Search

We report the case of a 69-year-old male patient, observed for vesiculobullous lesions involving the oral mucosa ([figure 1][1]), trunk and extremities. There were also more evolved lesions with crusted surface and erythematous cicatricial plaques covered by milia cysts. ![Figure 1][2]

Background Nutritional management of children with epidermolysis bullosa (EB) presents multiple challenges including reduced oral intake compounded by mucosal fragility. Gastrostomy tube feeding is effective in improving nutritional status however there is limited data on the safety and tolerance of this technique in EB children. We aim to review the effectiveness and morbidity of our minimally invasive two-port laparoscopic-assisted gastrostomy (LAG) approach using Seldinger techniques with serial dilatations in children with EB. Methods A retrospective, observational cohort study was conducted on all consecutive EB patients who underwent LAG tube insertion between 2009-2019. Patient demographics, admission details and 12-month clinical outcomes were reported. Results 32 EB patients underwent LAG placement. Median age at insertion was 7.3 (IQR ± 6.3) years, with 8 (25.0%) and 3 (9.4%) of patients also undergoing oesophageal dilatation and fundoplication, respectively. Minor complications arose in 58.1% of patients including: peri-stomal overgranulation (25.8%), gastrostomy infection (22.6%), pain (22.6%), mild gastrostomy leakage (16.1%), blockage (9.7%) and device failure (3.2%). 2 patients (6.5%) developed major complications with extensive gastrostomy site leakage. Improvements in growth were reflected in mean height Z-scores (-1.99 to -1.71). Mean weight Z-scores improved in patients aged 0-10 years (-2.30 to -1.61) and mean BMI Z-scores increased in patients over 10 years (-2.71 to -1.46). No cases of gastrostomy-related mortality were reported. Conclusion LAG is well-tolerated in EB patients with improvements in growth and minimal morbidity 12-months post-gastrostomy insertion. An extended follow-up period is required to ascertain the long-term implications of gastrostomy feeding.

Background Transition from pediatric to adult care is a critical component of health care for children with long-term needs. The characteristics of epidermolysis bullosa (EB) demand higher than average levels of provider support. There is consensus among health care professionals regarding the importance of transition; however, there is a scarcity of practical information regarding models for patients with EB. Objective To review transition of care programs in varying specialties. Highlight practical considerations to facilitate the development of programs for patients with EB and other complex dermatologic conditions. Methods Articles were identified via MEDLINE and EMBASE health literature databases and screened for relevance to transition of care. Results Various models for transition exist. A well-executed formal transition program, early introduction, interdisciplinary collaboration, and psychosocial support were themes associated with successful outcomes. Limitations Transition of care programs that have not been described in the literature are not reflected in this review. Conclusions Patients with EB have unique needs that affect transition and span expertise across traditional boundaries, such as dependency on others for daily skin care, failure to thrive, and risk of squamous cell carcinoma. Given the rarity of the disease, patients with EB will benefit from collaborative efforts to develop programs to optimize successful transition.

This work reports 30 cases of folliculitis decalvans (FD) in patients with dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (DEB) among a cohort of 125 DEB patients seen between 2010 and 2021 in 2 French expert centers for the management of inherited epidermolysis bullosa. Such an association between two rare diseases cannot be fortuitous and implies a physiopathological link that we discuss in this paper. This association is a new significant fact to add to the reflexion on FD causes, suggesting that skin abnormality of DEB could act as a factor of a specific skin barrier alteration which could favor FD. Scarring alopecia with tufted folliculitis and pustules on inflamed skin at the vertex of a woman with dominant dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa.

Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a group of rare congenital genetic conditions that result in painful blistering of the skin and mucous membranes, which occur with minor trauma or friction. There are many types and subtypes of EB that need to be distinguished, as the management and prognosis of each can vary significantly. We aim to perform an up-to-date literature review on congenital EB for healthcare providers in pediatrics. We performed a review of existing literature in the English language on EB via PubMed Clinical Queries, using key words such as “epidermolysis bullosa”, “congenital” and “children”. We reviewed EB based on the following subheadings: epidemiology, diagnosis, therapy, prognosis, and clinical prediction guidelines. EB is due to mutation in a number of genes, some types are autosomal dominant while others are autosomal recessive. The underlying mechanism is a defect in attachment between or within the epidermis and dermis of the skin. There are four main types: epidermolysis bullosa simplex, dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa, junctional epidermolysis bullosa, and Kindler syndrome. The diagnosis is suspected based on symptoms and confirmed by skin biopsy and definitive genetic testing. The severity of EB can range from mild to fatal. Severe complications may arise in some EB types and subtypes within the eye, ear, nose, upper airway, gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts. There is no cure for the condition to date. Optimal management must be multidisciplinary, and involves wound care, pain control, controlling infections, nutritional support, and prevention and treatment of complications. EB presents in different forms. Treatment is supportive. The prognosis of milder forms is good. Children severely affected with EB and their families live a misery life with impaired quality of life. Health care workers must be aware of the suffering in these families and proactively support them.

