surgery, and ACS - Atherosclerosis & ischemic syndromes
Subjects: Male, Reoperation, medicine.medical_specialty, Time Factors, Endoleak, medicine.medical_treatment, Aortic Rupture, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, 030204 cardiovascular system & hematology, 030230 surgery, Conservative Treatment, Endovascular aneurysm repair, 03 medical and health sciences, Aortic aneurysm, 0302 clinical medicine, Median follow-up, Risk Factors, medicine, Clinical endpoint, Humans, Abdominal, Prospective cohort study, Aged, Netherlands, Retrospective Studies, Aged, 80 and over, business.industry, Proportional hazards model, Retrospective cohort study, Middle Aged, medicine.disease, Abdominal aortic aneurysm, Surgery, Treatment Outcome, Endovascular procedures, Female, business, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal, Follow-Up Studies
Abstract: Objective: The aims of the present study were to examine the impact of type 2 endoleaks (T2EL) on overall survival and to determine the need for secondary intervention after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Methods: A multicentre retrospective cohort study in the Netherlands was conducted among patients with an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) who underwent EVAR between 2007 and 2012. The primary endpoint was overall survival for patients with (T2EL+) or without (T2EL-) a T2EL. Secondary endpoints were sac growth, AAA rupture, and secondary intervention. Kaplan–Meier survival and multivariable Cox regression analysis were used. Results: A total of 2 018 patients were included. The median follow up was 62.1 (range 0.1 – 146.2) months. No difference in overall survival was found between T2EL+ (n = 388) and T2EL- patients (n = 1630) (p =.54). The overall survival estimates at five and 10 years were 73.3%/69.4% and 45.9%/44.1% for T2EL+/T2EL- patients, respectively. Eighty-five of 388 (21.9%) T2EL+ patients underwent a secondary intervention. There was no difference in overall survival between T2EL+ patients who underwent a secondary intervention and those who were treated conservatively (p =.081). Sac growth was observed in 89 T2EL+ patients and 44/89 patients (49.4%) underwent a secondary intervention. In 41/44 cases (93.1%), sac growth was still observed after the intervention, but was left untreated. Aneurysm rupture occurred in 4/388 T2EL patients. In Cox regression analysis, higher age, ASA classification, and maximum iliac diameter were significantly associated with worse overall survival. Conclusion: No difference in overall survival was found between T2EL+ and T2EL- patients. Also, patients who underwent a secondary intervention did not have better survival compared with those who did not undergo a secondary intervention. This study reinforces the need for conservative treatment of an isolated T2EL and the importance of a prospective study to determine possible advantages of the intervention.
Published: 2021

3. Editor's Choice – Nationwide Analysis of Patients Undergoing Iliac Artery Aneurysm Repair in the Netherlands

Author: Hamid Jalalzadeh, Reza Indrakusuma, Mark J.W. Koelemay, Ron Balm, L.H. Van den Akker, P.J. Van den Akker, G.J. Akkersdijk, G.P. Akkersdijk, W.L. Akkersdijk, M.G. van Andringa de Kempenaer, C.H. Arts, J.A. Avontuur, J.G. Baal, O.J. Bakker, R. Balm, W.B. Barendregt, M.H. Bender, B.L. Bendermacher, M. van den Berg, P. Berger, R.J. Beuk, J.D. Blankensteijn, R.J. Bleker, J.H. Bockel, M.E. Bodegom, K.E. Bogt, A.P. Boll, M.H. Booster, B.L. Borger van der Burg, G.J. de Borst, W.T. Bos-van Rossum, J. Bosma, J.M. Botman, L.H. Bouwman, J.C. Breek, V. Brehm, M.J. Brinckman, T.H. van den Broek, H.L. Brom, M.T. de Bruijn, J.L. de Bruin, P. Brummel, J.P. van Brussel, S.E. Buijk, M.G. Buimer, D.H. Burger, H.C. Buscher, G. den Butter, E. Cancrinus, P.H. Castenmiller, G. Cazander, H.M. Coveliers, P.H. Cuypers, J.H. Daemen, I. Dawson, A.F. Derom, A.R. Dijkema, J. Diks, M.K. Dinkelman, M. Dirven, D.E. Dolmans, R.C. van Doorn, L.M. van Dortmont, M.M. van der Eb, D. Eefting, G.J. van Eijck, J.W. Elshof, B.H. Elsman, A. van der Elst, M.I. van Engeland, R.G. van Eps, M.J. Faber, W.M. de Fijter, B. Fioole, W.M. Fritschy, R.H. Geelkerken, W.B. van Gent, G.J. Glade, B. Govaert, R.P. Groenendijk, H.G. de Groot, R.F. van den Haak, E.F. de Haan, G.F. Hajer, J.F. Hamming, E.S. van Hattum, C.E. Hazenberg, P.P. Hedeman Joosten, J.N. Helleman, L.G. van der Hem, J.M. Hendriks, J.A. van Herwaarden, J.M. Heyligers, J.W. Hinnen, R.J. Hissink, G.H. Ho, P.T. den Hoed, M.T. Hoedt, F. van Hoek, R. Hoencamp, W.H. Hoffmann, A.W. Hoksbergen, E.J. Hollander, L.C. Huisman, R.G. Hulsebos, K.M. Huntjens, M.M. Idu, M.J. Jacobs, M.F. van der Jagt, J.R. Jansbeken, R.J. Janssen, H.H. Jiang, S.C. de Jong, V. Jongkind, M.R. Kapma, B.P. Keller, A. Khodadade Jahrome, J.K. Kievit, P.L. Klemm, P. Klinkert, B. Knippenberg, N.A. Koedam, M.J. Koelemay, J.L. Kolkert, G.G. Koning, O.H. Koning, A.G. Krasznai, R.M. Krol, R.H. Kropman, R.R. Kruse, L. van der Laan, M.J. van der Laan, J.H. van Laanen, J.H. Lardenoye, J.A. Lawson, D.A. Legemate, V.J. Leijdekkers, M.S. Lemson, M.M. Lensvelt, M.A. Lijkwan, R.C. Lind, F.T. van der Linden, P.F. Liqui Lung, M.J. Loos, M.C. Loubert, D.E. Mahmoud, C.G. Manshanden, E.C. Mattens, R. Meerwaldt, B.M. Mees, R. Metz, R.C. Minnee, J.C. de Mol van Otterloo, F.L. Moll, Y.C. Montauban van Swijndregt, M.J. Morak, R.H. van de Mortel, W. Mulder, S.K. Nagesser, C.C. Naves, J.H. Nederhoed, A.M. Nevenzel-Putters, A.J. de Nie, D.H. Nieuwenhuis, J. Nieuwenhuizen, R.C. van Nieuwenhuizen, D. Nio, A.P. Oomen, B.I. Oranen, J. Oskam, H.W. Palamba, A.G. Peppelenbosch, A.S. van Petersen, T.F. Peterson, B.J. Petri, M.E. Pierie, A.J. Ploeg, R.A. Pol, E.D. Ponfoort, P.P. Poyck, A. Prent, S. ten Raa, J.T. Raymakers, M. Reichart, B.L. Reichmann, M.M. Reijnen, A. Rijbroek, M.J. van Rijn, R.A. de Roo, E.V. Rouwet, C.G. Rupert, B.R. Saleem, M.R. van Sambeek, M.G. Samyn, H.P. van ’t Sant, J. van Schaik, P.M. van Schaik, D.M. Scharn, M.R. Scheltinga, A. Schepers, P.M. Schlejen, F.J. Schlosser, F.P. Schol, O. Schouten, M.H. Schreinemacher, M.A. Schreve, G.W. Schurink, C.J. Sikkink, M.P. Siroen, A. te Slaa, H.J. Smeets, L. Smeets, A.A. de Smet, P. de Smit, P.C. Smit, T.M. Smits, M.G. Snoeijs, A.O. Sondakh, T.J. van der Steenhoven, S.M. van Sterkenburg, D.A. Stigter, H. Stigter, R.P. Strating, G.N. Stultiëns, J.E. Sybrandy, J.A. Teijink, B.J. Telgenkamp, M.J. Testroote, R.M. The, W.J. Thijsse, I.F. Tielliu, R.B. van Tongeren, R.J. Toorop, J.H. Tordoir, E. Tournoij, M. Truijers, K. Türkcan, R.P. Tutein Nolthenius, Ç. Ünlü, A.A. Vafi, A.C. Vahl, E.J. Veen, H.T. Veger, M.G. Veldman, H.J. Verhagen, B.A. Verhoeven, C.F. Vermeulen, E.G. Vermeulen, B.P. Vierhout, M.J. Visser, J.A. van der Vliet, C.J. Vlijmen - van Keulen, H.G. Voesten, R. Voorhoeve, A.W. Vos, B. de Vos, G.A. Vos, B.H. Vriens, P.W. Vriens, A.C. de Vries, J.P. de Vries, M. de Vries, C. van der Waal, E.J. Waasdorp, B.M. Wallis de Vries, L.A. van Walraven, J.L. van Wanroij, M.C. Warlé, V. van Weel, A.M. van Well, G.M. Welten, R.J. Welten, J.J. Wever, A.M. Wiersema, O.R. Wikkeling, W.I. Willaert, J. Wille, M.C. Willems, E.M. Willigendael, W. Wisselink, M.E. Witte, C.H. Wittens, I.C. Wolf-de Jonge, O. Yazar, C.J. Zeebregts, M.L. van Zeeland, Surgery, ACS - Atherosclerosis & ischemic syndromes, Pathology, VU University medical center, Pediatrics, Dermatology, ACS - Microcirculation, ACS - Diabetes & metabolism, Graduate School, 02 Surgical specialisms, Robotics and image-guided minimally-invasive surgery (ROBOTICS), Neurology, Erasmus MC other, Molecular Genetics, Erasmus School of Economics, Socio-Medical Sciences (SMS), Cell biology, Gynecological Oncology, Research & Education, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry / Psychology, Cardiology, Urology, Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus School of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Erasmus School of Law, Department of History, Department of Psychology, Education and Child Studies, Obstetrics & Gynecology, Department of Finance, General Practice, Applied Economics, Pediatric Surgery, Department of Business-Society Management, Commercial Law and Financial Law, Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Business Economics, Neurosurgery, Public Health, Anesthesiology, Internal Medicine, Hematology, Intensive Care, Psychiatry, WP ESPhil, and Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Subjects: Male, medicine.medical_specialty, medicine.medical_treatment, Iliac Aneurysm/epidemiology, Patient characteristics, Netherlands/epidemiology, 030204 cardiovascular system & hematology, 030230 surgery, Iliac Artery/pathology, Endovascular aneurysm repair, Iliac Artery, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Aneurysm, Sex Factors, medicine, 80 and over, Humans, EVAR, Registries, Iliac artery aneurysm, Aged, Netherlands, Retrospective Studies, Surgical repair, Aged, 80 and over, business.industry, Open repair, Endovascular Procedures, Retrospective cohort study, Guideline, Vascular surgery, medicine.disease, Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data, Surgery, Endovascular Procedures/methods, Aneurysm repair, Treatment Outcome, Iliac Aneurysm, Female, Guideline Adherence, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, business
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: The new 2019 guideline of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) recommends consideration for elective iliac artery aneurysm (eIAA) repair when the iliac diameter exceeds 3.5 cm, as opposed to 3.0 cm previously. The current study assessed diameters at time of eIAA repair and ruptured IAA (rIAA) repair and compared clinical outcomes after open surgical repair (OSR) and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR).METHODS: This retrospective observational study used the nationwide Dutch Surgical Aneurysm Audit (DSAA) registry that includes all patients who undergo aorto-iliac aneurysm repair in the Netherlands. All patients who underwent primary IAA repair between 1 January 2014 and 1 January 2018 were included. Diameters at time of eIAA and rIAA repair were compared in a descriptive fashion. The anatomical location of the IAA was not registered in the registry. Patient characteristics and outcomes of OSR and EVAR were compared with appropriate statistical tests.RESULTS: The DSAA registry comprised 974 patients who underwent IAA repair. A total of 851 patients were included after exclusion of patients undergoing revision surgery and patients with missing essential variables. eIAA repair was carried out in 713 patients, rIAA repair in 102, and symptomatic IAA repair in 36. OSR was performed in 205, EVAR in 618, and hybrid repairs and conversions in 28. The median maximum IAA diameter at the time of eIAA and rIAA repair was 43 (IQR 38-50) mm and 68 (IQR 58-85) mm, respectively. Mortality was 1.3% (95% CI 0.7-2.4) after eIAA repair and 25.5% (95% CI 18.0-34.7) after rIAA repair. Mortality was not significantly different between the OSR and EVAR subgroups. Elective OSR was associated with significantly more complications than EVAR (intra-operative: 9.8% vs. 3.6%, post-operative: 34.0% vs. 13.8%, respectively).CONCLUSION: In the Netherlands, most eIAA repairs are performed at diameters larger than recommended by the ESVS guideline. These findings appear to support the recent increase in the threshold diameter for eIAA repair.
Published: 2020
Full Text: View/download PDF

4. Incidence and predictive factors for endograft limb patency of the fenestrated Anaconda endograft used for complex endovascular aneurysm repair

Author: Steven J.G. Leeuwerke, Arne de Niet, Robert H. Geelkerken, Michel M.P.J. Reijnen, Clark J. Zeebregts, P. Bungay, D. Pintar, S. Mylonas, J. Brunkwall, R.D. Moore, M. Salbalbal, M. Delbridge, M.M.P.J. Reijnen, J.W. Lardenoije, K. Oikonomou, P. Kasprzak, R. Meerwaldt, R.H. Geelkerken, A. Papaioannou, A. Stehr, C.J. Zeebregts, I.F.J. Tielliu, A. de Niet, S.J.G. Leeuwerke, S. Langer, R. Lakshminarayan, C.N. Kim, W.P. Ngu, R. Birk, TechMed Centre, Multi-Modality Medical Imaging, and Man, Biomaterials and Microbes (MBM)
Subjects: Time Factors, OCCLUSION, Fenestrated endovascular repair, IMPACT, UT-Hybrid-D, DEVICE, Prosthesis Design, Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation, TORTUOSITY, Risk Factors, Animals, Humans, EVAR, Retrospective Studies, ABDOMINAL AORTIC-ANEURYSM, RISK, OUTCOMES, Incidence, Endovascular Procedures, Limb occlusion, Blood Vessel Prosthesis, Boidae, Treatment Outcome, EXPERIENCE, Female, Surgery, STENT GRAFT SYSTEM, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal, Thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm
Abstract: Objective: In the present study, we have described the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of treatment of limb occlusion for patients who had undergone treatment of complex thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms with the fenestrated Anaconda endograft (Terumo Aortic, Inchinnan, UK). Methods: Between June 2010 and May 2018, 335 patients had undergone elective fenestrated aortic aneurysm repair at 11 participating centers using the fenestrated Anaconda endograft with a median follow-up of 14.3 months (interquartile range, 27.4 months). The primary outcome measure was freedom from limb occlusion. The secondary outcome measures were freedom from limb-related reintervention, secondary patency, and the risk factors associated with limb occlusion. Results: Of the 335 patients, 30 (9.0%) had presented with limb occlusion during follow-up with a freedom from limb occlusion rate of 98.5%, 91.2%, and 81.7% at 30 days and 1 and 5 years, respectively. In 87% of the cases, no obvious cause for limb occlusion was documented. Primary occlusion had occurred within 30 days in 36.7% and within 1 year in 80.0%. Of the 30 patients, 23 (77%) had undergone an occlusion-related reintervention and 7 (23.3%) had been treated conservatively. The freedom from limb occlusion-related reintervention at 30 days and 1 and 5 years was 97.8%, 93.2%, and 88.6%, respectively. Secondary patency was 91.3% after 1 month and 86.2% after 1 and 5 years. Female sex (odds ratio [OR], 3.27; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.28-8.34; P =.01) was a statistically significant predictor for limb occlusion. A greater proportion of thrombus in the aneurysm sac appeared to be protective for limb occlusion (0% vs 50%: OR, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.02-0.38; P =.00), as did iliac angulation (OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.98-1.00; P =.04). Conclusions: Limb occlusion remains a significant impediment of endograft durability for patients treated with the fenestrated Anaconda endograft, especially for female patients. In contrast, a high aneurysmal thrombus load and a high degree of iliac angulation appeared to be protective for limb occlusion, for which no obvious cause could be identified.
Published: 2022

5. Toward Optimizing Risk Adjustment in the Dutch Surgical Aneurysm Audit

Author: Niki Lijftogt, Anco Vahl, Esmee M. van der Willik, Vanessa J. Leijdekkers, Michel W.J.M. Wouters, Jaap F. Hamming, L.H. Van den Akker, P.J. Van den Akker, G.J. Akkersdijk, G.P. Akkersdijk, W.L. Akkersdijk, M.G. van Andringa de Kempenaer, C.H. Arts, J.A. Avontuur, J.G. Baal, O.J. Bakker, R. Balm, W.B. Barendregt, M.H. Bender, B.L. Bendermacher, M. van den Berg, P. Berger, R.J. Beuk, J.D. Blankensteijn, R.J. Bleker, J.H. Bockel, M.E. Bodegom, K.E. Bogt, A.P. Boll, M.H. Booster, B.L. Borger van der Burg, G.J. de Borst, W.T. Bos-van Rossum, J. Bosma, J.M. Botman, L.H. Bouwman, J.C. Breek, V. Brehm, M.J. Brinckman, T.H. van den Broek, H.L. Brom, M.T. de Bruijn, J.L. de Bruin, P. Brummel, J.P. van Brussel, S.E. Buijk, M.G. Buimer, D.H. Burger, H.C. Buscher, G. den Butter, E. Cancrinus, P.H. Castenmiller, G. Cazander, H.M. Coveliers, P.H. Cuypers, J.H. Daemen, I. Dawson, A.F. Derom, A.R. Dijkema, J. Diks, M.K. Dinkelman, M. Dirven, D.E. Dolmans, R.C. van Doorn, L.M. van Dortmont, M.M. van der Eb, D. Eefting, G.J. van Eijck, J.W. Elshof, B.H. Elsman, A. van der Elst, M.I. van Engeland, R.G. van Eps, M.J. Faber, W.M. de Fijter, B. Fioole, W.M. Fritschy, R.H. Geelkerken, W.B. van Gent, G.J. Glade, B. Govaert, R.P. Groenendijk, H.G. de Groot, R.F. van den Haak, E.F. de Haan, G.F. Hajer, J.F. Hamming, E.S. van Hattum, C.E. Hazenberg, P.P. Hedeman Joosten, J.N. Helleman, L.G. van der Hem, J.M. Hendriks, J.A. van Herwaarden, J.M. Heyligers, J.W. Hinnen, R.J. Hissink, Ho GH, P.T. den Hoed, M.T. Hoedt, F. van Hoek, R. Hoencamp, W.H. Hoffmann, A.W. Hoksbergen, E.J. Hollander, L.C. Huisman, R.G. Hulsebos, K.M. Huntjens, M.M. Idu, M.J. Jacobs, M.F. van der Jagt, J.R. Jansbeken, R.J. Janssen, H.H. Jiang, S.C. de Jong, V. Jongkind, M.R. Kapma, B.P. Keller, A. Khodadade Jahrome, J.K. Kievit, P.L. Klemm, P. Klinkert, B. Knippenberg, N.A. Koedam, M.J. Koelemaij, J.L. Kolkert, G.G. Koning, O.H. Koning, A.G. Krasznai, R.M. Krol, R.H. Kropman, R.R. Kruse, L. van der Laan, M.J. van der Laan, J.H. van Laanen, J.H. Lardenoye, J.A. Lawson, D.A. Legemate, V.J. Leijdekkers, M.S. Lemson, M.M. Lensvelt, M.A. Lijkwan, R.C. Lind, F.T. van der Linden, P.F. Liqui Lung, M.J. Loos, M.C. Loubert, D.E. Mahmoud, C.G. Manshanden, E.C. Mattens, R. Meerwaldt, B.M. Mees, R. Metz, R.C. Minnee, J.C. de Mol van Otterloo, F.L. Moll, Y.C. Montauban van Swijndregt, M.J. Morak, R.H. van de Mortel, W. Mulder, S.K. Nagesser, C.C. Naves, J.H. Nederhoed, A.M. Nevenzel-Putters, A.J. de Nie, D.H. Nieuwenhuis, J. Nieuwenhuizen, R.C. van Nieuwenhuizen, D. Nio, A.P. Oomen, B.I. Oranen, J. Oskam, H.W. Palamba, A.G. Peppelenbosch, A.S. van Petersen, T.F. Peterson, B.J. Petri, M.E. Pierie, A.J. Ploeg, R.A. Pol, E.D. Ponfoort, P.P. Poyck, A. Prent, S. ten Raa, J.T. Raymakers, M. Reichart, B.L. Reichmann, M.M. Reijnen, A. Rijbroek, M.J. van Rijn, R.A. de Roo, E.V. Rouwet, C.G. Rupert, B.R. Saleem, M.R. van Sambeek, M.G. Samyn, H.P. van 't Sant, J. van Schaik, P.M. van Schaik, D.M. Scharn, M.R. Scheltinga, A. Schepers, P.M. Schlejen, F.J. Schlosser, F.P. Schol, O. Schouten, M.H. Schreinemacher, M.A. Schreve, G.W. Schurink, C.J. Sikkink, M.P. Siroen, A. te Slaa, H.J. Smeets, L. Smeets, A.A. de Smet, P. de Smit, P.C. Smit, T.M. Smits, M.G. Snoeijs, A.O. Sondakh, T.J. van der Steenhoven, S.M. van Sterkenburg, D.A. Stigter, H. Stigter, R.P. Strating, G.N. Stultiëns, J.E. Sybrandy, J.A. Teijink, B.J. Telgenkamp, M.J. Testroote, R.M. The, W.J. Thijsse, I.F. Tielliu, R.B. van Tongeren, R.J. Toorop, J.H. Tordoir, E. Tournoij, M. Truijers, K. Türkcan, R.P. Tutein Nolthenius, Ç. Ünlü, A.A. Vafi, A.C. Vahl, E.J. Veen, H.T. Veger, M.G. Veldman, H.J. Verhagen, B.A. Verhoeven, C.F. Vermeulen, E.G. Vermeulen, B.P. Vierhout, M.J. Visser, J.A. van der Vliet, C.J. Vlijmen - van Keulen, H.G. Voesten, R. Voorhoeve, A.W. Vos, B. de Vos, G.A. Vos, B.H. Vriens, Vriens PW, A.C. de Vries, J.P. de Vries, M. de Vries, C. van der Waal, E.J. Waasdorp, B.M. Wallis de Vries, L.A. van Walraven, J.L. van Wanroij, M.C. Warlé, V. van Weel, A.M. van Well, G.M. Welten, R.J. Welten, J.J. Wever, A.M. Wiersema, O.R. Wikkeling, W.I. Willaert, J. Wille, M.C. Willems, E.M. Willigendael, W. Wisselink, M.E. Witte, C.H. Wittens, I.C. Wolf-de Jonge, O. Yazar, C.J. Zeebregts, M.L. van Zeeland, Surgery, ACS - Atherosclerosis & ischemic syndromes, Multi-Modality Medical Imaging, Gastroenterology and hepatology, Pediatrics, Hematology laboratory, Obstetrics and gynaecology, Amsterdam Movement Sciences - Restoration and Development, Public and occupational health, AGEM - Digestive immunity, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development (AR&D), ACS - Microcirculation, ACS - Diabetes & metabolism, RS: CAPHRI - R5 - Optimising Patient Care, and Epidemiologie
Subjects: Male, medicine.medical_specialty, Time Factors, SURGERY, Aortic Rupture, UT-Hybrid-D, 030204 cardiovascular system & hematology, Logistic regression, Risk Assessment, Decision Support Techniques, 030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Predictive Value of Tests, Risk Factors, Electronic Health Records, Humans, Medicine, Prospective Studies, Registries, Prospective cohort study, Aged, Netherlands, Aged, 80 and over, ABDOMINAL AORTIC-ANEURYSM, Medical Audit, business.industry, MORTALITY, Glasgow Coma Scale, Reproducibility of Results, General Medicine, medicine.disease, Comorbidity, Abdominal aortic aneurysm, n/a OA procedure, ERA, MODEL, Treatment Outcome, Predictive value of tests, Emergency medicine, Female, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, business, Risk assessment, Vascular Surgical Procedures, Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal, Abdominal surgery
Abstract: Background: To compare hospital outcomes of aortic aneurysm surgery, casemix correction for preoperative variables is essential. Most of these variables can be deduced from mortality risk prediction models. Our aim was to identify the optimal set of preoperative variables associated with mortality to establish a relevant and efficient casemix model.Methods: All patients prospectively registered between 2013 and 2016 in the Dutch Surgical Aneurysm Audit (DSAA) were included for the analysis. After multiple imputation for missing variables, predictors for mortality following univariable logistic regression were analyzed in a manual backward multivariable logistic regression model and compared with three standard mortality risk prediction models: Glasgow Aneurysm Score (GAS, mainly clinical parameters), Vascular Biochemical and Haematological Outcome Model (VBHOM, mainly laboratory parameters), and Dutch Aneurysm Score (DAS, both clinical and laboratory parameters). Discrimination and calibration were tested and considered good with a C-statistic > 0.8 and Hosmer-Lemeshow (H-L) P > 0.05.Results: There were 12,401 patients: 9,537 (76.9%) elective patients (EAAA), 913 (7.4%) acute symptomatic patients (SAAA), and 1,951 (15.7%) patients with acute rupture (RAAA). Overall postoperative mortality was 6.5%; 1.8% after EAAA surgery, 6.6% after SAAA, and 29.6% after RAAA surgery. The optimal set of independent variables associated with mortality was a mix of clinical and laboratory parameters: gender, age, pulmonary comorbidity, operative setting, creatinine, aneurysm size, hemoglobin, Glasgow coma scale, electrocardiography, and systolic blood pressure (C-statistic 0.871). External validation overall of VBHOM, DAS, and GAS revealed C-statistics of 0.836, 0.782, and 0.761, with an H-L of 0.028, 0.00, and 0.128, respectively.Conclusions: The optimal set of variables for casemix correction in the DSAA comprises both clinical and laboratory parameters, which can be collected easily from electronic patient files and will lead to an efficient casemix model.
Published: 2019
Full Text: View/download PDF

6. Nationwide Study to Predict Colonic Ischemia after Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in The Netherlands

Author: Saskia Irene Willemsen, Martijn Geert ten Berge, Randolph George Statius van Eps, Hugo Thomas Christian Veger, Hans van Overhagen, Lukas Carolus van Dijk, Hein Putter, Jan Jacob Wever, L.H. Van den Akker, P.J. Van den Akker, G.J. Akkersdijk, G.P. Akkersdijk, W.L. Akkersdijk, M.G. van Andringa de Kempenaer, C.H. Arts, J.A. Avontuur, J.G. Baal, O.J. Bakker, R. Balm, W.B. Barendregt, M.H. Bender, B.L. Bendermacher, M. van den Berg, P. Berger, R.J. Beuk, J.D. Blankensteijn, R.J. Bleker, J.H. Bockel, M.E. Bodegom, K.E. Bogt, A.P. Boll, M.H. Booster, B.L. Borger van der Burg, G.J. de Borst, W.T. Bos-van Rossum, J. Bosma, J.M. Botman, L.H. Bouwman, J.C. Breek, V. Brehm, M.J. Brinckman, T.H. van den Broek, H.L. Brom, M.T. de Bruijn, J.L. de Bruin, P. Brummel, J.P. van Brussel, S.E. Buijk, M.G. Buimer, D.H. Burger, H.C. Buscher, G. den Butter, E. Cancrinus, P.H. Castenmiller, G. Cazander, H.M. Coveliers, P.H. Cuypers, J.H. Daemen, I. Dawson, A.F. Derom, A.R. Dijkema, J. Diks, M.K. Dinkelman, M. Dirven, D.E. Dolmans, R.C. van Doorn, L.M. van Dortmont, M.M. van der Eb, D. Eefting, G.J. van Eijck, J.W. Elshof, B.H. Elsman, A. van der Elst, M.I. van Engeland, R.G. van Eps, M.J. Faber, W.M. de Fijter, B. Fioole, W.M. Fritschy, R.H. Geelkerken, W.B. van Gent, G.J. Glade, B. Govaert, R.P. Groenendijk, H.G. de Groot, R.F. van den Haak, E.F. de Haan, G.F. Hajer, J.F. Hamming, E.S. van Hattum, C.E. Hazenberg, P.P. Hedeman Joosten, J.N. Helleman, L.G. van der Hem, J.M. Hendriks, J.A. van Herwaarden, J.M. Heyligers, J.W. Hinnen, R.J. Hissink, G.H. Ho, P.T. den Hoed, M.T. Hoedt, F. van Hoek, R. Hoencamp, W.H. Hoffmann, A.W. Hoksbergen, E.J. Hollander, L.C. Huisman, R.G. Hulsebos, K.M. Huntjens, M.M. Idu, M.J. Jacobs, M.F. van der Jagt, J.R. Jansbeken, R.J. Janssen, H.H. Jiang, S.C. de Jong, V. Jongkind, M.R. Kapma, B.P. Keller, A. Khodadade Jahrome, J.K. Kievit, P.L. Klemm, P. Klinkert, B. Knippenberg, N.A. Koedam, M.J. Koelemaij, J.L. Kolkert, G.G. Koning, O.H. Koning, A.G. Krasznai, R.M. Krol, R.H. Kropman, R.R. Kruse, L. van der Laan, M.J. van der Laan, J.H. van Laanen, J.H. Lardenoye, J.A. Lawson, D.A. Legemate, V.J. Leijdekkers, M.S. Lemson, M.M. Lensvelt, M.A. Lijkwan, R.C. Lind, F.T. van der Linden, P.F. Liqui Lung, M.J. Loos, M.C. Loubert, D.E. Mahmoud, C.G. Manshanden, E.C. Mattens, R. Meerwaldt, B.M. Mees, R. Metz, R.C. Minnee, J.C. de Mol van Otterloo, F.L. Moll, Y.C. Montauban van Swijndregt, M.J. Morak, R.H. van de Mortel, W. Mulder, S.K. Nagesser, C.C. Naves, J.H. Nederhoed, A.M. Nevenzel-Putters, A.J. de Nie, D.H. Nieuwenhuis, J. Nieuwenhuizen, R.C. van Nieuwenhuizen, D. Nio, A.P. Oomen, B.I. Oranen, J. Oskam, H.W. Palamba, A.G. Peppelenbosch, A.S. van Petersen, T.F. Peterson, B.J. Petri, M.E. Pierie, A.J. Ploeg, R.A. Pol, E.D. Ponfoort, P.P. Poyck, A. Prent, S. ten Raa, J.T. Raymakers, M. Reichart, B.L. Reichmann, M.M. Reijnen, A. Rijbroek, M.J. van Rijn, R.A. de Roo, E.V. Rouwet, C.G. Rupert, B.R. Saleem, M.R. van Sambeek, M.G. Samyn, H.P. van’t Sant, J. van Schaik, P.M. van Schaik, D.M. Scharn, M.R. Scheltinga, A. Schepers, P.M. Schlejen, F.J. Schlosser, F.P. Schol, O. Schouten, M.H. Schreinemacher, M.A. Schreve, G.W. Schurink, C.J. Sikkink, M.P. Siroen, A. te Slaa, H.J. Smeets, L. Smeets, A.A. de Smet, P. de Smit, P.C. Smit, T.M. Smits, M.G. Snoeijs, A.O. Sondakh, T.J. van der Steenhoven, S.M. van Sterkenburg, D.A. Stigter, H. Stigter, R.P. Strating, G.N. Stultiëns, J.E. Sybrandy, J.A. Teijink, B.J. Telgenkamp, M.J. Testroote, R.M. The, W.J. Thijsse, I.F. Tielliu, R.B. van Tongeren, R.J. Toorop, J.H. Tordoir, E. Tournoij, M. Truijers, K. Türkcan, R.P. Tutein Nolthenius, Ç. Ünlü, A.A. Vafi, A.C. Vahl, E.J. Veen, H.T. Veger, M.G. Veldman, H.J. Verhagen, B.A. Verhoeven, C.F. Vermeulen, E.G. Vermeulen, B.P. Vierhout, M.J. Visser, J.A. van der Vliet, C.J. Vlijmen-van Keulen, H.G. Voesten, R. Voorhoeve, A.W. Vos, B. de Vos, G.A. Vos, B.H. Vriens, P.W. Vriens, A.C. de Vries, J.P. de Vries, M. de Vries, C. van der Waal, E.J. Waasdorp, B.M. Wallis de Vries, L.A. van Walraven, J.L. van Wanroij, M.C. Warlé, V. van Weel, A.M. van Well, G.M. Welten, R.J. Welten, J.J. Wever, A.M. Wiersema, O.R. Wikkeling, W.I. Willaert, J. Wille, M.C. Willems, E.M. Willigendael, W. Wisselink, M.E. Witte, C.H. Wittens, I.C. Wolf-de Jonge, O. Yazar, C.J. Zeebregts, M.L. van Zeeland, TechMed Centre, Multi-Modality Medical Imaging, Technical Medicine, Surgery, ACS - Atherosclerosis & ischemic syndromes, Medical Biochemistry, ACS - Diabetes & metabolism, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, APH - Methodology, and APH - Quality of Care
Subjects: Male, Time Factors, medicine.medical_treatment, Vascular damage Radboud Institute for Health Sciences [Radboudumc 16], 030204 cardiovascular system & hematology, Logistic regression, Endovascular aneurysm repair, 030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging, 0302 clinical medicine, Risk Factors, Colon/blood supply, 80 and over, Medicine, Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery, Netherlands, Aged, 80 and over, Univariate analysis, education.field_of_study, Endovascular Procedures, General Medicine, Middle Aged, Abdominal aortic aneurysm, Aortic Aneurysm, Treatment Outcome, Elective Surgical Procedures, Cardiology, Female, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Cohort study, medicine.medical_specialty, Colon, Population, Mesenteric Ischemia/diagnosis, Risk Assessment, 03 medical and health sciences, Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation, Aneurysm, Internal medicine, Humans, Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects, cardiovascular diseases, Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects, education, Aged, Retrospective Studies, business.industry, Colonic ischemia, Abdominal/surgery, medicine.disease, Mesenteric Ischemia, Surgery, Emergencies, business, Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Colonic ischemia remains a severe complication after abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair and is associated with a high mortality. With open repair being one of the main risk factors of colonic ischemia, deciding between endovascular or open aneurysm repair should be based on tailor-made medicine. This study aims to identify high-risk patients of colonic ischemia, a risk that can be taken into account while deciding on AAA treatment strategy.METHODS: A nationwide population-based cohort study of 9,433 patients who underwent an AAA operation between 2014 and 2016 was conducted. Potential risk factors were determined by reviewing prior studies and univariate analysis. With logistic regression analysis, independent predictors of intestinal ischemia were established. These variables were used to form a prediction model.RESULTS: Intestinal ischemia occurred in 267 patients (2.8%). Occurrence of intestinal ischemia was seen significantly more in open repair versus endovascular aneurysm repair (7.6% vs. 0.9%; P < 0.001). This difference remained significant after stratification by urgency of the procedure, in both intact open (4.2% vs. 0.4%; P < 0.001) and ruptured open repair (15.0% vs. 6.2%); P < 0.001). Rupture of the AAA was the most important predictor of developing intestinal ischemia (odds ratio [OR], 5.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.4-8.0), followed by having a suprarenal AAA (OR 3.4; CI 1.1-10.6). Associated procedural factors were open repair (OR 2.8; 95% CI 1.9-4.2), blood loss >1L (OR 3.6; 95% CI 1.7-7.5), and prolonged operating time (OR 2.0; 95% CI 1.4-2.8). Patient characteristics included having peripheral arterial disease (OR 2.4; 95% CI 1.3-4.4), female gender (OR 1.7; 95% CI 1.2-2.4), renal insufficiency (OR 1.7; 1.3-2.2), and pulmonary history (OR 1.6; 95% CI 1.2-2.2). Age CONCLUSIONS: One of the main risk factors is open repair. Several other risk factors can contribute to developing colonic ischemia after AAA repair. The proposed prediction model can be used to identify patients at high risk for developing colonic ischemia. With the current trend in AAA repair leaning toward open repair for better long-term results, our prediction model allows a better informed decision can be made in AAA treatment strategy.
Published: 2021

7. National Numbers of Secondary Aortic Reinterventions after Primary Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Surgery from the Dutch Surgical Aneurysm Audit

Author: Eleonora G. Karthaus, Anco Vahl, Bernard H.P. Elsman, Michel W.J.M. Wouters, Gert J. de Borst, Jaap F. Hamming, P.J. Van den Akker, G.J. Akkersdijk, G.P. Akkersdijk, W.L. Akkersdijk, M.G. van Andringa de Kempenaer, C.H. Arts, J.A. Avontuur, O.J. Bakker, R. Balm, W.B. Barendregt, J.A. Bekken, M.H. Bender, B.L. Bendermacher, M. van den Berg, P. Berger, R.J. Beuk, J.D. Blankensteijn, R.J. Bleker, J.J. Blok, A.S. Bode, M.E. Bodegom, K.E. van der Bogt, A.P. Boll, M.H. Booster, B.L. Borger van der Burg, G.J. de Borst, W.T. Bos-van Rossum, J. Bosma, J.M. Botman, L.H. Bouwman, V. Brehm, M.T. de Bruijn, J.L. de Bruin, P. Brummel, J.P. van Brussel, S.E. Buijk, M.A. Buijs, M.G. Buimer, D.H. Burger, H.C. Buscher, E. Cancrinus, P.H. Castenmiller, G. Cazander, A.M. Coester, P.H. Cuypers, J.H. Daemen, I. Dawson, J.E. Dierikx, M.L. Dijkstra, J. Diks, M.K. Dinkelman, M. Dirven, D.E. Dolmans, R.C. van Doorn, L.M. van Dortmont, J.W. Drouven, M.M. van der Eb, D. Eefting, G.J. van Eijck, J.W. Elshof, B.H. Elsman, A. van der Elst, M.I. van Engeland, R.G. van Eps, M.J. Faber, W.M. de Fijter, B. Fioole, T.M. Fokkema, F.A. Frans, W.M. Fritschy, P.H. Fung Kon Jin, R.H. Geelkerken, W.B. van Gent, G.J. Glade, B. Govaert, R.P. Groenendijk, H.G. de Groot, R.F. van den Haak, E.F. de Haan, G.F. Hajer, J.F. Hamming, E.S. van Hattum, C.E. Hazenberg, P.P. Hedeman Joosten, J.N. Helleman, L.G. van der Hem, J.M. Hendriks, J.A. van Herwaarden, J.M. Heyligers, J.W. Hinnen, R.J. Hissink, G.H. Ho, P.T. den Hoed, M.T. Hoedt, F. van Hoek, R. Hoencamp, W.H. Hoffmann, W. Hogendoorn, A.W. Hoksbergen, E.J. Hollander, M. Hommes, C.J. Hopmans, L.C. Huisman, R.G. Hulsebos, K.M. Huntjens, M.M. Idu, M.J. Jacobs, M.F. van der Jagt, J.R. Jansbeken, R.J. Janssen, H.H. Jiang, S.C. de Jong, T.A. Jongbloed-Winkel, V. Jongkind, M.R. Kapma, B.P. Keller, A. Khodadade Jahrome, J.K. Kievit, P.L. Klemm, P. Klinkert, N.A. Koedam, M.J. Koelemaij, J.L. Kolkert, G.G. Koning, O.H. Koning, R. Konings, A.G. Krasznai, R.M. Krol, R.H. Kropman, R.R. Kruse, L. van der Laan, M.J. van der Laan, J.H. van Laanen, G.W. van Lammeren, D.A. Lamprou, J.H. Lardenoye, G.J. Lauret, B.J. Leenders, D.A. Legemate, V.J. Leijdekkers, M.S. Lemson, M.M. Lensvelt, M.A. Lijkwan, R.C. Lind, F.T. van der Linden, P.F. Liqui Lung, M.J. Loos, M.C. Loubert, K.M. van de Luijtgaarden, D.E. Mahmoud, C.G. Manshanden, E.C. Mattens, R. Meerwaldt, B.M. Mees, G.C. von Meijenfeldt, T.P. Menting, R. Metz, R.C. Minnee, J.C. de Mol van Otterloo, M.J. Molegraaf, Y.C. Montauban van Swijndregt, M.J. Morak, R.H. van de Mortel, W. Mulder, S.K. Nagesser, C.C. Naves, J.H. Nederhoed, A.M. Nevenzel-Putters, A.J. de Nie, D.H. Nieuwenhuis, J. Nieuwenhuizen, R.C. van Nieuwenhuizen, D. Nio, V.J. Noyez, A.P. Oomen, B.I. Oranen, J. Oskam, H.W. Palamba, A.G. Peppelenbosch, A.S. van Petersen, B.J. Petri, M.E. Pierie, A.J. Ploeg, R.A. Pol, E.D. Ponfoort, I.C. Post, P.P. Poyck, A. Prent, S. ten Raa, J.T. Raymakers, M. Reichart, B.L. Reichmann, M.M. Reijnen, J.A. de Ridder, A. Rijbroek, M.J. van Rijn, R.A. de Roo, E.V. Rouwet, B.R. Saleem, P.B. Salemans, M.R. van Sambeek, M.G. Samyn, H.P. van't Sant, J. van Schaik, P.M. van Schaik, D.M. Scharn, M.R. Scheltinga, A. Schepers, P.M. Schlejen, F.J. Schlosser, F.P. Schol, V.P. Scholtes, O. Schouten, M.A. Schreve, G.W. Schurink, C.J. Sikkink, A. te Slaa, H.J. Smeets, L. Smeets, R.R. Smeets, A.A. de Smet, P.C. Smit, T.M. Smits, M.G. Snoeijs, A.O. Sondakh, M.J. Speijers, T.J. van der Steenhoven, S.M. van Sterkenburg, D.A. Stigter, R.A. Stokmans, R.P. Strating, G.N. Stultiëns, J.E. Sybrandy, J.A. Teijink, B.J. Telgenkamp, M. Teraa, M.J. Testroote, T. Tha-In, R.M. The, W.J. Thijsse, I. Thomassen, I.F. Tielliu, R.B. van Tongeren, R.J. Toorop, E. Tournoij, M. Truijers, K. Türkcan, R.P. Tutein Nolthenius, Ç. Ünlü, R.H. Vaes, A.A. Vafi, A.C. Vahl, E.J. Veen, H.T. Veger, M.G. Veldman, S. Velthuis, H.J. Verhagen, B.A. Verhoeven, C.F. Vermeulen, E.G. Vermeulen, B.P. Vierhout, R.J. van der Vijver-Coppen, M.J. Visser, J.A. van der Vliet, C.J. Vlijmen-van Keulen, R. Voorhoeve, J.R. van der Vorst, A.W. Vos, B. de Vos, C.G. Vos, G.A. Vos, M.T. Voute, B.H. Vriens, P.W. Vriens, A.C. de Vries, D.K. de Vries, J.P. de Vries, M. de Vries, C. van der Waal, E.J. Waasdorp, W. de Vries, L.A. van Walraven, J.L. van Wanroij, M.C. Warlé, W. van de Water, V. van Weel, A.M. van Well, G.M. Welten, R.J. Welten, J.J. Wever, A.M. Wiersema, O.R. Wikkeling, W.I. Willaert, J. Wille, M.C. Willems, E.M. Willigendael, E.D. Wilschut, W. Wisselink, M.E. Witte, C.H. Wittens, C.Y. Wong, R. Wouda, O. Yazar, K.K. Yeung, C.J. Zeebregts, M.L. van Zeeland, Surgery, ACS - Atherosclerosis & ischemic syndromes, Pathology, VU University medical center, Pediatrics, Dermatology, ACS - Microcirculation, ACS - Diabetes & metabolism, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Multi-Modality Medical Imaging, Technical Medicine, RS: CAPHRI - R5 - Optimising Patient Care, and Epidemiologie
Subjects: Male, Time Factors, medicine.medical_treatment, Vascular damage Radboud Institute for Health Sciences [Radboudumc 16], UT-Hybrid-D, EVAR TRIAL 1, OPEN REPAIR, 030204 cardiovascular system & hematology, Endovascular aneurysm repair, 030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging, Postoperative Complications, 0302 clinical medicine, LONG-TERM OUTCOMES, Risk Factors, FAILURE, Registries, skin and connective tissue diseases, Netherlands, Aged, 80 and over, Medical Audit, Endovascular Procedures, General Medicine, EDITORS CHOICE, Abdominal aortic aneurysm, Treatment Outcome, Cohort, cardiovascular system, INSTRUCTIONS, Female, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Reoperation, medicine.medical_specialty, Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation, 03 medical and health sciences, Aneurysm, medicine, Humans, Aged, Surgical repair, business.industry, MORTALITY, fungi, Stent, ENDOVASCULAR REPAIR, Odds ratio, medicine.disease, Confidence interval, Surgery, body regions, business, SYSTEM, Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal
Abstract: Contains fulltext : 226469.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) BACKGROUND: Long-term secondary aortic reinterventions (SARs) can be a sign of (lack of) effectiveness of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surgery. This study provides insight into the national number of SARs after primary AAA repair by endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) or by open surgical repair in the Netherlands. METHODS: Observational study included all patients undergoing SAR between 2016 and 2017, registered in the compulsory Dutch Surgical Aneurysm Audit (DSAA). The DSAA started in 2013, SARs are registered from 2016. Characteristics of SAR and postoperative outcomes (mortality/complications) were analyzed, stratified by urgency of SAR. Data of SARs were merged with data of their preceded primary AAA repair, registered in the DSAA after January 2013. In these patients undergoing SAR, treatment characteristics of the preceded primary AAA repair were additionally described, with focus on differences between stent grafts. RESULTS: Between 2016 and 2017, 691 patients underwent SAR, this concerned 9.3% of all AAA procedures (infrarenal/juxtarenal/suprarenal) in the Netherlands (77% elective/11% acute symptomatic/12% ruptured). Endoleak (60%) was the most frequent indication for SAR. SARs were performed with EVAR in 66%. Postoperative mortalities after SAR were 3.4%, 11%, and 29% in elective, acute symptomatic, and ruptured patients, respectively. In 26% (n = 181) of the patients undergoing SAR their primary AAA repair was performed after January 2013 and data of primary and SAR procedures could be merged. In 93% (n = 136), primary AAA repair was EVAR. Endografts primarily used were nitinol/polyester (62%), nitinol/polytetrafluoroethylene (8%), endovascular sealing (21%), and others (9%), compared with their national market share of 76% (odds ratio [OR], 0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38-0.71), 15% (OR, 0.50; CI, 0.29-0.89), 4.9% (OR, 5.04; CI, 3.44-7.38), and 4.1% (OR, 2.81; CI, 1.66-4.74), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In the Netherlands, about one-tenth of the annual AAA procedures concerns an SAR. A quarter of this cohort had an SAR within 1-5 years after their primary AAA repair. Most SARs followed after primary EVAR procedures, in which an overrepresentation of endovascular sealing grafts was seen. Postoperative mortality after SAR is comparable with primary AAA repair.
Published: 2020
Full Text: View/download PDF

8. A Composite Measure for Quality of Care in Patients with Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis Using Textbook Outcome

Author: Laurien S. Kuhrij, Eleonora G. Karthaus, Anco C. Vahl, Martine C.M. Willems, Jan W. Elshof, Gert J. de Borst, P.J. Van den Akker, G.J. Akkersdijk, G.P. Akkersdijk, W.L. Akkersdijk, M.G. van Andringa de Kempenaer, C.H. Arts, J.A. Avontuur, O.J. Bakker, R. Balm, W.B. Barendregt, J.A. Bekken, M.H. Bender, B.L. Bendermacher, M. van den Berg, P. Berger, R.J. Beuk, J.D. Blankensteijn, R.J. Bleker, J.J. Blok, A.S. Bode, M.E. Bodegom, K.E. van der Bogt, A.P. Boll, M.H. Booster, B.L. Borger van der Burg, G.J. de Borst, W.T. Bos-van Rossum, J. Bosma, J.M. Botman, L.H. Bouwman, V. Brehm, M.T. de Bruijn, J.L. de Bruin, P. Brummel, J.P. van Brussel, S.E. Buijk, M.A. Buijs, M.G. Buimer, D.H. Burger, H.C. Buscher, E. Cancrinus, P.H. Castenmiller, G. Cazander, A.M. Coester, P.H. Cuypers, J.H. Daemen, I. Dawson, J.E. Dierikx, M.L. Dijkstra, J. Diks, M.K. Dinkelman, M. Dirven, D.E. Dolmans, R.C. van Doorn, L.M. van Dortmont, J.W. Drouven, M.M. van der Eb, D. Eefting, G.J. van Eijck, J.W. Elshof, B.H. Elsman, A. van der Elst, M.I. van Engeland, R.G. van Eps, M.J. Faber, W.M. de Fijter, B. Fioole, T.M. Fokkema, F.A. Frans, W.M. Fritschy, P.H. Fung Kon Jin, R.H. Geelkerken, W.B. van Gent, G.J. Glade, B. Govaert, R.P. Groenendijk, H.G. de Groot, R.F. van den Haak, E.F. de Haan, G.F. Hajer, J.F. Hamming, E.S. van Hattum, C.E. Hazenberg, P.P. Hedeman Joosten, J.N. Helleman, L.G. van der Hem, J.M. Hendriks, J.A. van Herwaarden, J.M. Heyligers, J.W. Hinnen, R.J. Hissink, G.H. Ho, P.T. den Hoed, M.T. Hoedt, F. van Hoek, R. Hoencamp, W.H. Hoffmann, W. Hogendoorn, A.W. Hoksbergen, E.J. Hollander, M. Hommes, C.J. Hopmans, L.C. Huisman, R.G. Hulsebos, K.M. Huntjens, M.M. Idu, M.J. Jacobs, M.F. van der Jagt, J.R. Jansbeken, R.J. Janssen, H.H. Jiang, S.C. de Jong, T.A. Jongbloed-Winkel, V. Jongkind, M.R. Kapma, B.P. Keller, A. Khodadade Jahrome, J.K. Kievit, P.L. Klemm, P. Klinkert, N.A. Koedam, M.J. Koelemaij, J.L. Kolkert, G.G. Koning, O.H. Koning, R. Konings, A.G. Krasznai, R.M. Krol, R.H. Kropman, R.R. Kruse, L. van der Laan, M.J. van der Laan, J.H. van Laanen, G.W. van Lammeren, D.A. Lamprou, J.H. Lardenoye, G.J. Lauret, B.J. Leenders, D.A. Legemate, V.J. Leijdekkers, M.S. Lemson, M.M. Lensvelt, M.A. Lijkwan, R.C. Lind, F.T. van der Linden, P.F. Liqui Lung, M.J. Loos, M.C. Loubert, K.M. van de Luijtgaarden, D.E. Mahmoud, C.G. Manshanden, E.C. Mattens, R. Meerwaldt, B.M. Mees, G.C. von Meijenfeldt, T.P. Menting, R. Metz, R.C. Minnee, J.C. de Mol van Otterloo, M.J. Molegraaf, Y.C. Montauban van Swijndregt, M.J. Morak, R.H. van de Mortel, W. Mulder, S.K. Nagesser, C.C. Naves, J.H. Nederhoed, A.M. Nevenzel-Putters, A.J. de Nie, D.H. Nieuwenhuis, J. Nieuwenhuizen, R.C. van Nieuwenhuizen, D. Nio, V.J. Noyez, A.P. Oomen, B.I. Oranen, J. Oskam, H.W. Palamba, A.G. Peppelenbosch, A.S. van Petersen, B.J. Petri, M.E. Pierie, A.J. Ploeg, R.A. Pol, E.D. Ponfoort, I.C. Post, P.P. Poyck, A. Prent, S. ten Raa, J.T. Raymakers, M. Reichart, B.L. Reichmann, M.M. Reijnen, J.A. de Ridder, A. Rijbroek, M.J. van Rijn, R.A. de Roo, E.V. Rouwet, B.R. Saleem, P.B. Salemans, M.R. van Sambeek, M.G. Samyn, H.P. van ’t Sant, J. van Schaik, P.M. van Schaik, D.M. Scharn, M.R. Scheltinga, A. Schepers, P.M. Schlejen, F.J. Schlosser, F.P. Schol, V.P. Scholtes, O. Schouten, M.A. Schreve, G.W. Schurink, C.J. Sikkink, A. te Slaa, H.J. Smeets, L. Smeets, R.R. Smeets, A.A. de Smet, P.C. Smit, T.M. Smits, M.G. Snoeijs, A.O. Sondakh, M.J. Speijers, T.J. van der Steenhoven, S.M. van Sterkenburg, D.A. Stigter, R.A. Stokmans, R.P. Strating, G.N. Stultiëns, J.E. Sybrandy, J.A. Teijink, B.J. Telgenkamp, M. Teraa, M.J. Testroote, T. Tha-In, R.M. The, W.J. Thijsse, I. Thomassen, I.F. Tielliu, R.B. van Tongeren, R.J. Toorop, E. Tournoij, M. Truijers, K. Türkcan, R.P. Tutein Nolthenius, Ç. Ünlü, R.H. Vaes, A.A. Vafi, A.C. Vahl, E.J. Veen, H.T. Veger, M.G. Veldman, S. Velthuis, H.J. Verhagen, B.A. Verhoeven, C.F. Vermeulen, E.G. Vermeulen, B.P. Vierhout, R.J. van der Vijver-Coppen, M.J. Visser, J.A. van der Vliet, C.J. Vlijmen - van Keulen, R. Voorhoeve, J.R. van der Vorst, A.W. Vos, B. de Vos, C.G. Vos, G.A. Vos, M.T. Voute, B.H. Vriens, P.W. Vriens, A.C. de Vries, D.K. de Vries, J.P. de Vries, M. de Vries, C. van der Waal, E.J. Waasdorp, B.M. Wallis de Vries, L.A. van Walraven, J.L. van Wanroij, M.C. Warlé, W. van de Water, V. van Weel, A.M. van Well, G.M. Welten, R.J. Welten, J.J. Wever, A.M. Wiersema, O.R. Wikkeling, W.I. Willaert, J. Wille, M.C. Willems, E.M. Willigendael, E.D. Wilschut, W. Wisselink, M.E. Witte, C.H. Wittens, C.Y. Wong, R. Wouda, O. Yazar, K.K. Yeung, C.J. Zeebregts, M.L. van Zeeland, Surgery, ACS - Atherosclerosis & ischemic syndromes, Pathology, VU University medical center, Pediatrics, ACS - Microcirculation, ACS - Diabetes & metabolism, Multi-Modality Medical Imaging, Technical Medicine, RS: CAPHRI - R5 - Optimising Patient Care, Epidemiologie, Graduate School, ANS - Neurovascular Disorders, APH - Methodology, and APH - Quality of Care
Subjects: Male, Time Factors, medicine.medical_treatment, Vascular damage Radboud Institute for Health Sciences [Radboudumc 16], Psychological intervention, UT-Hybrid-D, Carotid endarterectomy, 030204 cardiovascular system & hematology, 030230 surgery, Logistic regression, 0302 clinical medicine, Risk Factors, Carotid Stenosis, Registries, Stroke, Netherlands, Outcome, Aged, 80 and over, RISK, Endarterectomy, Carotid, ENDARTERECTOMY, Middle Aged, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Treatment Outcome, Ischemic Attack, Transient, Female, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, medicine.medical_specialty, Funnel plot, Postoperative Hemorrhage, Patient Readmission, 03 medical and health sciences, Case mix index, Internal medicine, medicine, Humans, HOSPITAL QUALITY, Healthcare Disparities, Aged, Quality Indicators, Health Care, business.industry, Quality of care, 22/2 OA procedure, Length of Stay, medicine.disease, Comorbidity, Cranial Nerve Diseases, Stenosis, Surgery, business
Abstract: Contains fulltext : 226467.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access) OBJECTIVE: Composite measures may better objectify hospital performance than individual outcome measures (IOM). Textbook outcome (TO) is an outcome measure achieved for an individual patient when all undesirable outcomes are absent. The aim of this study was to assess TO as an additional outcome measure to evaluate quality of care in symptomatic patients treated by carotid endarterectomy (CEA). METHODS: All symptomatic patients treated by CEA in 2018, registered in the Dutch Audit for Carotid Interventions, were included. TO was defined as a composite of the absence of 30 day mortality, neurological events (any stroke or transient ischaemic attack [TIA]), cranial nerve deficit, haemorrhage, 30 day readmission, prolonged length of stay (LOS; > 5 days) and any other surgical complication. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify covariables associated with achieving TO, which were used for casemix adjustment for hospital comparison. For each hospital, an observed vs. expected number of events ratio (O/E ratio) was calculated and plotted in a funnel plot with 95% control limits. RESULTS: In total, 70.7% of patients had a desired outcome within 30 days after CEA and therefore achieved TO. Prolonged LOS was the most common parameter (85%) and mortality the least common (1.1%) for not achieving TO. Covariates associated with achieving TO were younger age, the absence of pulmonary comorbidity, higher haemoglobin levels, and TIA as index event. In the case mix adjusted funnel plot, the O/E ratios between hospitals ranged between 0.63 and 1.27, with two hospitals revealing a statistically significantly lower rate of TO (with O/E ratios of 0.63 and 0.66). CONCLUSION: In the Netherlands, most patients treated by CEA achieve TO. Variation between hospitals in achieving TO might imply differences in performance. TO may be used as an additive to the pre-existing IOM, especially in surgical care with low baseline risk such as CEA.
Published: 2020
Full Text: View/download PDF

9. Outcomes after treatment of complex aortic abdominal aneurysms with the fenestrated Anaconda endograft

Author: Piotr M. Kasprzak, M.M.P.J. Reijnen, R.D. Moore, P. Bungay, Robert H. Geelkerken, C.J. Zeebregts, I. F. J. Tielliu, Arne de Niet, R. Birk, A. de Niet, R. Lakshminarayan, Spyridon N. Mylonas, C.N. Kim, K. Oikonomou, R. Meerwaldt, M. Delbridge, D. Pintar, A. Papaioannou, S. Langer, Jan Brunkwall, Clark J. Zeebregts, Michel M.P.J. Reijnen, A. Stehr, W.P. Ngu, Jan Willem Lardenoije, Man, Biomaterials and Microbes (MBM), and Multi-Modality Medical Imaging
Subjects: Male, Time Factors, Endoleak, Fenestrated Anaconda, UT-Hybrid-D, 030204 cardiovascular system & hematology, Aortic aneurysm, 0302 clinical medicine, Interquartile range, Risk Factors, Medicine, 030212 general & internal medicine, biology, Endovascular, Endovascular Procedures, EDITORS CHOICE, Abdominal aortic aneurysm, Treatment Outcome, ENDOLEAKS, Female, GRAFTS, Abdominal aneurysm, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, After treatment, medicine.medical_specialty, RENAL-FUNCTION, Renal function, Prosthesis Design, Risk Assessment, Anaconda, 03 medical and health sciences, Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation, FEVAR, Humans, Vascular Patency, Aged, Retrospective Studies, Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic, business.industry, ENDOVASCULAR REPAIR, Odds ratio, medicine.disease, biology.organism_classification, n/a OA procedure, Surgery, Blood Vessel Prosthesis, EXPERIENCE, business, Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal
Abstract: Objective: To date, information on the fenestrated Anaconda endograft is limited to case series with a small sample size. This study was performed to assess the technical and clinical outcome of this device in a large international case series. Methods: All worldwide centers having treated more than 15 complex abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) or type IV thor- acoabdominal aortic aneurysm patients with the fenestrated Anaconda endograft were approached. Main outcome pa- rameters were procedural technical success, postoperative and follow-up clinical outcome for endoleaks, target vessel patency, reintervention rate, and patient survival. Results: Three hundred thirty-five consecutive cases treated between June 2010 and May 2018 in 11 sites were included. Patients were treated for a short neck infrarenal (n = 98), juxtarenal (n =191), suprarenal AAA (n = 27), or type IV thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (n =19). Mean age was 73.6 ? 4.6 years (292 male). Endografts contained a total of 920 fenestrations, with a mean of 2.7 ? 0.8 fenestrations per case. Technical success was 88.4% (primary, 82.7%; assisted primary 5.7%). In 6.9% of cases, a pro- cedural type IA endoleak was observed, spontaneously disappearing in 82.6% during early follow-up. The development of a type IA endoleak was associated with greater neck angulation (odds ratio [OR], 0.94; P = .01), three fenestrations (OR, 42.7; P = .01) and the presence of augmented proximal rings (OR, 0.17; P = .03). Median follow-up was 1.2 years (interquartile range, 0.4-2.6). The mean estimated glomerular filtration rate deteriorated from 67.6 ? 19.3 mL/min/1.73 m 2 preoperatively to 59.3 ? 22.7 mL/min/ 1.73 m 2 at latest follow-up ( P = .00). The freedom from AAA growth were 97.9 ? 0.9% (n =190) and 86.4 ? 3.0% (n = 68), with a freedom from AAA rupture of 99.7 ? 0.3% (n = 191) and 99.1 ? 0.7% (n = 68), at 1 and 3 years, respectively. The endoleak-free survival, excluding spontaneously resolved procedural endoleaks, at 1 and 3 years was 73.4 ? 2.6 (n = 143) and 65.6 ? 3.4% (n = 45), respectively. The target vessel patency at one and three years were 96.4 ? 0.7% (n = 493) and 92.7 ? 1.4% (n = 156), respectively. A total of 75 reinterventions were done in 64 cases (19.1%), of which 25 cases for an endoleak. The reintervention-free survival at 1 and 3 years were 83.6 ? 2.2% (n = 190) and 71.0 ? 3.7% (n = 68), respectively. No deaths during procedure, extending within 24 hours postoperatively, were observed. Within 30 days 14 patients (4.2%) died and during follow-up another 39 patients (11.6%) died. Three deaths were considered AAA related (one rupture, one endograft infection, and one bilateral renal artery occlusion). The estimated cumulative survival at 1 and 3 years were 89.8 ? 1.8% (n =191) and 79.2 ? 3.0% (n = 68), respectively. Conclusions: The custom-made fenestrated Anaconda endograft is a valuable option for the treatment of a complex AAA. A procedural type IA endoleak is seen relatively frequently, but spontaneously resolves in most cases. (J Vasc Surg 2020;72:25-35.)
Published: 2020

10. Early results with the custom-made Fenestrated Anaconda aortic cuff in the treatment of complex abdominal aortic aneurysm

Author: Spyridon N. Mylonas, Piotr M. Kasprzak, G.F. Fadda, Karin Pfister, G. Rouhani, R. Meerwaldt, Drosos Kotelis, R. Martinez, M. Delbridge, Robert H. Geelkerken, C.J. Zeebregts, Arne de Niet, Jan-Willem H. P. Lardenoije, M.M.P.J. Reijnen, Hence J.M. Verhagen, R. Williams, Clark J. Zeebregts, A. Papaioannou, J. Falkensammer, Bartosz Rylski, Jan Brunkwall, A. Giménez-Gaibar, Michel M.P.J. Reijnen, I. F. J. Tielliu, A. de Niet, Multi-Modality Medical Imaging, Man, Biomaterials and Microbes (MBM), and Surgery
Subjects: Male, Time Factors, Computed Tomography Angiography, DURABILITY, 030204 cardiovascular system & hematology, Kidney, 0302 clinical medicine, Interquartile range, Risk Factors, EVAR, 030212 general & internal medicine, Superior mesenteric artery, ENDOGRAFT, COMPLICATIONS, OUTCOMES, biology, Endovascular Procedures, Abdominal aortic aneurysm, Progression-Free Survival, Europe, Treatment Outcome, Cuff, cardiovascular system, Female, Stents, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Glomerular Filtration Rate, medicine.medical_specialty, MIGRATION, Perforation (oil well), Prosthesis Design, Aortography, Anaconda, 03 medical and health sciences, Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation, Aneurysm, medicine.artery, medicine, Humans, Renal artery, Vascular Patency, Aged, Retrospective Studies, Fenestrated Anaconda aortic cuff, business.industry, ENDOVASCULAR REPAIR, biology.organism_classification, medicine.disease, n/a OA procedure, ENDOLEAK, Surgery, Blood Vessel Prosthesis, Feasibility Studies, EXPERIENCE, STENT-GRAFTS, business, Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal
Abstract: Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the feasibility of a specific custom-made fenestrated aortic cuff in the treatment of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs).Methods: Between 2013 and 2016, a total of 57 custom-made Fenestrated Anaconda (Vascutek, Inchinnan, Scotland, UK) aortic cuffs were placed in 38 centers worldwide. All centers were invited to participate in this retrospective analysis. Postoperative and follow-up data included the presence of adverse events, necessity for reintervention, and renal function.Results: Fifteen clinics participated, leading to 29 cases. Median age at operation was 74 years (interquartile range [IQR], 71-78 years); five patients were female. Two patients were treated for a para-anastomotic AAA after open AAA repair, 19 patients were treated because of a complicated course after primary endovascular AAA repair, and 8 cases were primary procedures for AAA. A total of 76 fenestrations (mean, 2.6 per case) were used. Four patients needed seven adjunctive procedures. Two patients underwent conversion, one because of a dissection of the superior mesenteric artery and one because of perforation of a renal artery. Median operation time was 225 minutes (IQR, 150-260 minutes); median blood loss, 200 mL (IQR, 100-500 mL); and median contrast volume, 150 mL (IQR, 92-260 mL). Primary technical success was achieved in 86% and secondary technical success in 93%. The 30-day morbidity was 7 of 29 with amortality rate of 4 of 29. Estimated glomerular filtration rate remained unchanged before and after surgery (76 to 77 mL/min/m(2)). Between preoperative and median follow-up of 11 months, estimated glomerular filtration rate was reduced statistically significantly (76 to 63 mL/min/m(2)). During follow-up, 9 cases had an increase in aneurysm sac diameter (5 cases > 5 mm); 14 cases had a stable or decreased aneurysm sac diameter; and in 2 cases, no aneurysm size was reported. No type I endoleak was reported, and two cases with a type III endoleak were treated by endovascular means during follow-up. Survival, reintervention-free survival, and target vessel patency at 1 year were 81% +/- 8%, 75% +/- 9%, and 99% +/- 1%, respectively. After 2 years, these numbers were 81% +/- 8%, 67% +/- 11%, and 88% +/- 6%, respectively. During follow-up, the two patients with a type III endoleak needed endograft-related reinterventions.Conclusions: Treatment with this specific custom-made fenestrated aortic cuff is feasible after complicated previous (endovascular) aortic repair or in complex AAAs. The complexity of certain AAA cases is underlined in this study, and the Fenestrated Anaconda aortic cuff is a valid option in selected cases in which few treatment options are left.
Published: 2019

11. Nationwide study of the treatment of mycotic abdominal aortic aneurysms comparing open and endovascular repair in The Netherlands

Author: Quan Dang, Randolph G. Statius van Eps, Jan J. Wever, Hugo T.C. Veger, L.H. Van den Akker, P.J. Van den Akker, G.J. Akkersdijk, G.P. Akkersdijk, W.L. Akkersdijk, M.G. van Andringa de Kempenaer, C.H. Arts, J.A. Avontuur, J.G. Baal, O.J. Bakker, R. Balm, W.B. Barendregt, M.H. Bender, B.L. Bendermacher, M. van den Berg, P. Berger, R.J. Beuk, J.D. Blankensteijn, R.J. Bleker, J.H. Bockel, M.E. Bodegom, K.E. Bogt, A.P. Boll, M.H. Booster, B.L. Borger van der Burg, G.J. de Borst, W.T. Bos- van Rossum, J. Bosma, J.M. Botman, L.H. Bouwman, J.C. Breek, V. Brehm, M.J. Brinckman, T.H. van den Broek, H.L. Brom, M.T. de Bruijn, J.L. de Bruin, P. Brummel, J.P. van Brussel, S.E. Buijk, M.G. Buimer, D.H. Burger, H.C. Buscher, G. den Butter, E. Cancrinus, P.H. Castenmiller, G. Cazander, H.M. Coveliers, P.H. Cuypers, J.H. Daemen, I. Dawson, A.F. Derom, A.R. Dijkema, J. Diks, M.K. Dinkelman, M. Dirven, D.E. Dolmans, R.C. van Doorn, L.M. van Dortmont, M.M. van der Eb, D. Eefting, G.J. van Eijck, J.W. Elshof, B.H. Elsman, A. van der Elst, M.I. van Engeland, R.G. van Eps, M.J. Faber, W.M. de Fijter, B. Fioole, W.M. Fritschy, R.H. Geelkerken, W.B. van Gent, G.J. Glade, B. Govaert, R.P. Groenendijk, H.G. de Groot, R.F. van den Haak, E.F. de Haan, G.F. Hajer, J.F. Hamming, E.S. van Hattum, C.E. Hazenberg, P.P. Hedeman Joosten, J.N. Helleman, L.G. van der Hem, J.M. Hendriks, J.A. van Herwaarden, J.M. Heyligers, J.W. Hinnen, R.J. Hissink, G.H. Ho, P.T. den Hoed, M.T. Hoedt, F. van Hoek, R. Hoencamp, W.H. Hoffmann, A.W. Hoksbergen, E.J. Hollander, L.C. Huisman, R.G. Hulsebos, K.M. Huntjens, M.M. Idu, M.J. Jacobs, M.F. van der Jagt, J.R. Jansbeken, R.J. Janssen, H.H. Jiang, S.C. de Jong, V. Jongkind, M.R. Kapma, B.P. Keller, A. Khodadade Jahrome, J.K. Kievit, P.L. Klemm, P. Klinkert, B. Knippenberg, N.A. Koedam, M.J. Koelemaij, J.L. Kolkert, G.G. Koning, O.H. Koning, A.G. Krasznai, R.M. Krol, R.H. Kropman, R.R. Kruse, L. van der Laan, M.J. van der Laan, J.H. van Laanen, J.H. Lardenoye, J.A. Lawson, D.A. Legemate, V.J. Leijdekkers, M.S. Lemson, M.M. Lensvelt, M.A. Lijkwan, R.C. Lind, F.T. van der Linden, P.F. Liqui Lung, M.J. Loos, M.C. Loubert, D.E. Mahmoud, C.G. Manshanden, E.C. Mattens, R. Meerwaldt, B.M. Mees, R. Metz, R.C. Minnee, J.C. de Mol van Otterloo, F.L. Moll, Y.C. Montauban van Swijndregt, M.J. Morak, R.H. van de Mortel, W. Mulder, S.K. Nagesser, C.C. Naves, J.H. Nederhoed, A.M. Nevenzel-Putters, A.J. de Nie, D.H. Nieuwenhuis, J. Nieuwenhuizen, R.C. van Nieuwenhuizen, D. Nio, A.P. Oomen, B.I. Oranen, J. Oskam, H.W. Palamba, A.G. Peppelenbosch, A.S. van Petersen, T.F. Peterson, B.J. Petri, M.E. Pierie, A.J. Ploeg, R.A. Pol, E.D. Ponfoort, P.P. Poyck, A. Prent, S. ten Raa, J.T. Raymakers, M. Reichart, B.L. Reichmann, M.M. Reijnen, A. Rijbroek, M.J. van Rijn, R.A. de Roo, E.V. Rouwet, C.G. Rupert, B.R. Saleem, M.R. van Sambeek, M.G. Samyn, H.P. van ’t Sant, J. van Schaik, P.M. van Schaik, D.M. Scharn, M.R. Scheltinga, A. Schepers, P.M. Schlejen, F.J. Schlosser, F.P. Schol, O. Schouten, M.H. Schreinemacher, M.A. Schreve, G.W. Schurink, C.J. Sikkink, A. te Slaa, H.J. Smeets, L. Smeets, A.A. de Smet, P. de Smit, P.C. Smit, T.M. Smits, M.G. Snoeijs, A.O. Sondakh, T.J. van der Steenhoven, S.M. van Sterkenburg, D.A. Stigter, H. Stigter, R.P. Strating, G.N. Stultiëns, J.E. Sybrandy, J.A. Teijink, B.J. Telgenkamp, M.J. Testroote, R.M. The, W.J. Thijsse, I.F. Tielliu, R.B. van Tongeren, R.J. Toorop, J.H. Tordoir, E. Tournoij, M. Truijers, K. Türkcan, R.P. Tutein Nolthenius, Ç. Ünlü, A.A. Vafi, A.C. Vahl, E.J. Veen, H.T. Veger, M.G. Veldman, H.J. Verhagen, B.A. Verhoeven, C.F. Vermeulen, E.G. Vermeulen, B.P. Vierhout, M.J. Visser, J.A. van der Vliet, C.J. Vlijmen - van Keulen, H.G. Voesten, R. Voorhoeve, A.W. Vos, B. de Vos, G.A. Vos, B.H. Vriens, P.W. Vriens, A.C. de Vries, J.P. de Vries, M. de Vries, C. van der Waal, E.J. Waasdorp, B.M. Wallis de Vries, L.A. van Walraven, J.L. van Wanroij, M.C. Warlé, V. van Weel, A.M. van Well, G.M. Welten, R.J. Welten, J.J. Wever, A.M. Wiersema, O.R. Wikkeling, W.I. Willaert, J. Wille, M.C. Willems, E.M. Willigendael, W. Wisselink, M.E. Witte, C.H. Wittens, I.C. Wolf-de Jonge, O. Yazar, C.J. Zeebregts, M.L. van Zeeland, RS: CAPHRI - R5 - Optimising Patient Care, Epidemiologie, Surgery, ACS - Atherosclerosis & ischemic syndromes, Pathology, VU University medical center, Pediatrics, Dermatology, ACS - Microcirculation, ACS - Diabetes & metabolism, and Multi-Modality Medical Imaging
Subjects: Male, Clinical audit, Time Factors, SURGERY, medicine.medical_treatment, Vascular damage Radboud Institute for Health Sciences [Radboudumc 16], Abdominal aneurysm, 030204 cardiovascular system & hematology, Endovascular aneurysm repair, Postoperative Complications, 0302 clinical medicine, Risk Factors, Registries, 030212 general & internal medicine, Mycotic, Netherlands, Medical Audit, OUTCOMES, Incidence, Incidence (epidemiology), Endovascular Procedures, Abdominal aorta, Clinical course, Infectious, Middle Aged, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Treatment Outcome, Female, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, medicine.medical_specialty, Patient Readmission, Risk Assessment, Drug Administration Schedule, Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation, 03 medical and health sciences, Aneurysm, THORACIC AORTA, medicine.artery, medicine, Humans, Aged, Retrospective Studies, ILIAC ARTERIES, business.industry, MORTALITY, Retrospective cohort study, medicine.disease, n/a OA procedure, Surgery, VOLUME, business, Aneurysm, Infected, Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal
Abstract: Contains fulltext : 226470.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access) OBJECTIVE: Mycotic aneurysms of the abdominal aorta (MAAA) can be treated by open repair (OR) or endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). This nationwide study provides an overview of the situation of MAAA treatment in The Netherlands in 2016. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted with all centers that registered aortic abdominal aneurysms in the Dutch Surgical Aneurysm Audit in 2016. Questionnaires on 1-year outcomes were sent to all centers that treated patients with MAAA. The primary aim was to determine 30-day and 1-year mortality and morbidity of OR- and EVAR-treated patients. Morbidity was determined by the need for reoperations and the number of readmissions to the hospital. RESULTS: Twenty-six MAAA were detected in the Dutch Surgical Aneurysm Audit database of 2016, resulting in an incidence of 0.7% of all registered abdominal aortic aneurysms. The 30-day mortality for OR and EVAR treated patients was 1 in 13 and 0 in 13, respectively. Major and minor reinterventions within 30 days were needed for two (one OR and one EVAR) and two (one OR and one EVAR) patients, respectively. Two patients (15.4%) in the OR group and one patient (7.7%) in the EVAR group were readmitted to hospital within 30 days. In total, 1-year outcomes of 23 patients were available. In the OR group, one patient (9.1%) died in the first postoperative year. There was one major reintervention (removal of endoprosthesis and spiralvein reconstruction) in the EVAR group. Two patients (18.2%) treated with OR and two (16.7%) treated with EVAR required a minor reintervention. In both groups, four patients (OR, 36.4%; EVAR, 33.3%) were readmitted to hospital within 1 year postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Both OR- and EVAR-treated patients show acceptable clinical outcomes after 30 days and at the 1-year follow-up. Depending on the clinical course of the patient, EVAR may be considered in the management of this disease.
Published: 2020
Full Text: View/download PDF

12. Patients with a Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Are Better Informed in Hospitals with an 'EVAR-preferred' Strategy: An Instrumental Variable Analysis of the Dutch Surgical Aneurysm Audit

