1. Tracking neural correlates of successful learning over repeated sequence observations
- Author
-
Clara Moisello, M. Felice Ghilardi, Natalie A. Steinemann, and Simon P. Kelly
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Visual perception ,Cognitive Neuroscience ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Repetition priming ,Sensitivity and Specificity ,Article ,050105 experimental psychology ,Memorization ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Event-related potential ,Perception ,Repetition Priming ,Task Performance and Analysis ,Humans ,Learning ,0501 psychology and cognitive sciences ,Spatial Memory ,media_common ,Brain Mapping ,Neural correlates of consciousness ,Recall ,business.industry ,05 social sciences ,Reproducibility of Results ,Event-Related Potentials, P300 ,Neurology ,Mental Recall ,Visual Perception ,Female ,Artificial intelligence ,Sequence learning ,Psychology ,business ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,Cognitive psychology - Abstract
The neural correlates of memory formation in humans have long been investigated by exposing subjects to diverse material and comparing responses to items later remembered to those forgotten. Tasks requiring memorization of sensory sequences afford unique possibilities for linking neural memorization processes to behavior, because, rather than comparing across different items of varying content, each individual item can be examined across the successive learning states of being initially unknown, newly learned, and eventually, fully known. Sequence learning paradigms have not yet been exploited in this way, however. Here, we analyze the event-related potentials of subjects attempting to memorize sequences of visual locations over several blocks of repeated observation, with respect to pre- and post-block recall tests. Over centro-parietal regions, we observed a rapid P300 component superimposed on a broader positivity, which exhibited distinct modulations across learning states that were replicated in two separate experiments. Consistent with its well-known encoding of surprise, the P300 deflection monotonically decreased over blocks as locations became better learned and hence more expected. In contrast, the broader positivity was especially elevated at the point when a given item was newly learned, i.e., started being successfully recalled. These results implicate the Broad Positivity in endogenously-driven, intentional memory formation, whereas the P300, in processing the current stimulus to the degree that it was previously uncertain, indexes the cumulative knowledge thereby gained. The decreasing surprise/P300 effect significantly predicted learning success both across blocks and across subjects. This presents a new, neural-based means to evaluate learning capabilities independent of verbal reports, which could have considerable value in distinguishing genuine learning disabilities from difficulties to communicate the outcomes of learning, or perceptual impairments, in a range of clinical brain disorders.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF