1. Chloroquine nasal drops in asymptomatic & mild COVID-19: An exploratory randomized clinical trial
- Author
-
Smriti Panda, Anupam Kanodia, Sushma Bhatnagar, Lalit Dar, Subir Kumar Maulik, Shivram Dhakad, Megha Brijwal, Avinash Choudekar, Anant Mohan, Pirabu Sakthivel, and Alok Thakar
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Randomization ,030106 microbiology ,SARS CoV-2 ,National Early Warning Score ,Asymptomatic ,Antiviral Agents ,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology ,law.invention ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Randomized controlled trial ,law ,Internal medicine ,Medicine ,Humans ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Adverse effect ,Administration, Intranasal ,business.industry ,SARS-CoV-2 ,Standard treatment ,COVID-19 ,Chloroquine ,General Medicine ,Early warning score ,COVID-19 Drug Treatment ,Treatment Outcome ,nasal drops ,chloroquine - covid-19 - nasal drops - national early warning score - prophylaxis - sars cov-2 ,Nasal administration ,Original Article ,prophylaxis ,medicine.symptom ,business ,Viral load ,Hydroxychloroquine - Abstract
Background & objectives: Chloroquine (CQN) administered as nasal drops has the potential to achieve much greater local tissue levels than with oral/systemic administration. This trial was undertaken to study the efficacy and safety profile of topical nasal administration of CQN drops in reducing viral load and preventing clinical progression in early COVID-19 infection. Methods: This randomized clinical trial was done with a sample size of 60. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) confirmed asymptomatic patients or those with mild COVID-19 illness [National Early Warning Score (NEWS) ≤4] were included. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 manner. Control arm (standard supportive treatment, n=30) was compared with intervention arm (n=30) of standard treatment plus CQN eye drops (0.03%) repurposed as nasal drops administered six times daily (0.5 ml/dose) for 10 days. Outcome measures were adverse events and adherence; clinical progression and outcomes were measured by NEWS; sequential RT-PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values were also noted on days 0, 3, 7 and 10. Results: Nasal CQN was associated with local irritation in seven and non-compliance in one of 30 patients. Eleven patients were excluded due to enrolment error (2 – recovered; 9 – false-positive referral), and 49 patients were analyzed as per modified intention-to-treat analysis. Clinical recovery was noted as similar with 100 per cent asymptomatic by day seven in both arms. Virological outcomes also indicated similarly improving Ct values in both arms, and similar proportion of patients transitioning to non-infectivity by day 10 (controls - 19/25; nasal CQN - 15/24). Nine false-positive patients with enrolment error and day 0 RT-PCR negative were initially uninfected but had continuing COVID-19 exposure and treatment as per randomization. Patients receiving nasal CQN (n=5) demonstrated stable Ct values from day 0 to 10, while patients with no nasal CQN (n=4) demonstrated significant dip in Ct value indicating to infection (Ct
- Published
- 2021