Author: Eleonora G. Karthaus, Niki Lijftogt, Anco Vahl, Esmee M. van der Willik, Sonia Amodio, Erik W. van Zwet, Jaap F. Hamming, P.J. Van den Akker, G.J. Akkersdijk, G.P. Akkersdijk, W.L. Akkersdijk, M.G. van Andringa de Kempenaer, C.H. Arts, J.A. Avontuur, O.J. Bakker, R. Balm, W.B. Barendregt, J.A. Bekken, M.H. Bender, B.L. Bendermacher, M. van den Berg, P. Berger, R.J. Beuk, J.D. Blankensteijn, R.J. Bleker, J.J. Blok, A.S. Bode, M.E. Bodegom, K.E. van der Bogt, A.P. Boll, M.H. Booster, B.L. Borger van der Burg, G.J. de Borst, W.T. Bos- van Rossum, J. Bosma, J.M. Botman, L.H. Bouwman, V. Brehm, M.T. de Bruijn, J.L. de Bruin, P. Brummel, J.P. van Brussel, S.E. Buijk, M.A. Buijs, M.G. Buimer, D.H. Burger, H.C. Buscher, E. Cancrinus, P.H. Castenmiller, G. Cazander, A.M. Coester, P.H. Cuypers, J.H. Daemen, I. Dawson, J.E. Dierikx, M.L. Dijkstra, J. Diks, M.K. Dinkelman, M. Dirven, D.E. Dolmans, R.C. van Doorn, L.M. van Dortmont, J.W. Drouven, M.M. van der Eb, D. Eefting, G.J. van Eijck, J.W. Elshof, B.H. Elsman, A. van der Elst, M.I. van Engeland, R.G. van Eps, M.J. Faber, W.M. de Fijter, B. Fioole, T.M. Fokkema, F.A. Frans, W.M. Fritschy, P.H. Fung Kon Jin, R.H. Geelkerken, W.B. van Gent, G.J. Glade, B. Govaert, R.P. Groenendijk, H.G. de Groot, R.F. van den Haak, E.F. de Haan, G.F. Hajer, J.F. Hamming, E.S. van Hattum, C.E. Hazenberg, P.P. Hedeman Joosten, J.N. Helleman, L.G. van der Hem, J.M. Hendriks, J.A. van Herwaarden, J.M. Heyligers, J.W. Hinnen, R.J. Hissink, G.H. Ho, P.T. den Hoed, M.T. Hoedt, F. van Hoek, R. Hoencamp, W.H. Hoffmann, W. Hogendoorn, A.W. Hoksbergen, E.J. Hollander, M. Hommes, C.J. Hopmans, L.C. Huisman, R.G. Hulsebos, K.M. Huntjens, M.M. Idu, M.J. Jacobs, M.F. van der Jagt, J.R. Jansbeken, R.J. Janssen, H.H. Jiang, S.C. de Jong, T.A. Jongbloed-Winkel, V. Jongkind, M.R. Kapma, B.P. Keller, A. Khodadade Jahrome, J.K. Kievit, P.L. Klemm, P. Klinkert, N.A. Koedam, M.J. Koelemaij, J.L. Kolkert, G.G. Koning, O.H. Koning, R. Konings, A.G. Krasznai, R.M. Krol, R.H. Kropman, R.R. Kruse, L. van der Laan, M.J. van der Laan, J.H. van Laanen, G.W. van Lammeren, D.A. Lamprou, J.H. Lardenoye, G.J. Lauret, B.J. Leenders, D.A. Legemate, V.J. Leijdekkers, M.S. Lemson, M.M. Lensvelt, M.A. Lijkwan, R.C. Lind, F.T. van der Linden, P.F. Liqui Lung, M.J. Loos, M.C. Loubert, K.M. van de Luijtgaarden, D.E. Mahmoud, C.G. Manshanden, E.C. Mattens, R. Meerwaldt, B.M. Mees, G.C. von Meijenfeldt, T.P. Menting, R. Metz, R.C. Minnee, J.C. de Mol van Otterloo, M.J. Molegraaf, Y.C. Montauban van Swijndregt, M.J. Morak, R.H. van de Mortel, W. Mulder, S.K. Nagesser, C.C. Naves, J.H. Nederhoed, A.M. Nevenzel-Putters, A.J. de Nie, D.H. Nieuwenhuis, J. Nieuwenhuizen, R.C. van Nieuwenhuizen, D. Nio, V.J. Noyez, A.P. Oomen, B.I. Oranen, J. Oskam, H.W. Palamba, A.G. Peppelenbosch, A.S. van Petersen, B.J. Petri, M.E. Pierie, A.J. Ploeg, R.A. Pol, E.D. Ponfoort, I.C. Post, P.P. Poyck, A. Prent, S. ten Raa, J.T. Raymakers, M. Reichart, B.L. Reichmann, M.M. Reijnen, J.A. de Ridder, A. Rijbroek, M.J. van Rijn, R.A. de Roo, E.V. Rouwet, B.R. Saleem, P.B. Salemans, M.R. van Sambeek, M.G. Samyn, H.P. van ’t Sant, J. van Schaik, P.M. van Schaik, D.M. Scharn, M.R. Scheltinga, A. Schepers, P.M. Schlejen, F.J. Schlosser, F.P. Schol, V.P. Scholtes, O. Schouten, M.A. Schreve, G.W. Schurink, C.J. Sikkink, A. te Slaa, H.J. Smeets, L. Smeets, R.R. Smeets, A.A. de Smet, P.C. Smit, T.M. Smits, M.G. Snoeijs, A.O. Sondakh, M.J. Speijers, T.J. van der Steenhoven, S.M. van Sterkenburg, D.A. Stigter, R.A. Stokmans, R.P. Strating, G.N. Stultiëns, J.E. Sybrandy, J.A. Teijink, B.J. Telgenkamp, M. Teraa, M.J. Testroote, T. Tha-In, R.M. The, W.J. Thijsse, I. Thomassen, I.F. Tielliu, R.B. van Tongeren, R.J. Toorop, E. Tournoij, M. Truijers, K. Türkcan, R.P. Tutein Nolthenius, Ç. Ünlü, R.H. Vaes, A.A. Vafi, A.C. Vahl, E.J. Veen, H.T. Veger, M.G. Veldman, S. Velthuis, H.J. Verhagen, B.A. Verhoeven, C.F. Vermeulen, E.G. Vermeulen, B.P. Vierhout, R.J. van der Vijver-Coppen, M.J. Visser, J.A. van der Vliet, C.J. Vlijmen - van Keulen, R. Voorhoeve, J.R. van der Vorst, A.W. Vos, B. de Vos, C.G. Vos, G.A. Vos, M.T. Voute, B.H. Vriens, P.W. Vriens, A.C. de Vries, D.K. de Vries, J.P. de Vries, M. de Vries, C. van der Waal, E.J. Waasdorp, B.M. Wallis de Vries, L.A. van Walraven, J.L. van Wanroij, M.C. Warlé, W. van de Water, V. van Weel, A.M. van Well, G.M. Welten, R.J. Welten, J.J. Wever, A.M. Wiersema, O.R. Wikkeling, W.I. Willaert, J. Wille, M.C. Willems, E.M. Willigendael, E.D. Wilschut, W. Wisselink, M.E. Witte, C.H. Wittens, C.Y. Wong, R. Wouda, O. Yazar, K.K. Yeung, C.J. Zeebregts, M.L. van Zeeland, Multi-Modality Medical Imaging, Surgery, ACS - Atherosclerosis & ischemic syndromes, APH - Methodology, APH - Quality of Care, RS: CAPHRI - R5 - Optimising Patient Care, and Epidemiologie
Subjects: Male, Time Factors, medicine.medical_treatment, Vascular damage Radboud Institute for Health Sciences [Radboudumc 16], UT-Hybrid-D, 030204 cardiovascular system & hematology, Logistic regression, Endovascular aneurysm repair, 030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging, law.invention, Postoperative Complications, 0302 clinical medicine, Randomized controlled trial, Risk Factors, law, 80 and over, Hospital Mortality, Prospective Studies, Prospective cohort study, Netherlands, Aged, 80 and over, OUTCOMES, Medical Audit, education.field_of_study, Endovascular Procedures, Confounding, Absolute risk reduction, General Medicine, EDITORS CHOICE, Aortic Aneurysm, Treatment Outcome, OPEN SURGERY, TRIAL, Female, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, medicine.medical_specialty, Aortic Rupture, Clinical Decision-Making, Population, Abdominal/diagnostic imaging, Postoperative Complications/mortality, Risk Assessment, Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation, 03 medical and health sciences, medicine, Humans, Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects, Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects, education, Aged, business.industry, MORTALITY, ENDOVASCULAR REPAIR, Surgery, Aortic Rupture/diagnostic imaging, Propensity score matching, business, Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/diagnostic imaging, Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal
Abstract: Contains fulltext : 229914.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) BACKGROUND: While several observational studies suggested a lower postoperative mortality after minimal invasive endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) in patients with a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA) compared to conventional open surgical repair (OSR), landmark randomized controlled trials have not been able to prove the superiority of EVAR over OSR. Randomized controlled trials contain a selected, homogeneous population, influencing external validity. Observational studies are biased and adjustment of confounders can be incomplete. Instrumental variable (IV) analysis (pseudorandomization) may help to answer the question if patients with an RAAA have lower postoperative mortality when undergoing EVAR compared to OSR. METHODS: This is an observational study including all patients with an RAAA, registered in the Dutch Surgical Aneurysm Audit between 2013 and 2017. The risk difference (RD) in postoperative mortality (30 days/in-hospital) between patients undergoing EVAR and OSR was estimated, in which adjustment for confounding was performed in 3 ways: linear model adjusted for observed confounders, propensity score model (multivariable logistic regression analysis), and IV analysis (two-stage least square regression), adjusting for observed and unobserved confounders, with the variation in percentage of EVAR per hospital as the IV instrument. RESULTS: 2419 patients with an RAAA (1489 OSR and 930 EVAR) were included. Unadjusted postoperative mortality was 34.9% after OSR and 22.6% after EVAR (RD 12.3%, 95% CI 8.5-16%). The RD adjusted for observed confounders using linear regression analysis and propensity score analysis was, respectively, 12.3% (95% CI 9.6-16.7%) and 13.2% (95%CI 9.3-17.1%) in favor of EVAR. Using IV analysis, adjusting for observed and unobserved confounders, RD was 8.9% (95% CI -1.1-18.9%) in favor of EVAR. CONCLUSIONS: Adjusting for observed confounders, patients with an RAAA undergoing EVAR had a significant better survival than OSR in a consecutive large cohort. Adjustment for unobserved confounders resulted in a clinical relevant RD. An "EVAR preference strategy" in patients with an RAAA could result in lower postoperative mortality.
Published: 2020

13. Failure to Rescue - a Closer Look at Mortality Rates Has No Added Value for Hospital Comparisons but Is Useful for Team Quality Assessment in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Surgery in The Netherlands

Author: Niki Lijftogt, Eleonora G. Karthaus, Anco Vahl, Erik W. van Zwet, Esmee M. van der Willik, Robertus A.E.M. Tollenaar, Jaap F. Hamming, Michel W.J.M. Wouters, L.H. Van den Akker, P.J. Van den Akker, G.J. Akkersdijk, G.P. Akkersdijk, W.L. Akkersdijk, M.G. van Andringa de Kempenaer, C.H. Arts, J.A. Avontuur, J.G. Baal, O.J. Bakker, R. Balm, W.B. Barendregt, M.H. Bender, B.L. Bendermacher, M. van den Berg, P. Berger, R.J. Beuk, J.D. Blankensteijn, R.J. Bleker, J.H. Bockel, M.E. Bodegom, K.E. Bogt, A.P. Boll, M.H. Booster, B.L. Borger van der Burg, G.J. de Borst, W.T. Bos-van Rossum, J. Bosma, J.M. Botman, L.H. Bouwman, J.C. Breek, V. Brehm, M.J. Brinckman, T.H. van den Broek, H.L. Brom, M.T. de Bruijn, J.L. de Bruin, P. Brummel, J.P. van Brussel, S.E. Buijk, M.G. Buimer, D.H. Burger, H.C. Buscher, G. den Butter, E. Cancrinus, P.H. Castenmiller, G. Cazander, H.M. Coveliers, P.H. Cuypers, J.H. Daemen, I. Dawson, A.F. Derom, A.R. Dijkema, J. Diks, M.K. Dinkelman, M. Dirven, D.E. Dolmans, R.C. van Doorn, L.M. van Dortmont, M.M. van der Eb, D. Eefting, G.J. van Eijck, J.W. Elshof, B.H. Elsman, A. van der Elst, M.I. van Engeland, R.G. van Eps, M.J. Faber, W.M. de Fijter, B. Fioole, W.M. Fritschy, R.H. Geelkerken, W.B. van Gent, G.J. Glade, B. Govaert, R.P. Groenendijk, H.G. de Groot, R.F. van den Haak, E.F. de Haan, G.F. Hajer, J.F. Hamming, E.S. van Hattum, C.E. Hazenberg, P.P. Hedeman Joosten, J.N. Helleman, L.G. van der Hem, J.M. Hendriks, J.A. van Herwaarden, J.M. Heyligers, J.W. Hinnen, R.J. Hissink, G.H. Ho, P.T. den Hoed, M.T. Hoedt, F. van Hoek, R. Hoencamp, W.H. Hoffmann, A.W. Hoksbergen, E.J. Hollander, L.C. Huisman, R.G. Hulsebos, K.M. Huntjens, M.M. Idu, M.J. Jacobs, M.F. van der Jagt, J.R. Jansbeken, R.J. Janssen, H.H. Jiang, S.C. de Jong, V. Jongkind, M.R. Kapma, B.P. Keller, A. Khodadade Jahrome, J.K. Kievit, P.L. Klemm, P. Klinkert, B. Knippenberg, N.A. Koedam, M.J. Koelemaij, J.L. Kolkert, G.G. Koning, O.H. Koning, A.G. Krasznai, R.M. Krol, R.H. Kropman, R.R. Kruse, L. van der Laan, M.J. van der Laan, J.H. van Laanen, J.H. Lardenoye, J.A. Lawson, D.A. Legemate, V.J. Leijdekkers, M.S. Lemson, M.M. Lensvelt, M.A. Lijkwan, R.C. Lind, F.T. van der Linden, P.F. Liqui Lung, M.J. Loos, M.C. Loubert, D.E. Mahmoud, C.G. Manshanden, E.C. Mattens, R. Meerwaldt, B.M. Mees, R. Metz, R.C. Minnee, J.C. de Mol van Otterloo, F.L. Moll, Y.C. Montauban van Swijndregt, M.J. Morak, R.H. van de Mortel, W. Mulder, S.K. Nagesser, C.C. Naves, J.H. Nederhoed, A.M. Nevenzel-Putters, A.J. de Nie, D.H. Nieuwenhuis, J. Nieuwenhuizen, R.C. van Nieuwenhuizen, D. Nio, A.P. Oomen, B.I. Oranen, J. Oskam, H.W. Palamba, A.G. Peppelenbosch, A.S. van Petersen, T.F. Peterson, B.J. Petri, M.E. Pierie, A.J. Ploeg, R.A. Pol, E.D. Ponfoort, P.P. Poyck, A. Prent, S. ten Raa, J.T. Raymakers, M. Reichart, B.L. Reichmann, M.M. Reijnen, A. Rijbroek, M.J. van Rijn, R.A. de Roo, E.V. Rouwet, C.G. Rupert, B.R. Saleem, M.R. van Sambeek, M.G. Samyn, H.P. van ’t Sant, J. van Schaik, P.M. van Schaik, D.M. Scharn, M.R. Scheltinga, A. Schepers, P.M. Schlejen, F.J. Schlosser, F.P. Schol, O. Schouten, M.H. Schreinemacher, M.A. Schreve, G.W. Schurink, C.J. Sikkink, M.P. Siroen, A. te Slaa, H.J. Smeets, L. Smeets, A.A. de Smet, P. de Smit, P.C. Smit, T.M. Smits, M.G. Snoeijs, A.O. Sondakh, T.J. van der Steenhoven, S.M. van Sterkenburg, D.A. Stigter, H. Stigter, R.P. Strating, G.N. Stultiëns, J.E. Sybrandy, J.A. Teijink, B.J. Telgenkamp, M.J. Testroote, R.M. The, W.J. Thijsse, I.F. Tielliu, R.B. van Tongeren, R.J. Toorop, J.H. Tordoir, E. Tournoij, M. Truijers, K. Türkcan, R.P. Tutein Nolthenius, Ç. Ünlü, A.A. Vafi, A.C. Vahl, E.J. Veen, H.T. Veger, M.G. Veldman, H.J. Verhagen, B.A. Verhoeven, C.F. Vermeulen, E.G. Vermeulen, B.P. Vierhout, M.J. Visser, J.A. van der Vliet, C.J. Vlijmen-van Keulen, H.G. Voesten, R. Voorhoeve, A.W. Vos, B. de Vos, G.A. Vos, B.H. Vriens, P.W. Vriens, A.C. de Vries, J.P. de Vries, M. de Vries, C. van der Waal, E.J. Waasdorp, B.M. Wallis de Vries, L.A. van Walraven, J.L. van Wanroij, M.C. Warlé, V. van Weel, A.M. van Well, G.M. Welten, R.J. Welten, J.J. Wever, A.M. Wiersema, O.R. Wikkeling, W.I. Willaert, J. Wille, M.C. Willems, E.M. Willigendael, W. Wisselink, M.E. Witte, C.H. Wittens, I.C. Wolf-de Jonge, O. Yazar, C.J. Zeebregts, M.L. van Zeeland, RS: CAPHRI - R5 - Optimising Patient Care, Epidemiologie, Surgery, Pediatrics, ACS - Atherosclerosis & ischemic syndromes, Pathology, Dermatology, ACS - Microcirculation, AII - Inflammatory diseases, and AGEM - Digestive immunity
Subjects: Clinical audit, medicine.medical_specialty, Funnel plot, TO-RESCUE, Time Factors, Failure to rescue, Vascular damage Radboud Institute for Health Sciences [Radboudumc 16], MODELS, 030204 cardiovascular system & hematology, 030230 surgery, PREVENTABILITY, 03 medical and health sciences, Postoperative Complications, 0302 clinical medicine, Aneurysm, medicine, Humans, Hospital Mortality, SURGICAL COLORECTAL AUDIT, Netherlands, TRAUMA, REPAIR, RISK, Surgical outcome, OUTCOMES, medicine.diagnostic_test, business.industry, Mortality rate, Endovascular Procedures, Glasgow Coma Scale, CARE, medicine.disease, Quality Improvement, CANCER, Hospitals, Abdominal aortic aneurysm, Surgery, Composite outcome measures, Elective Surgical Procedures, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, business, Electrocardiography, Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal
Abstract: Objectives: Failure to rescue (FTR) is a composite quality indicator, defined as the proportion of deceased patients following major complications. The aims of this study were to compare FTR with mortality for hospital comparisons in abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surgery in The Netherlands and investigate hospital volume and associated factors.Methods: Patients prospectively registered between 2013 and 2015 in the Dutch Surgical Aneurysm Audit (DSAA) were analysed. FTR was analysed for AAA patients and subgroups elective (EAAA) and acute (AAAA; symptomatic or ruptured) aneurysms. Variables and hospital volume were analysed by uni- and multivariable regression analysis. Adjusted hospital comparisons for mortality, major complications, and FTR were presented in funnel plots. Isomortality lines were constructed when presenting FTR and major complication rates.Results: A total of 9258 patients were analysed in 61 hospitals: 7149 EAAA patients (77.2%) and 2109 AAAA patients (22.8%). There were 2785 (30.1%) patients with complications (unadjusted range 5-65% per hospital): 2161 (77.6%) with major and 624 (28.4%) patients with minor complications. Overall mortality was 6.6% (adjusted range 0-16% per hospital) and FTR was 28.4% (n = 613) (adjusted range 0-60% per hospital). Glasgow Coma Scale, age, pulse, creatinine, electrocardiography, and operative setting were independently associated with FTR. Hospital volume was not associated with FTR. In AAAA patients hospital volume was significantly associated with a lower adjusted major complication and mortality rate (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.49-0.78; and 0.64, 95% CI 0.48-0.87). Four hospitals had a significant lower adjusted FTR with different major complication rates on different isomortality lines.Conclusions: There was more variation in FTR than in mortality between hospitals. FTR identified the same best performing hospitals as for mortality and therefore was of limited additional value in measuring quality of care for AAA surgery. FTR can be used for internal quality improvement with major complications in funnel plots and diagrams with isomortality lines. (C) 2018 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Published: 2018
Full Text: View/download PDF

14. The Dutch Audit of Carotid Interventions: Transparency in Quality of Carotid Endarterectomy in Symptomatic Patients in the Netherlands

Author: Eleonora G. Karthaus, Anco Vahl, Laurien S. Kuhrij, Bernard H.P. Elsman, Robert H. Geelkerken, Michel W.J.M. Wouters, Jaap F. Hamming, Gert J. de Borst, L.H. Van den Akker, P.J. Van den Akker, G.J. Akkersdijk, G.P. Akkersdijk, W.L. Akkersdijk, M.G. van Andringa de Kempenaer, C.H. Arts, J.A. Avontuur, J.G. Baal, O.J. Bakker, R. Balm, W.B. Barendregt, M.H. Bender, B.L. Bendermacher, M. van den Berg, P. Berger, R.J. Beuk, J.D. Blankensteijn, R.J. Bleker, J.H. Bockel, M.E. Bodegom, K.E. Bogt, A.P. Boll, M.H. Booster, B.L. Borger van der Burg, G.J. de Borst, W.T. Bos- van Rossum, J. Bosma, J.M. Botman, L.H. Bouwman, J.C. Breek, V. Brehm, M.J. Brinckman, T.H. van den Broek, H.L. Brom, M.T. de Bruijn, J.L. de Bruin, P. Brummel, J.P. van Brussel, S.E. Buijk, M.G. Buimer, D.H. Burger, H.C. Buscher, G. den Butter, E. Cancrinus, P.H. Castenmiller, G. Cazander, H.M. Coveliers, P.H. Cuypers, J.H. Daemen, I. Dawson, A.F. Derom, A.R. Dijkema, J. Diks, M.K. Dinkelman, M. Dirven, D.E. Dolmans, R.C. van Doorn, L.M. van Dortmont, M.M. van der Eb, D. Eefting, G.J. van Eijck, J.W. Elshof, B.H. Elsman, A. van der Elst, M.I. van Engeland, R.G. van Eps, M.J. Faber, W.M. de Fijter, B. Fioole, W.M. Fritschy, R.H. Geelkerken, W.B. van Gent, G.J. Glade, B. Govaert, R.P. Groenendijk, H.G. de Groot, R.F. van den Haak, E.F. de Haan, G.F. Hajer, J.F. Hamming, E.S. van Hattum, C.E. Hazenberg, P.P. Hedeman Joosten, J.N. Helleman, L.G. van der Hem, J.M. Hendriks, J.A. van Herwaarden, J.M. Heyligers, J.W. Hinnen, R.J. Hissink, G.H. Ho, P.T. den Hoed, M.T. Hoedt, F. van Hoek, R. Hoencamp, W.H. Hoffmann, A.W. Hoksbergen, E.J. Hollander, L.C. Huisman, R.G. Hulsebos, K.M. Huntjens, M.M. Idu, M.J. Jacobs, M.F. van der Jagt, J.R. Jansbeken, R.J. Janssen, H.H. Jiang, S.C. de Jong, V. Jongkind, M.R. Kapma, B.P. Keller, A. Khodadade Jahrome, J.K. Kievit, P.L. Klemm, P. Klinkert, B. Knippenberg, N.A. Koedam, M.J. Koelemaij, J.L. Kolkert, G.G. Koning, O.H. Koning, A.G. Krasznai, R.M. Krol, R.H. Kropman, R.R. Kruse, L. van der Laan, M.J. van der Laan, J.H. van Laanen, J.H. Lardenoye, J.A. Lawson, D.A. Legemate, V.J. Leijdekkers, M.S. Lemson, M.M. Lensvelt, M.A. Lijkwan, R.C. Lind, F.T. van der Linden, P.F. Liqui Lung, M.J. Loos, M.C. Loubert, D.E. Mahmoud, C.G. Manshanden, E.C. Mattens, R. Meerwaldt, B.M. Mees, R. Metz, R.C. Minnee, J.C. de Mol van Otterloo, F.L. Moll, Y.C. Montauban van Swijndregt, M.J. Morak, R.H. van de Mortel, W. Mulder, S.K. Nagesser, C.C. Naves, J.H. Nederhoed, A.M. Nevenzel-Putters, A.J. de Nie, D.H. Nieuwenhuis, J. Nieuwenhuizen, R.C. van Nieuwenhuizen, D. Nio, A.P. Oomen, B.I. Oranen, J. Oskam, H.W. Palamba, A.G. Peppelenbosch, A.S. van Petersen, T.F. Peterson, B.J. Petri, M.E. Pierie, A.J. Ploeg, R.A. Pol, E.D. Ponfoort, P.P. Poyck, A. Prent, S. ten Raa, J.T. Raymakers, M. Reichart, B.L. Reichmann, M.M. Reijnen, A. Rijbroek, M.J. van Rijn, R.A. de Roo, E.V. Rouwet, C.G. Rupert, B.R. Saleem, M.R. van Sambeek, M.G. Samyn, H.P. van 't Sant, J. van Schaik, P.M. van Schaik, D.M. Scharn, M.R. Scheltinga, A. Schepers, P.M. Schlejen, F.J. Schlosser, F.P. Schol, O. Schouten, M.H. Schreinemacher, M.A. Schreve, G.W. Schurink, C.J. Sikkink, M.P. Siroen, A. te Slaa, H.J. Smeets, L. Smeets, A.A. de Smet, P. de Smit, P.C. Smit, T.M. Smits, M.G. Snoeijs, A.O. Sondakh, T.J. van der Steenhoven, S.M. van Sterkenburg, D.A. Stigter, H. Stigter, R.P. Strating, D. Stultiëns, J.E. Sybrandy, J.A. Teijink, B.J. Telgenkamp, M.J. Testroote, R.M. The, W.J. Thijsse, I.F. Tielliu, R.B. van Tongeren, R.J. Toorop, J.H. Tordoir, E. Tournoij, M. Truijers, K. Türkcan, R.P. Tutein Nolthenius, Ç. Ünlü, A.A. Vafi, A.C. Vahl, E.J. Veen, H.T. Veger, M.G. Veldman, H.J. Verhagen, B.A. Verhoeven, C.F. Vermeulen, E.G. Vermeulen, B.P. Vierhout, M.J. Visser, J.A. van der Vliet, C.J. Vlijmen - van Keulen, H.G. Voesten, R. Voorhoeve, A.W. Vos, B. de Vos, G.A. Vos, B.H. Vriens, P.W. Vriens, A.C. de Vries, J.P. de Vries, M. de Vries, C. van der Waal, E.J. Waasdorp, B.M. Wallis de Vries, L.A. van Walraven, J.L. van Wanroij, M.C. Warlé, V. van Weel, A.M. van Well, G.M. Welten, R.J. Welten, J.J. Wever, A.M. Wiersema, O.R. Wikkeling, W.I. Willaert, J. Wille, M.C. Willems, E.M. Willigendael, W. Wisselink, M.E. Witte, C.H. Wittens, I.C. Wolf-de Jonge, O. Yazar, C.J. Zeebregts, M.L. van Zeeland, Jan-Willem Elshof, Martine C. Willems, Surgery, ACS - Atherosclerosis & ischemic syndromes, Pathology, Pediatrics, Dermatology, ACS - Microcirculation, AII - Inflammatory diseases, AGEM - Digestive immunity, RS: CAPHRI - R5 - Optimising Patient Care, Epidemiologie, ANS - Neurovascular Disorders, Graduate School, and Multi-Modality Medical Imaging
Subjects: Male, medicine.medical_specialty, Patients, medicine.medical_treatment, Vascular damage Radboud Institute for Health Sciences [Radboudumc 16], Psychological intervention, Carotid endarterectomy, 030204 cardiovascular system & hematology, Revascularization, Logistic regression, STENOSIS, Risk Assessment, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, CEA, National clinical audit, Risk Factors, medicine, Humans, Carotid Stenosis, Hospital Mortality, 030212 general & internal medicine, PREDICTORS, Stroke, Netherlands, OUTCOMES, COMPLICATIONS, Endarterectomy, Carotid, business.industry, Mortality rate, DEATH, Quality of care, Symptomatic carotid artery stenosis, medicine.disease, n/a OA procedure, Stenosis, TRIALS, Treatment Outcome, Cohort, Emergency medicine, REVASCULARIZATION, Female, Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, business
Abstract: Background: The Dutch Audit for Carotid Interventions (DACI) registers all patients undergoing interventions for carotid artery stenosis in the Netherlands. This study describes the design of the DACI and results of patients with a symptomatic stenosis undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA). It aimed to evaluate variation between hospitals in process of care and (adjusted) outcomes, as well as predictors of major stroke/death after CEA.Methods: All patients with a symptomatic stenosis, who underwent CEA and were registered in the DACI between 2014 and 2016 were included in this cohort. Descriptive analyses of patient characteristics, process of care, and outcomes were performed. Casemix adjusted hospital procedural outcomes as (30 day/in hospital) mortality, stroke/death, and major stroke/death, were compared with the national mean. A multivariable logistic regression model (backward elimination at p > 0.10) was used to identify predictors of major stroke/death.Results: A total of 6459 patients, registered by 52 hospitals, were included. The majority (4,832, 75%) were treated Conclusion: CEA in The Netherlands is associated with an overall low mortality and (major) stroke/death rate. Whereas the indicator time to intervention varied between hospitals, mortality and (major) stroke/death were not significantly distinctive enough to identify worse practices and therefore were unsuitable for hospital comparison in the Dutch setting. Additionally, predictors of major stroke/death at population level could be identified. (C) 2018 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Published: 2018
Full Text: View/download PDF

15. Experience with the GORE EXCLUDER iliac branch endoprosthesis for common iliac artery aneurysms

Author: Steven M.M. van Sterkenburg, Jan M.M. Heyligers, Mathijs van Bladel, Hence J. Verhagen, Daniël Eefting, Marc R. van Sambeek, Clark J. Zeebregts, Michel M.P.J. Reijnen, J. Avontuur, T. Smits, M.R. van Sambeek, R.B.M. van Tongeren, H.J. Verhagen, G. Akkersdijk, D. Eefting, O.R.M. Wikkeling, C.J.J.M. Sikkink, M. van Bladel, S. Holewijn, E. Mathijssen, M.M.P.J. Reijnen, S.M.M. van Sterkenburg, J.M.M. Heyligers, T. Koëter, J. van Brussel, C.J. Zeebregts, I.F.J. Tielliu, Surgery, and Man, Biomaterials and Microbes (MBM)
Subjects: Male, medicine.medical_specialty, Time Factors, Computed Tomography Angiography, medicine.medical_treatment, Operative Time, 030204 cardiovascular system & hematology, Prosthesis Design, Medical Records, 030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging, 03 medical and health sciences, Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation, 0302 clinical medicine, Aneurysm, Postoperative Complications, Blood vessel prosthesis, medicine.artery, EXCLUSION, Medicine, Humans, Iliac Aneurysm, Embolization, PRESERVATION, Vascular Patency, Computed tomography angiography, Aged, Netherlands, Retrospective Studies, REPAIR, medicine.diagnostic_test, business.industry, Endovascular Procedures, GRAFT, Retrospective cohort study, Middle Aged, medicine.disease, EMBOLIZATION, Common iliac artery, Surgery, Blood Vessel Prosthesis, Treatment Outcome, Cohort, Retreatment, Female, Stents, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, business
Abstract: Objective: In this study, we analyzed the procedural success and early outcome of endovascular treatment of a multicenter cohort of patients with common iliac artery (CIA) aneurysms treated with the new GORE EXCLUDER (W. L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, Ariz) iliac branch endoprosthesis (IBE).Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis was performed in 13 sites in The Netherlands. Anatomic, demographic, procedural, and follow-up data were assessed from hospital records.Results: From November 2013 to December 2014, 51 CIA aneurysms were treated with an IBE in 46 patients. The median diameter of the treated aneurysm was 40.5 (range, 25.0-90.0) mm. The mean procedural time was 198 +/- 56 minutes. All but one implantation were successful; two type Ib endoleaks were noticed, resulting in a procedural success rate of 93.5%. The two type Ib endoleaks spontaneously disappeared at 30 days. There was no 30-day mortality. Ipsilateral buttock claudication was present in only two cases at 30 days and disappeared during follow-up. The incidence of reported erectile dysfunction was low and severe ischemic complications were absent. After a mean follow-up of 6 months, data on 17 treated aneurysms were available. Two showed a stable diameter, whereas 15 showed a mean decrease of 3.9 +/- 2.2 mm (P Conclusions: The use of the GORE EXCLUDER IBE device for CIA aneurysms is related to high procedural success, high patency rates, and low reintervention rates at short-term follow-up. Prospective data with longer follow-up are awaited to establish the role of the device in the treatment algorithm of CIA aneurysms.
Published: 2015

16. Treatment of Short-necked Infrarenal Aortic Aneurysms with Fenestrated Stent-grafts: Short-term Results

Author: R.G. Hulsebos, C.J. Zeebregts, J.J.A.M. van den Dungen, Matthijs Oudkerk, E.L.G. Verhoeven, M.G. van Andringa de Kempenaer, I. F. J. Tielliu, R van Schilfgaarde, and T. R. Prins
Subjects: Male, medicine.medical_specialty, Short neck, medicine.medical_treatment, Prosthesis Design, Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation, Aortic aneurysm, Postoperative Complications, Renal Artery, medicine.artery, Occlusion, medicine, Humans, Stent-graft, cardiovascular diseases, Renal artery, Aged, Fixation (histology), Aged, 80 and over, Medicine(all), business.industry, Stent, Middle Aged, medicine.disease, Surgery, Treatment Outcome, medicine.anatomical_structure, surgical procedures, operative, Abdomen, Female, Stents, Radiology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, business, Fenestration, Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal, Follow-Up Studies, Abdominal surgery
Abstract: Introduction. A proximal neck of 15 mm length is usually required to allow endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (EVAR). Many patients have been refused EVAR due to a short neck. By customising fenestrated grafts to the patients' anatomy, we can offer an endovascular solution, especially for patients who are unsuitable for open repair. Methods. Eighteen patients were selected for fenestrated stent-grafting if they presented with an abdominal aneurysm of at least 55 mm in diameter, a short neck (less than 15 mm), plus contra-indications for open repair (cardiopulmonary impairment or a hostile abdomen). The stent-graft used was a customised fenestrated model based on the Cook Zenith ® composite system. We used additional stents to ensure apposition of the fenestrations with the side branches. Results. All endovascular procedures were successful. Out of the 46 targeted side branches (10 superior mesenteric arteries, 36 renal arteries), 45 were patent at the end of the procedure. One accessory renal artery became occluded by the stent-graft. There was one possible proximal type I endoleak, which later proved to be a type II endoleak. There was no mortality, but complications occurred in six patients: two cardiac complications, three urinary complications and one occlusion of a renal artery. At follow-up (mean 9.4 months, range 1–18), there were no additional renal complications and all the remaining targeted vessels stayed patent. Discussion. By customizing fenestrated stent-grafts, it is possible to position the first covered stent completely inside the proximal neck, thus achieving a more stable position. The additional side-stents may also contribute to a better fixation. This technique may become a valuable alternative for patients who are at high risk from open surgery.
Published: 2004
Full Text: View/download PDF

17. Determinants of failure of brachiocephalic elbow fistulas for haemodialysis

Author: J.J.A.M. van den Dungen, C.J. Zeebregts, I. F. J. Tielliu, R.G. Hulsebos, E.L.G. Verhoeven, R.M. Huisman, C. de Bruin, Man, Biomaterials and Microbes (MBM), and Vascular Ageing Programme (VAP)
Subjects: Adult, Male, medicine.medical_specialty, RECOMMENDED STANDARDS, Multivariate analysis, Secondary patency, Elbow, Arteriovenous fistula, predictor, Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical, Renal Dialysis, Risk Factors, Diabetes mellitus, medicine, VASCULAR ACCESS, Humans, Vascular Patency, Prospective Studies, Renal Insufficiency, Treatment Failure, Prospective cohort study, brachiocephalic fistula, Brachiocephalic Trunk, Aged, Brachiocephalic Veins, Aged, 80 and over, Medicine(all), diabetes, Proportional hazards model, business.industry, ARTERIOVENOUS-FISTULA, gracz, Middle Aged, medicine.disease, Surgery, haemodialysis, medicine.anatomical_structure, SURVIVAL, Female, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, business, patency, Follow-Up Studies
Abstract: Objectives. The aim of this study was to analyse the results of brachiocephalic fistulas for haemodialysis and to determine possible predictors of failure.Patients and methods. Between April 1999 and September 2004, a consecutive series of 100 autologous brachiocephalic fistulas were created in 96 patients. There were 57 men and 39 women with a mean (SD) age of 59.2 (15.6) years. Data were prospectively gathered.Results. The mean (SD) follow-up was 20.1 (16.4) months. The primary, primary assisted, and secondary patency rates after 6 months were 73.4, 83.2 and 86.4%, respectively. After 1 year these figures were 54.7, 72.3 and 79.2%, and after 2 years 40.4, 59.2 and 67.5%, respectively. Predictors of failure with regard to primary patency, determined with Cox regression multivariate analysis, included diabetes mellitus (HR 2.81, p Conclusion. Primary patency of brachiocephalic fistulas is comparable to that of radiocephalic fistulas. Primary assisted and secondary patency rates can, however, be brought to a much higher level, especially in patients without diabetes and a large-diameter venous outflow tract.
Published: 2005

18. Endovascular treatment of acute abdominal aortic aneurysm with a bifurcated stentgraft

Author: B. Van der Heij, C.J. Zeebregts, J.J.A.M. van den Dungen, I. F. J. Tielliu, M. R. Kapma, T. R. Prins, E.L.G. Verhoeven, Man, Biomaterials and Microbes (MBM), and Vascular Ageing Programme (VAP)
Subjects: Male, medicine.medical_specialty, medicine.medical_treatment, OPEN REPAIR, Endovascular aneurysm repair, law.invention, Cohort Studies, abdominal aortic aneurysm, Primary outcome, law, MANAGEMENT, medicine, Humans, Local anesthesia, suitability, Endovascular treatment, Emergency Treatment, Procedure time, Aged, Medicine(all), Aged, 80 and over, business.industry, Middle Aged, medicine.disease, mortality, Intensive care unit, Abdominal aortic aneurysm, Surgery, Anesthesia, Acute Disease, rupture, endovascular, EXPERIENCE, Open repair, TRIAL, Female, Stents, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, business, LOCAL-ANESTHESIA, Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal
Abstract: Objectives. To analyse the results of emergency endovascular aneurysm repair (eEVAR) for acute abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA), in comparison to open repair, and to evaluate suitability and application rate.Patients and methods. All patients treated for an acute AAA between January 1998 and August 2004 were included. The primary outcome measure was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcome measures were procedure time, intra-operative blood loss, transfusion requirement, intensive care unit, and hospital length of stay. Suitability and application rate for eEVAR were assessed in a subgroup of patients, from January 2003.Results. A total of 253 patients were treated. eEVAR was performed in 40 patients, 5 (13%) died in-hospital. Open repair was performed in 213 patients, 64 (30%) died in-hospital. Secondary outcome measures were all significantly improved in the eEVAR subgroup. From January 2003, 56 patients were treated. Of the 44 (79%) patients who were evaluated for eEVAR, 16 (36%) patients were anatomically suitable. Eventually, 15 out of the 56 (27%) patients were treated by eEVAR.Conclusion. The results of eEVAR in a selected group of patients are promising, but suitability and application rate were low.
Published: 2005

19. Frequency and outcome of re-interventions after endovascular repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm: a prospective cohort study

Author: Claudio S. Cinà, I. F. J. Tielliu, T. R. Prins, E.L.G. Verhoeven, C.J. Zeebregts, J.J.A.M. van den Dungen, and M.G. van Andringa de Kempenaer
Subjects: Male, Reoperation, medicine.medical_specialty, Endoleak, Re-intervention, Aortic Rupture, Psychological intervention, Computed tomography, Quantum devices, Prosthesis Design, Disease-Free Survival, Postoperative Complications, medicine, Humans, Prospective Studies, Lost to follow-up, Prospective cohort study, Migration, Aged, Medicine(all), Rupture, Aged, 80 and over, Aortic aneurysm repair, medicine.diagnostic_test, business.industry, Ultrasound, Conversion, Middle Aged, medicine.disease, Abdominal aortic aneurysm, Surgery, Blood Vessel Prosthesis, Treatment Outcome, Female, Stents, Radiology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, business, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Vascular Surgical Procedures, Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal, Follow-Up Studies
Abstract: Purpose. To describe frequency, type, and outcome of re-intervention after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). Methods. Between September 1996 and December 2003, 308 patients were treated, with data collected prospectively. No patient was lost to follow up, but two were excluded (one primary conversion, and one post-operative death). Vanguard, Talent, Excluder, Zenith, and Quantum devices were used. Follow up required a CT scan before discharge. Initially, a CT scan was done at each follow up. Subsequently, we used duplex ultrasound and abdominal X-ray, with CT scan used selectively. Results. Mean follow-up was 36±22 months. Re-interventions were required in 47 (15%) patients, 31 (66%) elective and 16 (34%) emergency cases. In 32 patients, the primary re-intervention was successful; in 15 patients an additional 13 secondary and four tertiary re-interventions were required. A total of 72 adjunctive manoeuvres were performed: 49 endovascular (68%) and 23 open (32%). The success of endovascular re-interventions was 80%. The success of open re-interventions was 96%. Open conversions were required in nine patients (3%). There was no mortality. Conclusion. EVAR was associated with a low burden of re-interventions, with only 15% patients requiring re-intervention. Our long-term follow up, without regular CT, was simple and effective.
Published: 2004

20. Non-suture methods of vascular anastomosis

Author: J.J.A.M. van den Dungen, C.J. Zeebregts, R van Schilfgaarde, and RH Heijmen
Subjects: medicine.medical_specialty, ARGON-LASER, Anastomosis, NONPENETRATING CLIPS, Occlusion, Surgical Stapling, medicine, Vascular anastomosis, Vascular Patency, Humans, VEIN GRAFT ANASTOMOSES, CLIPS, Aneurysm formation, Fibrin glue, computer.programming_language, ASSISTED MICROVASCULAR ANASTOMOSIS, business.industry, Vascular disease, TO-SIDE ANASTOMOSIS, Anastomosis, Surgical, Suture Techniques, UNILINK SYSTEM, AORTIC CONNECTOR SYSTEM, Equipment Design, medicine.disease, Surgical Instruments, FIBRIN GLUE, Surgery, MILLIWATT CO2-LASER, CLINICAL-EXPERIENCE, Treatment Outcome, Stents, Tissue Adhesives, Laser Therapy, business, computer, Vascular Surgical Procedures
Abstract: Background The main aim of performing a vascular anastomosis is to achieve maximal patency rates. An important factor to achieve that goal is to minimize damage to the vessel walls. Sutures inevitably induce vascular wall damage, which influences the healing of the anastomosis. Over time, several alternatives to sutures have become available. Methods A Medline literature search was performed to locate English, German and French language articles pertinent to non-suture methods of vascular anastomosis. Manual cross-referencing was also performed and many historical articles were included. Results and conclusion The non-suture techniques can be categorized into five groups based on the materials used: rings, clips, adhesives, stents and laser welding. With all these techniques a faster and less traumatic anastomosis can be made compared with sutures. However, each device is associated with technique-related complications. As a consequence, suturing continues to be the standard approach. The disadvantages of the non-suture techniques include: rigidity and a non-compliant anastomosis with rings; toxicity, leakage and aneurysm formation with adhesives; early occlusion with stents; cost, reduced strength in larger-sized vessels and demand for surgical skills with laser welding. Further refinement is needed before widespread adoption of these techniques can occur. Clips, however, may be particularly promising but long-term evaluation is required.
Published: 2003

21. Local anesthesia for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Author: C.J. Zeebregts, Claudio S. Cinà, T. R. Prins, G.B. Eindhoven, J.J.A.M. van den Dungen, I. F. J. Tielliu, Mark M. Span, E.L.G. Verhoeven, M. R. Kapma, Faculteit Medische Wetenschappen/UMCG, Man, Biomaterials and Microbes (MBM), and Vascular Ageing Programme (VAP)
Subjects: Male, medicine.medical_specialty, FEASIBILITY, medicine.medical_treatment, Anesthesia, General, Endovascular aneurysm repair, Statistics, Nonparametric, law.invention, Aortic aneurysm, Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation, Postoperative Complications, law, Risk Factors, Operating time, Medicine, Humans, Local anesthesia, EVAR, Prospective Studies, Anesthetics, Local, Aged, Chi-Square Distribution, business.industry, Incidence, Length of Stay, medicine.disease, Intensive care unit, Abdominal aortic aneurysm, Surgery, Survival Rate, Treatment Outcome, Anesthesia, Cohort, Anesthetic, REPORTING STANDARDS, Female, TRIAL, Morbidity, business, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, medicine.drug, Anesthesia, Local, Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal
Abstract: Objectives: This study reports the results of a prospective continuous cohort of patients treated for endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) with a unified anesthetic strategy based on the use of local anesthesia (LA) in all patients, while reserving regional (RA) or general anesthesia (GA) only for those with predefined individually or surgically specific indications.Methods: All patients treated by EVAR for an elective aortic abdominal aneurysm (AAA) between April 1998 and December 2003 were included. The strategy of treatment generated three cohorts of patients (LA, RA, or GA). Primary outcome included all-cause mortality, nonfatal cardiac morbidity, respiratory complications, and renal failure. Secondary outcome measures included conversion to general anesthesia, use of analgesics, and time-related outcomes (operating time, length of stay in intensive care unit and hospital, time required to resume oral intake, and time to ambulation).Results: A total of 239 patients underwent EVAR: 170 LA, 31 RA, and 38 GA. Overall mortality was one patient (0.4%). LA was associated with a lower incidence of complications compared with GA (P Conclusions. A strategy based on the preferential use of LA for EVAR restricting RA or GA only to those with predefined contraindications is feasible and appears to be well tolerated.
Full Text: View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources

See catalog results

Searchworks

Select search scope, currently: Articles

Catalog

books, media & more in Jio Institute collections

Articles

journal articles & other e-resources

Refine your results

21 results on '"C.J. Zeebregts"'

1. Editor's Choice - Randomised Clinical Trial of Supervised Exercise Therapy vs. Endovascular Revascularisation for Intermittent Claudication Caused by Iliac Artery Obstruction

2. Type 2 Endoleak With or Without Intervention and Survival After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

3. Editor's Choice – Nationwide Analysis of Patients Undergoing Iliac Artery Aneurysm Repair in the Netherlands

4. Incidence and predictive factors for endograft limb patency of the fenestrated Anaconda endograft used for complex endovascular aneurysm repair

5. Toward Optimizing Risk Adjustment in the Dutch Surgical Aneurysm Audit

6. Nationwide Study to Predict Colonic Ischemia after Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in The Netherlands

7. National Numbers of Secondary Aortic Reinterventions after Primary Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Surgery from the Dutch Surgical Aneurysm Audit

8. A Composite Measure for Quality of Care in Patients with Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis Using Textbook Outcome

9. Outcomes after treatment of complex aortic abdominal aneurysms with the fenestrated Anaconda endograft

10. Early results with the custom-made Fenestrated Anaconda aortic cuff in the treatment of complex abdominal aortic aneurysm

11. Nationwide study of the treatment of mycotic abdominal aortic aneurysms comparing open and endovascular repair in The Netherlands

12. Patients with a Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Are Better Informed in Hospitals with an 'EVAR-preferred' Strategy: An Instrumental Variable Analysis of the Dutch Surgical Aneurysm Audit

13. Failure to Rescue - a Closer Look at Mortality Rates Has No Added Value for Hospital Comparisons but Is Useful for Team Quality Assessment in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Surgery in The Netherlands

14. The Dutch Audit of Carotid Interventions: Transparency in Quality of Carotid Endarterectomy in Symptomatic Patients in the Netherlands

15. Experience with the GORE EXCLUDER iliac branch endoprosthesis for common iliac artery aneurysms

16. Treatment of Short-necked Infrarenal Aortic Aneurysms with Fenestrated Stent-grafts: Short-term Results

17. Determinants of failure of brachiocephalic elbow fistulas for haemodialysis

18. Endovascular treatment of acute abdominal aortic aneurysm with a bifurcated stentgraft

19. Frequency and outcome of re-interventions after endovascular repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm: a prospective cohort study

20. Non-suture methods of vascular anastomosis

21. Local anesthesia for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Catalog

Searchworks

Select search scope, currently: Articles Catalog books, media & more in Jio Institute collections Articles journal articles & other e-resources

Search

Search Constraints

Refine your results

Search Limiters

Topic

Publication Year Range

Language

Journal

Database

Publisher

21 results on '"C.J. Zeebregts"'

Search Results

Catalog

Select search scope, currently: Articles

Catalog

books, media & more in Jio Institute collections

Articles

journal articles & other e-resources