Paediatric patients with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB) are at risk of vitamin D deficiency, owing to lack of sunlight from reduced mobility and having large areas of skin being covered with dressings, and to impaired nutritional intake and status.To establish an appropriate level of vitamin D supplementation in paediatric patients with RDEB.Patients with RDEB attending the EB tertiary multidisciplinary team clinic were enrolled. Serum levels of total 25(OH)D were retrospectively recorded for the study period 2012-2018. Data from clinical records on supplements, bone mineral density (BMD) Z scores, compliance, and use of enteral feeds and/or formula were also recorded.In total, 24 patients met the inclusion criteria: 20 with severe RDEB, 3 with RDEB inversa and 1 with intermediate RDEB. Of the 24 patients, 21 (88%) were advised to take a vitamin D3 supplement in line with Department of Health Guidelines (UK), with the remaining 3 patients receiving sufficient intake from formula or enteral feeds. Thirteen of the 24 (54%) had vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency despite advice to supplement; 9 of these 13 (69%) subsequently started or increased the dosage of vitamin D supplements and levels became sufficient (50 nmol/L), while the remaining 4 patients (31%) continued to have persistent insufficient levels due to noncompliance with supplements. Reasons for noncompliance were palatability, cost and forgetting to take the tablets. The dose required to maintain sufficient serum levels increased with age, up to 300% of the reference nutrient intake (RNI).All patients with RDEB require a supplement or a formula or enteral/sip feed containing vitamin D to maintain sufficient serum vitamin D. The dose required increases with age and can be up to three times higher than the RNI for the normal population. Compliance may improve using a once-weekly loading dose of vitamin D3. Vitamin D deficiency was not solely causative of a low BMD Z score.

BACKGROUND Accurate diagnosis of epidermolysis bullosa (EB) has significant implications for prognosis, management, and genetic counseling. OBJECTIVE To describe diagnostic testing patterns and assess diagnostic concordance of transmission electron microscopy (TEM), immunofluorescence mapping (IFM), and genetic analysis for EB. METHODS A retrospective cohort included patients enrolled in the Epidermolysis Bullosa Clinical Characterization and Outcomes Database from January 1, 2004, to July 8, 2019. Tests concluding the same EB type (EB simplex, junctional EB, dominant dystrophic EB, and recessive dystrophic EB) were considered concordant; those concluding different EB types were considered discordant; and those with nonspecific/nondefinitive results were equivocal. RESULTS A total of 970 diagnostic tests were conducted from 1984 to 2018 in 771 patients. Genetic analyses were performed chronologically later than IFM or TEM (P

Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) encompasses a heterogeneous group of inherited skin fragility disorders, with mutations in genes encoding the basement membrane zone (BMZ) proteins that normally ensure dermal-epidermal integrity. Of the four main EB types, recessive dystrophic EB (RDEB), especially the severe variant, represents one of the most debilitating clinical entities, with recurrent mucocutaneous blistering and ulceration leading to chronic wounds, infections, inflammation, scarring and ultimately cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, which leads to premature death. Improved understanding of the molecular genetics of EB over the past three decades and advances in biotechnology have led to rapid progress in developing gene and cell-based regenerative therapies for EB. In particular, RDEB is at the vanguard of advances in human clinical trials of advanced therapeutics. Furthermore, the past decade has witnessed the emergence of a real collective, global effort involving academia and industry, supported by international EB patient organizations such as the Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa Research Association (DEBRA), among others, to develop clinically relevant and marketable targeted therapeutics for EB. Thus, there is an increasing need for the practising dermatologist to become familiar with the concept of gene therapy, fundamental differences between various approaches, and their human applications. This review explains the principles of different approaches of gene therapy, summarizes its journey, and discusses its current and future impact in RDEB.

Revertant mosaicism (RM) is a phenomenon in which inherited mutations are spontaneously corrected in somatic cells. RM occurs in some congenital skin diseases, but genetic validation of RM in clinically revertant skin has been challenging, especially when homologous recombination (HR) is responsible for RM. Here, we introduce nanopore Cas9-targeted sequencing (nCATS) for identifying HR in clinically revertant skin. We took advantage of compound heterozygous COL7A1 mutations in a patient with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa who showed revertant skin spots. Cas9-mediated enrichment of genomic DNA (gDNA) covering the two mutation sites (>8 kb) in COL7A1 and subsequent MinION sequencing successfully detected intragenic crossover in the epidermis of the clinically revertant skin. This method enables the discernment of haplotypes of up to a few tens of kilobases of gDNA. Moreover, it is devoid of polymerase chain reaction amplification, which can technically induce recombination. We, therefore, propose that nCATS is a powerful tool for understanding complicated gene modifications, including RM.

Summary Background The rare inversa subtype of recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB-I) is characterized by predominant intertriginous skin blistering and marked mucosal involvement. Specific recessive missense mutations in the collagen VII triple helix are implicated in the disease. To date, otological complications have been reported infrequently in this patient group. Methods We conducted an observational, retrospective, double institution case record review of patients with RDEB-I who presented with otological complications between January 2000 and June 2020. Diagnosis was established on the basis of clinical features, family history and mutation analysis of the COL7A1 gene. Results In total, 11 (44%) of 25 patients with RDEB-I in our database (2 paediatric, 9 adult; mean age 40.9 years, range 8–72 years) experienced otological complications. Of these 11 patients, 10 (90.9%) had recurrent otitis externa, 7 (63.6%) had meatal stenosis and 7 (63.6%) had recurrent blistering of the external auditory canals. All 11 patients reported hearing difficulties, with conductive hearing loss confirmed by audiology testing in 6 (54.5%) of these. Of the 11 patients, 3 (27.3%) went on to have implantable hearing aids [2 bone-anchored hearing aids (BAHA) and 1 middle ear implant (MEI)] fitted with favourable outcome, while a fourth paediatric patient presented with a cholesteatoma that was surgically managed. Discussion We observed a higher prevalence of otological morbidity in RDEB-I than previously reported, and present the first case of cholesteatoma in epidermolysis bullosa (EB). Our data indicate that BAHA and MEI are safe and effective treatment options for hearing loss in EB. Clinicians should be vigilant in screening for ear symptoms in RDEB-I and consider early referral to an Ear, Nose and Throat specialist.

