Search

Reperfusion lung injury is a postoperative complication of pulmonary thromboendarterectomy that can significantly affect morbidity and mortality. Studies in other postoperative patient populations have demonstrated a reduction in acute lung injury with the use of a low-tidal volume (Vt) ventilation strategy. Whether this approach benefits patients undergoing thromboendarterectomy is unknown.We sought to determine if low-Vt ventilation reduces reperfusion lung injury in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension undergoing thromboendarterectomy.Patients undergoing thromboendarterectomy at one center were randomized to receive either low (6 ml/kg predicted body weight) or usual care Vts (10 ml/kg) from the initiation of mechanical ventilation in the operating room through Postoperative Day 3. The primary endpoint was the onset of reperfusion lung injury. Secondary outcomes included severity of hypoxemia, days on mechanical ventilation, and intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay.A total of 128 patients were enrolled and included in the analysis; 63 were randomized to the low-Vt group and 65 were randomized to the usual care group. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of reperfusion lung injury between groups (32%, n=20 in the low-Vt group vs. 23%, n=15 in the usual care group; P=0.367). Although differences were noted in plateau pressures (17.9 cm H2O vs. 20.1 cm H2O, P0.001) and peak inspiratory pressures (20.4 cm H2O vs. 23.0 cm H2O, P0.001) between the low-Vt and usual care groups, respectively, mean airway pressures, PaO2/FiO2, days on mechanical ventilation, and ICU and hospital lengths of stay were all similar between groups.In patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension undergoing pulmonary thromboendarterectomy, intra- and postoperative ventilation using low Vts (6 mg/kg) compared with usual care Vts (10 mg/kg) does not reduce the incidence of reperfusion lung injury or improve clinical outcomes. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00747045).

Post–intensive care syndrome, a condition defined by new or worsening impairment in cognition, mental health, and physical function after critical illness, has emerged in the past decade as a common and life-altering consequence of critical illness. New strategies are urgently needed to mitigate the risk of neuropsychological and functional impairment common after critical illness and to prepare and support survivors on their road toward recovery. The present state of critical care survivorship is described, and postdischarge care delivery in the United States and the potential impact of the present-day fragmented model of care delivery are detailed. A novel strategy that uses peer support groups could more effectively meet the needs of survivors of critical illness and mitigate post–intensive care syndrome.

No major trial evaluating prone positioning for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has incorporated a high-positive end-expiratory pressure (high-PEEP) strategy despite complementary physiological rationales. We evaluated generalizability of three recent proning trials to patients receiving a high-PEEP strategy. All trials employed a relatively low-PEEP strategy. After protocol ventilator settings were initiated and the patient was positioned per treatment assignment, post-intervention PEEP was not more than 5 cm H2O in 16.7 % and not more than 10 cm H2O in 66.0 % of patients. Post-intervention PEEP would have been nearly twice the set PEEP had a high-PEEP strategy been employed. Use of either proning or high-PEEP likely improves survival in moderate-severe ARDS; the role for both concomitantly remains unknown.