Patients with epidermolysis bullosa (EB) are susceptible to development of squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) at sites of chronic inflammation and fibrosis. While triterpenoids such as RTA 408 (Omaveloxolone) have been shown to reduce inflammation and inhibit tumour growth in various cancer models, the utility of this class of drugs in the treatment of SCC has not been investigated. Given the dual anti-inflammatory and anti-neoplastic properties of triterpenoids, we hypothesized RTA 408 would be an effective treatment for SCCs that arise in the chronic inflammatory setting in EB. We tested the effects of topical RTA 408 on a mouse model of non-Herlitz, junctional EB. RTA 408 significantly reduced phenotypic severity in the affected ears of Lamc2jeb mice. In cultures, RTA 408 reduced cell viability in EB-associated SCC cell lines and normal human epidermal keratinocytes. When administered in vivo, RTA 408 inhibited SCC tumour growth in mice without cutaneous or systemic toxicity. These results suggest that RTA 408 can be a promising new therapy to reduce inflammation and inhibit SCC growth in patients with EB.

Hereditary epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a rare genodermatosis characterized by skin fragility and blistering of the skin and mucous membranes in reaction to minimal traumas. The development of cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas (cSCCs) is one of the most common medical complications in junctional and dystrophic forms of the disease. Complete surgical excision of cutaneous tumors represents the gold standard of treatment. However, not only recognition of cSCCs can be challenging in the affected skin but also wound closure after surgical excision poses a great therapeutic challenge in EB patients. The aim of our study was to analyze the postoperative outcomes of such patients in order to have a better knowledge of the main critical issues in their surgical management and oncological follow-up.We retrospectively identified a cohort of five EB patients treated at Modena University Hospital. Collected data included patient age and sex, date of cSCC diagnosis, relapses/recurrences, site of the neoplasm, number of surgical interventions, use of dermal substitutes, and postoperative infections.A total of 26 cSCCs were detected in our cohort. Forty-one surgical interventions were necessary to achieve excision of cSCCs with clear margins, varying from 1 to 4 surgical sessions per cSCC. Dermal substitutes were used in most cases but carried a higher infectious risk.EB patients tend to develop numerous cSCCs that often relapse even after complete excision with clear margins. These results stress the importance of early cSCC diagnosis and strict postsurgical follow-up.

Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a group of clinically and genetically heterogeneous diseases characterized by trauma-induced mucocutaneous fragility and blister formation. Here, we investigated five Chinese families with EB, and eight variants including a novel nonsense variant (c.47GA, p.W16*) in LAMA3, a known recurrent variant (c.74CT, p.P25L) in KRT5, 2 novel (c.2531TA, p.V844E; c.6811_6814del, p.R2271fs) and 4 known (c.6187CT, p.R2063W; c.7097GA, p.G2366D; c.8569GT, p.E2857*; c.3625_3635del, p.S1209fs) variants in COL7A1 were detected. Notably, this study identified a nonsense variant in LAMA3 that causes EB within the Chinese population and revealed that this variant resulted in a reduction in LAMA3 mRNA and protein expression levels by nonsense-mediated mRNA decay. Our study expands the mutation spectra of Chinese patients with EB.

The genodermatosis epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a monogenetic disease, characterized by severe blister formation on the skin and mucous membranes upon minimal mechanical trauma. Causes for the disease are mutations in genes encoding proteins that are essential for skin integrity. In EB, one of these proteins is either functionally impaired or completely absent. Therefore, the development and improvement of DNA and RNA-based therapeutic approaches for this severe blistering skin disease is mandatory to achieve a treatment option for the patients.Currently, there are several forms of DNA/RNA therapies potentially feasible for EB. Whereas some of them are still at the preclinical stage, others are clinically advanced and have already been applied to patients. In particular, this is the case for a cDNA replacement approach successfully applied for a small number of patients with junctional EB.The heterogeneity of EB justifies the development of therapeutic options with distinct modes of action at a DNA or RNA level. In addition, splicing-modulating therapies, based on RNA

Although dermatologists are well-trained in the medical management of complex skin disease, psychosocial care often exceeds a dermatologist's skillset. We aim to elucidate major factors to consider in the comprehensive management of pediatric epidermolysis bullosa (EB) and provide care recommendations. There are many types of trauma a child with EB may experience, from social to psychological to medical. We include information on trauma-informed care and advice for the dermatologist and multidisciplinary team regarding patient-centered and family-centered approaches to recognizing and reducing anxiety and trauma in EB patients.

Mutational analysis and immunofluorescence antigen mapping (IFM) are recommended as the laboratory tools of choice for diagnosing EB. In the past, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was considered the gold standard, and more recently, clinical diagnostic matrix (CDM) has shown good concordance with next-generation sequencing (NGS).In this prospective diagnostic study, a skin biopsy was taken for TEM and IFM in consecutive patients with EB (aged6 months) diagnosed clinically with CDM. Wherever possible, mutational analysis was done using targeted NGS.Of the 80 patients diagnosed with CDM, skin biopsy specimens of 42 patients were assessed using TEM, and of 59 patients using IFM. NGS was done in 39 patients. Taking NGS as the gold standard for diagnosing EB (n = 39 patients), the concordance with CDM, TEM, and IFM were estimated at 84.6% (33/39), 78.5% (11/14), and 76% (19/25) respectively. CDM showed a substantial agreement with NGS (k = 0.69, p 0.001).In comparison to NGS, the highest concordance was seen with CDM followed by TEM and IFM in diagnosing major subtypes of EB.

Drug repurposing has the potential to discover new treatments for diseases with high unmet medical needs. Lee et al. (2021) combined transcriptomics and computational analysis of drug-target databases to identify novel therapies for epidermolysis bullosa simplex. Differential gene expression analysis of blister epidermis identified the phosphoinositide 3-kinase/protein kinase B/mTOR signaling pathway as central. A pilot study using a topical mTOR inhibitor showed marked improvement.

To establish the epidemiological, clinical, pathological and genetic characteristics of epidermolysis bullosa (EB) in New Zealand (NZ).Participants were recruited through the Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa Research Association of New Zealand (DEBRA NZ). Dedicated EB nurse medical records, Genetic Health Service NZ (GHSNZ) records and, where available, public hospital records were manually reviewed for relevant clinical data.Ninety-two participants took part in the study (56% participation rate). Forty-nine (53%) participants had EB simplex (EBS), 40 (43%) had dystrophic EB (DEB), and 3 (3%) had junctional EB (JEB). Point prevalence for EB of all types was 19.5 per million, and 10.4, 8.6 and 0.9 per million for EBS, DEB and JEB, respectively. Thirty-four participants had intermediate or severe EB. There were 29 paediatric cases and almost even numbers of males and females. Compared to NZ European and Māori, prevalence rates were lower for Pacific and Asian people and higher in the Middle Eastern/Latin American/African population. Eight out of 14 skin biopsy results were informative, and 14 of 15 genetic test results were informative.New Zealand has similar prevalence rates of EB compared with other national cohorts. This is likely to be an underestimate due to methodological limitations. Recent advancements in genomic testing have resulted in an improved diagnostic rate in our population. Further research into ethnic differences in prevalence, and exploring the characteristics of lethal forms of EB, is warranted. A dynamic registry may be helpful for the EB community in NZ.

Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a group of inherited skin and mucosal fragility disorders resulting from mutations in genes encoding basement membrane zone (BMZ) components or proteins that maintain the integrity of BMZ and adjacent keratinocytes. More than 30 years have passed since the first causative gene for EB was identified, and over 40 genes are now known to be responsible for the protean collection of mechanobullous diseases included under the umbrella term of EB. Through the elucidation of disease mechanisms using human skin samples, animal models, and cultured cells, we have now reached the stage of developing more effective therapeutics for EB. This review will initially focus on what is known about blister wound healing in EB, since recent and emerging basic science data are very relevant to clinical translation and therapeutic strategies for patients. We then place these studies in the context of the latest information on gene therapy, read-through therapy, and cell therapy that provide optimism for improved clinical management of people living with EB.

Background/Purpose Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a rare disease of skin and mucosa which may causes surgical complications. We review these in a large patient cohort from Saudi Arabia. Methods A retrospective study was conducted at 21 centers between 2003 and 2020. Demographic data and information on EB type [Simplex (EBA), Dystrophic (DEB) and Junctional (JEB)]. The dataset included clinical features, operations, surgical complications, and treatment. Results There were 152 (63 male) children with EB [EBS n = 93 (61.2%); DEB n = 30 (19.7%); JEB n = 25 (16.4%), and Kindler syndrome n = 4, (2.6%)]. Children with JEB and DEB tended to have a higher frequency of skin and musculoskeletal system complications (skin cancer, pseudosyndactyly and recurrent skin infection). Esophageal strictures were mostly seen in DEB (n = 19, 63%) and to a lesser extent in EBS (n = 20, 21%) and JEB (n = 4, 16%). Pyloric atresia was uncommon (n = 4) and limited to those with JEB. Percutaneous gastrostomy for feeding support was used in all types. Ankyloglossia was common but often recurred (76%) after division. Circumcision was usually safe and complication-free in male children except in those with severe JEB. Phimosis was reported in 10% of uncircumcised patients. Conclusions Our series showed that surgeons play a key role in the management of some complications associated with EB. It is also important to be aware of the particular sub-type as this can predict the natural history and likely response to treatment. Level of Evidence 2

Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting is a rapidly developing technology that has the potential to initiate a paradigm shift in the treatment of skin wounds arising from burns, ulcers and genodermatoses. Recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB), a severe form of epidermolysis bullosa, is a rare genodermatosis that results in mechanically induced blistering of epithelial tissues that leads to chronic wounds. Currently, there is no cure for RDEB, and effective treatment is limited to protection from trauma and extensive bandaging. The care of chronic wounds and burns significantly burdens the healthcare system, further illustrating the dire need for more beneficial wound care. However, in its infancy, 3D bioprinting offers therapeutic potential for wound healing and could be a breakthrough technology for the treatment of rare, incurable genodermatoses like RDEB. This viewpoint essay outlines the promise of 3D bioprinting applications for treating RDEB, including skin regeneration, a delivery system for gene-edited cells and small molecules, and disease modelling. Although the future of 3D bioprinting is encouraging, there are many technical challenges to overcome-including optimizing bioink and cell source-before this approach can be widely implemented in clinical practice.

Chronic wounds present a major disease burden in people with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB), an inherited blistering skin disorder caused by mutations in COL7A1 encoding type VII collagen, the major component of anchoring fibrils at the dermal-epidermal junction. Treatment of RDEB wounds is mostly symptomatic, and there is considerable unmet need in trying to improve and accelerate wound healing. In this study, we defined transcriptomic profiles and gene pathways in RDEB wounds and compared these to intact skin in RDEB and healthy control subjects. We then used a reverse transcriptomics approach to discover drugs or compounds, which might restore RDEB wound profiles towards intact skin. Differential expression analysis identified >2000 differences between RDEB wounds and intact skin, with RDEB wounds displaying aberrant cytokine-cytokine interactions, Toll-like receptor signalling, and JAK-STAT signalling pathways. In-silico prediction for compounds that reverse gene expression signatures highlighted methotrexate as a leading candidate. Overall, this study provides insight into the molecular profiles of RDEB wounds and underscores the possible clinical value of reverse transcriptomics data analysis in RDEB, and the potential of this approach in discovering or repurposing drugs for other diseases.

Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) are multi-potent stromal-derived cells capable of self-renewal that possess several advantageous properties for wound healing, making them of interest to the field of dermatology. Research has focused on characterizing the unique properties of MSCs, which broadly revolve around their regenerative and more recently discovered immunomodulatory capacities. Because of ease of harvesting and expansion, differentiation potential and low immunogenicity, MSCs have been leading candidates for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine applications for wound healing, yet results from clinical studies have been variable, and promising pre-clinical work has been difficult to reproduce. Therefore, the specific mechanisms of how MSCs influence the local microenvironment in distinct wound etiologies warrant further research. Of specific interest in MSC-mediated healing is harnessing the secretome, which is composed of components known to positively influence wound healing. Molecules released by the MSC secretome can promote re-epithelialization and angiogenesis while inhibiting fibrosis and microbial invasion. This review focuses on the therapeutic interest in MSCs with regard to wound healing applications, including burns and diabetic ulcers, with specific attention to the genetic skin disease recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa. This review also compares various delivery methods to support skin regeneration in the hopes of combating the poor engraftment of MSCs after delivery, which is one of the major pitfalls in clinical studies utilizing MSCs.

Background Wound management is a critical factor when treating patients with the inherited skin fragility disease dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (DEB). Due to genetic defects in structural proteins, skin and mucous epithelia are prone to blistering and chronic wounding upon minor trauma. Furthermore, these wounds are commonly associated with excessive pruritus and predispose to the development of life-threatening squamous cell carcinomas, underscoring the unmet need for new therapeutic options to improve wound healing in this patient cohort. Vitamin D3 is acknowledged to play an important role in wound healing by modulating different cellular processes that impact epidermal homeostasis and immune responses. In this study, we evaluate the safety and efficacy of low-dose calcipotriol, a vitamin D3 analogue, in promoting wound healing and reducing itch and pain in patients with DEB. Methods Eligible DEB patients, aged ≥ 6 years and with a known mutation in the COL7A1 gene, were recruited to a placebo-controlled, randomized, double blind, cross-over phase II monocentric clinical trial. Patients were required to have at least two wounds with a minimum size of 6 cm2 per wound. The primary objective was to evaluate efficacy of daily topical application of a 0.05 µg/g calcipotriol ointment in reducing wound size within a 4-week treatment regimen. Secondary objectives were to assess safety, as well as the impact of treatment on pruritus, pain, and bacterial wound colonization in these patients. Results Six patients completed the clinical trial and were included into the final analysis. Topical low-dose calcipotriol treatment led to a significant reduction in wound area at day 14 compared to placebo (88.4% vs. 65.5%, P P 0.05) and 1.83 vs 5.52 (P 0.0001) at days 14 and 28, respectively. Treatment with low-dose calcipotriol did not affect serum calcium levels and improved the species richness of the wound microbiome, albeit with no statistical significance. Conclusions Our results show that topical treatment with low-dose calcipotriol can accelerate wound closure and significantly reduces itch, and can be considered a safe and readily-available option to improve local wound care in DEB patients. TrialRegistration EudraCT: 2016–001,967-35. Registered 28 June 2016, https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2016-001967-35/AT

Background A spectrum of skin disease severity exists in patients with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB). Objective To characterize the patient-reported outcomes and quality of life (QOL) in patients with RDEB. Methods A cross-sectional study of patients with RDEB surveyed through the global EBCare Registry. Patient-reported outcomes included skin disease severity, wound characteristics, pain, itch, extracutaneous symptoms, and medications. QOL was measured by using the validated Quality of Life in Epidermolysis Bullosa instrument. Results A total of 85 patients with RDEB reported 1226 wounds (937 recurrent wounds and 289 chronic open wounds). Overall skin disease severity was self-reported as mild (26%; 22/83), moderate (48%; 40/83), or severe (25%; 21/83). Worsening skin disease severity was significantly associated with larger wounds, increased opiate use, anemia, gastrostomy tube use, infections, osteoporosis, and squamous cell carcinoma. Larger wound size was associated with worse quality of life scores. Limitations All data were self-reported from an online epidermolysis bullosa patient registry. Conclusions This study shows a significant correlation between larger wound size with worsening skin disease severity and quality of life in participants with RDEB. Worsening skin disease severity significantly correlated with key clinical manifestations. These results show that patients with RDEB are able to self-report their skin disease severity and wounds.

ispartof: J Am Acad Dermatol vol:87 issue:4 pages:872-874 ispartof: location:United States status: published

IMPORTANCE: Junctional epidermolysis bullosa (JEB) is an incurable blistering skin disorder with high infant mortality often caused by nonsense variants in the genes that encode laminin 332. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and outcomes following intravenous gentamicin readthrough therapy and subsequent laminin 332 expression in patients with JEB. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This open-label, pilot nonrandomized clinical trial assessed 1 course of low- or high-dose intravenous gentamicin, including follow-up at 30 and 90 days after treatment. Five pediatric patients with JEB (2 with intermediate JEB and 3 with severe JEB) and confirmed nonsense variants in LAMA3 or LAMB3 in 1 or 2 alleles and decreased expression of laminin 332 at the dermal-epidermal junction of their skin participated in the study, which was performed at a single institution in collaboration with physicians and home infusion services near the patients from April 1, 2019, to February 28, 2021, with follow-up until May 31, 2021. INTERVENTIONS: Three patients received gentamicin at 7.5 mg/kg daily for 14 days, and 2 patients received gentamicin at 10 mg/kg daily for 24 days. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary outcomes were change in expression of laminin 332 in patients’ skin and assessments for safety (ototoxic effects, nephrotoxic effects, and autoimmune response). Secondary outcomes included wound healing in monitored wounds and Epidermolysis Bullosa Disease Activity and Scarring Index (EBDASI) score. RESULTS: After gentamicin treatment, all 5 patients (age range, 3 months to 10 years, 4 [80%] female) exhibited increased laminin 332 in the dermal-epidermal junction. By 1 month, 7 of 9 wounds in patients receiving low-dose intravenous gentamicin and all wounds in patients receiving high-dose intravenous gentamicin exhibited at least 50% wound closure. By 3 months, 8 of 9 wounds in patients receiving low-dose gentamicin and all wounds in patients receiving high-dose intravenous gentamicin exhibited greater than 85% closure. All 3 patients who were evaluated with EBDASI showed a decrease in total activity scores that met minimal clinically important differences 1 month after treatment. All 5 patients completed the study, and no ototoxic effects, nephrotoxic effects, or anti–laminin 332 antibodies were detected. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this nonrandomized clinical trial, intravenous gentamicin therapy was associated with induced readthrough of nonsense variants in patients with JEB, restored functional laminin 332 in their skin, and wound closure during the 3-month study period. Although long-term safety and efficacy requires further evaluation, a single cycle of intravenous gentamicin may be a safe and readily available therapy in the short term for this population of patients with JEB. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT03526159 and NCT04140786

The public and health care providers are increasingly curious about the potential medical benefits of Cannabis. In vitro and in vivo studies of Cannabis have suggested it has favorable effects on regulating pain, pruritus, and inflammation, making it a potentially attractive therapeutic agent for many dermatologic conditions. The body of literature reporting on the role of cannabinoids in dermatology is in its infancy but growing. We review the current research, possible cutaneous adverse effects, and future directions for cannabinoids and their use in skin cancer, acne, psoriasis, pruritus, dermatitis, scleroderma, dermatomyositis, cutaneous lupus erythematous, epidermolysis bullosa, pain, and wound healing.

Background Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) patient anecdotes and case reports indicate that cannabinoid-based medicines (CBMs) may alleviate pain and pruritus and improve wound healing. CBM use has not been characterized in the EB patient population. Objectives To evaluate CBM use among EB patients, including CBM types, effects on symptoms (e.g., pain and pruritus), disease process (e.g., blistering, wounds, and inflammation), well-being (e.g., sleep, appetite) and concomitant medications. Methods English-speaking EB patients or caregivers completed an online international, anonymous, cross-sectional survey regarding CBM use. Respondents reported the types of CBMs, subsequent effects including perceived EB symptom alteration, changes in medication use, and side effects. Results Seventy-one EB patients from five continents reported using or having used CBMs to treat their EB. Missing question responses ranged between 0 (0%) and 33 (46%). Most used more than one CBM preparation (mean: 2.4 ± 1.5) and route of administration (mean: 2.1 ± 1.1). Topical and ingested were the most common routes. Pain and pruritus were reported retrospectively to decrease by 3 points (scale: 0–10; p overall EB symptoms (95%), pain (94%), pruritus (91%) and wound healing (81%). Most participants (79%) reported decreased use of pain medications. The most common side-effect was dry mouth (44%). Conclusions CBMs improve the perception of pain, pruritus, wound healing, and well-being in EB patients and reduced concomitant medication use. Nevertheless, a direct relation between the use of CBMs and reduction of the above-mentioned symptoms cannot be proven by these data. Therefore, future controlled studies using pharmaceutically standardised CBM preparations in EB are warranted to delineate the risks and benefits of CBMs.

Background Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a rare disease characterized by blistering and erosion of the skin and mucus membranes in response to minor external forces. Research focusing on daily skin care in EB patients is sparse. Two international clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) have been published in English, but they have not yet been translated into other languages such as Japanese. Therefore, their recommendations have not been adapted to multiple geographic regions in the world. This multiple case series describes our approach to the skin care of 3 Japanese patients with EB. Results All 3 patients were diagnosed with genetic EB. A 13-year-old male patient had dominant dystrophic EB and suffered skin breakdown covering nearly 1% to 6% of his total body surface area (TBSA) during a 21-week data collection period. A 3-year-old male patient had EB simplex; he suffered skin breakdown covering 2% to 40% of his TBSA during a 36-week data collection period. The third case was a 5-year-old male patient with recessive dystrophic EB who experienced skin breakdown covering 2% to 40% of his TBSA during a 35-week data collection period. Blisters were punctured daily and treated with a soft silicone dressing. Daily application of moisturizers was undertaken to prevent the skin from drying out and itching. Conclusion Our experience suggests that application of published CPGs promoted wound healing. Nevertheless, given the nature of the disease, a complete resolution to an individual's vulnerability to skin lesions even with relatively minor trauma remains elusive. Additional research is needed to explore interventions for skin and ulcer care, along with symptom management, including pain and pruritus.

Background: Quality of life (QoL) has not been evaluated in Indian patients having epidermolysis bullosa (EB). Aims: The aims of the study were to measure health-related QoL in Indian patients having EB using the quality of life in epidermolysis bullosa (QoLEB) questionnaire, and to find its correlation with clinically measured disease severity. Methods: In this observational cross-sectional study, the QoLEB questionnaire was translated from English to Hindi (QoLEB-Hin) and culturally adapted without a change in concept following standard guidelines. QoLEB-Hin and three clinical scores that have been independently validated in EB, that is, Birmingham Epidermolysis Bullosa severity score (BEBs), Instrument for Scoring Clinical Outcomes of Research for Epidermolysis Bullosa (iscorEB) and Epidermolysis Bullosa Disease Activity and Scarring Index (EBDASI), were administered to EB patients/their parents in the presence of an expert. This was followed by validity and correlation studies. Results: Fifty-four patients were recruited (19-females, 35-males; median age 5 years, range 0.025–36 years and 12 patients with an age >13 years). The parents answered the questions for 42 patients (age P < 0.001, Kruskal–Wallis analysis of variance). Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.946 was obtained for all items indicating excellent internal consistency and reliability. Mean sample adequacy was 0.91; absolute fit based off diagonal values was 0.99; indices root mean square error of approximation and root mean square residual were 0.04 and 0.05, respectively, and Tucker Lewis index was >1 indicating overfit. The mean time taken to complete the questionnaire was 6.1 min (range, 6–8 min). QoLEB-Hin correlated significantly (P < 0.001) with BEBs (ρ = 0.79), iscorEB (ρ= 0.63) and EBDASI (ρ = 0.77). Three multiple linear regression models were used to ascertain the strength of relationship between QoL-Hin, and BEBs, iSCOREB and EBDASI, respectively, after adjusting for age, gender and disease subtype. The EBDASI clinical score accounted for approximately 74% (R2 = 0.736, P < 0.001) of the variability in QOL-Hin, as compared to 73% and 55% by BEBs (R2 = 0.731, P < 0.001) and iscorEB (R2 = 0.545, P < 0.001), respectively. Limitations: Parents filled out the questionnaires for many patients and probably led to an overall moderate degree of affliction of QoL. Comparison with Dermatology Life Quality Index and other QoL scores were not done in this study. Furthermore, the scoring was done at one point in time, and test-retest measurements could not be performed. Conclusion: This study validated QoLEB-Hin in an Indian population finding an overall moderate reduction in QoL due to EB. Maximally affected QoL was seen in patients with RDEB. Furthermore, QoLEB-Hin had a variable positive correlation and association with all clinical severity assessment scores.

Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a group of rare, inherited diseases characterized by skin fragility and multiorgan system involvement that presents many anesthetic challenges. Although the literature regarding anesthetic management focuses primarily on the pediatric population, as life expectancy improves, adult patients with EB are more frequently undergoing anesthesia in nonpediatric hospital settings. Safe anesthetic management of adult patients with EB requires familiarity with the complex and heterogeneous nature of this disease, especially with regard to complications that may worsen during adulthood. General, neuraxial, and regional anesthetics have all been used safely in patients with EB. A thorough preoperative evaluation is essential. Preoperative testing should be guided by EB subtype, clinical manifestations, and extracutaneous complications. Advanced planning and multidisciplinary coordination are necessary with regard to timing and operative plan. Meticulous preparation of the operating room and education of all perioperative staff members is critical. Intraoperatively, utmost care must be taken to avoid all adhesives, shear forces, and friction to the skin and mucosa. Special precautions must be taken with patient positioning, and standard anesthesia monitors must be modified. Airway management is often difficult, and progressive airway deterioration can occur in adults with EB over time. A smooth induction, emergence, and postoperative course are necessary to minimize blister formation from excess patient movement. With careful planning, preparation, and precautions, adult patients with EB can safely undergo anesthesia.

WHO defines malnutrition as severe if the z-scores are less than − 3 Standard deviation (SD), moderate if between − 2 and − 3 SD and mild if between − 2 SD to – 1 SD. This study was aimed to assess nutritional aspects of Indian children suffering from EB and to evaluate the effect of severity of EB on the severity of malnutrition. In this study, pediatric EB patients were evaluated prospectively for baseline nutritional status using anthropometric parameters and WHO growth charts, and its correlation with disease severity using instrument for Scoring Clinical Outcomes for Research of Epidermolysis Bullosa-iscorEB. In second phase, an individualized diet chart was given to meet the energy, protein and micronutrients needs and its effects were observed after 6 months. The median age of participants was 3 years (IQR-9). Of 57 patients, malnutrition was seen in 40.35% patients (22.81%-moderate and 17.54%-severe), and significantly correlated with iscorEB (r = 0.45, p

With recent advances in genetic engineering technology, gene therapy is now being considered as a treatment not only for congenital diseases but also acquired diseases, such as cancer. Gene therapeutic agents for hereditary immune disorders, haemophilia, retinal diseases, neurodegenerative diseases, and lymphoma have been approved in the United States and Europe. In the field of dermatology, clinical trials of gene therapy have been conducted, because the skin is an easily accessible organ that represents an attractive tissue for gene therapy. In recent years, gene therapy has been attempted for a variety of skin diseases, such as genodermatoses (including epidermolysis bullosa and Netherton syndrome), cutaneous lymphoma, and malignant melanoma. As a result, it is difficult to grasp the current status of gene therapy in dermatology. This review focuses on each of the gene-transfer techniques currently in use and describes the current status of gene therapy for skin diseases using each technology.

Background Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a heterogeneous group of hereditary skin diseases characterized by skin fragility. Primary data on Taiwanese population remain scarce. Methods We gathered clinical information from EB patients at National Cheng Kung University Hospital from January, 2012, to June, 2021. Diagnostic tests including transmission electron microscopy, immunofluorescence studies, and whole-exome sequencing (WES) were performed. The pathogenicity of novel splice-site mutations was determined through reverse transcriptase-PCR of skin mRNA followed by Sanger and/or RNA sequencing. Results Seventy-seven EB patients from 45 families were included: 19 EB simplex, six junctional EB, and 52 dystrophic EB. Pathogenic variants were identified in 37 of 38 families (97.4%), in which WES was used as a first-line tool for mutational analysis; RNA sequencing determined pathogenic variants in the remaining one family. A total of 60 mutations in EB-related genes were identified, including 22 novel mutations. The mutations involved KRT5, KRT14, PLEC, COL17A1, LAMB3, LAMA3, ITGB4, and COL7A1. Over one-quarter of DEB patients had EB pruriginosa. Conclusions The distinct clinical presentation and molecular pathology of EB in Taiwan expand our understanding of this disorder. WES was an effective first-line diagnostic tool for identifying EB-associated variants. RNA sequencing complemented WES when multiple potentially pathogenic splice-site mutations were found.

Inherited epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a group of genetic rare diseases associated with skin fragility, which leads to the formation of blisters, erosions, and scars on the skin and mucous membranes. Epidermolysis bullosa includes four main types and some several clinical subtypes including EB simplex, junctional EB, dystrophic EB, and Kindler's EB. Ocular involvement ranged from 51 to 68% in EB and can cause irreversible damages if not properly managed. Corneal erosions are the most common finding among series, including our cohort. We review here clinical and pathological features of ocular involvement in EB and the main keys for management, with a focus on recent innovative therapies.

Background Epidermolysis bullosa is a rare, often severe, genetic disorder characterized by fragility of the skin and mucous membranes. Despite the important role of parents during wound care, an essential factor in adapting to this disease, studies focusing on the parent–child relationship during wound care are scarce. The current study is aimed at addressing this gap. Methods A quantitative study among 31 children (n = 21 ≤ 17 years; n = 10 17–25 years) and 34 parents (including 27 parent–child dyads) was conducted to examine the relationship between pain, itch, anxiety, positive and negative feelings, and coping strategies assessed with the newly developed Epidermolysis Bullosa Wound Care List. The majority of the analyses were descriptive and the results were interpreted qualitatively because of the small sample size. Results Children and parents both showed significantly more positive (i.e. ‘protected’, ‘proud’, ‘calm’, ‘connected to each other’ and ‘courageous’) than negative feelings (i.e. ‘helpless’, ‘angry’, ‘insecure’, ‘guilty’, ‘gloomy’ and ‘sad’) during wound care, with parents reporting both feelings more than children. The more children experienced pain, the more they were anxious, had negative feelings, were inclined to use distraction, to postpone wound care and to cry. The more parents experienced feelings (either positive or negative), the more likely they sought distraction. With regard to child-parent dyads the results showed that the more children expressed anxiety, the more parents experienced negative feelings. Furthermore, those who reported more negative feelings were more likely to hide their feelings, while those who reported more positive feelings were more inclined to show their feelings. Pain, itch and anxiety in the child were associated with more distraction or postponement of wound care by the parent. Conclusion This study underlines the importance of paying attention to the relationship between feelings and coping strategies in child-parent dyads in the management of pain and anxiety during wound care. Further research could provide more insight how these feelings and coping strategies are related to the psychological well-being of both the child and the parent in the short term as well as in the long term.

Skin wound healing is a crucial process for regenerating healthy skin and avoiding the undesired consequences associated with open skin wounds. For epidermolysis bullosa (EB), a debilitating group of fragile skin disorders currently without a cure, skin blistering can often be severe and heal poorly, increasing susceptibility to life-threatening complications. To prevent these, investigational therapies have been exploring the use of tissue-engineered skin substitutes (TESSs) aimed at replacing damaged skin and promoting long-term wound closure. These products have either been developed in house or commercially sourced and are composed of allogeneic or autologous human skin cells, often with some form of bioscaffolding. They can be broadly classified based on their cellular composition: keratinocytes (epidermal substitutes), fibroblasts (dermal substitutes) or a combination of both (composite substitutes). Encouraging long-term wound healing has been achieved with epidermal substitutes. However, these substitutes have not demonstrated the same efficacy for all patients, which may be due to the molecular heterogeneity observed between EB subtypes. Autologous composite TESSs, which more closely resemble native human skin, are therefore being investigated and may hold promise for treating an extended range of patients. Additionally, future TESSs for EB are focused on using gene-corrected patient skin cells, which have already demonstrated remarkable long-term wound healing capabilities. In this review, we provide an overview of the different TESSs that have been investigated in clinical studies to treat patients with EB, as well as their long-term wound healing results. Where available, we describe the methods used to develop these products to inform future efforts in this field.